Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Post-match thread: Charlton Athletic vs Wycombe Wanderers: Saturday 23rd September 2023: KO 3:00
Comments
-
king addick said:Some of the markings for the defence are an embarrassment. We won 3-1 and there only shot on target was a good goal.
And Louis Watson...showed for the ball and got stuck on, yeah misplaced a couple but to gets 5s is a joke. Honestly have a fucking look at yourselves.Leuth said:Someone just gave my beloved, Terell Thomas, 4 on Player Marks, so I'm probably going to be extremely aggressive for the rest of the thread. The guy was enormous today ffs
It would appear the Post-Match thread is now the Players' Marks - Discuss thread.king addick said:Isted: 6.5. Good at collecting set pieces today. not completely convinced about his shot stopping
Wow...the guy didn't have a save to make....0 -
Oh God. He's not human, is he?Siv_in_Norfolk said:
Out of interest, did you see the game?Major said:
Totally agree. The kid is trying to settle in. He's been developed as a centre back and now doing his best playing out of position because of our injury/fitness issues.cafc_se7 said:
I seem to recall a fair few on here calling JRS pony after his first game for us last season!Covered End said:
Beds is right.swordfish said:
Why can't you make allowances. 'Abankwah was pony again' could read 'yet to see the best of him in his natural position in a Charlton shirt' but no, abuse it is. Crack on!Bedsaddick said:
Bring the lols on ! Those who gave me them know I’m right they just didn’t have the intelligence to see it ! 😂LargeAddick said:Bedsaddick said:3-1 totally flattered us . Wycombe looked like a decent side . When they equalised there looked like only one team was going to win and it wasn’t us but thanks to a scuffed shot and a brilliant individual goal from CBT, I can go home happy .Still lots of work to do. The right back Abankwah was pony again and when Watson came on to replace him , we looked far more assured .COYR!
Don't know why this got two lol's, was exactly how I saw it.
He was pony last week & pony today.
He may be playing right back instead of right sided centre half, but you wouldn't want him in your Welling/Bromley etc team playing like that.
He's a complete liability & it's not his fault but hopefully he doesn't feature again for some time.He doesn’t get signed by Udinese and given the plaudits he gets by being pony.
I actually think he did ok in the first half, it was the second half where he struggled. Pony though? Come on, he’s a 19 year old professional, get a grip!
And there is a marked difference.
Easier to read the game as a centre back and with hopefully your flanks protected and pretty much everyrhing in front of you ( Or it should be). The move from there to full back feels a much more isolated position, with balls over the top, down the wing, dealing with speedy wingers, or two on one overlaps, etc.
Expecting him to adapt in a couple of weeks at his age is ludicrous. So, let's cut him some slack.
Besides, despite the spite, was he responsible for the only goal against us today?
I hope he comes good, but there have been sloppy lapses and poor passes in his 2 games so far.1 -
Easy to do, even when he's playing.PragueAddick said:
You forgot Charlie Kirk🤣Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Was actually thinking that as well. Fraser, Camara, McGrandles (don't laugh), Edun and Chem Campbell (although he was a sub) all didn't feature today.sirjohnhumphrey said:First first half was decent. Interesting to use TC where he did and I think he showed some glimpses of promise in that position, particularly when he had space. At times the ball into his feet was too easy to be taken off him but he will learn.
Jones had his best game for us. Thomas did well at left back. Isted dealt with their late crosses well.They were only dangerous from set pieces and apart from the goal and the header that hit the bar there was little threat.
Good subs from Appleton - when Camara and Fraser are back we have a very decent squad.
Early days but positive signs.
Admittedly highly unlikely they'll all be fit at the same time, but if they are we have a decent squad that should be play off contenders.
Defence still worries me though and i think we'd definitely have to look for reinforcements in January.
I like the look of Louie Watson. He looks like a young Mark Kinsella. But he is young.I’d hope that we can offload McG, and Kirk in Jan. And I think Fraser has to make a case why we shouldn’t offload him too to help pay for a decent defender who is captain material. I don’t know what’s wrong with Hector, but right now he’s more a Naby Sarr on a bad day than a Jason Pearce. Definitely not captain material. And it does seem that Ness has gone backwards, but some decent coaching will hopefully fix that.
Seriously, what is it with Kirk? We obviously saw something there to want to sign him, he went on loan to a team in a higher division - how often does that happen? Yet he is mostly somewhere between poor and awful for us.0 -
It was a very good strike but it was the side of the goal where the keeper was standing and he didn't moveSouthWest_Addicks said:https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/12968419/charlton-3-1-wycombe-wanderers-league-one-highlightsWycombe goal 52 seconds in. Hell of a strike as Campbell has already got out to put pressure on him.
im undecided on whether the keeper was
poor or whether it was just a very good strike2 -
Didn’t think Campbell (T) in the no. 10 role was a disaster. He had some good moments although it was noticeable a lot of them came when he drifted into wider positions.
Would he interesting to try Leaburn as a no. 10. He’s certainly good enough on the deck. I think at least we could rotate that front 4 around a bit during matches and be a bit more fluid.5 -
Carl leaburn - man up 😂HandG said:
PWR a bit but just wanted to share getting a great Charlton picture post game!
Thought we were great today, particularly first half, and I’m feeling so much more positive about the season as long as the really big man in the picture stays fit…
kids wearing t-shirts and shorts and big Carl is wearing 3 layers.14 -
-
I'm a you tube star. I'm walking down floyd road when you are interviewing mullet haired Wycombe fansBraziliance said:ladies and gents, it's up.
Absolutely buzzing with that result, short & sweet; Appleton subs made a difference, CBT is the best winger in this league, Tennai Watson looked rapid, Wycombe couldn't cope with us on the wings (cheers Corey) and on a game that could have swung either way, we took the lead and didn't look back.
COME ON YOU ADDICKS!!!
happy weekend lifers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXdrEYQx6dI
im in it 3 times. That's made my weekend 👏🏻7 -
Was at the game and delighted with the win.
One thing I would like to say is what a difference it makes when you have a strong bench.
Under Holden when things were going wrong all you had on the bench was a bunch of kids plus kirk.
Yesterday after Wickham equalised and looked like they were going to go for the win Appleton had the luxury of having on the bench player's who can change the game.
Aneke, Tedic, Campbell and Watson.
Going forward from here with all the extra minutes being played our bench will be massively important.33 -
In 2 of those games Tedic hasn't been on long enough to get a player mark, and he's also won a penalty in that time. Also he's done a lot defensively, doing the unglamorous pressing and covering a lot of yards. Also knocked it about a bit without losing it, which is good to see. Haaland he ain't, but agree he's a very good option off the bench with his energy.cafctom said:Tedic is one of those players, who in three matches of seeing him, hasn’t touched the ball or done that much besides a scuffed goal.
But there’s just something about him that tells me he’s decent. Can’t put my finger on it.13 -
Sponsored links:
-
You may be right, but I just feel he was a little bit lost out there and the ball wasn’t being held up in the middle as well as it could have been.Smithy said:
Have to disagree with that, I think Leaburn is actually much more suited to playing on the right. He’s a big guy but he’s so good with the ball at his feet it sometimes feels like a waste of his talent having his back to the defenders. Give him the ball running towards the opposition and he’s more effective in my opinion.RC_CAFC said:Delighted with the win and really happy about how much influence the last set of substitutions made. Appleton got a lot of credit with me for that.
But for me, he didn't set the team up in the way that suited that team he put out. I feel that it would have had far more threat and balance with Campbell out wide and Leaburn down the middle where they are both more comfortable. The goal even came from those players being in their more natural positions. Both players put in a decent shift, but I just felt we would have been better.
We won so it's all great. Just thought we'd have looked stronger against this Wycombe team with that set up.I think Leaburn is our most talented player and in league 1 he should be in that middle showing off all the skills he’s capable of, holding the ball up, flicking it on to May, taking it past players, linking up with May on the ground, getting on the end of crosses and above all just scoring goals.Either way it’s wonderful to see him fit again as we need to enjoy him in a Charlton shirt while we have him.4 -
We have a right bunch of touchy fans
I like to hear all views of how fans are seeing it and don’t want it sugarcoated , especially when I’m not there .
Being of the negative persuasion , I want people , Beds for example , to tell me how he sees it and if he thinks someone’s playing pony , I appreciate him saying so
on the flip side , I like to hear Leuth waxing lyrical about anyone , even if I think he’s overrating someone .
It’s good to hear either view and it’s not affecting anyone’s career because the amount of talking shit about how great player xyz is who we’ve signed in the last 15 years wouldn’t have seen us sloshing around in this shithouse league for 10 of em if talking people up/down/sidewards made any difference .
i thought George Dobson was pony and Gavin Kilkenny was a proper player after a game or two, completely and utterly wrong.I thought there was a player in Simon Francis in spite of some guff for us and that Bonne was utter shite in spite of some goals , when the majority were polar opposites to my view , completely and utterly right .
we are allowed to see it differently and can cherry pick what we like out of the views , there’s certain posters who are so ‘nothings ever wrong at Charlton’ I never read their posts , it’s not difficult .
sorry Afka
back to the match17 -
A few people saying "work to be done" etc. Funny, because I can't remember the last time we had a manager where performances actually improved over time (or indeed after the much vaunted full week's training before a match!).AFKABartram said:We’re a definite work in progress in a whole number of different ways, so picking up wins that might not be flattering is really important so that we don’t get ourselves too far behind the play off positions.There’s lots of work to be done with this team, but with additions now on board and if everyone could do a spiritual dance or something that we get a bit of better luck with injuries, there is everything still to play for here
It's always an uptick in performances with the new manager bounce, then it tails off. Let's see this time.2 -
Kevin Nolan's write-up: https://greenwichwire.co.uk/2023/09/24/kevin-nolans-valley-view-charlton-athletic-3-1-wycombe-wanderers/1
-
That's because they've been asked not to do it on the Player Marks thread because it makes Lancs job more difficult, especially when they go and quote the whole of someone else's marks. And 3 posts in seven pages is hardly excessive.AddicksAddict said:king addick said:Some of the markings for the defence are an embarrassment. We won 3-1 and there only shot on target was a good goal.
And Louis Watson...showed for the ball and got stuck on, yeah misplaced a couple but to gets 5s is a joke. Honestly have a fucking look at yourselves.Leuth said:Someone just gave my beloved, Terell Thomas, 4 on Player Marks, so I'm probably going to be extremely aggressive for the rest of the thread. The guy was enormous today ffs
It would appear the Post-Match thread is now the Players' Marks - Discuss thread.king addick said:Isted: 6.5. Good at collecting set pieces today. not completely convinced about his shot stopping
Wow...the guy didn't have a save to make....
7 -
How do we become real contenders at this level? For me we sort the defence out which I think we have the players to do and whilst yesterday wasn't perfect, nor last Saturday, it feels like we are getting there. If you can get there without losing and indeed, like yesterday, winning all the better. Attacking wise, we suddenly look close to where we want to be. In midfield we can currently compete, with Camara and Fraser to come back which will elevate us into the top L1 midfields.
Basically, you can see the path to success. Of course, this is Charlton and we often find the fork in that path that leads nowhere, but if we can stay on it and get players back without losing any key ones, I think we have cause to be reasonably optimistic. I think next Saturday is quite a big game as a win and we will be firmly going in the right direction. Confidence levels that were/are a bit fragile will be less so.2 -
Anyone else think Isted might have dived for their goal ? I know it went through bodies2
-
Probably didnt even see it coming - So many bodies in the waywmcf123 said:Anyone else think Isted might have dived for their goal ? I know it went through bodies3 -
I think he saves it if Campbell doesn't come out to block it. Of course it was what Campbell should have done and maybe he could have done it a bit better but as a result, Isted couldn't see the ball so can't really be balmed for the goal.wmcf123 said:Anyone else think Isted might have dived for their goal ? I know it went through bodies0 -
Regarding Chucks it's not a surprise he's only lasting twenty, it's his second minutes in around 10 months.
Love AM passion.
People saying about MA playing players out of position or system. MA seems a different level to DH tactically. Maybe he has us set up a certain way to nullify the opposition. He can adjust the system accordingly too. Not going to criticise anyone after a 3-1 win against a in form Wycombe side2 -
Sponsored links:
-
It feels like the step up we made from Slade to Robinson to me. I’m not saying Holden was as bad as Slade and he was lovely, but Appleton seems to have a lot more about him. Whether he’s the answer remains to be seenmattinfinland said:Regarding Chucks it's not a surprise he's only lasting twenty, it's his second minutes in around 10 months.
Love AM passion.
People saying about MA playing players out of position or system. MA seems a different level to DH tactically. Maybe he has us set up a certain way to nullify the opposition. He can adjust the system accordingly too. Not going to criticise anyone after a 3-1 win against a in form Wycombe side2 -
that was a game we would have lost a few weeks ago,no heads went down when we conceded,just picked themselves up and won the game.Lots of good performances,CBT unplayable at times,(got to sort his contract out)midfield tidy,and energetic.Defence 50% fine,Thomas and Jones brilliant,The other two well,a bit dodgy Hector looks like he is treading in treacle ,frightens me,the other lad is young and looked a bit lost,will reserve judgement but he never hid and always wanted the ball.Subs were good and all at the right time(not something we are used to)Plenty of optimism after this,6 points from next two games and we will be up there.2
-
To be fair to Holden, Appleton has his full compliment of Strikers whereas Holden usuall only had one established one.17
-
Appleton said post match that he's been working them really hard in training to get their fitness up, that will have an effect on the next match. A few players were cramping up too. Plus Wycombe had just bought on a rapid forward so the safe option is to have fresh legs against himPragueAddick said:
Ok. Let’s assume that was the reason.Leuth said:What is this bizarre consensus that Hector was rubbish, btw? He defended really quite well? Yeah, he's not the quickest, and he was subbed off because he was exhausted, but he didn't really screw up much except one clearance?
So could you then explain how come our most experienced defender, who had a pre-season, of sorts, is “exhausted” after 65 minutes?1 -
Watching the sky highlights I think so, it looked close to him.wmcf123 said:Anyone else think Isted might have dived for their goal ? I know it went through bodies
watching the goal again from the footage by @Braziliance, which was from the other side of the ground, I'm not sure.It went like a rocket but he moved his head and watched it. If he can do that, why not stick out an arm.
as is said, I'm not sure. Any goalkeepers on here with a view?1 -
That will remain a frustration for the whole season. We had so much time to bring in a backup for Leaburn. Things would look very different.MuttleyCAFC said:To be fair to Holden, Appleton has his full compliment of Strikers whereas Holden usuall only had one established one.0 -
Yes, I've been a goalie (very amateur) for almost 30 years until recent possible-retirement. Take it from me, Isted had no chance with that one. He would have had to start diving before the guy hit itTodds_right_hook said:
Watching the sky highlights I think so, it looked close to him.wmcf123 said:Anyone else think Isted might have dived for their goal ? I know it went through bodies
watching the goal again from the footage by @Braziliance, which was from the other side of the ground, I'm not sure.It went like a rocket but he moved his head and watched it. If he can do that, why not stick out an arm.
as is said, I'm not sure. Any goalkeepers on here with a view?6 -
I think Appleton has instilled some tactical belief in the players. As others have said, when we conceded before our heads went down and things fell apart. With the benefit of 2 games under a different manager, it feels like the team believe more in the tactics and are being shown patterns of play that they know will work. Weirdly I think Appleton as head coach to do the tactics and Holden as assistant to help with the mentality would have been a great combo5
-
Entertaining game , defence much better, Jones the standout , CBT some player for us and generally a good win.
Shame we didn’t move up the table much with these 3 points
Appleton didn’t acknowledge the crowd at the end , perhaps it’s not his style , walked off with his arm round the Wycombe goalie. Did well with the substitution’s and set up though0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQfGqf580t0
