Premier League 22/23
Comments
-
14 -
Nottingham Forest actually play some decent football, just lacking a bit in the final third. Which makes it odd that their 2 main striker signings this summer are sat on the bench.3
-
Must be a rare penalty miss from Harry Kane.
Although Dean Henderson celebrating that save is gonna bite him on the arse with a calamity error0 -
Richarlson is such a pantomime villain!2
-
se9addick said:Richarlson is such a pantomime villain!Carragher just isn’t able to be impartial. They need to get rid of him.4
-
Wow - Man Utd's spending has just gone over £200m what with Antony signing.
They're now looking to bring in Dubravka from Newcastle...0 -
Doesn't Anthony play in the same position as Sancho? I know so far it's not worked out as expected for Sancho but they are surely not looking to move him on already?
With that sort of cash being thrown around they will be looking to get Ronaldo, Maguire and Rashford out in the next few days. Maybe a swap dealing involving Dubravka on the cards but they really should have signed Pope in the summer!0 -
ten Hag spends over $140 MILLION on players from his old club ? .. bargains, going rate, paying the Man U 'premium' or doing his old Ajax mates a favour ?0
-
I'm more annoyed that Chelsea are spending money like water despite having £1.6bn debts just 'written off'. How does that work with FFP?! Makes a complete mockery of it really.4
-
Bournemouth Addick said:Doesn't Anthony play in the same position as Sancho? I know so far it's not worked out as expected for Sancho but they are surely not looking to move him on already?
With that sort of cash being thrown around they will be looking to get Ronaldo, Maguire and Rashford out in the next few days. Maybe a swap dealing involving Dubravka on the cards but they really should have signed Pope in the summer!I can’t see Maguire leaving either, Chelsea will sign Fofana.1 - Sponsored links:
-
Lincsaddick said:ten Hag spends over $140 MILLION on players from his old club ? .. bargains, going rate, paying the Man U 'premium' or doing his old Ajax mates a favour ?4
-
Lincsaddick said:ten Hag spends over $140 MILLION on players from his old club ? .. bargains, going rate, paying the Man U 'premium' or doing his old Ajax mates a favour ?1
-
cafcfan1990 said:Bournemouth Addick said:Doesn't Anthony play in the same position as Sancho? I know so far it's not worked out as expected for Sancho but they are surely not looking to move him on already?
With that sort of cash being thrown around they will be looking to get Ronaldo, Maguire and Rashford out in the next few days. Maybe a swap dealing involving Dubravka on the cards but they really should have signed Pope in the summer!I can’t see Maguire leaving either, Chelsea will sign Fofana.0 -
Chelsea's home game with West Ham on Sunday has been moved forward to Saturday by the Premier League following the Champions League draw.
The game was due to be shown live by Sky Sports this Sunday at 14:00 BST.
It will now take place on Saturday at 15:00 because the Blues face Dinamo Zagreb in Croatia in the Champions League on 6 September.
Chelsea and West Ham United fan groups described the late date change as "totally unacceptable".
0 -
clive said:
Chelsea's home game with West Ham on Sunday has been moved forward to Saturday by the Premier League following the Champions League draw.
The game was due to be shown live by Sky Sports this Sunday at 14:00 BST.
It will now take place on Saturday at 15:00 because the Blues face Dinamo Zagreb in Croatia in the Champions League on 6 September.
Chelsea and West Ham United fan groups described the late date change as "totally unacceptable".
0 -
Just catching up with MOTD. Why was Palace's third disallowed and why wasn't it checked by VAR?0
-
Cafc43v3r said:Just catching up with MOTD. Why was Palace's third disallowed and why wasn't it checked by VAR?
- prevents the goalkeeper from releasing the ball from the hands or kicks or attempts to kick the ball when the goalkeeper is in the process of releasing it
If the keeper had rolled it out or something, it would have been different.0 -
clive said:
Chelsea's home game with West Ham on Sunday has been moved forward to Saturday by the Premier League following the Champions League draw.
The game was due to be shown live by Sky Sports this Sunday at 14:00 BST.
It will now take place on Saturday at 15:00 because the Blues face Dinamo Zagreb in Croatia in the Champions League on 6 September.
Chelsea and West Ham United fan groups described the late date change as "totally unacceptable".
Putting it on a Sunday and then saying it's unavoidable it has to be moved just 5 days before the game is pathetic.1 -
Never known them to move one before. Normally the clubs complain about the league not being flexible0
-
North Lower Neil said:Cafc43v3r said:Just catching up with MOTD. Why was Palace's third disallowed and why wasn't it checked by VAR?
- prevents the goalkeeper from releasing the ball from the hands or kicks or attempts to kick the ball when the goalkeeper is in the process of releasing it
If the keeper had rolled it out or something, it would have been different.0 - Sponsored links:
-
killerandflash said:North Lower Neil said:Cafc43v3r said:Just catching up with MOTD. Why was Palace's third disallowed and why wasn't it checked by VAR?
- prevents the goalkeeper from releasing the ball from the hands or kicks or attempts to kick the ball when the goalkeeper is in the process of releasing it
If the keeper had rolled it out or something, it would have been different.0 -
I would love to see Forrest stay in the Prem as I think their fans deserve it. But they are just about to sign their 20th player this window !!!! How the hell are they staying within FFP rules ? Their wage bill must be off the chart0
-
Scott Parker sacked at Bournemouth apparently. Must be one of the earliest sackings after the start of the season.0
-
philcafc said:Scott Parker sacked at Bournemouth apparently. Must be one of the earliest sackings after the start of the season.0
-
I've no idea how on earth they're getting this past FFP but after spending over 200m on Sterling, Cucurella, Koulibaly, Fofana and Chukwuemeka, Chelsea are apparently now in discussions with Leipzig to buy Josko Gvardiol for almost 80m.
And to think Chelsea fans were worried about the future when Abramovich left. Todd Boehly is spending even more.2 -
Can't stand the twat but that's a great goal.0
-
Chris_from_Sidcup said:I've no idea how on earth they're getting this past FFP but after spending over 200m on Sterling, Cucurella, Koulibaly, Fofana and Chukwuemeka, Chelsea are apparently now in discussions with Leipzig to buy Josko Gvardiol for almost 80m.
And to think Chelsea fans were worried about the future when Abramovich left. Todd Boehly is spending even more.
1 -
JohnBoyUK said:Chris_from_Sidcup said:I've no idea how on earth they're getting this past FFP but after spending over 200m on Sterling, Cucurella, Koulibaly, Fofana and Chukwuemeka, Chelsea are apparently now in discussions with Leipzig to buy Josko Gvardiol for almost 80m.
And to think Chelsea fans were worried about the future when Abramovich left. Todd Boehly is spending even more.
Leipzig surely aren't going to say no as a) they get to keep him and b) he'll be leaving for less money next summer anyway.0 -
After losing 2-1 to Southampton tonight, surely Chelsea defensive reinforcements now, not next season?0
-
killerandflash said:After losing 2-1 to Southampton tonight, surely Chelsea defensive reinforcements now, not next season?
A back 5 of James - Silva - Koulibaly - Fofana - Cucurella is pretty decent. Cucurella can also cover LCB and they also have Chilwell.1