When people dress up as clowns it makes me wonder about them. Like they think if they wear exaggerated make up, colourful clothes and oversized shoes they are automatically funny, and more worryingly attractive to children! To be funny you have to do a lot more than dress up, not expect a knee jerk amused reaction just because of your appearance.
People being clowns are not so much scary as creepy, not really harmless fun but weird indulgence for the costumed adult.
I say, interesting clown comments. How do you feel about men dressed up as women?
Having listened to Peter Shirtliff doing a guest commentary stint on Charlton Live today, I reckon if we need a defensive coach he would fit the bill perfectly. His comments on our poor defensive mistakes were all spot on each and every time.
Good shout, however I fear that his views would be made loud and clear and the fragile little poppets might get upset and tell their mummies, when they get picked up after training (daycare).
I'm thinking of pitching a new show to Channel 4. You've probably heard of the'Undateables', how about the 'Uncoachables'
When people dress up as clowns it makes me wonder about them. Like they think if they wear exaggerated make up, colourful clothes and oversized shoes they are automatically funny, and more worryingly attractive to children! To be funny you have to do a lot more than dress up, not expect a knee jerk amused reaction just because of your appearance.
People being clowns are not so much scary as creepy, not really harmless fun but weird indulgence for the costumed adult.
I say, interesting clown comments. How do you feel about men dressed up as women?
I would need a bit more information regarding the difference between dressing as a man and dressing as a woman.
When people dress up as clowns it makes me wonder about them. Like they think if they wear exaggerated make up, colourful clothes and oversized shoes they are automatically funny, and more worryingly attractive to children! To be funny you have to do a lot more than dress up, not expect a knee jerk amused reaction just because of your appearance.
People being clowns are not so much scary as creepy, not really harmless fun but weird indulgence for the costumed adult.
I say, interesting clown comments. How do you feel about men dressed up as women?
I would need a bit more information regarding the difference between dressing as a man and dressing as a woman.
Clothes are made differently - buttons on different sides, less (or even no) pockets on women's trousers/blazers. Higher waisted trousers for women.
- Nathan Jones 6/4 - Nigel Pearson 3/1 - Neil Warnock 4/1 - Michael Duff 5/1 - John Eustace 5/1 - Mark Bonner 10/1 - Gareth Ainsworth 14/1 - 16/1 bar
27th January morning update…
- Nathan Jones 1/2 - Alex Neil 7/2 - Neil Warnock 6/1 - Michael Duff 6/1 - Nigel Pearson 8/1 - John Eustace 10/1 - 20/1 bar
28th January update…
- Nathan Jones 2/1 - Mark Warburton 2/1 - Gary Rowett 4/1 - Alex Neil 6/1 - Michael Duff 8/1 - Neil Warnock 8/1 - Nigel Pearson 10/1 - John Eustace 12/1 - 20/1 bar
Whatever you think of Jones if he comes in these owners can't be accused of doing it on the cheap anymore
When I looked at the names on the odds list this morning, I was thinking that we're after all still an attractive club despite being at the bottom half of the table of third division, as some of them have managed Premiere clubs and done well/OK.
Just hope he's in before the window closes. Would surely be a draw to players
I'm not sure how much say a manager has on transfers under Scott
Not saying he would pick but if I was a player I'd rather sign for a club with Nathan Jones as a manager than virtually any of the other clubs in L1. I wouldn't want Jones getting involved in identifying the targets before he's even taken a full match
It would show a real statement of intent from the owners, and as long as he is backed with his choice of players and coaching staff, next season should be full steam ahead.
Just hope he's in before the window closes. Would surely be a draw to players
I'm not sure how much say a manager has on transfers under Scott
I thought that the situation had been explained. The manager identifies areas where he would like the squad strengthening and Scott is then responsible for sourcing players in that role? Pretty sure Scott would also let the manager know if he knows of an available player who can fit into a role where it is glaringly obvious we need strengthening in.
Really can't see any manager, including Appleton, agreeing to a situation where they have no say whatsoever on who's coming in.
I am not against appointing him but I would like us to give Fleming a chance first. A two defeats (and some wins) or we bring somebody in chance over February. I think that is the common sense approach. I know some people don't share it but if Jones came in and failed that would fcuk us up. Somebody like him should be the lasp gasp option.
Comments
I'm thinking of pitching a new show to Channel 4. You've probably heard of the'Undateables', how about the 'Uncoachables'
His appointment would show ambition IMO
Think it will be good appointment if it comes about, echoing others, it shows ambition.
See what happens from here..
It would show a real statement of intent from the owners, and as long as he is backed with his choice of players and coaching staff, next season should be full steam ahead.
Happy days.
Really can't see any manager, including Appleton, agreeing to a situation where they have no say whatsoever on who's coming in.