The standout aspect from the line ups of both sides yesterday was the average age of the respective sides - Hull's was 24 and ours nearer 29. They had 7 players 24 or younger whereas we had 2 including an 18 year old loanee. They didn't have a single player over 30 but we had 5 in that category. The average age of Lincoln's starting XI was 24 too with 7 of their side that age or under.
They are clearly building for the future and playing younger, fitter and faster players. We have signed and are playing a lot of bodies that are journeymen whose best years are behind them.
When we went up last time we had the likes of Fosu-Henry, Aribo, Bielik, Cullen, Grant, Dijksteel, Lapslie and even a few cameos from Morgan who were all 23 or under but who went on to make 216 appearances between them. And all six of the ones that have left us are now playing at a higher level - Lapslie is on his way too and yet LB thought he was good enough to make 27 appearances as a 21 year old but who isn't now.
Where are their equivalents this season? Yes we are missing Doughty but who is to say that he isn't going to go the same way as so many before him? Morgan is a reluctant starter for LB too. We also have a couple of young CBs out injured but, again, take a look at the positions that most of the players above played in - the engine room or up top.
For both the short and long term LB has to begin to balance the side. And the absence of Watson and Pratley gives him the chance to start to do that. I hope that he doesn't waste it by not playing the likes of Morgan or by signing yet another player or two with question marks about whether they retain any pace or ability. Or, for that matter, desire.
Wait a minute. At first glance, I get your point. Too many over 30 +. But perhaps we could look under the surface a little?
First of all you say that our average age was "nearer 29" ...... and of course, straight away we see Pearce (33) and Pratley (35) at CB. Neither of those would be playing CB if it wasn't for the fact that Inniss (24) and Famewo (22) are both victim of long term injury.
I'm not going to count 30 year old Amos, because most sides like to include an experienced keeper - and really, pace isn't an issue with him. Then there's Gunter (32) but he's quick enough. And Watson (35) who isn't - but he's now injured, so we won't see him for a while.
But our side, while missing Doughty (20) did include Morgan (21) and Maatsen (18).
We could/should also have started24 year old Purrington at LB. 'Little' Smyth (23) is no geriatric either.
The rest of them sit in that 'player in his prime, 25-29' category. Can't see anything wrong with picking players who should be in their prime. But as always it's the right combination that's needed. And we are right to question that.
But we didn't. And if we had a fit CB then we would have had Watson and Pratley in midfield so Morgan probably wouldn't have started. And if Doughty had played then Smyth wouldn't have. In fact, Smyth didn't even start.
The point I am trying to make is that Lincoln and Hull do not play one 35 year old let alone two - anywhere! They have 7 or 8 under 24 not a token one or two. They don't drop flair players who have been MOMs in the previous game for square ball merchants.
That isn't to say that a 35 year old with the CVs of Pratley or Watson can't improve us. Whilst different players, they perform a similar role so unless one is covering for another position, they shouldn't both be on the team sheet.
I doubt anybody can think of a period at any club where a different MOTM gets dropped in the next game in the space of a few games. Simply because it is ridiculous. It is ridiculous if you are a football manager, if you are a fan or even if you are a village idiot. It is a big reason for questioning what is wrong with Bowyer.
Really hope we see Innis soon. He seems exactly the player we need to get us into a decent position again. obviously don't want to rush his return but do hope he is back in the red shirt shortly.
Great window so far. We needed a better striker to put chances away and some pace injected into the side to replace Alfie. We've added that in at the first available opportunity, which is very unlike the Charlton of recent years. Time will tell if the players work out and how quickly Schwartz can get up to speed but on the face of it we've done exactly what we needed to do already. I feel like our defenders are good players, and they'll look a lot better than they have done recently once the pressure is lifted off them by our attacking play having more going for it
Agree on the first half, but honestly believe with Pratley playing CB with Pearce, we won't be good enough regardless of attack. We desperately need Famewo/Innis/New CB or the top of the pitch will be barely relevant.
I want them back asap too, but I don't think what we have is as bad as all that. They are suitable squad players and taking the pressure off them through better attacking play will protect their shortcomings a little more. I would like to see us bring in another CB though while the main two heal as we'd benefit from more quality there, but we can definitely beat teams in this league with what we have if we're doing more damage at the other end of the pitch
I just can't agree. From watching the last 6/7 games, we're completely up against it - it's hard to find the words to say how bad it's been. I admit, Pearce is a little better as he's a natural CB and left footed which is slightly better than Gunter/Pratley, but regardless of the combination of Pearce/Pratley/Gunter you still have no height or leap at all to combat target men, they're too slow to track the runner in behind. They're prone to mistakes as they're not used to being there (Gunter pen comes to mind as well as Pratley first goal vs Hull not covering the space) etc. You can have lethal finishers up the other end, but you still need a solid back line to bring the ball forward.
If you don't have that solid backline you end up with your attacking players having to drop very, very deep to retrieve the ball and then they're busting a gut to get forward. The only players I see capable right now of linking play are Williams who never plays and Maddison who rarely plays too. That's why we're SO much more effective with Innis/Famewo because they're confident and able enough to travel 20 yards forward and pick a pass, it also frees up the players in front of them to exploit space rather than having to cover, knowing that their centre-half's are most likely about to be beat.
It's been bad, but it's a wider team malaise. We were quite comfortable with a CH pairing of Famewo and Gunter against a good Pompey side, beat Fleetwood with a pairing of Inniss and Pratley, and should have beaten Gillingham if not for a missed pen with Pratley and Gunter. We should really have beaten Shrewsbury and that was when we had a pairing of Pearce and Famewo, one of the only times recently we've had two proper centre backs recently. The issue there was that the whole team went into its shell and allowed Shrews to play. We murdered Wimbledon with Pratley and Pearce, but only after the rest of the team woke up and we started attacking. Against Swindon we let them take the initiative at the death again all over the pitch with the same pairing. The point is that in amongst our very poor performances since we lost our first choice pairing, our biggest issue has been that the whole team has lacked cohesion and the ability to put together flowing moves owing to a lack of width, pace, imagination and passivity as the games have gone on. We've given away cheap goals which, yes, does come about due to some players being unused to their positions, but we've also given away late goals when we've left our defenders to do all the work for 30 minutes and not created anything. In the second half against Wimbledon you could have put a clothes horse and a copy of Heat at centre half and it wouldn't have made a difference because we forced all the play to happen in their half, scoring 4 goals. There was no pressure on our backline as a result. I agree with you that we could do with getting another quality CH in, if only to replace Deji and improve the squad as a whole, but we have a good CH in Pearce and Pratley is easing towards becoming a CH at this stage in his career anyway. We can always improve all over but if the window closed right now I'd be happier with us having brought in a striker and a pacy winger than if we'd singed a couple of defenders. Hopefully we can get a defender too and keep building
What is the general consensus? We probably need to shift a couple before having enough under the cap to get another centre back in? Or sadly send famewo back and try and replace with another loan?
What is the general consensus? We probably need to shift a couple before having enough under the cap to get another centre back in? Or sadly send famewo back and try and replace with another loan?
Both seem plausible, Bowyer/Gallen said two early doors (which we have now done) and more business later on. I'm presuming what happens next depends on what business others do and who becomes available/sold.
I expect there to be some outgoings but not sure on who or how many, especially now we're back in lockdown.
What is the general consensus? We probably need to shift a couple before having enough under the cap to get another centre back in? Or sadly send famewo back and try and replace with another loan?
Nooooo, Famewo has to stay. We may get lucky and get to buy him if Norwich go up and he should be fit and plating before the end of the season so ready for Wemberley! Innis is recovering quicker than expected apparently which would be a huge lift.
What is the general consensus? We probably need to shift a couple before having enough under the cap to get another centre back in? Or sadly send famewo back and try and replace with another loan?
Both seem plausible, Bowyer/Gallen said two early doors (which we have now done) and more business later on. I'm presuming what happens next depends on what business others do and who becomes available/sold.
I expect there to be some outgoings but not sure on who or how many, especially now we're back in lockdown.
Perhaps this is where lapslie's departure comes in - can't see oztumer staying if we get a reasonable offer
What is the general consensus? We probably need to shift a couple before having enough under the cap to get another centre back in? Or sadly send famewo back and try and replace with another loan?
Nooooo, Famewo has to stay. We may get lucky and get to buy him if Norwich go up and he should be fit and plating before the end of the season so ready for Wemberley! Innis is recovering quicker than expected apparently which would be a huge lift.
I'd like famewo to stay too but if he will be out injured I don't know if we can afford to be paying his salary with no return , harsh as that is
What is the general consensus? We probably need to shift a couple before having enough under the cap to get another centre back in? Or sadly send famewo back and try and replace with another loan?
Nooooo, Famewo has to stay. We may get lucky and get to buy him if Norwich go up and he should be fit and plating before the end of the season so ready for Wemberley! Innis is recovering quicker than expected apparently which would be a huge lift.
I'd like famewo to stay too but if he will be out injured I don't know if we can afford to be paying his salary with no return , harsh as that is
Bows has said he would like to keep him and mentioned the possibility that a break in the season may occur that will make it a sensible thing to do.
What is the general consensus? We probably need to shift a couple before having enough under the cap to get another centre back in? Or sadly send famewo back and try and replace with another loan?
Both seem plausible, Bowyer/Gallen said two early doors (which we have now done) and more business later on. I'm presuming what happens next depends on what business others do and who becomes available/sold.
I expect there to be some outgoings but not sure on who or how many, especially now we're back in lockdown.
Perhaps this is where lapslie's departure comes in - can't see oztumer staying if we get a reasonable offer
Oztumer is a no go. If Bristol sign him perm then fine, but he can’t play for another club this season. the only way they sign him is if we let them have him for free, but he’ll be above the wage cap, so they may prefer the subsidised wage. We can’t pay up his contract as that doesn’t free up budget for us. Lapslie could go, Doughty if the Scottish clubs come calling but that doesn’t affect wages.
What is the general consensus? We probably need to shift a couple before having enough under the cap to get another centre back in? Or sadly send famewo back and try and replace with another loan?
Both seem plausible, Bowyer/Gallen said two early doors (which we have now done) and more business later on. I'm presuming what happens next depends on what business others do and who becomes available/sold.
I expect there to be some outgoings but not sure on who or how many, especially now we're back in lockdown.
Perhaps this is where lapslie's departure comes in - can't see oztumer staying if we get a reasonable offer
Oztumer is a no go. If Bristol sign him perm then fine, but he can’t play for another club this season. the only way they sign him is if we let them have him for free, but he’ll be above the wage cap, so they may prefer the subsidised wage. We can’t pay up his contract as that doesn’t free up budget for us. Lapslie could go, Doughty if the Scottish clubs come calling but that doesn’t affect wages.
I thought it was already confirmed that since June players can play for 3 teams in a season. Maybe I misheard.
What is the general consensus? We probably need to shift a couple before having enough under the cap to get another centre back in? Or sadly send famewo back and try and replace with another loan?
Both seem plausible, Bowyer/Gallen said two early doors (which we have now done) and more business later on. I'm presuming what happens next depends on what business others do and who becomes available/sold.
I expect there to be some outgoings but not sure on who or how many, especially now we're back in lockdown.
Perhaps this is where lapslie's departure comes in - can't see oztumer staying if we get a reasonable offer
Oztumer is a no go. If Bristol sign him perm then fine, but he can’t play for another club this season. the only way they sign him is if we let them have him for free, but he’ll be above the wage cap, so they may prefer the subsidised wage. We can’t pay up his contract as that doesn’t free up budget for us. Lapslie could go, Doughty if the Scottish clubs come calling but that doesn’t affect wages.
I thought it was already confirmed that since June players can play for 3 teams in a season. Maybe I misheard.
Not sure. I read it in an interview with the Bristol manager. If Innis and Famewo had stayed fit, I reckon that Oshilaja would have been heading out of the door.
What is the general consensus? We probably need to shift a couple before having enough under the cap to get another centre back in? Or sadly send famewo back and try and replace with another loan?
Both seem plausible, Bowyer/Gallen said two early doors (which we have now done) and more business later on. I'm presuming what happens next depends on what business others do and who becomes available/sold.
I expect there to be some outgoings but not sure on who or how many, especially now we're back in lockdown.
Perhaps this is where lapslie's departure comes in - can't see oztumer staying if we get a reasonable offer
Oztumer is a no go. If Bristol sign him perm then fine, but he can’t play for another club this season. the only way they sign him is if we let them have him for free, but he’ll be above the wage cap, so they may prefer the subsidised wage. We can’t pay up his contract as that doesn’t free up budget for us. Lapslie could go, Doughty if the Scottish clubs come calling but that doesn’t affect wages.
I thought it was already confirmed that since June players can play for 3 teams in a season. Maybe I misheard.
That's correct. Special dispensation for this season that a player can play for 3 teams
The risk the club may have to weigh up would be do we leave it until the end of the season and see if we get promoted. If so, Alfie should sign.
If not, how is the money we get offered in this window compared to what we would get from compensation if he stayed in England?
If he goes cross border, we will get a fraction of £650k if the bid is true.
If we sell him and as @ForeverAddickted has suggested, we get Lindsay in with Stoke covering the whole wages, that is a reasonable deal, but not great in my eyes.
A lot depends on Alfie, and it seems as though he won’t be signing unless we are a Championship club next season.
- Is he going to sign one at all - Will he potentially sign one in the summer if we're a Championship club
If its the latter and we do stand a chance of keeping him where we get a proper decent fee in a few years then its fully worth doing just that
Or do we let him go for a lot less where we can bring in another player and so increase our chances of being in the Championship next year, as unfortunately Alfie wont be able to help this year
Let’s face it, Doughty ain’t going to sign, his agent is in his ear saying wait until Jan to see what offers are made and if he was fit I’d say wait until the end of the season but he probably won’t play again. Let him go and let it him be the last youngster to run his contract down and for the agent to be in control. Kid was playing for Bromley first half of last season.
- Is he going to sign one at all - Will he potentially sign one in the summer if we're a Championship club
If its the latter and we do stand a chance of keeping him where we get a proper decent fee in a few years then its fully worth doing just that
Or do we let him go for a lot less where we can bring in another player and so increase our chances of being in the Championship next year, as unfortunately Alfie wont be able to help this year
Difficult decision to make if that were the case
The club have offered him a new contract , I am sure there is a promotion clause , and if his agent is any good it will have a release clause tied to a fee if we don’t get promotion.
To me that would work all ways for Alfie and the club.
The risk the club may have to weigh up would be do we leave it until the end of the season and see if we get promoted. If so, Alfie should sign.
If not, how is the money we get offered in this window compared to what we would get from compensation if he stayed in England?
If he goes cross border, we will get a fraction of £650k if the bid is true.
If we sell him and as @ForeverAddickted has suggested, we get Lindsay in with Stoke covering the whole wages, that is a reasonable deal, but not great in my eyes.
A lot depends on Alfie, and it seems as though he won’t be signing unless we are a Championship club next season.
He can talk to the Scottish clubs now. He can agree a deal and I’d imagine they’d put a big offer on the table for him. even in the Championship we wouldn’t match a salary they’d offer.
Comments
I doubt anybody can think of a period at any club where a different MOTM gets dropped in the next game in the space of a few games. Simply because it is ridiculous. It is ridiculous if you are a football manager, if you are a fan or even if you are a village idiot. It is a big reason for questioning what is wrong with Bowyer.
I expect there to be some outgoings but not sure on who or how many, especially now we're back in lockdown.
Innis is recovering quicker than expected apparently which would be a huge lift.
If Bristol sign him perm then fine, but he can’t play for another club this season.
the only way they sign him is if we let them have him for free, but he’ll be above the wage cap, so they may prefer the subsidised wage.
We can’t pay up his contract as that doesn’t free up budget for us.
Lapslie could go, Doughty if the Scottish clubs come calling but that doesn’t affect wages.
If Innis and Famewo had stayed fit, I reckon that Oshilaja would have been heading out of the door.
If Bowyer and Gallen think there’s no chance on a contract then it’s a very good deal for us.
https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-will-demand-sell-on-in-any-january-deal-for-midfielder/
“We would always demand a sell on, like every club does. It’s only fair. This club developed him from a young age."
If not, how is the money we get offered in this window compared to what we would get from compensation if he stayed in England?
If he goes cross border, we will get a fraction of £650k if the bid is true.
If we sell him and as @ForeverAddickted has suggested, we get Lindsay in with Stoke covering the whole wages, that is a reasonable deal, but not great in my eyes.
A lot depends on Alfie, and it seems as though he won’t be signing unless we are a Championship club next season.
- Is he going to sign one at all
- Will he potentially sign one in the summer if we're a Championship club
If its the latter and we do stand a chance of keeping him where we get a proper decent fee in a few years then its fully worth doing just that
Or do we let him go for a lot less where we can bring in another player and so increase our chances of being in the Championship next year, as unfortunately Alfie wont be able to help this year
Difficult decision to make if that were the case
He can agree a deal and I’d imagine they’d put a big offer on the table for him.
even in the Championship we wouldn’t match a salary they’d offer.