Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

January 2020 transfer rumours thread (Deadline Day starts Page 283)

1252253255257258350

Comments

  • robroy said:
    mendonca said:
    Do we know WHO Matt Southall used to be a footie agent for? Let's also remember he is new to this role and acting an agent rather than a CEO could be what Bows is hinting at. 
    Southall used to have a directorship at a hair dressing and beauty business, 'Live Lusso Aesthetics',  the company was dissolved in April 2019..  ((:>) … https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/10700280
    Was he not best mates with Kieron Richardson and got into being an agent that way. As I said would be interesting to find out what players he represented 
    perhaps he was the agent for a few crimpers .. the 'football agent' business is so rife with hangers on and chancers, but I am sure Southall was/is skweeky clean .. he could have had interests in the 'leg' of a few footballers .. rather as syndicate members own a hoof or two in a few racehorses 
  • https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51309426

    Luton sign Cameron Carter-Vickers on loan from Spurs...
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Reading that article from Bows I can only conclude that ESI have no money . Why else would he say we are relying on favours? 
    or not willing to give money this window or for only for players that fit the mould of young to be sold on at a profit? 
    Any evidence so far they actually have cash?
     Fit and proper test demands evidence of funds and to run a club. 

    But that doesn't mean they'll be willing to spunk it all away.
    If the club cost £1 and this season has a break even budget (the 6+6 forecast probably shows a profit) how much funds do you need evidence of? 
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Reading that article from Bows I can only conclude that ESI have no money . Why else would he say we are relying on favours? 
    or not willing to give money this window or for only for players that fit the mould of young to be sold on at a profit? 
    Any evidence so far they actually have cash?
     Fit and proper test demands evidence of funds and to run a club. 

    But that doesn't mean they'll be willing to spunk it all away.
    If the club cost £1 and this season has a break even budget (the 6+6 forecast probably shows a profit) how much funds do you need evidence of? 
    I believe it's supposed to cover years rather than a year.
  • Huge step up for Doherty if he arrives.
    he played in league one last year and performed very well by all accounts. In that respect no different to Phillips, Lockyer, Taylor, Cullen etc who stepped up and less of a step than Bonne and the youngster who have had to come in. 
    Tongue in cheek remark about the Scottish premiership.
  • Mr Southall prioritised signing up Bowyer and Lyle and expressed a desire to sign Cullen on a permanent move. 

    They are still the key to survival this season.  Rangers reserves and talented youngsters from Norwich are almost irrelevant to that task.

    33.3 per cent success so far..
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Reading that article from Bows I can only conclude that ESI have no money . Why else would he say we are relying on favours? 
    or not willing to give money this window or for only for players that fit the mould of young to be sold on at a profit? 
    Any evidence so far they actually have cash?
     Fit and proper test demands evidence of funds and to run a club. 

    But that doesn't mean they'll be willing to spunk it all away.
    If the club cost £1 and this season has a break even budget (the 6+6 forecast probably shows a profit) how much funds do you need evidence of? 
    I believe it's supposed to cover years rather than a year.
    So you run the same budget for the next 2 years?

    The proof of funds prove nothing either way. 
  • I hope the favours comment relates to clubs being reluctant to sell players in January, so we're forced into the loan market. I hope.
  • Sponsored links:


  • JamesSeed said:
    To me Taylor represents winning.
    I don't know the stats, but would love to know the average number of points we win with him in the side, versus without him.
    Probably the same, or worse, than Cullen. 

  • JamesSeed said:
    To me Taylor represents winning.
    I don't know the stats, but would love to know the average number of points we win with him in the side, versus without him.
    Weve not lost a game when hes played the full 90 minutes this season
  • JamesSeed said:
    To me Taylor represents winning.
    I don't know the stats, but would love to know the average number of points we win with him in the side, versus without him.
    JamesSeed said:
    To me Taylor represents winning.
    I don't know the stats, but would love to know the average number of points we win with him in the side, versus without him.

    there IS a stat on this deep in the vaults on here .. just don't ask me where
  • We allowed to air negativity yet, that article is shite news and I’m not buying into the “bluffing” argument.

    If this mob had any dosh, even a reasonable amount to spunk, we’d have JCH and Taylor up top come Saturday, a decent replacement for Gallagher, and the centre half cover with no one leaving, with the rock bottom wage bill we already have, that is certainly not an unreasonable expectation.  Bored already, post Barnsley meltdown incoming. 
    Meltdown is allowed after 12pm today.
  • Scoham said:
    We allowed to air negativity yet, that article is shite news and I’m not buying into the “bluffing” argument.

    If this mob had any dosh, even a reasonable amount to spunk, we’d have JCH and Taylor up top come Saturday, a decent replacement for Gallagher, and the centre half cover with no one leaving, with the rock bottom wage bill we already have, that is certainly not an unreasonable expectation.  Bored already, post Barnsley meltdown incoming. 
    Meltdown is allowed after 12pm today.
    Why after 12 today? Surely it's after 12 tomorrow?

  • Has Lee just repeated the same answers at the Thursday press day ?  
  • Well I don't know why I visited your site,
    I get the feeling that something a'int right,
    Don't they care if we drop on down the league?
    Now I'm suffering from a rumour fed fatigue,
    Frowns to the posts above,
    Woe in posts below, 
    Here I am,
    Reading the fans points of view

  • Well I don't know why I visited your site,
    I get the feeling that something a'int right,
    Don't they care if we drop on down the league?
    Now I'm suffering from a rumour fed fatigue,
    Frowns to the posts above,
    Woe in posts below, 
    Here I am,
    Reading the fans points of view

    you left out the bits about clowns to the left and jokers to the right ((:>)
  • Sponsored links:


  • robroy said:
    I've said it before and I will say it again. 

    "I sometimes think we are part of a computer simulation being played by Crystal Palace fans.


    We are certainly being played !

    (Millwall fans, would be my guess)
  • Apologies if others have already posted this, but I find it quite alarming:

    “We need to bring bodies through the door. We are two players down from when the window opened – we need to bring at least two to bring us even.“We need to strengthen and bring bodies through the door because all the teams around us are strengthening and we’re not.

    “It’s not even just me, the players want help. The players want bodies through the door as well.“We need to add to the squad, not deplete it. We need to keep people like Lyle – he is massive for us.”

  • I wonder what has happened since the press conference. SG said he have put in 3 bids for Perm players.... Not long to go!
  • I don't buy the optimism anymore, maybe a few weeks ago but not now, too many things aren't adding up with this lot. Out of the frying pan and into the fire springs to mind.
  • We fecking rich ------ do fuc k off

    ESI using Rolands Poundland card and his strategy 

    Only thing that's changed is they brought in a new PR guy
  • Reading that article from Bows I can only conclude that ESI have no money . Why else would he say we are relying on favours? 
    Of course ESI have money. They just paid £50 mill for our football club! 

    My take on it is that Agents know this and are asking silly money for their players hence we’ve now turned our attention to the loan market. That plus the fact that our current position in the Championship is putting players off joining us.
    I don't think anybody thinks that's true now do they? 
  • edited January 2020
    Imagine the meltdown Saturday if we lose Tayler, no incomings & lose to Barnsley!  
    Can’t understand why ESI rushed through this deal in time for the transfer window! Going to get pelters!!!!!
  • we seem to be getting thinner
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!