If the trust do get their much coveted meeting with RD, surely he would turn up and give the exact same answers as KM. This is even more likely if you subscribe to the view that she is a 'puppet'.
In my view, the majority of the 'Woolwich Worriers' would refuse to believe these answers and the whole thing would be a pointless exercise.
It's a valid reaction if you believe the world is conspiring against you for some reason.
It's not a "reaction". It's a statement of the lessons you can learn from Charlton history 1989 -2004, not to mention at many other clubs, most notably Swansea.
Seems there is an agenda here ...the only speaker from the floor who was questioned by the chair has been the one who is pro-network. When stating that he is happy to see how matters go over next few weeks, he was met by a shout of 'rubbish' from the floor.
Seems there is an agenda here ...the only speaker from the floor who was questioned by the chair has been the one who is pro-network. When stating that he is happy to see how matters go over next few weeks, he was met by a shout of 'rubbish' from the floor.
Seems there is an agenda here ...the only speaker from the floor who was questioned by the chair has been the one who is pro-network. When stating that he is happy to see how matters go over next few weeks, he was met by a shout of 'rubbish' from the floor.
Seems there is an agenda here ...the only speaker from the floor who was questioned by the chair has been the one who is pro-network. When stating that he is happy to see how matters go over next few weeks, he was met by a shout of 'rubbish' from the floor.
That's not good we need UNITY and everyone deserves their opinion.....don't weaken an argument by shouting down those that don't agree
Cheers guys for the updates so far. Look forward to reading up on it in it's entirity. Some good comment's being made so far that bang the nail on the head.
Seems there is an agenda here ...the only speaker from the floor who was questioned by the chair has been the one who is pro-network. When stating that he is happy to see how matters go over next few weeks, he was met by a shout of 'rubbish' from the floor.
And what was the question from the chair?
Prague, just expressing my surprise that no questions were asked of the others.
Seems there is an agenda here ...the only speaker from the floor who was questioned by the chair has been the one who is pro-network. When stating that he is happy to see how matters go over next few weeks, he was met by a shout of 'rubbish' from the floor.
And the exact same in reverse yesterday night at the VIP Q&A meeting. If anything this whole network is a negative thing alone from the splitting of the fans, usually one of the strongest family Football Club's around, not any more.
Seems there is an agenda here ...the only speaker from the floor who was questioned by the chair has been the one who is pro-network. When stating that he is happy to see how matters go over next few weeks, he was met by a shout of 'rubbish' from the floor.
And what was the question from the chair?
Prague, just expressing my surprise that no questions were asked of the others.
Need to hear more.
Fine but what was the chair's question? Steve Clarke is one of the most reasonable people I know. The Matt Holland of Charlton activists. Maybe his question was genuinely one of clarification?
Comments
In my view, the majority of the 'Woolwich Worriers' would refuse to believe these answers and the whole thing would be a pointless exercise.
Steve Clarke reading out a load of tweets. Now opening up to floor
It's a valid reaction if you believe the world is conspiring against you for some reason.
It's not a "reaction". It's a statement of the lessons you can learn from Charlton history 1989 -2004, not to mention at many other clubs, most notably Swansea.
Need to hear more.