Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)
Comments
- 
            
Dazzlers alright, he lol’d one of my players marks posts end of last season but I don’t bear a grudge, it helped me get to fourteen thousand of them 😉.stoneroses19 said:
I find it unfair you use words as strong as bullying and abuse to describe this great community which has been built over several years. Just my personal view, but the only time I can clearly remember you posting is to patronise Dazzler and mock his lists.Maccn05 said:Devastating news for all but I’m out of this place it’s become toxic.
The level of sniping & bullying on here is out of control. People’s opinions are no longer considered or acknowledged it’s just people attacking and ganging up on each other.
Golfie, Addicks59, Ronnie, myself all getting abuse.From what I can tell it’s a bunch of old men who should know better you all should be embarrassed. I hope the moderators take some action.
3 - 
            
I have no inside knowledge, purely speculation but I think the club probably stagger releases. Plenty of things to talk about today so could be saving it tomorrow to get more engagement. Also, the media team were likely preparing for the game so probably haven't edited the content yet. There's also the age old theory of signings in the new shirt (which never happens). My bet would be Sunday or Tuesday if it has indeed happened.ShootersHillGuru said:Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today.
1 - 
            
Here's the post you were referring to @ShootersHillGuruCovered_End_Lad said:Another one is done, no idea if it will be announced today.
Posted at 2:36 yesterday afternoon. 60 likes. :-)2 - 
            
I get it but if we had a new player then unless he’s actually injured (quite possibly knowing CAFC) then he should have been involved today. Makes no sense to keep them under wraps for the sake of a sodding kit that changes every bloody year.Vfrf said:
I have no inside knowledge, purely speculation but I think the club probably stagger releases. Plenty of things to talk about today so could be saving it tomorrow to get more engagement. Also, the media team were likely preparing for the game so probably haven't edited the content yet. There's also the age old theory of signings in the new shirt (which never happens). My bet would be Sunday or Tuesday if it has indeed happened.ShootersHillGuru said:Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today.4 - 
            
You know what I'm going to say 😂ShootersHillGuru said:Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today.1 - 
            🤦🏻♂️2
 - 
            
Mmmmm DFTT?Henry Irving said:
You know what I'm going to say 😂ShootersHillGuru said:Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today.
                        2 - 
            
Close.eastterrace6168 said:
Mmmmm DFTT?Henry Irving said:
You know what I'm going to say 😂ShootersHillGuru said:Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today.
Have another go0 - 
            SWALK ?1
 - 
            ShootersHillGuru said:
I get it but if we had a new player then unless he’s actually injured (quite possibly knowing CAFC) then he should have been involved today. Makes no sense to keep them under wraps for the sake of a sodding kit that changes every bloody year.Vfrf said:
I have no inside knowledge, purely speculation but I think the club probably stagger releases. Plenty of things to talk about today so could be saving it tomorrow to get more engagement. Also, the media team were likely preparing for the game so probably haven't edited the content yet. There's also the age old theory of signings in the new shirt (which never happens). My bet would be Sunday or Tuesday if it has indeed happened.ShootersHillGuru said:Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today.Could be that he isn't ready or Adkins didn't want to bed him in without training etc. Could also have a knock or whatever - we can only speculate
Other rumour is that Gomes is the signing as most people don't name their triallists though I'm not sure there's actually rules against this.3 - 
Sponsored links:
 - 
            
Please either apologise, delete your post or point me to the post where I said any of this.addick1956 said:
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.Oggy Red said:addick1956 said:
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.Oggy Red said:
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?addick1956 said:
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.Cafc43v3r said:
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.addick1956 said:
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.Cafc43v3r said:
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.addick1956 said:
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.Maccn05 said:And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.
And also a post where I insulted you? Other than repeated your insults back at you.3 - 
            
Errr,,DFTf'ingTHenry Irving said:
Close.eastterrace6168 said:
Mmmmm DFTT?Henry Irving said:
You know what I'm going to say 😂ShootersHillGuru said:Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today.
Have another go
                        0 - 
            addick1956 said:
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.Oggy Red said:addick1956 said:
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.Oggy Red said:
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?addick1956 said:
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.Cafc43v3r said:
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.addick1956 said:
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.Cafc43v3r said:
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.addick1956 said:
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.Maccn05 said:And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.
Are we not allowed to argue with other posters on here then?
To be fair 90% of some of the bollocks you've posted on here deserves some of the reactions you have had.
Try and concentrate on the remaining 10% and you may even start getting 'likes'.
And stop being so paranoid.
6 - 
            
Close enougheastterrace6168 said:
Errr,,DFTf'ingTHenry Irving said:
Close.eastterrace6168 said:
Mmmmm DFTT?Henry Irving said:
You know what I'm going to say 😂ShootersHillGuru said:Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today.
Have another go1 - 
            
Do I get a prize...maybe a promoteHenry Irving said:
Close enougheastterrace6168 said:
Errr,,DFTf'ingTHenry Irving said:
Close.eastterrace6168 said:
Mmmmm DFTT?Henry Irving said:
You know what I'm going to say 😂ShootersHillGuru said:Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today.
Have another go
                        3 - 
            Never met such a needy lot
                        1 - 
            
Possible but we sign someone and then keep schtum…..nah.Vfrf said:ShootersHillGuru said:
I get it but if we had a new player then unless he’s actually injured (quite possibly knowing CAFC) then he should have been involved today. Makes no sense to keep them under wraps for the sake of a sodding kit that changes every bloody year.Vfrf said:
I have no inside knowledge, purely speculation but I think the club probably stagger releases. Plenty of things to talk about today so could be saving it tomorrow to get more engagement. Also, the media team were likely preparing for the game so probably haven't edited the content yet. There's also the age old theory of signings in the new shirt (which never happens). My bet would be Sunday or Tuesday if it has indeed happened.ShootersHillGuru said:Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today.Could be that he isn't ready or Adkins didn't want to bed him in without training etc. Could also have a knock or whatever - we can only speculate
Other rumour is that Gomes is the signing as most people don't name their triallists though I'm not sure there's actually rules against this.1 - 
            
Shocking.addick1956 said:
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.Oggy Red said:addick1956 said:
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.Oggy Red said:
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?addick1956 said:
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.Cafc43v3r said:
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.addick1956 said:
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.Cafc43v3r said:
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.addick1956 said:
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.Maccn05 said:And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.0 - 
            
Would you settle for ‘if you are good enough (and strong enough), you are old enough’, as a compromise? That’d be great. 👍addick1956 said:
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.Oggy Red said:addick1956 said:
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.Oggy Red said:
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?addick1956 said:
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.Cafc43v3r said:
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.addick1956 said:
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.Cafc43v3r said:
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.addick1956 said:
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.Maccn05 said:And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.
0 - 
            
I'm happy to read your views and while I might not agree with everything you say; if I want to give you a reply I'll do it in a usually considered way.: I might even have a bit of a larf with you.addick1956 said:
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.Oggy Red said:addick1956 said:
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.Oggy Red said:
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?addick1956 said:
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.Cafc43v3r said:
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.addick1956 said:
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.Cafc43v3r said:
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.addick1956 said:
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.Maccn05 said:And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.
Your views and opinions are perfectly valid.
That's not the issue at all.
Not everyone is going to agree with them - that's the whole point of this forum, to exchange opinions.
Some people will even laugh at you, but you know that's okay - you just have to grow a thick skin.
Let's take our Golfie, for example .... he's usually pretty contrary in his views and always invariably comes up with the worst case scenario.
But for the most part, he takes it on the chin, keeps his cool and dignity. He's a valued member of this forum.
You know, that's the way to do it.
4 - 
Sponsored links:
 - 
            
How/Where do you get this?RonnieMoore said:Wrexham paying Mullin 9k a week0 - 
            
You need to get really good at playing football and then get yourself an agentElfsborgAddick said:
How/Where do you get this?RonnieMoore said:Wrexham paying Mullin 9k a week31 - 
            
Obviously you can't else you would have answered the first bit as well. Or admitted you made it up.addick1956 said:
The one about me not being able to read for a start . Now go away please .Cafc43v3r said:
Please either apologise, delete your post or point me to the post where I said any of this.addick1956 said:
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.Oggy Red said:addick1956 said:
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.Oggy Red said:
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?addick1956 said:
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.Cafc43v3r said:
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.addick1956 said:
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.Cafc43v3r said:
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.addick1956 said:
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.Maccn05 said:And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.
And also a post where I insulted you? Other than repeated your insults back at you.
Either that or you a massive WUM. If you were looking for a bite, we'll done you got me.
Look post what you like I'll just ignore it because 90% of it is either bollocks, you abusing other posters or claiming your the result of some make believe conspiracy, or shoeing politics into everything.0 - 
            
Jimmy Seed was a great manager, but I read that he believed that starving players of the ball in the week in training made them want it more on Saturday. It wasn't because he wasn't a great manager, his record speaks for itself, but that was the view in football at the time.JamesSeed said:
Would you settle for ‘if you are good enough (and strong enough), you are old enough’, as a compromise? That’d be great. 👍addick1956 said:
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.Oggy Red said:addick1956 said:
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.Oggy Red said:
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?addick1956 said:
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.Cafc43v3r said:
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.addick1956 said:
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.Cafc43v3r said:
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.addick1956 said:
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.Maccn05 said:And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.
I recall having a friendly argument with my father in law, that having a winger who never went into his own half would be a disaster in the modern game, but that was the view of how they should play in times gone by.
Football has moved on and if you transported an average player from today into the 50s, they would be a superstar. It is just the way football has developed and isn't a slight on the players that went before. They are all part of it moving from point A to point B and onwards.1 - 
            If anyone actually believes that Mullin is on 9k per week at Wrexham, over 1.35million on a three year deal, in the National League, they seriously need to give their head a wobble.6
 - 
            

15 - 
            
Where did you see this?RonnieMoore said:Wrexham paying Mullin 9k a week0 - 
            
Where he gets all his information. Plucked out of the air or straight from cloud cuckoo land .ElfsborgAddick said:
How/Where do you get this?RonnieMoore said:Wrexham paying Mullin 9k a week1 - 
            

7 
This discussion has been closed.
            











