And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests. That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.
Please either apologise, delete your post or point me to the post where I said any of this.
And also a post where I insulted you? Other than repeated your insults back at you.
The one about me not being able to read for a start . Now go away please .
Obviously you can't else you would have answered the first bit as well. Or admitted you made it up.
Either that or you a massive WUM. If you were looking for a bite, we'll done you got me.
Look post what you like I'll just ignore it because 90% of it is either bollocks, you abusing other posters or claiming your the result of some make believe conspiracy, or shoeing politics into everything.
And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests. That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.
Would you settle for ‘if you are good enough (and strong enough), you are old enough’, as a compromise?That’d be great. 👍
Jimmy Seed was a great manager, but I read that he believed that starving players of the ball in the week in training made them want it more on Saturday. It wasn't because he wasn't a great manager, his record speaks for itself, but that was the view in football at the time.
I recall having a friendly argument with my father in law, that having a winger who never went into his own half would be a disaster in the modern game, but that was the view of how they should play in times gone by.
Football has moved on and if you transported an average player from today into the 50s, they would be a superstar. It is just the way football has developed and isn't a slight on the players that went before. They are all part of it moving from point A to point B and onwards.
If anyone actually believes that Mullin is on 9k per week at Wrexham, over 1.35million on a three year deal, in the National League, they seriously need to give their head a wobble.
And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests. That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.
Would you settle for ‘if you are good enough (and strong enough), you are old enough’, as a compromise?That’d be great. 👍
Jimmy Seed was a great manager, but I read that he believed that starving players of the ball in the week in training made them want it more on Saturday. It wasn't because he wasn't a great manager, his record speaks for itself, but that was the view in football at the time.
I recall having a friendly argument with my father in law, that having a winger who never went into his own half would be a disaster in the modern game, but that was the view of how they should play in times gone by.
Football has moved on and if you transported an average player from today into the 50s, they would be a superstar. It is just the way football has developed and isn't a slight on the players that went before. They are all part of it moving from point A to point B and onwards.
Yes, the game’s certainly developed along with the strength, fitness and technical ability of the players. In fifty years time though they may be even fitter and faster and more skilful than they are now, but that doesn’t mean we can’t enjoy the likes of Messi and Ronaldo and Josh Parker etc as they’re the best available right now.
;-) Not 100% sure how much JS actually starved the players of the ball, but they certainly did far less work on technique than they do now.
I wonder how some of todays players would have got on playing on the muddy pitches that were often the norm. The old ball was heavier and, especially on a cold wet day, could knock a player off their feet. Diving and shirt pulling were never a part of the game, and slide tackles and shoulder charges were expected of all players. My memory, or mental picture of John Summers is of him knocking defenders out of the way on the edge of the penalty area and falling into ankle deep mud as he put the ball in the net. The game has changed, so have the players, I'm not sure if it's more enjoyable now to watch, or if it's as enjoyable to play.
And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.
TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?
Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼
You are of course correct. If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.
If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak. I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up.
If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests. That doesn't make him a bad player of course.
However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.
Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh.
Have you ever watch Mullin play? I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play.
Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions.
Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence.
So what do you think and what does it matter ?
32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.
And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek.
I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that. I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.
I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him. This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough. We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc.
You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table.
There you go, failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question.
I never said he was good enough for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines.
We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though.
Try answering questions. Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?
It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.
It's not even what you say.
It's the way you say it.
I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing.
Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".
An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's, R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it.
Would you settle for ‘if you are good enough (and strong enough), you are old enough’, as a compromise?That’d be great. 👍
Jimmy Seed was a great manager, but I read that he believed that starving players of the ball in the week in training made them want it more on Saturday. It wasn't because he wasn't a great manager, his record speaks for itself, but that was the view in football at the time.
I recall having a friendly argument with my father in law, that having a winger who never went into his own half would be a disaster in the modern game, but that was the view of how they should play in times gone by.
Football has moved on and if you transported an average player from today into the 50s, they would be a superstar. It is just the way football has developed and isn't a slight on the players that went before. They are all part of it moving from point A to point B and onwards.
Yes, the game’s certainly developed along with the strength, fitness and technical ability of the players. In fifty years time though they may be even fitter and faster and more skilful than they are now, but that doesn’t mean we can’t enjoy the likes of Messi and Ronaldo and Josh Parker etc as they’re the best available right now ;-) Not 100% sure how much JS actually starved the players of the ball, but they certainly did far less work on technique than they do now.
That is the point. I suppose there is a limit around human capabilities, but even those increase as years go on. Look at World records in other sports and how few really old ones there are. What we also see in football is new approaches and tactics that can get found out and new tactics come in. We are seeing clubs using computers to assess the effectiveness of players.
Here is a rumor for you pick the bones out of this we have signed a striker believed to be Randall from Plymouth. Also we are close to a CB.Enjoy this one bully boys I may be old but I have respect and just for the record my name is not Colin I wish everybody on here enjoy the new season and continue to support our great club.
I don't see a Randall in the Plymouth squad, there's a young central midfider they've got called Adam Randell but think he's pretty highly thought of. If we were linked to a Plymouth player I'd still like Pantuche Camara in the middle of midfield.
Here is a rumor for you pick the bones out of this we have signed a striker believed to be Randall from Plymouth. Also we are close to a CB.Enjoy this one bully boys I may be old but I have respect and just for the record my name is not Colin I wish everybody on here enjoy the new season and continue to support our great club.
Is that Joel Randall, the winger from Exeter?
Or Adam Randell, the defensive midfielder from Plymouth who spent last season on loan at Torquay?
Here is a rumor for you pick the bones out of this we have signed a striker believed to be Randall from Plymouth. Also we are close to a CB.Enjoy this one bully boys I may be old but I have respect and just for the record my name is not Colin I wish everybody on here enjoy the new season and continue to support our great club.
So just to check we're signing a 20 year old striker that has only ever played defensive midfield, with 2 goals in 42 on loan for Torquay in the National league.
Even I will admit I will be massively underwhelmed by that.
Or as Callum asks do you mean the Exeter winger. I'd be happier with that.
Comments
Either that or you a massive WUM. If you were looking for a bite, we'll done you got me.
Look post what you like I'll just ignore it because 90% of it is either bollocks, you abusing other posters or claiming your the result of some make believe conspiracy, or shoeing politics into everything.
I recall having a friendly argument with my father in law, that having a winger who never went into his own half would be a disaster in the modern game, but that was the view of how they should play in times gone by.
Football has moved on and if you transported an average player from today into the 50s, they would be a superstar. It is just the way football has developed and isn't a slight on the players that went before. They are all part of it moving from point A to point B and onwards.
Righty ho old chap, whatever you're on must be some seriously strong shit
I actually live 12 mile from their ground and I'm reading more about them on here than iam the local press lol
Not 100% sure how much JS actually starved the players of the ball, but they certainly did far less work on technique than they do now.
Any chance we can put yesterday's bollox to bed and get this thread back on track.
Cheers.
Even I will admit I will be massively underwhelmed by that.
Or as Callum asks do you mean the Exeter winger. I'd be happier with that.