Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)

1429430432434435868

Comments

  • Any chance of a rumour ?
  • Maccn05 said:
    Devastating news for all but I’m out of this place it’s become toxic.

    The level of sniping & bullying on here is out of control. People’s opinions are no longer considered or acknowledged it’s just people attacking and ganging up on each other.

    Golfie, Addicks59, Ronnie, myself all getting abuse. 

    From what I can tell it’s a bunch of old men who should know better you all should be embarrassed. I hope the moderators take some action.

    I'm not old or embarrassed so I know you aren't talking to me.
  • Maybe another failed medical at last min...👀
  • Maccn05 said:
    Devastating news for all but I’m out of this place it’s become toxic.

    The level of sniping & bullying on here is out of control. People’s opinions are no longer considered or acknowledged it’s just people attacking and ganging up on each other.

    Golfie, Addicks59, Ronnie, myself all getting abuse. 

    From what I can tell it’s a bunch of old men who should know better you all should be embarrassed. I hope the moderators take some action.
    I find it unfair you use words as strong as bullying and abuse to describe this great community which has been built over several years. Just my personal view, but the only time I can clearly remember you posting is to patronise Dazzler and mock his lists. 
    Dazzlers alright, he lol’d one of my players marks posts end of last season but I don’t bear a grudge, it helped me get to fourteen thousand of them 😉.
  • Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today. 
    I have no inside knowledge, purely speculation but I think the club probably stagger releases. Plenty of things to talk about today so could be saving it tomorrow to get more engagement. Also, the media team were likely preparing for the game so probably haven't edited the content yet. There's also the age old theory of signings in the new shirt (which never happens). My bet would be Sunday or Tuesday if it has indeed happened.
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited July 2021
    Another one is done, no idea if it will be announced today.
    Here's the post you were referring to @ShootersHillGuru

    Posted at 2:36 yesterday afternoon. 60 likes. :-)
  • Vfrf said:
    Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today. 
    I have no inside knowledge, purely speculation but I think the club probably stagger releases. Plenty of things to talk about today so could be saving it tomorrow to get more engagement. Also, the media team were likely preparing for the game so probably haven't edited the content yet. There's also the age old theory of signings in the new shirt (which never happens). My bet would be Sunday or Tuesday if it has indeed happened.
    I get it but if we had a new player then unless he’s actually injured (quite possibly knowing CAFC) then he should have been involved today. Makes no sense to keep them under wraps for the sake of a sodding kit that changes every bloody year.
  • Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today. 
    You know what I'm going to say 😂
  • 🤦🏻‍♂️
  • Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today. 
    You know what I'm going to say 😂
    Mmmmm DFTT? B)
  • Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today. 
    You know what I'm going to say 😂
    Mmmmm DFTT? B)
    Close.

    Have another go
  • Vfrf said:
    Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today. 
    I have no inside knowledge, purely speculation but I think the club probably stagger releases. Plenty of things to talk about today so could be saving it tomorrow to get more engagement. Also, the media team were likely preparing for the game so probably haven't edited the content yet. There's also the age old theory of signings in the new shirt (which never happens). My bet would be Sunday or Tuesday if it has indeed happened.
    I get it but if we had a new player then unless he’s actually injured (quite possibly knowing CAFC) then he should have been involved today. Makes no sense to keep them under wraps for the sake of a sodding kit that changes every bloody year.
    Could be that he isn't ready or Adkins didn't want to bed him in without training etc. Could also have a knock or whatever - we can only speculate :)
    Other rumour is that Gomes is the signing as most people don't name their triallists though I'm not sure there's actually rules against this.
  • edited July 2021
    Oggy Red said:
    Oggy Red said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Maccn05 said:
    And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.

    TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising  comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?

    Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼 
    You are of course correct.  If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.

    If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak.  I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up. 

    If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
    That doesn't make him a bad player of course. 

    However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.  

    Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh. 


    Have you ever watch Mullin play?   I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play. 
     Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions. 

    Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence. 

    So what do you think and what does it matter ?

    32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.  

    And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek. 
    I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that.  I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.

    I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him.   This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough.   We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc. 

    You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table. 
    There you go,  failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question. 

    I never said he was good enough  for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines. 

    We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though. 

    Try answering questions.  Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
    Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?

    It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.





     When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.

    It's not even what you say.

    It's the way you say it.


     I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing. 

    Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult  others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".

    An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's,  R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults  me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it. 
    Please either apologise, delete your post or point me to the post where I said any of this.

    And also a post where I insulted you?  Other than repeated your insults back at you. 
  • edited July 2021
    Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today. 
    You know what I'm going to say 😂
    Mmmmm DFTT? B)
    Close.

    Have another go
    Errr,,DFTf'ingT B)B)
  • Sponsored links:


  • Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today. 
    You know what I'm going to say 😂
    Mmmmm DFTT? B)
    Close.

    Have another go
    Errr,,DFTf'ingT
    Close enough
  • edited July 2021
    Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today. 
    You know what I'm going to say 😂
    Mmmmm DFTT? B)
    Close.

    Have another go
    Errr,,DFTf'ingT
    Close enough
    Do I get a prize...maybe a promote B)B)
  • Never met such a needy lot
  • Vfrf said:
    Vfrf said:
    Sorry to interrupt the bickering but wasn’t it accepted that we’d signed someone yesterday ? Strange enough it’s not been announced but stranger still that NA wasn’t keen for him to be involved today. 
    I have no inside knowledge, purely speculation but I think the club probably stagger releases. Plenty of things to talk about today so could be saving it tomorrow to get more engagement. Also, the media team were likely preparing for the game so probably haven't edited the content yet. There's also the age old theory of signings in the new shirt (which never happens). My bet would be Sunday or Tuesday if it has indeed happened.
    I get it but if we had a new player then unless he’s actually injured (quite possibly knowing CAFC) then he should have been involved today. Makes no sense to keep them under wraps for the sake of a sodding kit that changes every bloody year.
    Could be that he isn't ready or Adkins didn't want to bed him in without training etc. Could also have a knock or whatever - we can only speculate :)
    Other rumour is that Gomes is the signing as most people don't name their triallists though I'm not sure there's actually rules against this.
    Possible but we sign someone and then keep schtum…..nah.
  • Oggy Red said:
    Oggy Red said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Maccn05 said:
    And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.

    TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising  comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?

    Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼 
    You are of course correct.  If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.

    If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak.  I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up. 

    If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
    That doesn't make him a bad player of course. 

    However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.  

    Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh. 


    Have you ever watch Mullin play?   I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play. 
     Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions. 

    Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence. 

    So what do you think and what does it matter ?

    32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.  

    And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek. 
    I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that.  I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.

    I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him.   This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough.   We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc. 

    You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table. 
    There you go,  failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question. 

    I never said he was good enough  for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines. 

    We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though. 

    Try answering questions.  Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
    Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?

    It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.





     When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.

    It's not even what you say.

    It's the way you say it.


     I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing. 

    Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult  others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".

    An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's,  R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults  me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it. 
    Shocking.  
  • Oggy Red said:
    Oggy Red said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Maccn05 said:
    And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.

    TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising  comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?

    Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼 
    You are of course correct.  If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.

    If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak.  I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up. 

    If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
    That doesn't make him a bad player of course. 

    However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.  

    Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh. 


    Have you ever watch Mullin play?   I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play. 
     Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions. 

    Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence. 

    So what do you think and what does it matter ?

    32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.  

    And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek. 
    I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that.  I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.

    I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him.   This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough.   We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc. 

    You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table. 
    There you go,  failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question. 

    I never said he was good enough  for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines. 

    We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though. 

    Try answering questions.  Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
    Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?

    It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.
     When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.

    It's not even what you say.

    It's the way you say it.


     I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing. 

    Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult  others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".

    An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's,  R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults  me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it. 
    Would you settle for ‘if you are good enough (and strong enough), you are old enough’, as a compromise? That’d be great. 👍
  • Oggy Red said:
    Oggy Red said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Maccn05 said:
    And I stand by that. If we signed a striker tomorrow with the same stats in L2 everyone would be going nuts but because NA says he’s good we take it as gospel…. So yeah happy clappers.

    TBH I’m bored of your constant put downs on anything I post and to others. Even on Twitter where I don’t follow you you interject on a thread with another sarky, patronising  comment… why bother? Insecurity maybe? Lack of self worth? Need to feel important?

    Feel free to not interact with my occasional posts, I’ll do the same and you can concentrate on your silly tables 👍🏼 
    You are of course correct.  If we had signed a L2 forward with such stats there would be uproar. I got the same criticism for saying 'if they are good enough they are old enough'.

    If you disagree the insults abound , ageist, IQ insults etc. Not one person but a whole tribe so to speak.  I think they hope to just make one give up. Don't give up. 

    If Davison had been bought from FGR or on a free imagine the protests.
    That doesn't make him a bad player of course. 

    However I can't see how a bloke scoring 32 goals in L2 isn't better than one who scores 5/6 pro rata.  

    Or a the players we were in for in January are suddenly a bit meh. 


    Have you ever watch Mullin play?   I don't mean his goals on Quest or YouTube I mean actually play. 
     Why can you never make a point, just ask 👉less questions. 

    Quest doesn't count, You tube is off limits and as you ought to know because Mullin was only at Cambridge for 1 season . A season nobody could attend in essence. 

    So what do you think and what does it matter ?

    32 goals against 5 or 6. Not much in it yet the 16 Aneke scored is a huge total apparently.  

    And you challenged my IQ ? Fxxxing cheek. 
    I ask because you seem convinced that he is good enough for league 1 and a promotion chasing league 1 club at that.  I wondered what great insight you had to why this would be the case.

    I also have to ask why you keep banging on about him.   This time last year he was released by Tranmere because he wasn't good enough.   We had no interest in him, neither did Sunderland, Wigan, Ipswich, Portsmouth etc. 

    You claim to not be able to see why he isn't highly thought of, I suggest the reason you can't see it because you haven't look any where other than the top goal scorers table. 
    There you go,  failing to answer a question but inventing another to answer yourself or to justify the first silly question. 

    I never said he was good enough  for League 1 or that he wasn't . However he is proven at that level now and Davison didn't exactly set headlines. 

    We don't know what interest he had. Wrexham are obviously paying well to attract ayers from a division above though. 

    Try answering questions.  Start at 11 plus level and see how progress can help to stop making assumptions that don't exist .
    Addick1956 got out of bed on the wrong side again. Hey mate, perhaps try being a little less aggressive to people?

    It's just a football forum, a place to exchange opinions - not a place where you have to be right at all costs.





     When you consider the nonsense I am accused of yet others say the same and get no comments. How is that aggressive . You must have had a sheltered life mate.

    It's not even what you say.

    It's the way you say it.


     I get criticism for every view I print. Further, others print the same views and, guess what, nothing. 

    Further some just like to insult people. Some also insult  others but not as regular. I wrote a quote, ,'Ifyou are good enough you are old enough ".

    An old maxim that stands the test of time. However because I printed a list of people from the 50's,  R2D2 , otherwise known as Cafc43v3r decided to tell me that 50's players were rubbish in effect as today they could not hack it in the super fit run 100 kilometres a game blokes. Then he starts other arguments and insults  me. Naturally I will retaliate if proved. I fail to see how it is my fault when this joker , who insults others too, gets away with it. 
     I'm happy to read your views and while I might not agree with everything you say; if I want to give you a reply I'll do it in a usually considered way.: I might even have a bit of a larf with you. :smile:

    Your views and opinions are perfectly valid.
    That's not the issue at all.

    Not everyone is going to agree with them - that's the whole point of this forum, to exchange opinions.
    Some people will even laugh at you, but you know that's okay - you just have to grow a thick skin. 

    Let's take our Golfie, for example .... he's usually pretty contrary in his views and always invariably comes up with the worst case scenario.
    But for the most part, he takes it on the chin, keeps his cool and dignity. He's a valued member of this forum.

    You know, that's the way to do it. 

  • Wrexham paying Mullin 9k a week 
    How/Where do you get this?
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!