Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)

1…223224226228229…867

Comments

  • Richard J
    Richard J Posts: 8,033
    Boyle seems to be another Scottish Yorkshire man according to Wiki.

    I always thought Tucker was unrealistic. This does seem to be more plausible. 
  • RedRobin
    RedRobin Posts: 1,377
    Boyle is a bit of goal scoring CB. Think he’s scored 20 goals for Cheltenham since he joined. 
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,982
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    Thoughts on Boyle ?

    Bit too close to Bogle for my liking
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,927
    Boyle had a knee injury which ruled him out for the last 3 months of the season (bar a couple of games before the injury returned)
  • Cafc_lifer
    Cafc_lifer Posts: 74
    killerandflash said:
    Boyle had a knee injury which ruled him out for the last 3 months of the season (bar a couple of games before the injury returned)
    Injury prone ticks another box in addition to the height and age test. 
  • Gravesend_Addick
    Gravesend_Addick Posts: 7,300
    killerandflash said:
    Boyle had a knee injury which ruled him out for the last 3 months of the season (bar a couple of games before the injury returned)
    Sounds like a perfect fit for us 
  • Cordoban Addick
    Cordoban Addick Posts: 5,448
    Mendonca In Asdas said:
    CH4RLTON said:
    Scoham said:
    Leeds_Addick said:
    AFKABartram said:
    @addick59 said on the wrong thread:

    CH in building today told it is Tucker from Gillingham.But also been told we are in for Norwich lad we had on loan.Exciting week this week hopefully.
    If we sign both Tucker and Famewo I'd be amazed. Would be setup very well at CB with Pearce and Inniss already in the building and Barker hopefully getting a bit more game time.
    I’ll be very surprised if we don’t bring in a good RCB and a good LCB. Can’t rely on Pearce too much and Inniss needs strong competition (especially important given his injury record).
    I've heard Will Boyle from Cheltenham is the centre back we are talking to today
    Nephew of Trevor Kettle?
    An unwatched T Kettle, Will Boyle.
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600

    I have actually played against Will Boyle's dad, god I feel old!

    His is Simon Walton's cousin. 
  • covered_end_junior
    covered_end_junior Posts: 4,528
    Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • covered_end_junior
    covered_end_junior Posts: 4,528
    MattF said:
    covered_end_junior said:
    Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM. 
    CM is Craig MacGillivray surely

    Durrr my bad lol 
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,427
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,427
    Boyle could be available for around £200k.

    6 ft 3 and left footed, so if he signs then I wouldn’t expect Famewo to.

    Also means it’s not impossible for us to sign Tucker, assuming he’s right footed.

    https://www.deepdaledigest.com/news/report-sheffield-wednesday-very-interested-in-preston-linked-will-boyle-may-cost-just-200k/
  • Lazy_eye_metaphor
    Lazy_eye_metaphor Posts: 1,960
    MattF said:
    covered_end_junior said:
    Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM. 
    CM is Craig MacGillivray surely

    Morrell perhaps?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,599
    Lazy_eye_metaphor said:
    MattF said:
    covered_end_junior said:
    Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM. 
    CM is Craig MacGillivray surely

    Morrell perhaps?
    No... Cawley is saying: "C (Craig) M (MacGillivray) was the one I knew was close"
  • hoof_it_up_to_benty
    hoof_it_up_to_benty Posts: 22,474
    When are we going to sign some non scoring forwards? 
  • Six-a-bag-of-nuts
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts Posts: 8,130
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    After asking a few questions of others. Boyle is very dominant in the air. Boyle, Stockley and Inniss would be quite an Ariel threat at set pieces. 


  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Charles Manson close apparently 
  • Lazy_eye_metaphor
    Lazy_eye_metaphor Posts: 1,960
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Lazy_eye_metaphor said:
    MattF said:
    covered_end_junior said:
    Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM. 
    CM is Craig MacGillivray surely

    Morrell perhaps?
    No... Cawley is saying: "C (Craig) M (MacGillivray) was the one I knew was close"
    Dammit!

  • Sponsored links:



  • MattF
    MattF Posts: 3,797
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Charles Manson close apparently 
    Does he have family round here then?
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,427
    Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    After asking a few questions of others. Boyle is very dominant in the air. Boyle, Stockley and Inniss would be quite an Ariel threat at set pieces. 


    I can’t wait to sea witch player we sign next.


  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,386
    edited June 2021
    Covered End said:
    Braziliance said:
    I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out 
    Don't be silly. We've just signed Pompey's POTY.
    Perfectly aware of who he is and what he's done. On paper though we have stayed the same, we lost our number 1 and gained a new one on a free. It's not a marquee signing you would do a tweet like that for. That's all I'm saying.

    Chunes said:
    Braziliance said:
    I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out 
    "We will have an announcement at 11 but don't get too excited."
    That is not what I'm trying to imply. Just keep it simple, tweet it out in one go, don't do a teaser tweet for a goalkeeper on a free when we've just lost one. You save those tweets for the transfer fee signings or when you have actually strengthened the squad. 

    I don't have an issue with the signing just the manner of the tweet, it's unnecessary imo.

    How that's earned 6 lols is beyond me, are people that ticklish on here? 
  • Cordoban Addick
    Cordoban Addick Posts: 5,448
    Any other Yorkshire Jocks playing in the lower divisions?
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,040
    Braziliance said:
    Covered End said:
    Braziliance said:
    I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out 
    Don't be silly. We've just signed Pompey's POTY.
    Perfectly aware of who he is and what he's done. On paper though we have stayed the same, we lost our number 1 and gained a new one on a free. It's not a marquee signing you would do a tweet like that for. That's all I'm saying.

    Chunes said:
    Braziliance said:
    I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out 
    "We will have an announcement at 11 but don't get too excited."
    That is not what I'm trying to imply. Just keep it simple, tweet it out in one go, don't do a teaser tweet for a goalkeeper on a free when we've just lost one. You save those tweets for the transfer fee signings or when you have actually strengthened the squad. 

    I don't have an issue with the signing just the manner of the tweet, it's unnecessary imo.

    How that's earned 6 lols is beyond me, are people that ticklish on here? 
    The squad was strengthened by signing a goalkeeper.
    I don't fancy our chances playing without a goalie.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,362
    Scoham said:
    lmao, Famewo was an absolute disaster with ball at feet. even ignoring his excellent assist for Wimbledon he was constantly putting it out of play and hitting long balls 20 yards away from the forward
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,386
    Covered End said:
    Braziliance said:
    Covered End said:
    Braziliance said:
    I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out 
    Don't be silly. We've just signed Pompey's POTY.
    Perfectly aware of who he is and what he's done. On paper though we have stayed the same, we lost our number 1 and gained a new one on a free. It's not a marquee signing you would do a tweet like that for. That's all I'm saying.

    Chunes said:
    Braziliance said:
    I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out 
    "We will have an announcement at 11 but don't get too excited."
    That is not what I'm trying to imply. Just keep it simple, tweet it out in one go, don't do a teaser tweet for a goalkeeper on a free when we've just lost one. You save those tweets for the transfer fee signings or when you have actually strengthened the squad. 

    I don't have an issue with the signing just the manner of the tweet, it's unnecessary imo.

    How that's earned 6 lols is beyond me, are people that ticklish on here? 
    The squad was strengthened by signing a goalkeeper.
    I don't fancy our chances playing without a goalie.
    This has definitely gone over the head and becoming borderline petty posting now. 

    We lost our number 1, we got another number1. We weakened and then went back to where we were, we didn't strengthen, that could only be guess work at this point. 

    I am happy with the signing, just pointing out it's crap content from the comms team. Don't see how that's so hard to understand here 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,687
    Covered End said:
    Braziliance said:
    Covered End said:
    Braziliance said:
    I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out 
    Don't be silly. We've just signed Pompey's POTY.
    Perfectly aware of who he is and what he's done. On paper though we have stayed the same, we lost our number 1 and gained a new one on a free. It's not a marquee signing you would do a tweet like that for. That's all I'm saying.

    Chunes said:
    Braziliance said:
    I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out 
    "We will have an announcement at 11 but don't get too excited."
    That is not what I'm trying to imply. Just keep it simple, tweet it out in one go, don't do a teaser tweet for a goalkeeper on a free when we've just lost one. You save those tweets for the transfer fee signings or when you have actually strengthened the squad. 

    I don't have an issue with the signing just the manner of the tweet, it's unnecessary imo.

    How that's earned 6 lols is beyond me, are people that ticklish on here? 
    The squad was strengthened by signing a goalkeeper.
    I don't fancy our chances playing without a goalie.
    As far as I'm concerned we haven't "strengthened" anything.  Since Watson & Pierce (re) signed all that's happened is that we have lost a striker & a goalkeeper & added a goalkeeper. 

    A net position of minus 1.

    Yay for small mercies.
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    grumpyaddick said:


    Is this deal with Boyle in the bag?

This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”