Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)
Comments
-
Boyle seems to be another Scottish Yorkshire man according to Wiki.
I always thought Tucker was unrealistic. This does seem to be more plausible.0 -
Boyle is a bit of goal scoring CB. Think he’s scored 20 goals for Cheltenham since he joined.1
-
8
-
Boyle had a knee injury which ruled him out for the last 3 months of the season (bar a couple of games before the injury returned)0
-
killerandflash said:Boyle had a knee injury which ruled him out for the last 3 months of the season (bar a couple of games before the injury returned)0
-
killerandflash said:Boyle had a knee injury which ruled him out for the last 3 months of the season (bar a couple of games before the injury returned)2
-
Mendonca In Asdas said:CH4RLTON said:Scoham said:Leeds_Addick said:AFKABartram said:@addick59 said on the wrong thread:
CH in building today told it is Tucker from Gillingham.But also been told we are in for Norwich lad we had on loan.Exciting week this week hopefully.6 -
I have actually played against Will Boyle's dad, god I feel old!
His is Simon Walton's cousin.1 -
Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM.15
-
covered_end_junior said:Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM.
33 -
Sponsored links:
-
MattF said:covered_end_junior said:Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM.13
-
-
Scoham said:23
-
Boyle could be available for around £200k.
6 ft 3 and left footed, so if he signs then I wouldn’t expect Famewo to.
Also means it’s not impossible for us to sign Tucker, assuming he’s right footed.
https://www.deepdaledigest.com/news/report-sheffield-wednesday-very-interested-in-preston-linked-will-boyle-may-cost-just-200k/
2 -
MattF said:covered_end_junior said:Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM.2
-
Lazy_eye_metaphor said:MattF said:covered_end_junior said:Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM.3
-
When are we going to sign some non scoring forwards?2
-
ShootersHillGuru said:After asking a few questions of others. Boyle is very dominant in the air. Boyle, Stockley and Inniss would be quite an Ariel threat at set pieces.
10 -
Charles Manson close apparently1
-
ForeverAddickted said:Lazy_eye_metaphor said:MattF said:covered_end_junior said:Cawley says Macgillivray isn't the player he was referring to the other day when he said one was close. That player is a CM.1
-
Sponsored links:
-
Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:ShootersHillGuru said:After asking a few questions of others. Boyle is very dominant in the air. Boyle, Stockley and Inniss would be quite an Ariel threat at set pieces.
2 -
Is this deal with Boyle in the bag?33 -
Covered End said:Braziliance said:I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already outChunes said:Braziliance said:I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out
I don't have an issue with the signing just the manner of the tweet, it's unnecessary imo.
How that's earned 6 lols is beyond me, are people that ticklish on here?0 -
Any other Yorkshire Jocks playing in the lower divisions?0
-
Braziliance said:Covered End said:Braziliance said:I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already outChunes said:Braziliance said:I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out
I don't have an issue with the signing just the manner of the tweet, it's unnecessary imo.
How that's earned 6 lols is beyond me, are people that ticklish on here?
I don't fancy our chances playing without a goalie.0 -
Scoham said:9
-
Covered End said:Braziliance said:Covered End said:Braziliance said:I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already outChunes said:Braziliance said:I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out
I don't have an issue with the signing just the manner of the tweet, it's unnecessary imo.
How that's earned 6 lols is beyond me, are people that ticklish on here?
I don't fancy our chances playing without a goalie.
We lost our number 1, we got another number1. We weakened and then went back to where we were, we didn't strengthen, that could only be guess work at this point.
I am happy with the signing, just pointing out it's crap content from the comms team. Don't see how that's so hard to understand here2 -
Covered End said:Braziliance said:Covered End said:Braziliance said:I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already outChunes said:Braziliance said:I don't wanna be negative cause it's a good signing on paper, but to do a stay 'tuned at 11am' for a replacement goalie is completely OTT. You're expecting proper marquee signings for that, especially when the leaks are already out
I don't have an issue with the signing just the manner of the tweet, it's unnecessary imo.
How that's earned 6 lols is beyond me, are people that ticklish on here?
I don't fancy our chances playing without a goalie.
A net position of minus 1.
Yay for small mercies.0 -
3
This discussion has been closed.