Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Summer Transfer Rumours 2020 (DEADLINE DAY from pg.258)

1…8788909293…297

Comments

  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,493
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
     With our usual list of crocks, I can personally guarantee this fella will get some games.
  • MattF
    MattF Posts: 3,797
    Cafc43v3r said:
    MattF said:
    cafc4life said:
    Why one in one out if we are out of the embargo now?
    The wage cap I assume
    And limit on squad size of over 21s 
    And that, just typical really, got any inkling as to what option we're likely to go with?
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,432
    https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/charlton-athletic/kader/verein/358

    Only a few under age players.

  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    MattF said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    MattF said:
    cafc4life said:
    Why one in one out if we are out of the embargo now?
    The wage cap I assume
    And limit on squad size of over 21s 
    And that, just typical really, got any inkling as to what option we're likely to go with?
    None. But if it was me I would take an u21 right back tbh.  Matthews is a very good player but I would rather have the fire power and a solid center half. Ideally we can have all 4.
  • moutuakilla
    moutuakilla Posts: 7,584
    Are we still forced to have players in our 23 that are not going to feature but have had 1 appearance or was that just under the embargo? Can we now decide who we count as our 23?
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,493
    What’s the latest with Albie M?

    wouldnt mind betting he’ll be sacrificed as Bows doesn’t appear to rate him.
  • MattF
    MattF Posts: 3,797
    Cafc43v3r said:
    MattF said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    MattF said:
    cafc4life said:
    Why one in one out if we are out of the embargo now?
    The wage cap I assume
    And limit on squad size of over 21s 
    And that, just typical really, got any inkling as to what option we're likely to go with?
    None. But if it was me I would take an u21 right back tbh.  Matthews is a very good player but I would rather have the fire power and a solid center half. Ideally we can have all 4.
    Suppose we had better hope someone comes up with a good offer for Phillips then
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    moutuakilla said:
    Are we still forced to have players in our 23 that are not going to feature but have had 1 appearance or was that just under the embargo? Can we now decide who we count as our 23?
    If they are u21, at what ever the cut off date was someone posted but I can't remember, they don't count for the numbers or the wage cap. 
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,652
    With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference 
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    carly burn said:
    What’s the latest with Albie M?

    wouldnt mind betting he’ll be sacrificed as Bows doesn’t appear to rate him.
    U21 though so pointless as a sacrifice. More likely to be Lapslie surely. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,889
    Can’t bowyer drive Forster caskey to the middle of the woods and leave him there, then use the free space for another forward 
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference 
    If we sold him for £10 million we couldn't spend it and it would only free up, at the most, about 2.5k a week wages.  Typical for charlton the first time in our history we have an owner that wants to splash some cash and we can't! 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,712
    Cafc43v3r said:
    moutuakilla said:
    Are we still forced to have players in our 23 that are not going to feature but have had 1 appearance or was that just under the embargo? Can we now decide who we count as our 23?
    If they are u21, at what ever the cut off date was someone posted but I can't remember, they don't count for the numbers or the wage cap. 
    Jan 1st 2020
  • Leeds_Addick
    Leeds_Addick Posts: 4,709
    Cafc43v3r said:
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference 
    If we sold him for £10 million we couldn't spend it and it would only free up, at the most, about 2.5k a week wages.  Typical for charlton the first time in our history we have an owner that wants to splash some cash and we can't! 
    Would be less than £2.5k as well. Would be the league average which I think is about £1.7k
  • Jackosleftboot
    Jackosleftboot Posts: 34
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
  • MattF
    MattF Posts: 3,797
    Jackosleftboot said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
    They're only the perms we want, might be a LB we're looking to bring in on loan (although they'd be competing with Purrington for game time)
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Jackosleftboot said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
    We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 
  • Shrew
    Shrew Posts: 5,750
    edited September 2020
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Jackosleftboot said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
    We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 
    Everyone seems pretty happy with Purrington, While he is ok I would rather see a left back who is more decisive and positive going forwards.
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,832
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Jackosleftboot said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
    We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 
    I do hope Purrington isn’t the left back of choice when the window ends 
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    wmcf123 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Jackosleftboot said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
    We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 
    I do hope Purrington isn’t the left back of choice when the window ends 
    You can't replace the whole team... 

    I would rather have Purrington than the no one that is the current rcb and rb. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • moutuakilla
    moutuakilla Posts: 7,584
    Who currently counts as one of the 23 then?
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,712
    Jackosleftboot said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
    Sell Bonne & free up a wage to be used elsewhere.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,943
    Dazzler21 said:
    https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/charlton-athletic/kader/verein/358

    Only a few under age players.

    That's only 15 over 21s (the cutoff being the age on January 1st) not including Matthews with 22 the limit, so that's 7 more we can bring in, so I don't see the problem
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,334
    Shrew said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Jackosleftboot said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
    We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 
    Everyone seems pretty happy with Purrington, While he is ok I would rather see an left back who is more decisive and positive going forwards.
    I think Doughty should being left back.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,943
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    Seeing that we need at least 1 RB if not 2, puzzled at that logic. If we faff around and end up playing Barker at RB against Sunderland, it won't be pretty

    Similarly we need at least 1 CB in, and already have one loan player there
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,748
    meldrew66 said:
    Please can we have a striker who scores goals? If Judas had been up front on Sunday we would have won 4-2. We need another non-Judas Judas.
    Sadly, we didn't have enough pieces of silver.....
  • Sage
    Sage Posts: 7,281
    killerandflash said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    Seeing that we need at least 1 RB if not 2, puzzled at that logic. If we faff around and end up playing Barker at RB against Sunderland, it won't be pretty

    Similarly we need at least 1 CB in, and already have one loan player there
    Completely agree. Barker has been excellent for us, but we need to bring in someone who can properly play right back otherwise they will target our right side all game and have a lot of joy.

    I am sure we will see a few players coming through the door over the next couple of days. 
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,238
    Redrobo said:
    Shrew said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Jackosleftboot said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
    We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 
    Everyone seems pretty happy with Purrington, While he is ok I would rather see an left back who is more decisive and positive going forwards.
    I think Doughty should being left back.
    If we get Matthews, yes... He isn't a full back, but with him and Matthews wingbacks I think we look good. 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,712
    Cafc43v3r said:
    ShootersHillGuru said:
    With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference 
    If we sold him for £10 million we couldn't spend it and it would only free up, at the most, about 2.5k a week wages.  Typical for charlton the first time in our history we have an owner that wants to splash some cash and we can't! 
    Yeah......thanks Accrington, Burton, Rochdale etc etc for voting for a cap that basically means we can't put a meaningful squad together. 

    W*****s.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,712
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Jackosleftboot said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

    Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

    I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

    They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 
    So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
    We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 
    I really think Oztumer is surplus to requirements. If we are going to be limited on numbers I'd rather bring in a RB & CB & get rid of a midfielder or 2.

Categories

“Marketplace”