Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
I don’t believe the league have had the paperwork quite as long as some assume. On that basis I’m expecting a further hiatus, but I wouldn’t ready anything into it.2
-
I think you will find it will be a face to face meeting, not over a telephone or Skype.StigThundercock said:
Australia obviously remains a cultural backwater but even there they do have telephones and even the interwebamujig, communicating with Mr Muir and/or his cohort didn't ought to seriously challenge even such a bunch of dullards as the Football League.eaststandmike said:If the Sunderland sale is anything to go by It looks like the EFL like to speak to the new owners so lets hope the Aussies did this before they flew back home. If not and he is not coming back for two weeks expect no news until the middle of June.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/441533450 -
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere2 -
Simple solution - Leave her at home - you’ll have a much better time as well.cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere14 -
@MrLargo will account for that...ricky_otto said:
Simple solution - Leave her at home - you’ll have a much better time as well.cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere9 -
Yeah either leave her at home or just give her your credit card and Wu Tang Clan's back catologue - should keep her entertained for days.ForeverAddickted said:
@MrLargo will account for that...ricky_otto said:
Simple solution - Leave her at home - you’ll have a much better time as well.cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere4 -
Be careful mate.nth london addick said:LargeAddick said:
so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.nth london addick said:I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear
Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom
And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money
Thing is large what have I posted that’s been incorrectLargeAddick said:
so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.nth london addick said:I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear
Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom
And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money
Look back through everything I put was proven to be true
Imminent I said it wasn’t and was right
Done deal I disagreed And was right
Fee agreed I said it wasn’t up until you asked 10 days ago
Aussie not having the funds and James Seed contact said it was still waiting investors to sign off
Not trusting RD is based on his in ability to run the club properly
Not trusting RM is based on the lies he has told to so many over so long
Now if the people who have been telling me bits and pieces had got any of the above wrong I wouldn’t have been quick to share however right now tell me what bits above have been proved wrong contrary to the popular believe that I was wrong each time I posted it
That’s more or less what Colin is saying to his dissenters.0 -
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere0 -
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere1 -
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere2 - Sponsored links:
-
.0
-
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!7 -
Maybe the Aussies being so brazen, turning up at the matches on mass wearing scarfs etc is part of a ploy to show the EFL box tickers that they exist and are keen to purchase as part of the fit and proper test. Makes sense to show your face and added fan commitment. Maybe we begin to understand why they did that, as those images surely will be available to view for this purpose. Add some gravitas0
-
Good point. Blinkin' @AFKABartram makes all the money, and then takes away my promotes!Scoham said:"Cashing in" I'd like to know how you're making money from posting on here and your blog...
2 -
James Seed
Would you please post the link for donations again. Thanks .0 -
https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/jimmyduttoncafcStarinnaddick said:James Seed
Would you please post the link for donations again. Thanks .
I think 'Team Charlton' has raised quite a big total between us. I'm sure @Tracey Leaburn will fill us in when the total is know.0 -
There are a lot of undesirables that post on that site....@ElfsborgAddick for one - I rest my case.JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!2 -
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.
7 -
Careful, words like that’ll make you look like a berk*nth london addick said:LargeAddick said:
so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.nth london addick said:I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear
Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom
And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money
Thing is large what have I posted that’s been incorrectLargeAddick said:
so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.nth london addick said:I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear
Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom
And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money
Look back through everything I put was proven to be true
Imminent I said it wasn’t and was right
Done deal I disagreed And was right
Fee agreed I said it wasn’t up until you asked 10 days ago
Aussie not having the funds and James Seed contact said it was still waiting investors to sign off
Not trusting RD is based on his in ability to run the club properly
Not trusting RM is based on the lies he has told to so many over so long
Now if the people who have been telling me bits and pieces had got any of the above wrong I wouldn’t have been quick to share however right now tell me what bits above have been proved wrong contrary to the popular believe that I was wrong each time I posted it
*although granted you don’t contradict yourself with every 3rd post and you have provided info that wasn’t widely available elsewhere
2 -
Have I missed something? RD has confirmed that takeover is not with EFL. He would have a input, if only to confirm the ID of bidder(s). Others have said one price regardless of promotion. Why? Given language differences and dealing with a semi-senile old git, does agreeing the price mean OK we agree to pay £40m or whatever, or does it mean OK we want to buy the club and know you want £40m but we aren't prepared to input that level of funding. Any sensible buyer would pay more for a CCC side than L1. A deluded seller may have one price.0
- Sponsored links:
-
Can't believe you didn't use floundering instead of flouncing. Someone clearly hasn't read 4 pages of fish puns.dickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.14 -
Have you ever seen @nth london addick and Colin in the same room together... HmmnSoundAsa£ said:
Be careful mate.nth london addick said:LargeAddick said:
so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.nth london addick said:I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear
Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom
And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money
Thing is large what have I posted that’s been incorrectLargeAddick said:
so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.nth london addick said:I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear
Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom
And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money
Look back through everything I put was proven to be true
Imminent I said it wasn’t and was right
Done deal I disagreed And was right
Fee agreed I said it wasn’t up until you asked 10 days ago
Aussie not having the funds and James Seed contact said it was still waiting investors to sign off
Not trusting RD is based on his in ability to run the club properly
Not trusting RM is based on the lies he has told to so many over so long
Now if the people who have been telling me bits and pieces had got any of the above wrong I wouldn’t have been quick to share however right now tell me what bits above have been proved wrong contrary to the popular believe that I was wrong each time I posted it
That’s more or less what Colin is saying to his dissenters.3 -
You don't get it do you. I find it actually quite funny, and a bit sad. I was shocked at first because your mate Nick Gary (banned from here, and even ITTV) clearly has a screw loose, and needs help. But each to their own if you enjoy that sort of thing.dickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.
I did argue my point. I heard about the '60 year old lifelong Millwall fan thing' and explained how I was a fan between the ages of 7 and 10, but old loony tunes wasn't interested. Never let the facts spoil a good story eh. He's a keyboard warrior who even claimed to have spoken to me, when he hasn't.
And I'm guessing you were the one who didn't get the fish pun?
I hope I'm not 'pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up my own arse.' If I am I'm truly sorry. Nobody's perfect.17 -
Ohdickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.
Someone's tired.
Mr Seed isn't in the 'clique' is he???????????4 -
Is this guy for real?dickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.
... If so how do I become Charlton Life royalty?6 -
Well I like you.JamesSeed said:
You don't get it do you. I find it actually quite funny, and a bit sad. I was shocked at first because your mate Nick Gary (banned from here, and even ITTV) clearly has a screw loose, and needs help. But each to their own if you enjoy that sort of thing.dickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.
I did argue my point. I heard about the '60 year old lifelong Millwall fan thing' and explained how I was a fan between the ages of 7 and 10, but old loony tunes wasn't interested. Never let the facts spoil a good story eh. He's a keyboard warrior who even claimed to have spoken to me, when he hasn't.
And I'm guessing you were the one who didn't get the fish pun?
I hope I'm not 'pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up my own arse.' If I am I'm truly sorry. Nobody's perfect.11 -
That was a bit unnecessary, mate.dickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.21 -
Actually I didn't know there's a top table of 'CL royalty'.KBslittlesis said:
Ohdickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.
Someone's tired.
Mr Seed isn't in the 'clique' is he???????????
You are CL Royalty.The Red Robin said:
Is this guy for real?dickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.
... If so how do I become Charlton Life royalty?
Can someone start a CL Royalty thread, and we can have nominations?
I nominate @Henry Irving because according to Not606 (was it @dickplumb or his mate?) I'm obsessed with him and want to have his babies.5 -
I like you too, now that I've got to know you! xGreenie said:
Well I like you.JamesSeed said:
You don't get it do you. I find it actually quite funny, and a bit sad. I was shocked at first because your mate Nick Gary (banned from here, and even ITTV) clearly has a screw loose, and needs help. But each to their own if you enjoy that sort of thing.dickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.
I did argue my point. I heard about the '60 year old lifelong Millwall fan thing' and explained how I was a fan between the ages of 7 and 10, but old loony tunes wasn't interested. Never let the facts spoil a good story eh. He's a keyboard warrior who even claimed to have spoken to me, when he hasn't.
And I'm guessing you were the one who didn't get the fish pun?
I hope I'm not 'pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up my own arse.' If I am I'm truly sorry. Nobody's perfect.2 -
Don't feed the troll @JamesSeed the smallest mention or response is like food to a starving man in their mind.JamesSeed said:
Actually I didn't know there's a top table of 'CL royalty'.KBslittlesis said:
Ohdickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.
Someone's tired.
Mr Seed isn't in the 'clique' is he???????????
You are CL Royalty.The Red Robin said:
Is this guy for real?dickplumb said:
Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?JamesSeed said:
I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.ricky_otto said:
This is not the time or plaice for it.Howells said:
Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.JamesSeed said:
What takeover? Have I missed something?!cantersaddick said:
Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.Henry Irving said:
Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.bobmunro said:
Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.micks1950 said:The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":
That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).
So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
@micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.
Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
Rant over.
... If so how do I become Charlton Life royalty?
Can someone start a CL Royalty thread, and we can have nominations?
I nominate @Henry Irving because according to Not606 (was it @dickplumb or his mate?) I'm obsessed with him and want to have his babies.3
This discussion has been closed.
