Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

18198208228248252265

Comments

  • bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
  • bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    Simple solution - Leave her at home - you’ll have a much better time as well.
    @MrLargo will account for that...
    Yeah either leave her at home or just give her your credit card and Wu Tang Clan's back catologue - should keep her entertained for days.
  • I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear

    Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom

    And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money

    so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.

    I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear

    Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom

    And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money

    so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.

    Thing is large what have I posted that’s been incorrect

    Look back through everything I put was proven to be true

    Imminent I said it wasn’t and was right
    Done deal I disagreed And was right
    Fee agreed I said it wasn’t up until you asked 10 days ago
    Aussie not having the funds and James Seed contact said it was still waiting investors to sign off

    Not trusting RD is based on his in ability to run the club properly

    Not trusting RM is based on the lies he has told to so many over so long

    Now if the people who have been telling me bits and pieces had got any of the above wrong I wouldn’t have been quick to share however right now tell me what bits above have been proved wrong contrary to the popular believe that I was wrong each time I posted it
    Be careful mate.
    That’s more or less what Colin is saying to his dissenters.
  • bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    What takeover? Have I missed something?!
  • JamesSeed said:

    bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    What takeover? Have I missed something?!
    Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.
  • Howells said:

    JamesSeed said:

    bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    What takeover? Have I missed something?!
    Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.
    This is not the time or plaice for it.
  • edited May 2018
    .
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited May 2018
    Maybe the Aussies being so brazen, turning up at the matches on mass wearing scarfs etc is part of a ploy to show the EFL box tickers that they exist and are keen to purchase as part of the fit and proper test. Makes sense to show your face and added fan commitment. Maybe we begin to understand why they did that, as those images surely will be available to view for this purpose. Add some gravitas
  • Scoham said:

    "Cashing in" I'd like to know how you're making money from posting on here and your blog...

    Good point. Blinkin' @AFKABartram makes all the money, and then takes away my promotes!
  • James Seed
    Would you please post the link for donations again. Thanks .
  • James Seed
    Would you please post the link for donations again. Thanks .

    https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/jimmyduttoncafc

    I think 'Team Charlton' has raised quite a big total between us. I'm sure @Tracey Leaburn will fill us in when the total is know.
  • JamesSeed said:

    Howells said:

    JamesSeed said:

    bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    What takeover? Have I missed something?!
    Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.
    This is not the time or plaice for it.
    I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.

    They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
    There are a lot of undesirables that post on that site....@ElfsborgAddick for one - I rest my case.
  • I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear

    Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom

    And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money

    so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.

    I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear

    Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom

    And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money

    so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.

    Thing is large what have I posted that’s been incorrect

    Look back through everything I put was proven to be true

    Imminent I said it wasn’t and was right
    Done deal I disagreed And was right
    Fee agreed I said it wasn’t up until you asked 10 days ago
    Aussie not having the funds and James Seed contact said it was still waiting investors to sign off

    Not trusting RD is based on his in ability to run the club properly

    Not trusting RM is based on the lies he has told to so many over so long

    Now if the people who have been telling me bits and pieces had got any of the above wrong I wouldn’t have been quick to share however right now tell me what bits above have been proved wrong contrary to the popular believe that I was wrong each time I posted it
    Careful, words like that’ll make you look like a berk*


    *although granted you don’t contradict yourself with every 3rd post and you have provided info that wasn’t widely available elsewhere :wink:
  • edited May 2018
    Have I missed something? RD has confirmed that takeover is not with EFL. He would have a input, if only to confirm the ID of bidder(s). Others have said one price regardless of promotion. Why? Given language differences and dealing with a semi-senile old git, does agreeing the price mean OK we agree to pay £40m or whatever, or does it mean OK we want to buy the club and know you want £40m but we aren't prepared to input that level of funding. Any sensible buyer would pay more for a CCC side than L1. A deluded seller may have one price.
  • I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear

    Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom

    And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money

    so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.

    I dont trust RD as much as I don’t rust Richard Murray it does strike me as confusing though that a few months ago there was demands of one liar to talk and now another one is talking there is a ground swell not to hear

    Right now I think it’s fair to say all parties are not being totally truthful with what is being said and to whom

    And @Davidsmith has said about this having a bit longer to play out is going to be bang on the money

    so you don't trust RD and he's not being truthful yet you have been using him as your source for months, without revealing so, and in doing so have been posting stuff as if it's fact which you are now saying it hasn't been. I don't think anyone is listening now.

    Thing is large what have I posted that’s been incorrect

    Look back through everything I put was proven to be true

    Imminent I said it wasn’t and was right
    Done deal I disagreed And was right
    Fee agreed I said it wasn’t up until you asked 10 days ago
    Aussie not having the funds and James Seed contact said it was still waiting investors to sign off

    Not trusting RD is based on his in ability to run the club properly

    Not trusting RM is based on the lies he has told to so many over so long

    Now if the people who have been telling me bits and pieces had got any of the above wrong I wouldn’t have been quick to share however right now tell me what bits above have been proved wrong contrary to the popular believe that I was wrong each time I posted it
    Be careful mate.
    That’s more or less what Colin is saying to his dissenters.
    Have you ever seen @nth london addick and Colin in the same room together... Hmmn
  • Sponsored links:


  • dickplumb said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Howells said:

    JamesSeed said:

    bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    What takeover? Have I missed something?!
    Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.
    This is not the time or plaice for it.
    I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.

    They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
    Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?
    Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
    Rant over.

    Oh
    Someone's tired.

    Mr Seed isn't in the 'clique' is he???????????
  • Greenie said:

    JamesSeed said:

    dickplumb said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Howells said:

    JamesSeed said:

    bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    What takeover? Have I missed something?!
    Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.
    This is not the time or plaice for it.
    I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.

    They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
    Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?
    Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
    Rant over.

    You don't get it do you. I find it actually quite funny, and a bit sad. I was shocked at first because your mate Nick Gary (banned from here, and even ITTV) clearly has a screw loose, and needs help. But each to their own if you enjoy that sort of thing.
    I did argue my point. I heard about the '60 year old lifelong Millwall fan thing' and explained how I was a fan between the ages of 7 and 10, but old loony tunes wasn't interested. Never let the facts spoil a good story eh. He's a keyboard warrior who even claimed to have spoken to me, when he hasn't.
    And I'm guessing you were the one who didn't get the fish pun?

    I hope I'm not 'pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up my own arse.' If I am I'm truly sorry. Nobody's perfect.
    Well I like you.
    I like you too, now that I've got to know you! x
  • JamesSeed said:

    dickplumb said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Howells said:

    JamesSeed said:

    bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    What takeover? Have I missed something?!
    Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.
    This is not the time or plaice for it.
    I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.

    They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
    Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?
    Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
    Rant over.

    Oh
    Someone's tired.

    Mr Seed isn't in the 'clique' is he???????????
    Actually I didn't know there's a top table of 'CL royalty'.

    dickplumb said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Howells said:

    JamesSeed said:

    bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    What takeover? Have I missed something?!
    Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.
    This is not the time or plaice for it.
    I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.

    They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
    Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?
    Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
    Rant over.

    Is this guy for real?

    ... If so how do I become Charlton Life royalty?
    You are CL Royalty.

    Can someone start a CL Royalty thread, and we can have nominations?

    I nominate @Henry Irving because according to Not606 (was it @dickplumb or his mate?) I'm obsessed with him and want to have his babies.
    Don't feed the troll @JamesSeed the smallest mention or response is like food to a starving man in their mind.
  • I blame it all on Harry Windsor and Meghan Markle.

  • JamesSeed said:

    dickplumb said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Howells said:

    JamesSeed said:

    bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    What takeover? Have I missed something?!
    Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.
    This is not the time or plaice for it.
    I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.

    They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
    Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?
    Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
    Rant over.

    Oh
    Someone's tired.

    Mr Seed isn't in the 'clique' is he???????????
    Actually I didn't know there's a top table of 'CL royalty'.

    dickplumb said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Howells said:

    JamesSeed said:

    bobmunro said:

    micks1950 said:

    The link below is to the tweets from Richard Cawley on May 21st that Sunderland's sale had just been approved by the EFL and Muir's consortium was next in line. He also confirmed that there is "Only one panel that sits on 'fit and proper' test":



    That was only 6 working days ago (plus as we know, due to the 'spivs' opaque ownership structure and Duchatelet's failure to do 'due diligence', consideration of Charlton's takeover might be more complicated).

    So shouldn't we all relax a bit?
    Surely the EFL wouldn't be interested in the convoluted structure - that's an issue for the buyer. It should merely be whether or not the prospective 'person(s) with significant control' are fit and proper.

    Especially, as far as we know, the ownership is no longer convoluted.

    @micks1950 makes an excellent point. Six working days only.

    Meanwhile Muir has gone to Oz for two weeks so pencil in week commencing 11 June for his return and the official news on the official site. I hope the story is written by @Ollywozere
    Ffs. I go on holiday on the 12th and the missus will get the right hump f I spend the whole time on Charlton life reading about the takeover.
    What takeover? Have I missed something?!
    Wish people would stop going on about it and get back to fish puns.
    This is not the time or plaice for it.
    I got abuse on Not606 because they thought I couldn't spell 'place', when I used that one. lol.

    They copied and pasted all my aussie stuff onto their site (are they allowed to do that?), and gave me a torrent of abuse, for reasons I don't fully understand. Someone there thinks I made it all up as clickbait. Bloody good idea for the next occasion. Must get some ads on my blog!
    Poor you. A torrent of abuse? Slightly overstated. I think the reason is that some people find you pompous, self important, condescending and basically Up your own arse. Sorry for that TORRENT of abuse, just my observation. You are trying really hard to sit at the top table of the CL Royalty aren't you?
    Why didn't you stay on NOT606 and argue your point? What were you doing on there anyway? If you have a problem with posters on NOT606 have it out with them, rather than flouncing back on here and moaning about it.
    Rant over.

    Is this guy for real?

    ... If so how do I become Charlton Life royalty?
    You are CL Royalty.

    Can someone start a CL Royalty thread, and we can have nominations?

    I nominate @Henry Irving because according to Not606 (was it @dickplumb or his mate?) I'm obsessed with him and want to have his babies.
    Don't feed the troll @JamesSeed the smallest mention or response is like food to a starving man in their mind.
    So much to learn, so little time.

    I *think* that's a quote from a Peter Sellers LP, but I'm not sure.

    I much prefer @seth plum
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!