Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

January 2024 Transfer Rumours (D/day starts pg.263)

1123124126128129296

Comments

  • £10k a week is what he / his agent wants. We have probably offered nearer £6k.

    Which is fair enough.
    Didn't Scott say that wage offers were 'insentivised' as in performance bonus related. I wonder if. A player with a significant injuries history has clauses in the contract around availability to play. 
  • edited January 2024
    Stop pressurising the board : - )
    Is that a rumour...🙄
  • But you are blaming the fans for the owners giving into that pressure when all the power and decision making is in the hands of the club.  A minority, and it is a minority, of the fans moaning on forums is just noise or at least it should be.

    It is a pathetic excuse.

    The Will Grigg signing is a very good example.  There were no Sunderland fans in that room making Methven pay £5m for him, that was his decision. 
    Have you not watched the Netflix documentary? It was the Sunderland owner at the time who forced that move. Not Charlie
  • DiscoCAFC said:
    Have you not watched the Netflix documentary? It was the Sunderland owner at the time who forced that move. Not Charlie
    You are correct - it was Donald who paid way over the odds for Grigg - in the scene even his head of recruitment is telling him not to do it, but he goes ahead regardless - Grigg’s subsequent record at Sunderland was utterly woeful 
  • Either way let's just hope they have more targets than one (admittedly) very good player. It wasn't hard to identify Alfie May and it certainly isn't hard to identify one of the best players this league has seen in recent history in JCH.

    It seems we have the money, prove it, earn your salaries and identify other players who would do well in this team from this league and below.

    If they're feeling pressured good, they should be. 1 win in 10 league games is completely unacceptable for us, especially at this poxy level. They should be spending money, how else will they convince people to keep turning up to watch such a meek side lead by a man hardly any of us fans resonate with? 
    Agree with this. We haven't seen much to see scouting has improved. I know that takes time but we don't have time, this season is basically a write off but we need to be strong contenders next season. Build a good spine now, I don't want to have a summer where the core of the squad aren't together for most of preseason
  • Sponsored links:


  • Call me naive on how recruitment should work with currently contracted players…

    I think the first step is to identify what style of player we are currently missing that fits the systems(s) the manager wants to play, or what cover weaknesses we have.

    You then identify a list of targets for each of those.

    You then work through what is feasible, likely and within budget. 

    You then find out whether the players demands are likely to be alligned to what you’re willing to pay.

    You then proceed and speak to the club.

    in other words, you don’t dick around, waste time and effort chasing targets when it comes down to the crunch, aren’t prepared to sign for what you are willing to pay. 

    If (and big if) we don’t get Clarke Harris due to wage demands, then we’ve completely and unnecessarily wasted the last fortnight. 
    Or if JCH has indicated previously that said figure would work and now is being advised that there is potentially more to extracted from what is likely to be his last big money contract.  He may now move the goalposts from his original indication that a deal could be struck.
  • Call me naive on how recruitment should work with currently contracted players…

    I think the first step is to identify what style of player we are currently missing that fits the systems(s) the manager wants to play, or what cover weaknesses we have.

    You then identify a list of targets for each of those.

    You then work through what is feasible, likely and within budget. 

    You then find out whether the players demands are likely to be alligned to what you’re willing to pay.

    You then proceed and speak to the club.

    in other words, you don’t dick around, waste time and effort chasing targets when it comes down to the crunch, aren’t prepared to sign for what you are willing to pay. 

    If (and big if) we don’t get Clarke Harris due to wage demands, then we’ve completely and unnecessarily wasted the last fortnight. 
    Trouble with the above is we change managers every 8 months, I know a lot of them have been underwhelming but surely it's better to give them a bit more time. 
  • 50/50 on this. What if our plan b has 18 months left on his contract, will we be in a better negotiating position in the summer rather than now?

    if the vision long term is to rebuild the squad with permanent signings that are right for the club then I'm happy with loans to see us through this season, although this isn't my preferred option and of course, the basis that they are good loans that improve is, not tedic and the Irish dude.

    if the vision is loans and hope we strike gold is the plan, then the owners deserve the criticism heading their way.
    Depends on the position and how urgent the need is in within the team.

    IMO we need to get a decent, experienced, physical striker through the door this window, in order to help us see out the season.

    When we dont have that type of player in the line-up we are so much worse as a team. No way we can go rest of season with just Aneke/Kanu expected to play that role.

    For other positions, I think we can be more patient given this is pretty much a dead season now.
  • You are correct - it was Donald who paid way over the odds for Grigg - in the scene even his head of recruitment is telling him not to do it, but he goes ahead regardless - Grigg’s subsequent record at Sunderland was utterly woeful 
    I thought it was a decent signing at the time but didn’t work out in the end. They did pay way over the odds but I Donald was pressured into signing a Striker.
  • Sponsored links:


  • DiscoCAFC said:
    I thought it was a decent signing at the time but didn’t work out in the end. They did pay way over the odds but I Donald was pressured into signing a Striker.
    Do you believe all that Charlie tells you?
  • robroy said:
    So Charlie boy is your contact? Not sure if you have confirmed in the past. 
    What contact!
  • Call me naive on how recruitment should work with currently contracted players…

    I think the first step is to identify what style of player we are currently missing that fits the systems(s) the manager wants to play, or what cover weaknesses we have.

    You then identify a list of targets for each of those.

    You then work through what is feasible, likely and within budget. 

    You then find out whether the players demands are likely to be alligned to what you’re willing to pay.

    You then proceed and speak to the club.

    in other words, you don’t dick around, waste time and effort chasing targets when it comes down to the crunch, aren’t prepared to sign for what you are willing to pay. 

    If (and big if) we don’t get Clarke Harris due to wage demands, then we’ve completely and unnecessarily wasted the last fortnight. 

    And you don't do all those things in the glare of publicity ( leaks an all)Go about the business quietly and announce the deal when done unless of courses you are conducting a deliberate nurgatory exercise to appease people. Fwiw the JCH won't happen in my view..and I am not sure if I want it to 
  • Call me naive on how recruitment should work with currently contracted players…

    I think the first step is to identify what style of player we are currently missing that fits the systems(s) the manager wants to play, or what cover weaknesses we have.

    You then identify a list of targets for each of those.

    You then work through what is feasible, likely and within budget. 

    You then find out whether the players demands are likely to be alligned to what you’re willing to pay.

    You then proceed and speak to the club.

    in other words, you don’t dick around, waste time and effort chasing targets when it comes down to the crunch, aren’t prepared to sign for what you are willing to pay. 

    If (and big if) we don’t get Clarke Harris due to wage demands, then we’ve completely and unnecessarily wasted the last fortnight. 
    I think that’s largely true but you can’t legislate for a player / agent who keeps moving what he’ll expect in terms of money. If rumours are to be believed it’s his agent that’s pushing for more than what might have been discussed. I’d guess that unless Clarke -Harris has decided his best option is to see out his contract then what we’re seeing is a stalling tactic to see if either they can squeeze more out of the deal or to see if they can attract other interest. We should actively pursue others and and sign them if that’s the way it pans out but leave the JCH offer on the table until we sign someone.
  • I hope we've got active targets in the background that are maybe being kept quiet. I just don't see the JCH deal working out if his agent is playing games and is wanting unrealistic terms. I don't want to be left with another Tedic situation. Would be interesting if we went back for Kion Etete at Cardiff. 

    Same with Coventry if he looks like going to Sheffield Wednesday, hopefully Docherty or Bate are advanced talks.... 

    Not convinced we'll end up signing Gillesphey either but I like the idea yesterday of going after Jonathan Panzo , even if it would need some loan juggling to work out I would expect. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!