Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Michael Appleton - Sacked 23/1/2024 (p105)

13334363839125

Comments

  • edited September 2023
    The issue is we're not as good a team as we, (the fanbase overall) think.

    The owners see thousands of fans go to Man Utd in the cup and don't understand if we have rubbish results, recruit poorly and don't look like making the play offs the attendances will rapidly decline and their business plan will be £Millions off.

    We have a very impressive line up of potentially good young players but I doubt, if two years on, if the club has sold many of them and we are not anywhere near promotion, will the investors be happy their £12m investment has sold a lot of the family silver and stood still, if not regressed.

    CM had to sell a dream to get the investors on board.  With luck it could work.  I'm not sure we look like getting lucky at the moment.

    Maybe Leaburn becomes a major force and him and May get 40 goals between them.



  • edited September 2023
    The number of players used by us per season offers an insight of the instability on the playing side that has plagued us for years, never mind the owners who come and go and the fact that we don't own the ground. Never recovered from Roland offering short term contracts and new owners longer ones to the wrong players. As @supaclive says, we've regressed whilst others have passed us by.

    Edit. We've managed to succeed under some crap owners before now, so there is hope.
  • supaclive said:
    The issue is we're not as good a team as we, (the fanbase overall) think.

    The owners see thousands of fans go to Man Utd in the cup and don't understand if we have rubbish results, recruit poorly and don't look like making the play offs the attendances will rapidly decline and their business plan will be £Millions off.

    We have a very impressive line up of potentially good young players but I doubt, if two years on, if the club has sold many of them and we are not anywhere near promotion, will the investors be happy their £12m investment has sold a lot of the family silver and stood still, if not regressed.

    CM had to sell a dream to get the investors on board.  With luck it could work.  I'm not sure we look like getting lucky at the moment.

    Maybe Leaburn becomes a major force and him and May get 40 goals between them.



    I really hope Appleton and this team prove you wrong like I think they can, You don’t give it a rest.
  • As long as Appleton starts May and Leaburn together in a 2 then I don’t really care how the rest of the team lines up.

    This is the key point for me. Got to be building around that strike partnership. 
  • As long as Appleton starts May and Leaburn together in a 2 then I don’t really care how the rest of the team lines up.
    When everyone is fit, whichever system we play we will have to leave out at least one of CBT, Chem Campbell, Fraser, Camara, Leaburn and May as you can’t fit them all in. 

    History tells us Appleton plays a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 so it is probably going to be May or Leaburn that misses out. Hopefully he doesn’t do this as I do agree we should be starting those 2 up front as much as possible whether it’s 4-4-2, diamond or 3-5-2 

    I still think a diamond works best when everyone is fit. CBT misses out but I think he is good as an an impact player anyway
  • Solidgone said:
    Roland has us by the short and curlies. 
    Why .. we have excellent agreement on the rent and we have 13 more years left … so no panic ti waste 50 mill now 
  • NabySarr said:
    As long as Appleton starts May and Leaburn together in a 2 then I don’t really care how the rest of the team lines up.
    When everyone is fit, whichever system we play we will have to leave out at least one of CBT, Chem Campbell, Fraser, Camara, Leaburn and May as you can’t fit them all in. 

    History tells us Appleton plays a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 so it is probably going to be May or Leaburn that misses out. Hopefully he doesn’t do this as I do agree we should be starting those 2 up front as much as possible whether it’s 4-4-2, diamond or 3-5-2 

    I still think a diamond works best when everyone is fit. CBT misses out but I think he is good as an an impact player anyway

    Would be more than happy with a diamond of Dobbo, Camara , Fraser and Chem Campbell when all fit. CBT off the bench at tiring legs would work for me. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • JamesSeed said:
    We sometimes feel like a doomed club;

    Great stadium that we don’t own, that we perhaps can’t afford, and certainly can’t fill right now. 
    A succession of owners with a succession of plans for the club that don’t seem to add up. 
    Serious potential owners put off by the financial black hole, and the separation of the club from the freeholds. 
    A fan base that has run out a patience with League One status, the owners, the management (soon probably), and to some extent the players.
    Our nearby rivals are flying, while we are struggling. 

    BUT:
    We have DLM; Dobbo, Leaburn & May. 
    We have various promising young players breaking through, and more potential in the academy. 
    Our new manager might improve things, who knows.
    We have a more successful history than our nearby rivals. History doesn’t win matches, but it at least winds them up.
    We have fans that set up parties and win elections to protect the club’s future. 
    And we have a game on Saturday where our allocation has sold out.
    Is there a glimmer of hope?
    New owners have already said they intend to speak to RD about the valley and TG .. there’s no panic over it at the moment there intentions is to purchase both 
    For how much?
  • supaclive said:
    May and Leaburn are two of our best players.  Leaving either out when both fit would be a mistake.
    Expecting 3-5-2/5-3-2 or the much maligned 4-4-2. 
  • Dazzler21 said:
    supaclive said:
    May and Leaburn are two of our best players.  Leaving either out when both fit would be a mistake.
    Expecting 3-5-2/5-3-2 or the much maligned 4-4-2. 
    We might even see a variation of 4-3-3. 
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    supaclive said:
    May and Leaburn are two of our best players.  Leaving either out when both fit would be a mistake.
    Expecting 3-5-2/5-3-2 or the much maligned 4-4-2. 
    We might even see a variation of 4-3-3. 
    I could see a bit of a hybrid 4-4-2/4-3-3 with Leaburn playing as a ST/RW and then someone like Campbell, Camara or Anderson playing CM/RM so it’s a bit of both. If Tenai Watson is good going forward this will help as he can also give us some threat down the right while Leaburn is moving more central 
  • edited September 2023
    Anyway - Haven't been on here too much lately - but this proved to be as reliable as Ketts @Richard J You certainly proved that @AFKABartram
    for Lolling you. 


  • Dazzler21 said:
    Anyway - Haven't been on here too much lately - but this proved to be as reliable as Ketts @Richard J You certainly proved that @AFKABartram
    for Lolling you. 



    I am honoured.
  • Can assure that LOL would have been a fat finger. Richard J is my new man on the ground (hope you’re well mate) 
  • So how did Coventry return to the Championship and nearly the Premiership after the off field problems they have had.
    From League 2 to a Wembley play off.
    Can't just be down to Mark Robins 🤔

    And Luton obviously but I believe they did it differently from Coventry and they have gone from the Conference to the Premier(for 1 season only)
    Always an exception to a rule.
  • JamesSeed said:
    We sometimes feel like a doomed club;

    Great stadium that we don’t own, that we perhaps can’t afford, and certainly can’t fill right now. 
    A succession of owners with a succession of plans for the club that don’t seem to add up. 
    Serious potential owners put off by the financial black hole, and the separation of the club from the freeholds. 
    A fan base that has run out a patience with League One status, the owners, the management (soon probably), and to some extent the players.
    Our nearby rivals are flying, while we are struggling. 

    BUT:
    We have DLM; Dobbo, Leaburn & May. 
    We have various promising young players breaking through, and more potential in the academy. 
    Our new manager might improve things, who knows.
    We have a more successful history than our nearby rivals. History doesn’t win matches, but it at least winds them up.
    We have fans that set up parties and win elections to protect the club’s future. 
    And we have a game on Saturday where our allocation has sold out.
    Is there a glimmer of hope?
    New owners have already said they intend to speak to RD about the valley and TG .. there’s no panic over it at the moment there intentions is to purchase both 
    Why can’t I Lol this more than once?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Slightly off topic, but I saw the group of American investers are looking to buy Everton, with a £430m debt. WTF is going on in club ownership. And still they are perennial relegation contenders. They might be Prem league, but the owner losses just get bigger the higher up the ladder you go. 
  • Slightly off topic, but I saw the group of American investers are looking to buy Everton, with a £430m debt. WTF is going on in club ownership. And still they are perennial relegation contenders. They might be Prem league, but the owner losses just get bigger the higher up the ladder you go. 
    And this is why we need to let go of finding the dream owners! We are not in as much shit as some of the teams higher up than us are, regardless of their rank.
  • cafc_se7 said:
    Slightly off topic, but I saw the group of American investers are looking to buy Everton, with a £430m debt. WTF is going on in club ownership. And still they are perennial relegation contenders. They might be Prem league, but the owner losses just get bigger the higher up the ladder you go. 
    And this is why we need to let go of finding the dream owners! We are not in as much shit as some of the teams higher up than us are, regardless of their rank.
    We are still in a lot of the brown stuff.

    To think we were classed as a model club not too long ago.
  • Slightly off topic, but I saw the group of American investers are looking to buy Everton, with a £430m debt. WTF is going on in club ownership. And still they are perennial relegation contenders. They might be Prem league, but the owner losses just get bigger the higher up the ladder you go. 

    I believe people did mention on here this 777 group that want Everton did look at buying us maybe 18 months ago and were put off by TS. 
  • Can assure that LOL would have been a fat finger. Richard J is my new man on the ground (hope you’re well mate) 
    All good.

    The reason I named my source was that it was so unlikely and random. It probably was worth a LOL.
  • LoOkOuT said:
    I think the latest episode of his Where's the money gone? podcast, published yesterday, shows that Charlie thinks he's cracked it by planning on the financial restructuring brought about by impending regulatory reform, including Premier League payments to EFL clubs plugging a lot of the gaps. Even in League One, provided you play the game.

    That involves new rules that will bestow a competitive advantage on clubs that bring academy players through (hence the amount of academy players in our squad), allowing more budget (albeit a smaller budget) to be spent on fewer players. One would assume, key players.

    Essentially, that all, he seems to be suggesting, protects our investors from the financial risks that plagued all our owners to date (bar the fake sheik and the hair plugs guy, or were just there for the free bitches and bread). 

    A sensible gamble? He doesn't say it, but with more showcasing of competent academy graduates in the squad (ie the proverbial shop window), it's likely that any issues to the plan will be further offset by player sales... thus it always was for a club like ours. Another insurance policy, at least as long as the conveyor belt keeps turning. The investors seem to think they've sussed it without having to spunk huge sums (in fact, Charlie says the rules won't let them).


    Yes, I gathered that’s what he thinks but it’s just a hypothesis and I still think he hasn’t a clue about the club. He just thinks it’s a set of numbers.
     Not entirely sure about that. Yes he's a bit of a flannel but he has been around English football for a while. No idea if it's true but wasn't he part of the supporters trust at Oxford? He must have slightly more than a fleeting interest of what we are about surely?
    I'm going to avoid painting him as a city boy that knows nothing about football but decided to get into it a few months ago as I think thst would be wide if the mark.
  • MarcusH26 said:
    Slightly off topic, but I saw the group of American investers are looking to buy Everton, with a £430m debt. WTF is going on in club ownership. And still they are perennial relegation contenders. They might be Prem league, but the owner losses just get bigger the higher up the ladder you go. 

    I believe people did mention on here this 777 group that want Everton did look at buying us maybe 18 months ago and were put off by TS. 
    Yes, that is what I was told although he might have, inadvertently, done us a favour as a lot of evidence that 777 are dodgy as ****

    Oh absolutely, the stories I've read about their background is very very dodgy sounding. 
  • edited September 2023
    LoOkOuT said:
    I think the latest episode of his Where's the money gone? podcast, published yesterday, shows that Charlie thinks he's cracked it by planning on the financial restructuring brought about by impending regulatory reform, including Premier League payments to EFL clubs plugging a lot of the gaps. Even in League One, provided you play the game.

    That involves new rules that will bestow a competitive advantage on clubs that bring academy players through (hence the amount of academy players in our squad), allowing more budget (albeit a smaller budget) to be spent on fewer players. One would assume, key players.

    Essentially, that all, he seems to be suggesting, protects our investors from the financial risks that plagued all our owners to date (bar the fake sheik and the hair plugs guy, or were just there for the free bitches and bread). 

    A sensible gamble? He doesn't say it, but with more showcasing of competent academy graduates in the squad (ie the proverbial shop window), it's likely that any issues to the plan will be further offset by player sales... thus it always was for a club like ours. Another insurance policy, at least as long as the conveyor belt keeps turning. The investors seem to think they've sussed it without having to spunk huge sums (in fact, Charlie says the rules won't let them).


    Yes, I gathered that’s what he thinks but it’s just a hypothesis and I still think he hasn’t a clue about the club. He just thinks it’s a set of numbers.
     Not entirely sure about that. Yes he's a bit of a flannel but he has been around English football for a while. No idea if it's true but wasn't he part of the supporters trust at Oxford? He must have slightly more than a fleeting interest of what we are about surely?
    I'm going to avoid painting him as a city boy that knows nothing about football but decided to get into it a few months ago as I think thst would be wide if the mark.
    It’s not so much that as that knowing about Oxford isn’t knowing about Charlton, or Sunderland. Clubs are not widget producers, they have very specific local contexts. I’m not seeing him as someone likely to be tuned into that. Their comms, for example, are weak and superficial. That won’t wash here.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!