Have we helped Burton to get out of the relegation area or put them further in, depends how you value the players we let them have 🤔
If Burton are trying to get out of trouble then pick up Mac, Lavelle and Kirk their recruitment team must be even worse than Charlton’s so I know where my money is.
Club is full of liars and chancers, I just hope one day we get an owner that runs the club properly and doesn't see us as a way to make a quick couple of quid or for some vanity project.
How has anyone deemed that window anything but negative. I keep seeing 'we got all the dead wood out' we haven't! They'll be straight back next year and we are back where we are now.. had we got them off the wages and recruited improvements and went for a promotion push, then fair enough, but no, we have loaned out a ton of players we paid fees for and haven't replaced them adequately.
McG was good business, so was Stockley. EoC, shocking. Hands down our best centre back and sold for a measly 350k. The only senior centre back who looked like he could improve. Selling him to Wrexham is genuinely embarrassing and should be raising alarms, our vice captain has willingly dropped to non league instead of staying with us. Jesus Christ.
Abysmal being a Charlton fan atm, yes men everywhere just getting an easy salary from us, a load of crap players. One of the worst run clubs in league 1, have to be
Steve Gallen is one of the biggest frauds going, terrible track record for signings
Any window that has made us a better side is a good one. This looks like it has been.
How does it look like it has made us better? There has been more outs than ins, the majority of our outs that we don't want our coming back regardless, we haven't replaced them like for like with better quality. We are definitely weaker.
I actually cannot believe this nonsense, Holden is full of it and we will turn on him after a few bad results as per, Scott is not naive, he knew there was no money, he lied. Gallen is maybe the worst football negotiator or whatever his title is now, his bad signings outweigh the good ones (the good ones mostly being loans), our owner is a complete twat. We genuinely haven't had a proper good manager since Curbs other than Powelly when we had two good seasons under him, all the rest chancers or yes men, beyond fed up
Worst run club in league 1 comfortably
Experienced players who have all played at a higher level. All out of contract in the summer so need to impress to earn a contract here or elsewhere. Having players at the Club that have no chance of playing does not make us stronger. I would prefer Mitchell or Eleware in the side than say Lavelle. All about opinions.
May I ask why you are angry at so many going out and then complain about that they will be coming back?
I will not be turning on our manager after a few bad results and I suspect I will be comfortably in the majority .
Experienced players who have played at a higher level, remind me of how that's worked out for us in recent years? You can brand it that way, I'll say it for what it really is, washed up, has beens who are looking for an easy pay day, enter Charlton Athletic. We always do this, sign players with terrible injury records, more clubs than goals or players who have had their day in the sun. All our players who have actually been good in recent years have been loans from premier League teams or players who are climbing the league's. Our recruitment system/team has been absolutely tragic
It's not about them not playing, we have 19 games to go to secure league 1 football next season. The last thing we needed was to trim the squad when we always struggle with injuries.
Who says I'm angry? I am deflated more like, fed up of this club being made a joke of. Same old season after season and it doesn't look like it's gonna improve anytime soon, we are going to be a league 1 club if we are lucky next season (cause theres so much crap in this league) but who knows what happens next season. The players that have left are coming back, I am fully aware they are pants but do you not see how them being 'off the wage bill' doesn't benefit us? A) we will still be paying some of their wages B ) we haven't replaced them with better players C) we have potentially made relegation rivals stronger sides D) with the money shaved we haven't brought in any marquee types to actually push us up the table. Then you've got these yes men feeding us lies making out like everything is all dandy, it's farcial.
You may not turn on him, that's fine but lets not pretend that's not what's happened with every manager at CAFC since Curbs and Powell. Constant cycle, they get a few results, charm fans with the usual drivel 'I'll have these players fighting, this club is too big to be where it is' and then we are worried Barcelona are gonna come along and take them, few bad results and we are up in arms. Had Holden not won 3 games in a row we would have reacted very differently this window, we seem to think we are safe when we are only 9 points above the drop. If you think we won't turn on this manager after a couple of losses like the rest you are mistaken, I have heard us boo off the pitch every Charlton variation over the years, this team goes on a dry streak it will be no different.
All good though, we've got an injured Coventry reject, a Bournemouth kid on loan who barely has any professional games, a typical football league mercenary and Ipswich's third choice left back. It's an absolute shambles
I applaud you.
This is like the evil version of me cheering on Garrymanilow
Selling our most reliable and experienced central defender was bonkers, given the problems we've had defensively all season and the fact O'Connell was the only established player on a long term contract. Inniss - who always has a mistake in him - is out of contract in June (and, in my opinion, needs to be moved on); ditto the unwanted Thomas, who was about to sign for Forest Green; Lavelle's Charlton's career will be over if anyone will take him in the summer; and Hector - who has played something like 4 games in the last 18 months and none this season, only has a deal until June.
So come 1 July, we could potentially be in a position where our only contracted central defenders will be Ness, a veteran of 11 first team games (assuming he's not been sold by then) and two teenagers, Deji Elerewe and Zac Mitchell.
Whilst it made sense to unload fringe players, it's as plain as a pikestaff that the whole objective of the window was to cut costs to the bone. Judging by the remarks of Burton's manager, Dino Maamria, they smelt our desperation to get Kirk and Lavelle temporarily off the premises:
In chasing the Charlton duo, Maamria had to hold his nerve: “I wanted them both at the start of the window but at first they weren’t available – then they were available but for a high price,” he said. “Then, two days before the last day, they became available at a price that was affordable to us.
In terms of incomings, it's all desperately short term and, of the 5 players who have joined, only Matt Penney has played more than a handful of games this season. None of us will be surprised if Kane is not the only one to suffer an injury setback.
My recollection is that, in Andy Scott's first interview after he joined, he boldly stated that "I wouldn't be here if there wasn't a budget to improve the squad" - the clear implication being that money was available and there would be permanent deals. That was misleading and for him and Holden to now assert that it's been a good window and the squad has been strengthened is an insult to our intelligence. As employees (in Scott's case, for at least another week), they're almost obliged to put a positive spin on things, but please don't take us for mugs.
Selling our most reliable and experienced central defender was bonkers, given the problems we've had defensively all season and the fact O'Connell was the only established player on a long term contract. Inniss - who always has a mistake in him - is out of contract in June (and, in my opinion, needs to be moved on); ditto the unwanted Thomas, who was about to sign for Forest Green; Lavelle's Charlton's career will be over if anyone will take him in the summer; and Hector - who has played something like 4 games in the last 18 months and none this season, only has a deal until June.
So come 1 July, we could potentially be in a position where our only contracted central defenders will be Ness, a veteran of 11 first team games (assuming he's not been sold by then) and two teenagers, Deji Elerewe and Zac Mitchell.
Whilst it made sense to unload fringe players, it's as plain as a pikestaff that the whole objective of the window was to cut costs to the bone. Judging by the remarks of Burton's manager, Dino Maamria, they smelt our desperation to get Kirk and Lavelle temporarily off the premises:
In chasing the Charlton duo, Maamria had to hold his nerve: “I wanted them both at the start of the window but at first they weren’t available – then they were available but for a high price,” he said. “Then, two days before the last day, they became available at a price that was affordable to us.
In terms of incomings, it's all desperately short term and, of the 5 players who have joined, only Matt Penney has played more than a handful of games this season. None of us be surprised if Kane is not the only one to suffer an injury setback.
My recollection is that, in Andy Scott's first interview after he joined, he boldly stated that "I wouldn't be here if there wasn't a budget to improve the squad" - the clear implication being that money was available and there would be permanent deals. That was misleading and for him and Holden to now assert that it's been a good window and the squad has been strengthened is an insult to our intelligence. As employees (in Scott's case, for at least another week), they're almost obliged to put a positive spin on things, but please don't take us for mugs.
But he wanted the move after Holden could not guarantee him the playing time he wanted
Selling our most reliable and experienced central defender was bonkers, given the problems we've had defensively all season and the fact O'Connell was the only established player on a long term contract. Inniss - who always has a mistake in him - is out of contract in June (and, in my opinion, needs to be moved on); ditto the unwanted Thomas, who was about to sign for Forest Green; Lavelle's Charlton's career will be over if anyone will take him in the summer; and Hector - who has played something like 4 games in the last 18 months and none this season, only has a deal until June.
So come 1 July, we could potentially be in a position where our only contracted central defenders will be Ness, a veteran of 11 first team games (assuming he's not been sold by then) and two teenagers, Deji Elerewe and Zac Mitchell.
Whilst it made sense to unload fringe players, it's as plain as a pikestaff that the whole objective of the window was to cut costs to the bone. Judging by the remarks of Burton's manager, Dino Maamria, they smelt our desperation to get Kirk and Lavelle temporarily off the premises:
In chasing the Charlton duo, Maamria had to hold his nerve: “I wanted them both at the start of the window but at first they weren’t available – then they were available but for a high price,” he said. “Then, two days before the last day, they became available at a price that was affordable to us.
In terms of incomings, it's all desperately short term and, of the 5 players who have joined, only Matt Penney has played more than a handful of games this season. None of us be surprised if Kane is not the only one to suffer an injury setback.
My recollection is that, in Andy Scott's first interview after he joined, he boldly stated that "I wouldn't be here if there wasn't a budget to improve the squad" - the clear implication being that money was available and there would be permanent deals. That was misleading and for him and Holden to now assert that it's been a good window and the squad has been strengthened is an insult to our intelligence. As employees (in Scott's case, for at least another week), they're almost obliged to put a positive spin on things, but please don't take us for mugs.
Selling of EOC severely undermines the defence. Charlton are left with an error prone & red card 3 match suspension away player in Inniss as one of the mainstays & youngsters with Ness & Thoma & some defender who barely played in 2 year. It sets the alarm bells ringing on the Sandgaard / Methven consortium ‘plan’ for rest of the season.
Inniss hardly presents insurmountable competition for O'Connell, who is a far better player. If it was the other way around, Wrexham would have acquired Inniss. Apart from his numerous howlers, Inniss is, as Vff says, a red card waiting to happen.
The words of sophistry about not being able to "guarantee [O'Connell] the playing time he wanted" are complete bullshit. It was all about the cheque that Wrexham dangled in front of Sandgaard - nothing more and nothing less.
O'Connell is better on the ball than Inniss, but I've always liked to have one big geezer in defence who won't get out muscled and who will win headers. O'Connell doesn't give you that. I think he's been ever so slightly over rated, based on what we've seen from him so far. Would have liked to have kept him though, but suspect he wanted the move.
Stockley AND Kirk scored today against each other and MacG make a great save to deny Stockley a second. Charlton didn’t quite read the script though and offset the despair with a win. Still feels a bit off though.
Stockley AND Kirk scored today against each other and MacG make a great save to deny Stockley a second. Charlton didn’t quite read the script though and offset the despair with a win. Still feels a bit off though.
Who really cares about our old players, no wonder why the club buy them back
I still feel the squad is better even though lighter on numbers than when the window opened. 3 newcomers started in todays win. How many departures would anyone want in the starting 11. OConnell for me would be the only one in with a shout.
Said it before, far too much doom and gloom about our window. We let our rubbish players go and we brought in players who have a decent pedigree with something to prove. All of whom will be available to make a decision on at the end of the season.
There was no point in signing anyone on a longer contract with the club ownership so up in the air and with us having such little chance of going up or down.
The club seems in safe hands on the pitch in Dean Holden and now we need to see what is happening off it.
At the moment there is no real need to alter the back four. Yes having Sess' in there would be great but although Clare has a habit of going to sleep at crucial moments, he is a decent replacement. I also think that Kilkenny has given us a midfield three as good as any in the top ten teams in this division. If as reported Hector is ready to play under 21 games, great, but at his level of fitness he was never going to be a starter and I would rather have him on the bench than Thomas or Lavelle. We have two winnable games coming up, then we face probably our hardest run with Derby, Plymouth, Sheff wed and the rearranged Peterborough game, those games will definitely define our season, with only one of them at home. Also lets address the comment by Andy Scott about money being available in the transfer window. I believe that Andy Scott was told that the takeover would have been completed by mid January, and as quite a few people on here have alluded to, TS has dragged it on and if that isn't the case why is Andy Scott still here or for that matter the other exec's who arrived with him ?
I know it’s only one game, but Kilkenny looks like a very shrewd signing. Makes me feel more optimistic about Hector’s prospects somehow. If only Sess and Egbo were fit I think we’d potentially have an excellent back four.
Penney was ok yesterday, and improved a lot from his debut performance where he looked shaky. I’m trying to remember when we last signed a player I’d heard of, not that it seems to matter. Probably Marcus Maddison, and Harry Arter? They turned out well!
I knew of Elliott Lee, Fraser and Jaiyesimi only because they stood out when they played against us. I’d never heard of Dobbo, Egbo, Kilkenny, Inniss or even Stephen Sessegnon.
Shame we’ll presumably lose Kilkenny, Sessegnon, Kane, Penney and Rak Sakyi next season. Perhaps our three billionaires will have a whip round to make a couple of them permanent? Lol
Hector keeps himself fit but not fit enough for the match day squad
He might as well stay back getting more training in instead of sitting on a bench
You are correct with that comment. Hector will be on a fitness program to shake off the tons of dust.
Kilkenney despite playing very few games appears to be a natural athlete who would do well on the bleep tests. Just needs games to get Match fit and reach his optimum performances. Good debut overall and proved he is a fit lad.
Big CB are so different. Most would rather do Gym work than too much running. Even the fans favourite German, Patrick Bauer our Wembley hero could look sluggish after coming back from yet another injury set back. Same problems at Preston where BFG misses more games than he plays.
Michael Hector was at Sheffield Wednesday having a trial and it looks like they will be in the Championship next season. Ok he didn't get to their required level but we are mid table and treading water until the take over.
I go back to my first thoughts on Michael Hector: A total disaster or a cult hero. Two weeks of bespoke training at the training ground may give him more chance of being the latter.
Selling our most reliable and experienced central defender was bonkers, given the problems we've had defensively all season and the fact O'Connell was the only established player on a long term contract. Inniss - who always has a mistake in him - is out of contract in June (and, in my opinion, needs to be moved on); ditto the unwanted Thomas, who was about to sign for Forest Green; Lavelle's Charlton's career will be over if anyone will take him in the summer; and Hector - who has played something like 4 games in the last 18 months and none this season, only has a deal until June.
So come 1 July, we could potentially be in a position where our only contracted central defenders will be Ness, a veteran of 11 first team games (assuming he's not been sold by then) and two teenagers, Deji Elerewe and Zac Mitchell.
Whilst it made sense to unload fringe players, it's as plain as a pikestaff that the whole objective of the window was to cut costs to the bone. Judging by the remarks of Burton's manager, Dino Maamria, they smelt our desperation to get Kirk and Lavelle temporarily off the premises:
In chasing the Charlton duo, Maamria had to hold his nerve: “I wanted them both at the start of the window but at first they weren’t available – then they were available but for a high price,” he said. “Then, two days before the last day, they became available at a price that was affordable to us.
In terms of incomings, it's all desperately short term and, of the 5 players who have joined, only Matt Penney has played more than a handful of games this season. None of us will be surprised if Kane is not the only one to suffer an injury setback.
My recollection is that, in Andy Scott's first interview after he joined, he boldly stated that "I wouldn't be here if there wasn't a budget to improve the squad" - the clear implication being that money was available and there would be permanent deals. That was misleading and for him and Holden to now assert that it's been a good window and the squad has been strengthened is an insult to our intelligence. As employees (in Scott's case, for at least another week), they're almost obliged to put a positive spin on things, but please don't take us for mugs.
Football politics: Andy Scott having a short term Contract of six weeks made it obvious that fringe players would be moved on, whether loan or full time. The worse kept secret is Thomas Sandgaard is looking to sell and keep a %.
No 'assets' AMB, Ness, Leaburn, Dobson, CBT, Fraser left the building despite interest. Not being a mug( my wife will disagree !) I know that was because the players are the only 'Assets' that Sandgaard owns at CAFC. O'Connell going was a disappointment but compared to the players above ? At Least Dean Holden owned that move and explained why. Not ideal for Cafc fans I agree.
Yes, Scott put a Spin on it, because that's what happens in football and the business world, but I don't believe Scott and Holden are taking us for mugs, it just the club is in limbo yet again and trying to keep the people paying your wages happy but also the Fan/critic base is a tough gig.
An articulate post from you Blucher but I never expect anything less; I respect your views.
Comments
So come 1 July, we could potentially be in a position where our only contracted central defenders will be Ness, a veteran of 11 first team games (assuming he's not been sold by then) and two teenagers, Deji Elerewe and Zac Mitchell.
Whilst it made sense to unload fringe players, it's as plain as a pikestaff that the whole objective of the window was to cut costs to the bone. Judging by the remarks of Burton's manager, Dino Maamria, they smelt our desperation to get Kirk and Lavelle temporarily off the premises:
In chasing the Charlton duo, Maamria had to hold his nerve: “I wanted them both at the start of the window but at first they weren’t available – then they were available but for a high price,” he said. “Then, two days before the last day, they became available at a price that was affordable to us.
In terms of incomings, it's all desperately short term and, of the 5 players who have joined, only Matt Penney has played more than a handful of games this season. None of us will be surprised if Kane is not the only one to suffer an injury setback.
My recollection is that, in Andy Scott's first interview after he joined, he boldly stated that "I wouldn't be here if there wasn't a budget to improve the squad" - the clear implication being that money was available and there would be permanent deals. That was misleading and for him and Holden to now assert that it's been a good window and the squad has been strengthened is an insult to our intelligence. As employees (in Scott's case, for at least another week), they're almost obliged to put a positive spin on things, but please don't take us for mugs.
The words of sophistry about not being able to "guarantee [O'Connell] the playing time he wanted" are complete bullshit. It was all about the cheque that Wrexham dangled in front of Sandgaard - nothing more and nothing less.
Still let’s hope he is and he turns out to be a great player, as with everyone else I will give him ten games before I write him off
There was no point in signing anyone on a longer contract with the club ownership so up in the air and with us having such little chance of going up or down.
The club seems in safe hands on the pitch in Dean Holden and now we need to see what is happening off it.
I’m trying to remember when we last signed a player I’d heard of, not that it seems to matter. Probably Marcus Maddison, and Harry Arter? They turned out well!
You are correct with that comment. Hector will be on a fitness program to shake off the tons of dust.
Kilkenney despite playing very few games appears to be a natural athlete who would do well on the bleep tests. Just needs games to get Match fit and reach his optimum performances. Good debut overall and proved he is a fit lad.
Big CB are so different. Most would rather do Gym work than too much running. Even the fans favourite German, Patrick Bauer our Wembley hero could look sluggish after coming back from yet another injury set back. Same problems at Preston where BFG misses more games than he plays.
Michael Hector was at Sheffield Wednesday having a trial and it looks like they will be in the Championship next season. Ok he didn't get to their required level but we are mid table and treading water until the take over.
I go back to my first thoughts on Michael Hector: A total disaster or a cult hero.
Two weeks of bespoke training at the training ground may give him more chance of being the latter.
I thought the comments were very positive
Football politics:
Andy Scott having a short term Contract of six weeks made it obvious that fringe players would be moved on, whether loan or full time. The worse kept secret is Thomas Sandgaard is looking to sell and keep a %.
No 'assets' AMB, Ness, Leaburn, Dobson, CBT, Fraser left the building despite interest.
Not being a mug( my wife will disagree !) I know that was because the players are the only 'Assets' that Sandgaard owns at CAFC. O'Connell going was a disappointment but compared to the players above ? At Least Dean Holden owned that move and explained why. Not ideal for Cafc fans I agree.
Yes, Scott put a Spin on it, because that's what happens in football and the business world, but I don't believe Scott and Holden are taking us for mugs, it just the club is in limbo yet again and trying to keep the people paying your wages happy but also the Fan/critic base is a tough gig.
An articulate post from you Blucher but I never expect anything less; I respect your views.