There’s no way 3 midfielders put in a better performance than Albie. Shows those teams of the week are a bit meaningless.
Would love to know the ins and outs of the WhoScored ratings because that's what these are based on. I do like a stat but i've not gone that deep into it... although now I've got an idea for my free time later. :-)
Ben Garner getting manager of the week must mean our team as a collective had the highest average which is great to see.
Very early days stil but I really do get a sense of something good building up.
thevtransformation in some of the players is stunning and the overall style of play has been pretty fucking decent!
The Plymouth scoreline will make a few more sit up and notice us and long May it continue. I hope once teams start to set out to disrupt us or frustrate us we can come up with the goods and just do our lien thing around them too.
Very early days stil but I really do get a sense of something good building up.
thevtransformation in some of the players is stunning and the overall style of play has been pretty fucking decent!
The Plymouth scoreline will make a few more sit up and notice us and long May it continue. I hope once teams start to set out to disrupt us or frustrate us we can come up with the goods and just do our lien thing around them too.
loving it so far!
100%. Before the season kicked off I thought that as long as I saw progress and the club build towards something and the football was good to watch I’d be happy. That’s still my view and I still get the feeling the journey is maybe a two season one. We mustn’t forget the first 45 v Derby and the second 45 v Accrington. We’re not there yet but I agree things are looking promising. I have no doubt Garner is exactly what we needed.
I think Garner could be a success if supported. But as he isn't we really need a pragmatic manager. Yes, we have brought a few in, but basically we have changed our style of play on the say so of an idiot with less money/resources. I said when Garner was brought in we needed to either evolve the current team, which was the cheaper option or back Garner and hope he knew what he was doing. I think he does know what he is doing, which is a positive but he hasn't been backed and he probably feels he can't be pragmatic. He should look what he has got and try to maximise that and if Sandgaard doesn't like it, tell him to F off or sack me.
I think we've signed about 8 players and three of those are permanent deals with players from Swindon, yet the general consensus is that Garner doesn't have any input on player signings?
I think we've signed about 8 players and three of those are permanent deals with players from Swindon, yet the general consensus is that Garner doesn't have any input on player signings?
And that's because Sandgaard and his scouting man (son) haven't got the first clue about spotting talent so they handed much of it to Garner. As I said earlier, quite where they'd go after sacking Garner would be interesting. I think we've got a fair old way to go before it happens for that very reason.
I think we've signed about 8 players and three of those are permanent deals with players from Swindon, yet the general consensus is that Garner doesn't have any input on player signings?
If your homeless and you pick up 3 £1 coins off the floor do you have any input to your income?
Taking CBT off today and replacing with Kirk. For a moment I thought the Barnsley manager was in charge of our substitutions.
It doesn’t matter, neither are good enough. This is the problem. We don’t have good enough players. The only thing I can critique BG on so far is the fact he said he watched all our games last season and decided to play Stockley up top in a 3 in this possession based style. Stockley can’t run the channels, has the touch of Bambi on ice and is only effective getting on the end of crosses. If he said he watched all those games, you wouldn’t get Stockley to play that role.
I also think he’s been very naive to think players of the quality of Inniss, Lavelle and O’Connell can build a game from the back, and his commitment to his possession style in general.
Apart from that I would say he’s had to bring in players on a paltry budget, working for a deluded owner in an unstable football club.
It’s unlikely to turn round for him with the players we have, it’s just a case of how bad it gets with them under him now for me.
Comments
Eeuugghh
Still disappointing. Would have thought we'd be ahead of Bolton on the right wing at least.
I couldn't help noticing who the striker of the week was too. Two very good goals before it all went wrong for the Dons...
Would love to know the ins and outs of the WhoScored ratings because that's what these are based on. I do like a stat but i've not gone that deep into it... although now I've got an idea for my free time later. :-)
Ben Garner getting manager of the week must mean our team as a collective had the highest average which is great to see.
https://www.whoscored.com/Matches/1648590/Live/England-League-One-2022-2023-Charlton-Plymouth
Albie Morgan got a 7.0 (Kirk was rated our best player)
Diang and Benson got an 8.0 | Johnson got a rating of 9.0
https://www.whoscored.com/Matches/1648591/Live/England-League-One-2022-2023-Exeter-Wycombe
https://www.whoscored.com/Matches/1648680/Live/England-League-One-2022-2023-Milton-Keynes-Dons-Port-Vale
Explanation of their ratings system...
https://www.whoscored.com/Explanations#:~:text=WhoScored.com Ratings are considered,giants, bookmakers and football clubs.
thevtransformation in some of the players is stunning and the overall style of play has been pretty fucking decent!
The Plymouth scoreline will make a few more sit up and notice us and long May it continue. I hope once teams start to set out to disrupt us or frustrate us we can come up with the goods and just do our lien thing around them too.
loving it so far!
There's real detail, with focus on plans and delivery
Kirk did more in 30 mins than CBT did in 60 today.
Not looking good is it?
Giving him a bunch of crap players and then blaming him when he can't win with them is idiotic.
Drawn 13
Lost 22
Points 37
Out of his depth in L1 by those stats.
We are his third managerial role. He is yet to stay anywhere a year.
the fact that I'm trying to explain says it all. I expect more tumbleweed to pass in front of me
I don't think he'll last long
He's fu*ked up every appointment he's made
As I said earlier, quite where they'd go after sacking Garner would be interesting.
I think we've got a fair old way to go before it happens for that very reason.
I also think he’s been very naive to think players of the quality of Inniss, Lavelle and O’Connell can build a game from the back, and his commitment to his possession style in general.
All of them spinning the same record.