To early to comment on esi, but the week coming up will give a good indication.
tbh i wasn’t that impressed with southalls interviews/presser so far, said to my friend i can see through the bravado (gut), but give him the benefit as always.
Still hope and believe they are gonna back us well. We believe!
Early days, and I'll judge them initially in early February and then again at the end of the summer transfer window. But, so far:
Positive: 1. They say all the right things, even IF they are penned by a PR guy. After all, they are paying said PR guy and presumably either give him direction or approve his material. 2. Good intent and practice in fan engagement.
Fears: 1. An adherence to budget and wage structures is to be applauded but needs to be kept in balance with the imperative to stay in the Championship this season. I fear that they just don't have the finances available to offer the kind of deals needed to land the quality we need. And I'm not talking about paying over the odds or being foolhardy, but to be competitive. Matt Southall talks about the need to be sustainable, but the budget also needs to be commensurate with making Championship status sustainable. 2. The confused messages about ownership of the Valley and an apparent reluctance to clarify that further when asked causes me to question their honesty. If it was a genuine mistake say so, otherwise I'm going to question whether i'm being lied to.
Doesn't really help to compare us so closely to Man City.
We have a Sheikh as our owner ... like it it not, it’s inevitable the comparison will be made. We’ve done it ourselves by singing ‘We’re fucking rich”.
No point expecting articles to disregard the facts.
Doesn't really help to compare us so closely to Man City.
We have a Sheikh as our owner ... like it it not, it’s inevitable the comparison will be made. We’ve done it ourselves by singing ‘We’re fucking rich”.
No point expecting articles to disregard the facts.
Officially we don't have a Sheikh as an owner "just" an Excellency.
The point may well be moot if agents and clubs assume our club has an owner who is a rich Arab with loads of cash to spend.
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
there are lies, damned lies and statistics .. add on guesswork and bullshit
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
there are lies, damned lies and statistics .. add on guesswork and bullshit
I am asking those questions because I don't know the answers!!
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
there are lies, damned lies and statistics .. add on guesswork and bullshit
I am asking those questions because I don't know the answers!!
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
there are lies, damned lies and statistics .. add on guesswork and bullshit
I am asking those questions because I don't know the answers!!
that's the point .. within limits, 'financial facts' and 'information' can be skewed to bolster and/or 'prove' any argument or to supposedly validate any article
Well, like most people I was hoping this was a glorious new dawn we were about to see, and, of course, it may still be, and that’s what I’m still really hoping it is going to be. As supporters, we have endured a pretty difficult few years under the cockery of Mr D., so we are naturally a little edgy under our current circumstance, because we really WANT to believe. Just like we did back where the Dancing Visionary waltzed (badly, no doubt) into SE7 promising a glorious new dawn as well. I guess, we’ll know more by the end of the window. There’s not much we can do other than try and be patient as it unfolds a bit more, and we can see what is going on. For now I’m going to try to hold off playing Fooled Again ( which may morph into Fooked Again if this is not what we thought it was going to be). Let’s hope.
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
Jackson and Marshall said at Bromley Addicks earlier in the season that we had the lowest budget. When asked how they know that they replied that everyone in the game knows other teams budgets. They also said the management team was the lowest paid as they'd seen others payslips.
Bowyer has said the same regarding CAFC having the lowest budget.
Benjy also works for the club on, I think, a freelance basis so would have links to the management team.
More money for Barnsley and Blackburn match coming in .
No
Yeah because last season over 17,000 for football for a fiver already sold over 18,000.Plus no Barnsley offer last season where a season ticket holder can bring a friend for free £1.50 booking fee and money spent at the ground.
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
Jackson and Marshall said at Bromley Addicks earlier in the season that we had the lowest budget. When asked how they know that they replied that everyone in the game knows other teams budgets. They also said the management team was the lowest paid as they'd seen others payslips.
Bowyer has said the same regarding CAFC having the lowest budget.
Benjy also works for the club on, I think, a freelance basis so would have links to the management team.
I was puzzled by that comment in particular, on what occasion would the managers and coaches get together to show each other their payslips? Or do clubs submit that information to the EFL, for open access to all the clubs?
If found this bit intresting, for a number of reasons.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
Jackson and Marshall said at Bromley Addicks earlier in the season that we had the lowest budget. When asked how they know that they replied that everyone in the game knows other teams budgets. They also said the management team was the lowest paid as they'd seen others payslips.
Bowyer has said the same regarding CAFC having the lowest budget.
Benjy also works for the club on, I think, a freelance basis so would have links to the management team.
I am not doubting any of that is true. But doesn't answer the question of what "budget" means, in this context.
Is it purely total wages, wages they could offer a player, transfer fees, does it include the u23 group, academy spend, total wage bill of the club?
I believe we had the 4th highest wage bill in league 1 last season. Higher than Luton. I am not being argumentative I just don't know what it means.
Comments
tbh i wasn’t that impressed with southalls interviews/presser so far, said to my friend i can see through the bravado (gut), but give him the benefit as always.
"Spend some money. Quickly. Any money. Do it now. The quicker the better. Don't care who you send it on. Just spend it."
Positive:
1. They say all the right things, even IF they are penned by a PR guy. After all, they are paying said PR guy and presumably either give him direction or approve his material.
2. Good intent and practice in fan engagement.
Fears:
1. An adherence to budget and wage structures is to be applauded but needs to be kept in balance with the imperative to stay in the Championship this season. I fear that they just don't have the finances available to offer the kind of deals needed to land the quality we need. And I'm not talking about paying over the odds or being foolhardy, but to be competitive. Matt Southall talks about the need to be sustainable, but the budget also needs to be commensurate with making Championship status sustainable.
2. The confused messages about ownership of the Valley and an apparent reluctance to clarify that further when asked causes me to question their honesty. If it was a genuine mistake say so, otherwise I'm going to question whether i'm being lied to.
One caveat, Benjy also writes for the OS so the cynical will question his impartiality. I don't BTW
https://medium.com/@benjynurick/transfer-window-from-hell-why-charlton-face-a-january-full-of-toil-bf7728b3504b
No point expecting articles to disregard the facts.
The point may well be moot if agents and clubs assume our club has an owner who is a rich Arab with loads of cash to spend.
"The Addicks went from having the smallest budget in the Championship at the start of the season to having an owner who’s net worth outmuscles the vast majority of his peers across the Football League."
Asuuming HE is the person referenced as the "owner".
I am not sure how true that is compared to his peers in the championship?
How relevant is that when you add in parachute money?
RD had more personal wealth, didn't he?
Does it matter if you can't filter it into the club with out breaching FFP?
Also what is ment by the often referenced "smallest budget"? Is it total wage bill, transfer fees, or a combination of both? I think we had a higher wage bill than Luton last season. Not saying its right or wrong just asking what the methodology is.
As supporters, we have endured a pretty difficult few years under the cockery of Mr D., so we are naturally a little edgy under our current circumstance, because we really WANT to believe. Just like we did back where the Dancing Visionary waltzed (badly, no doubt) into SE7 promising a glorious new dawn as well.
I guess, we’ll know more by the end of the window. There’s not much we can do other than try and be patient as it unfolds a bit more, and we can see what is going on. For now I’m going to try to hold off playing Fooled Again ( which may morph into Fooked Again if this is not what we thought it was going to be).
Let’s hope.
Bowyer has said the same regarding CAFC having the lowest budget.
Benjy also works for the club on, I think, a freelance basis so would have links to the management team.
Sort out those couple of little things on Bowyer's contract. Get it signed tomorrow and you may have changed the direction of travel.
Mind you, it is such an obvious message - lets see what happens over the next few days!
Nope, this is deeply worrying especially about ownership of the Valley.
Is it purely total wages, wages they could offer a player, transfer fees, does it include the u23 group, academy spend, total wage bill of the club?
I believe we had the 4th highest wage bill in league 1 last season. Higher than Luton. I am not being argumentative I just don't know what it means.
Any chance of explaining?