Comes as no surprise from a party that campaigned partly on bringing back that genteel pastime of hunting an animal to exhaustion before gleefully watching it get torn to pieces. Animals to them are nothing more than commodities to be used, consumed and abused as they see fit. Makes you wonder why Gove is ensuring there are cameras in every slaughterhouse. Surely the animals that pass through those gates of hell can be treated however seen fit if they don’t think nor feel.
The Nazis called Jews criminals, that's how they got away with it. For someone who claimed to be ambiguous on the subject, you spend an awful lot of time sticking up for Brexit?
The Nazis called Jews criminals, that's how they got away with it. For someone who claimed to be ambiguous on the subject, you spend an awful lot of time sticking up for Brexit?
So me agreeing that non-EU nationals, living in Britain illegally, should be deported is 'sticking up for Brexit'? Really? Think you might need a lie down.
Apologies that I don't fawn over your every post and rush to lap up your sensationalism every time someone points out something awry from your position.
I have no issue with deporting people that are here illegally.
The Nazis called Jews criminals, that's how they got away with it. For someone who claimed to be ambiguous on the subject, you spend an awful lot of time sticking up for Brexit?
So me agreeing that non-EU nationals, living in Britain illegally, should be deported is 'sticking up for Brexit'? Really? Think you might need a lie down.
Apologies that I don't fawn over your every post and rush to lap up your sensationalism every time someone points out something awry from your position.
I have no issue with deporting people that are here illegally.
So I imagine all the other occasions you did so?
I explained the position, if you are unable to comprehend it there's no more I can say to help you.
The Nazis called Jews criminals, that's how they got away with it. For someone who claimed to be ambiguous on the subject, you spend an awful lot of time sticking up for Brexit?
So me agreeing that non-EU nationals, living in Britain illegally, should be deported is 'sticking up for Brexit'? Really? Think you might need a lie down.
Apologies that I don't fawn over your every post and rush to lap up your sensationalism every time someone points out something awry from your position.
I have no issue with deporting people that are here illegally.
So I imagine all the other occasions you did so?
I explained the position, if you are unable to comprehend it there's no more I can say to help you.
Ah, another case of being caught with your pants down so revert to blaming the person that caught you with your kecks around your ankles due to them needing help or being unable to comprehend/understand your position.
Do you come with a title? Something like 'The Infallible'?
You can also 'imagine' all you like. Your imagination seems very vivid at times so I doubt you'll have any trouble in that department.
The Nazis called Jews criminals, that's how they got away with it. For someone who claimed to be ambiguous on the subject, you spend an awful lot of time sticking up for Brexit?
So me agreeing that non-EU nationals, living in Britain illegally, should be deported is 'sticking up for Brexit'? Really? Think you might need a lie down.
Apologies that I don't fawn over your every post and rush to lap up your sensationalism every time someone points out something awry from your position.
I have no issue with deporting people that are here illegally.
So I imagine all the other occasions you did so?
I explained the position, if you are unable to comprehend it there's no more I can say to help you.
Ah, another case of being caught with your pants down so revert to blaming the person that caught you with your kecks around your ankles due to them needing help or being unable to comprehend/understand your position.
Do you come with a title? Something like 'The Infallible'?
The Nazis called Jews criminals, that's how they got away with it. For someone who claimed to be ambiguous on the subject, you spend an awful lot of time sticking up for Brexit?
So me agreeing that non-EU nationals, living in Britain illegally, should be deported is 'sticking up for Brexit'? Really? Think you might need a lie down.
Apologies that I don't fawn over your every post and rush to lap up your sensationalism every time someone points out something awry from your position.
I have no issue with deporting people that are here illegally.
So I imagine all the other occasions you did so?
I explained the position, if you are unable to comprehend it there's no more I can say to help you.
Ah, another case of being caught with your pants down so revert to blaming the person that caught you with your kecks around your ankles due to them needing help or being unable to comprehend/understand your position.
Do you come with a title? Something like 'The Infallible'?
Like I say - no more that I can say to help you.
It would help if you took your fingers out of your ears and stopped pulling silly faces.
Do you think Brexiters believe they are going to be immune from this shit fest?
Yes. I genuinely do think that there's a huge, "I won't happen to me!" factor in Leavers thinking.
I pointed out many times pre-referendum the advantages we benefit from by being in the EU in terms of consumer rights, food safety/standards, product safety, employees rights, environmental protections, etc. Leavers just do not want to acknowledge these benefits and, if there was any response at all, it would be along the lines of "we can have our own laws around these things then!".
Which is true but ignored several important factors; EU law/regulation is in my experience far superior in its aims and effectiveness than the dogs dinners our domestic legislators seem to produce in these areas, our businesses will still have to comply with EU legislation if they want to tap into the world's biggest single market on our doorstep and that the lobbyists for business are going to have a field day buttering up the government to get the concessions they've wanted, leaving us as consumers, employees, etc in a far worse position than before.
All this was even before the disgrace of allowing individual ministers to make those decisions became policy, which I didn't think even this lot of snake oil salesmen would be able to sucker the public into accepting.
The Nazis called Jews criminals, that's how they got away with it. For someone who claimed to be ambiguous on the subject, you spend an awful lot of time sticking up for Brexit?
So me agreeing that non-EU nationals, living in Britain illegally, should be deported is 'sticking up for Brexit'? Really? Think you might need a lie down.
Apologies that I don't fawn over your every post and rush to lap up your sensationalism every time someone points out something awry from your position.
I have no issue with deporting people that are here illegally.
So I imagine all the other occasions you did so?
I explained the position, if you are unable to comprehend it there's no more I can say to help you.
Ah, another case of being caught with your pants down so revert to blaming the person that caught you with your kecks around your ankles due to them needing help or being unable to comprehend/understand your position.
Do you come with a title? Something like 'The Infallible'?
Like I say - no more that I can say to help you.
It would help if you took your fingers out of your ears and stopped pulling silly faces.
What Brexit really means seems sometimes to have more interpretations than there are atoms in the universe. Eventually what Brexit becomes will be revealed eventually bit by bit. So when it is announced, the brexiters can dance in celebration at the prospect of blue passports, whilst others will weep when it is announced that Brexit ushers in the legitimisation of further cruelty to animals.
Do I get a promote for starting this thread or has someone put a contract out on me?
Someone else would have done it swiftly after you. If it gets closed within a day or two it would have been opened again. They were in the blocks ready for the starting pistol.... You fired it.
Do I get a promote for starting this thread or has someone put a contract out on me?
Someone else would have done it swiftly after you. If it gets closed within a day or two it would have been opened again. They were in the blocks ready for the starting pistol.... You fired it.
They have spent 250 mill on a badger cull - so far in a five year plan I believe. Big numbers but nothing to be afraid of.
Just to be clear, you're saying that, instead of having £350m extra cash to spend, we have to find £57m a week is "nothing to be afraid of"?
Leave it to the experts at the Treasury. These twitter twits are just frightening the children again.
The Chancellor announced the additional cost of £3bn. So, again, let me suggest that voting for a windfall of £350m and, instead of getting it, receiving a bill of £57m, is probably worth being "afraid of", on balance. Although, as you brought up the issue of "the children", maybe we should we just leave it to them to worry about, like every other part of the self-inflicted economic chaos that is being brought about by Brexit.
Comments
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/brexit-government-vote-animal-sentience-cant-feel-pain-eu-withdrawal-bill-anti-science-tory-mps-a8065161.html
Comes as no surprise from a party that campaigned partly on bringing back that genteel pastime of hunting an animal to exhaustion before gleefully watching it get torn to pieces. Animals to them are nothing more than commodities to be used, consumed and abused as they see fit. Makes you wonder why Gove is ensuring there are cameras in every slaughterhouse. Surely the animals that pass through those gates of hell can be treated however seen fit if they don’t think nor feel.
Do you think Brexiters believe they are going to be immune from this shit fest?
https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/21/immigration-minister-pledges-swift-processing-of-eu-citizens-status
Poor criminals.
Apologies that I don't fawn over your every post and rush to lap up your sensationalism every time someone points out something awry from your position.
I have no issue with deporting people that are here illegally.
I explained the position, if you are unable to comprehend it there's no more I can say to help you.
Do you come with a title? Something like 'The Infallible'?
You can also 'imagine' all you like. Your imagination seems very vivid at times so I doubt you'll have any trouble in that department.
I pointed out many times pre-referendum the advantages we benefit from by being in the EU in terms of consumer rights, food safety/standards, product safety, employees rights, environmental protections, etc. Leavers just do not want to acknowledge these benefits and, if there was any response at all, it would be along the lines of "we can have our own laws around these things then!".
Which is true but ignored several important factors; EU law/regulation is in my experience far superior in its aims and effectiveness than the dogs dinners our domestic legislators seem to produce in these areas, our businesses will still have to comply with EU legislation if they want to tap into the world's biggest single market on our doorstep and that the lobbyists for business are going to have a field day buttering up the government to get the concessions they've wanted, leaving us as consumers, employees, etc in a far worse position than before.
All this was even before the disgrace of allowing individual ministers to make those decisions became policy, which I didn't think even this lot of snake oil salesmen would be able to sucker the public into accepting.
Eventually what Brexit becomes will be revealed eventually bit by bit.
So when it is announced, the brexiters can dance in celebration at the prospect of blue passports, whilst others will weep when it is announced that Brexit ushers in the legitimisation of further cruelty to animals.
Big numbers but nothing to be afraid of.
These twitter twits are just frightening the children again.