Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The 2017 Summer Transfer Rumours Thread (Deadline Day from page 264)

1261262264266267296

Comments

  • I'm working from home today ;)

    Coincidence I swear!
  • Swisdom said:

    We've tried to sign the players Robinson wants and they are not available. There is very little point in us signing someone for the sake of signing someone.

    If we can't get a keeper then Dillon Phillips stays. Not the best thing for everyone but it is best for the club.

    If however novak goes then we must replace him with someone. Seeing as our choices are not available I don't think Novak will go anywhere this window.

    Yeah, didn't want promotion anyway did we.
  • Swisdom said:

    We've tried to sign the players Robinson wants and they are not available. There is very little point in us signing someone for the sake of signing someone.

    Today's the day when we find out whether they are really not available. Their clubs may have been holding on to see if they get better offers and knew they don't need to rush until today unless charlton started sniffing around buying somebody else instead. Clubs with debts and insufficient income that can't be supplemented by a rich owner need to offload players when they can (i.e. the transfer window) to reduce their overheads.
  • Scoham said:

    Swisdom said:

    We've tried to sign the players Robinson wants and they are not available. There is very little point in us signing someone for the sake of signing someone.

    If we can't get a keeper then Dillon Phillips stays. Not the best thing for everyone but it is best for the club.

    If however novak goes then we must replace him with someone. Seeing as our choices are not available I don't think Novak will go anywhere this window.

    So there's literally no one out there that's affordable and could at least compete with Magennis and Novak?
    Sure there are. But do their clubs want to sell them, and do the players themselves want to move?
  • edited August 2017
    Scoham said:

    Swisdom said:

    We've tried to sign the players Robinson wants and they are not available. There is very little point in us signing someone for the sake of signing someone.

    If we can't get a keeper then Dillon Phillips stays. Not the best thing for everyone but it is best for the club.

    If however novak goes then we must replace him with someone. Seeing as our choices are not available I don't think Novak will go anywhere this window.

    So there's literally no one out there that's affordable and could at least compete with Magennis and Novak?
    :+1: ^ This a thousand times over. Everyone has their price and if you want it that badly you go and get it. Of course it might still happen but the previous signs do not fill you with confidence.
  • Swisdom said:

    We've tried to sign the players Robinson wants and they are not available. There is very little point in us signing someone for the sake of signing someone.

    If we can't get a keeper then Dillon Phillips stays. Not the best thing for everyone but it is best for the club.

    If however novak goes then we must replace him with someone. Seeing as our choices are not available I don't think Novak will go anywhere this window.

    Yeah, didn't want promotion anyway did we.
    Thing is whilst I agree we shouldn't sign anyone just for the sake of getting bodies in, it does make me wonder how long we have to work on signings now. I mean we supposedly started working on this summer's recruits in January, we still haven't completed the squad so maybe we have to start even further ahead..........is Messi's Mrs pregnant?
  • JamesSeed said:

    Scoham said:

    Swisdom said:

    We've tried to sign the players Robinson wants and they are not available. There is very little point in us signing someone for the sake of signing someone.

    If we can't get a keeper then Dillon Phillips stays. Not the best thing for everyone but it is best for the club.

    If however novak goes then we must replace him with someone. Seeing as our choices are not available I don't think Novak will go anywhere this window.

    So there's literally no one out there that's affordable and could at least compete with Magennis and Novak?
    Sure there are. But do their clubs want to sell them, and do the players themselves want to move?
    Premier League youngsters, Championship reserves, smaller League 1 clubs, League 2, Scotland, abroad, free agents? Must be someone out there more proven than RHF that isn't overpriced? This isn't like the years under Parkinson where the most we could afford was a nominal fee.

    I get why someone like Grigg isn't available, but that was always likely to be the case.
  • edited August 2017
    JamesSeed said:

    Scoham said:

    Swisdom said:

    We've tried to sign the players Robinson wants and they are not available. There is very little point in us signing someone for the sake of signing someone.

    If we can't get a keeper then Dillon Phillips stays. Not the best thing for everyone but it is best for the club.

    If however novak goes then we must replace him with someone. Seeing as our choices are not available I don't think Novak will go anywhere this window.

    So there's literally no one out there that's affordable and could at least compete with Magennis and Novak?
    Sure there are. But do their clubs want to sell them, and do the players themselves want to move?
    And do we actually have any genuine ambitions to sign them?

    Been a summer of excuses from Robinson (no doubt on behalf of Katrien) with probably a couple more to come today.

    Still got a chance of promotion, as long as nobody gets injured, suspended or loses form
  • Sponsored links:


  • Hanlan to Colchester on loan

    Good move for him... Be good to see him make the step up after his successful loan at Bromley last season. If Magennis | Novak | RHF get injured... Who is actually fourth choice as Striker now? - Is it some kid studying for his GCSE's as part of the U18 squad?
  • Hanlan to Colchester on loan

    Ideal for him but not for us. Scored a few goals with Bromley, surely worth keeping around unless we sign someone.
  • Hanlan to Colchester on loan

    Positive. Him getting league football and by situ suggesting we are more likely to bring a striker in
    Scoham said:

    Hanlan to Colchester on loan

    Ideal for him but not for us. Scored a few goals with Bromley, surely worth keeping around unless we sign someone.
    Sounds like the club are taking their typical approach of shifting players off the wage bill before bringing someone in... the danger of that though is if we dont actually have someone lined up waiting in the wings (like a normal club), we're left short.
  • Hanlan to Colchester on loan

    Positive. Him getting league football and by situ suggesting we are more likely to bring a striker in
    Scoham said:

    Hanlan to Colchester on loan

    Ideal for him but not for us. Scored a few goals with Bromley, surely worth keeping around unless we sign someone.
    Sounds like the club are taking their typical approach of shifting players off the wage bill before bringing someone in... the danger of that though is if we dont actually have someone lined up waiting in the wings (like a normal club), we're left short.
    Surely the likes of Umerah and Hanlan are only on hundreds rather than thousands a week? Wouldn't come near covering the cost of a Prem/Champ loanee?
  • Redhenry said:

    i would be happy keeping this squad together and adding a prem/champ player on loan.

    Its interesting that we were rumoured to be looking @ George Miller (Middlesbrough signed him from Bury in the summer). Was looking at him the other day and he's only in the 'Boro U23 squad, surely worth sending him out for some game time!!
  • Swisdom said:

    We've tried to sign the players Robinson wants and they are not available. There is very little point in us signing someone for the sake of signing someone.

    Today's the day when we find out whether they are really not available. Their clubs may have been holding on to see if they get better offers and knew they don't need to rush until today unless charlton started sniffing around buying somebody else instead. Clubs with debts and insufficient income that can't be supplemented by a rich owner need to offload players when they can (i.e. the transfer window) to reduce their overheads.
    It's also possible that the player might have a strop and refuse to train, if the club prevents his "dream move" to Charlton :smile:

    Well that's what seems to happen in the PL
  • Sponsored links:


  • Cheltenham have signed GK Scott Flinders. Rules out a Phillips loan to them at least.
  • Hanlan to Colchester on loan

    He'll be able to team up with Dijksteel.
  • Anyone making an "excuses bingo" card for when Robinson is wheeled out tonight to let us know why we failed to land a striker?
  • Anyone making an "excuses bingo" card for when Robinson is wheeled out tonight to let us know why we failed to land a striker?

    Wouldnt it be great if he comes out proper Kevin Keegan style after we fail to sign Will Grigg

    "And I'll tell you, honestly, I will love it if we beat them. Love it."
  • Wouldn't feel like deadline day without Yann being linked with a move.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!