after some of the abuse you've received I'd imagine you'd quite rightly feel very pleased with yourself
Yep. If there was a way to filter this thread to only read @DOUCHER and @nth london addick 's contributions we could have all saved ourselves a hell of a lot of time from muddling through the residual tittle tattle over the past year.
Looking forward to it and his further vindication.
lol (I assume)
Not really lol no. They've been pretty much spot on hitherto in comparison to most even though @DOUCHER has received a lot of unnecessary and unwanted flak for not being on the approved list for this sort of thing.
The ugly side of CL on a site that oft rears its unwelcome head on a site filled with such beauty.
after some of the abuse you've received I'd imagine you'd quite rightly feel very pleased with yourself
Yep. If there was a way to filter this thread to only read @DOUCHER and @nth london addick 's contributions we could have all saved ourselves a hell of a lot of time from muddling through the residual tittle tattle over the past year.
Looking forward to it and his further vindication.
lol (I assume)
Not really lol no. They've been pretty much spot on hitherto in comparison to most even though @DOUCHER has received a lot of unnecessary and unwanted flak for not being on the approved list for this sort of thing.
The ugly side of CL on a site that oft rears its unwelcome head on a site filled with such beauty.
I agree NLA has been consistent with his message all along and has turned out to be pretty much right throughout. However, anyone who can read must have worked out that Douchers story has changed a hundred times depending on what other info others have produced. Especially early on it was changing on a weekly basis. He may have got some stick but in my view it's deserved for his style of posting and confrontational approach.
To be fair the only gripe I have with NLA is that his contact keeps telling him he thinks they’re short of money, when they’re not. As I’ve said, the hold ups haven’t been about the money. Haven’t really noticed what else he’s been predicting, but I’ll take your word for it that it’s not been inaccurate.
Thrillingly I am able to take the wind out of @DOUCHER 's sails.
Yes, I've had a message from he who must not be named, and he has exclusively revealed to me (it's all about me of course), that..... you know what, I'll let him speak for himself .....
'Hi mate. I am back in Aus tidying up my other business interests. Everything progressing well.' [Name redacted for reasons of confidentiality]. Colin
I remember the day when my CL Badge was awarded. One of the proudest days of my life. Was in the Liberal Club by a be cardiganed gentleman who pinned it on my chest and then kissed me on both cheeks.
When a person becomes a member of the CL Clique, he is expected to be able to practice tolerance and to 'keep a secret'. Rarely are posters capable of such high morals and regrettably, very few can be initiated into such a position of trust.
And do the other members Urinate on the new member as part of the initiation? If so I’d definitely like to join.
I remember the day when my CL Badge was awarded. One of the proudest days of my life. Was in the Liberal Club by a be cardiganed gentleman who pinned it on my chest and then kissed me on both cheeks.
Awarded?
I just pinned him in the corner and said 'I'll have one of those buddy'
I remember the day when my CL Badge was awarded. One of the proudest days of my life. Was in the Liberal Club by a be cardiganed gentleman who pinned it on my chest and then kissed me on both cheeks.
after some of the abuse you've received I'd imagine you'd quite rightly feel very pleased with yourself
Yep. If there was a way to filter this thread to only read @DOUCHER and @nth london addick 's contributions we could have all saved ourselves a hell of a lot of time from muddling through the residual tittle tattle over the past year.
Looking forward to it and his further vindication.
lol (I assume)
Not really lol no. They've been pretty much spot on hitherto in comparison to most even though @DOUCHER has received a lot of unnecessary and unwanted flak for not being on the approved list for this sort of thing.
The ugly side of CL on a site that oft rears its unwelcome head on a site filled with such beauty.
after some of the abuse you've received I'd imagine you'd quite rightly feel very pleased with yourself
Yep. If there was a way to filter this thread to only read @DOUCHER and @nth london addick 's contributions we could have all saved ourselves a hell of a lot of time from muddling through the residual tittle tattle over the past year.
Looking forward to it and his further vindication.
lol (I assume)
Not really lol no. They've been pretty much spot on hitherto in comparison to most even though @DOUCHER has received a lot of unnecessary and unwanted flak for not being on the approved list for this sort of thing.
The ugly side of CL on a site that oft rears its unwelcome head on a site filled with such beauty.
I agree NLA has been consistent with his message all along and has turned out to be pretty much right throughout. However, anyone who can read must have worked out that Douchers story has changed a hundred times depending on what other info others have produced. Especially early on it was changing on a weekly basis. He may have got some stick but in my view it's deserved for his style of posting and confrontational approach.
To be fair the only gripe I have with NLA is that his contact keeps telling him he thinks they’re short of money, when they’re not. As I’ve said, the hold ups haven’t been about the money. Haven’t really noticed what else he’s been predicting, but I’ll take your word for it that it’s not been inaccurate.
Thrillingly I am able to take the wind out of @DOUCHER 's sails.
Yes, I've had a message from he who must not be named, and he has exclusively revealed to me (it's all about me of course), that..... you know what, I'll let him speak for himself .....
'Hi mate. I am back in Aus tidying up my other business interests. Everything progressing well.' [Name redacted for reasons of confidentiality]. Colin
after some of the abuse you've received I'd imagine you'd quite rightly feel very pleased with yourself
Yep. If there was a way to filter this thread to only read @DOUCHER and @nth london addick 's contributions we could have all saved ourselves a hell of a lot of time from muddling through the residual tittle tattle over the past year.
Looking forward to it and his further vindication.
lol (I assume)
Not really lol no. They've been pretty much spot on hitherto in comparison to most even though @DOUCHER has received a lot of unnecessary and unwanted flak for not being on the approved list for this sort of thing.
The ugly side of CL on a site that oft rears its unwelcome head on a site filled with such beauty.
after some of the abuse you've received I'd imagine you'd quite rightly feel very pleased with yourself
Yep. If there was a way to filter this thread to only read @DOUCHER and @nth london addick 's contributions we could have all saved ourselves a hell of a lot of time from muddling through the residual tittle tattle over the past year.
Looking forward to it and his further vindication.
lol (I assume)
Not really lol no. They've been pretty much spot on hitherto in comparison to most even though @DOUCHER has received a lot of unnecessary and unwanted flak for not being on the approved list for this sort of thing.
The ugly side of CL on a site that oft rears its unwelcome head on a site filled with such beauty.
I agree NLA has been consistent with his message all along and has turned out to be pretty much right throughout. However, anyone who can read must have worked out that Douchers story has changed a hundred times depending on what other info others have produced. Especially early on it was changing on a weekly basis. He may have got some stick but in my view it's deserved for his style of posting and confrontational approach.
To be fair the only gripe I have with NLA is that his contact keeps telling him he thinks they’re short of money, when they’re not. As I’ve said, the hold ups haven’t been about the money. Haven’t really noticed what else he’s been predicting, but I’ll take your word for it that it’s not been inaccurate.
Thrillingly I am able to take the wind out of @DOUCHER 's sails.
Yes, I've had a message from he who must not be named, and he has exclusively revealed to me (it's all about me of course), that..... you know what, I'll let him speak for himself .....
'Hi mate. I am back in Aus tidying up my other business interests. Everything progressing well.' [Name redacted for reasons of confidentiality]. Colin
‘1. They’re hoping, subject to approval from a couple of investors and the EFL, that the sale will happen next week. I think they might being a little optimistic with their estimate of the how long the EFL can take processing these fit and proper person tests, so an extra week or two might be on the cards? (Just guessing). But they're patient people.’
So I suspect it’s the ‘couple of investors’ / EFL thing that must have caused the delay?
‘1. They’re hoping, subject to approval from a couple of investors and the EFL, that the sale will happen next week. I think they might being a little optimistic with their estimate of the how long the EFL can take processing these fit and proper person tests, so an extra week or two might be on the cards? (Just guessing). But they're patient people.’
So I suspect it’s the ‘couple of investors’ / EFL thing that must have caused the delay?
Cheers
Colin
(PS Am I getting the hang of this?)
No - you need to incorporate a few grammatical errors.
‘1. They’re hoping, subject to approval from a couple of investors and the EFL, that the sale will happen next week. I think they might being a little optimistic with their estimate of the how long the EFL can take processing these fit and proper person tests, so an extra week or two might be on the cards? (Just guessing). But they're patient people.’
So I suspect it’s the ‘couple of investors’ / EFL thing that must have caused the delay?
Cheers
Colin
(PS Am I getting the hang of this?)
No - you need to incorporate a few grammatical errors.
Also absolutely refusing to acknowledge all the other times you were completely wrong on something from your cast iron “sources”. Then you’ve gone full Colin.
Comments
Bodmin today is famous only for both it's now closed Dickensian jail and lunatic asylum.
Or is that what you meant?
And I not only do I promise not to do any due diligence, I've got a mate at the EFL, so fit & proper should be a piss.
Clique?
Oggy my friend 'clique ' has been superseded by 'Royalty', and you are the Duke of Bodmin.
Duke of Bodmin?
Bodmin today is famous only for both it's now closed Dickensian jail and lunatic asylum.
Or is that what you meant?
And The Beast. Don't forget The Beast of Bodmin
Bodmin today is famous only for both it's now closed Dickensian jail and lunatic asylum.
Or is that what you meant?
And The Beast. Don't forget The Beast of Bodmin
How could he forget himself?
And Jamaica Inn.
Rarely are posters capable of such high morals and regrettably, very few can be initiated into such a position of trust.
And do the other members Urinate on the new member as part of the initiation? If so I’d definitely like to join.
I just pinned him in the corner and said 'I'll have one of those buddy'
‘1. They’re hoping, subject to approval from a couple of investors and the EFL, that the sale will happen next week. I think they might being a little optimistic with their estimate of the how long the EFL can take processing these fit and proper person tests, so an extra week or two might be on the cards? (Just guessing). But they're patient people.’
So I suspect it’s the ‘couple of investors’ / EFL thing that must have caused the delay?
Cheers
Colin
(PS Am I getting the hang of this?)
[Edit: Can anybody tell me what's the biggest time gap between posts on this thread?]
Whatever a lol mate is.