Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Joe Gomez rumours (ed. Signed for Liverpool)

13839404244

Comments

  • Options
    Who was it that was assuring us that we'd got far more for Joe Gomez ?
  • Options
    A lot of people who were in the know apparently threw out comments such as 'trust me, the figure is much higher'
  • Options
    se9addick said:

    Who was it that was assuring us that we'd got far more for Joe Gomez ?

    I don't want to give this mob the benefit of the doubt but it could well be what we got up front and there's going to be more coming in from clauses etc..
  • Options
    MrOneLung said:

    A lot of people who were in the know apparently threw out comments such as 'trust me, the figure is much higher'

    Was it one of the guys from the comms team ?
  • Options
    See page 25 of the accounts. States that £6.24million possibly due from player sales based on future appearances etc. Is this all Gomez??
  • Options

    See page 25 of the accounts. States that £6.24million possibly due from player sales based on future appearances etc. Is this all Gomez??

    I'd imagine Poyet has some substantial add on's too. Not that they'll ever be realised mind.
  • Options
    se9addick said:

    MrOneLung said:

    A lot of people who were in the know apparently threw out comments such as 'trust me, the figure is much higher'

    Was it one of the guys from the comms team ?
    Possibly, but a lot of people were saying the same.

  • Options

    se9addick said:

    Who was it that was assuring us that we'd got far more for Joe Gomez ?

    I don't want to give this mob the benefit of the doubt but it could well be what we got up front and there's going to be more coming in from clauses etc..
    We haven't "got" it then. The correct transfer fee is therefore the £3.5m that was reported at the time. Whether we get another couple of mil if Joe Gomez one day walks on the moon or whatever is inconsequential and it's mis-leading for people to suggest otherwise.
  • Options

    See page 25 of the accounts. States that £6.24million possibly due from player sales based on future appearances etc. Is this all Gomez??

    The operative word being POSSIBLY.

    No use to us until we have it.

    Let's hope to God it doesn't happen to Joe but cruciates can and have finished careers or severely impaired players from what they were so no guarantees even if that possible future revenue is theoretically him.
  • Options
    The 'deal' is worth more than the 3.5 mill first payment.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options

    The 'deal' is worth more than the 3.5 mill first payment.

    No it isn't. The deal is "worth" whatever we end up getting, right now it's probably £3.5m. Might be more on the future, might not be, but right now it's £3.5m.
  • Options
    se9addick said:

    The 'deal' is worth more than the 3.5 mill first payment.

    No it isn't. The deal is "worth" whatever we end up getting, right now it's probably £3.5m. Might be more on the future, might not be, but right now it's £3.5m.
    Unless we've received more based on his appearances for Liverpool since then.
  • Options
    Scoham said:

    se9addick said:

    The 'deal' is worth more than the 3.5 mill first payment.

    No it isn't. The deal is "worth" whatever we end up getting, right now it's probably £3.5m. Might be more on the future, might not be, but right now it's £3.5m.
    Unless we've received more based on his appearances for Liverpool since then.
    Yeah those appearance fees must be rolling in !
  • Options
    se9addick said:

    The 'deal' is worth more than the 3.5 mill first payment.

    No it isn't. The deal is "worth" whatever we end up getting, right now it's probably £3.5m. Might be more on the future, might not be, but right now it's £3.5m.
    What if it's a guaranteed fee in the next few seasons? Hardly any transfers are lump sum these days.
  • Options
    se9addick said:

    Scoham said:

    se9addick said:

    The 'deal' is worth more than the 3.5 mill first payment.

    No it isn't. The deal is "worth" whatever we end up getting, right now it's probably £3.5m. Might be more on the future, might not be, but right now it's £3.5m.
    Unless we've received more based on his appearances for Liverpool since then.
    Yeah those appearance fees must be rolling in !
    Could have been a fee after his first apperance.
  • Options
    edited March 2016

    se9addick said:

    The 'deal' is worth more than the 3.5 mill first payment.

    No it isn't. The deal is "worth" whatever we end up getting, right now it's probably £3.5m. Might be more on the future, might not be, but right now it's £3.5m.
    What if it's a guaranteed fee in the next few seasons? Hardly any transfers are lump sum these days.
    In that case it would have to be included in the stated profit now. If it's guaranteed it's not material to the declared profit when it's paid.
  • Options
    Scoham said:

    se9addick said:

    Scoham said:

    se9addick said:

    The 'deal' is worth more than the 3.5 mill first payment.

    No it isn't. The deal is "worth" whatever we end up getting, right now it's probably £3.5m. Might be more on the future, might not be, but right now it's £3.5m.
    Unless we've received more based on his appearances for Liverpool since then.
    Yeah those appearance fees must be rolling in !
    Could have been a fee after his first apperance.
    Possibly - there's a "Post Balance Sheet Event" of £299,500 related to the disposal of players' registrations which could be Gomez's debut.

    We've spent £2.5m since then on new players !
  • Options

    se9addick said:

    The 'deal' is worth more than the 3.5 mill first payment.

    No it isn't. The deal is "worth" whatever we end up getting, right now it's probably £3.5m. Might be more on the future, might not be, but right now it's £3.5m.
    What if it's a guaranteed fee in the next few seasons? Hardly any transfers are lump sum these days.
    In that case it would have to be included in the stated profit now. If it's guaranteed it's not material to the declared profit when it's paid.
    Exactly.

    It's shown as a 'contingent' receipt. In simple terms if this happens and that happens then we could get this money.

    If it doesn't though we won't.

    Anterior cruciate ligament.
  • Options
    More importantly, does anybody know how much we paid for Francis Jeffers?
  • Options
    se9addick said:

    Who was it that was assuring us that we'd got far more for Joe Gomez ?

    The funniest bit of info on that screen shot is the rise in staffing costs due to the increased player wages to remain competitive, hahahaha they got that badly wrong.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    smiffyboy said:

    se9addick said:

    Who was it that was assuring us that we'd got far more for Joe Gomez ?

    The funniest bit of info on that screen shot is the rise in staffing costs due to the increased player wages to remain competitive, hahahaha they got that badly wrong.
    If you think that's funny you should the whole thing (and then you'd cry, for hours).
  • Options

    More importantly, does anybody know how much we paid for Francis Jeffers?

    2.6m
  • Options
    Good thing we sold him when we did, blokes a busted flush
  • Options
    What a shame for him.
  • Options

    sam3110 said:

    Good thing we sold him when we did, blokes a busted flush

    Busted flush? He picked up an ACL - an injury that any player can pick up, and now a second unrelated injury.

    Whoosh
  • Options
    What a shame for the kid.
  • Options
    Scouse Cory Gibbs
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!