I still (I think) stand by my earlier points, though I admit that softened when later learning Powell had spoke to multiple outlets, however congratulations Weegie on another excellent interview, you really are very good at these. Great read.
A very interesting development. I'm kind of on the fence on the timing of this. On the one hand, I think that the truth is the be all and end all and "publish and be damned". Yet on the other hand, the timing isn't great.
However, I've been more vocal than many on this subject. It was I who questioned Katrien, on this very subject at the VIP meeting. The response was that anyone making such comments "had left the club". For me, that was, never a response of any meaning. For me, it was akin to "no comment". Especially, when Mick Everitt told Katrien not to answer.
Now, the thing for me, is this.
If RD & KM are so proud of their plans/their way of doing things. If they truly believe that they are right and the rest of the football world is wrong. Then why are they covering up, what goes on, with a tissue of lies ?
Fanny, possibly among others, said that hopefully, this was all in the past and we could maybe move on.
However, I can't find the SLP interview with Bob Peeters, but he also said the same, as did Rednic at Liege and I can't believe, that the most recent coach at Liege, was sacked because of results. They were unbeaten in about 10 games, won the majority and he moved them up from 12th to 5th. His reward, sacked !
As I said at Woolwich, you can look at this two ways. Katrien's interpretation is that she speaks truth whereas none of the many people who have alluded to Roland's interference can be trusted because they are all "former employees". However, you could equally well argue that she is the only one being paid and therefore the only one with an ongoing interest in telling lies.
Someone at one of these meetings should ask her specifically what was in the email received by Chris Powell before the Sheffield United game.
Can you enlighten us about this said email AB? Have you also seen or read it?
I haven't seen it but am told that it was instructions who to play, which he chose to disregard.
I don't doubt SCP for a second but could he make these public via the LMA possibly? Would it be worth his or our while to do this?
Also - a thought that occurred to me on Saturday - is the reason for not providing Luzon with any of his own staff to stop any leaks of interference in team selection? i.e. Luzon won't be close enough to Matthews, Roberts et al to share with them that Duchatlet is pressuring him to select certain players if / when that happens?
Also - a thought that occurred to me on Saturday - is the reason for not providing Luzon with any of his own staff to stop any leaks of interference in team selection? i.e. Luzon won't be close enough to Matthews, Roberts et al to share with them that Duchatlet is pressuring him to select certain players if / when that happens?
Also - a thought that occurred to me on Saturday - is the reason for not providing Luzon with any of his own staff to stop any leaks of interference in team selection? i.e. Luzon won't be close enough to Matthews, Roberts et al to share with them that Duchatlet is pressuring him to select certain players if / when that happens?
Comments
It confirmed what most of us knew and many of us deny, is the reality.
Ho hum.