Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

**Luzon Confirmed Charlton Head Coach - Deal to 2016 - Praise the Lord, Work Permit GRANTED (pg 24)*

1202123252628

Comments

  • @VFF

    Interesting theory. Should be clearer once the window closes. If we lose say TBH and Buyens, there are few quality additions to the squad, Luzon doesn't add to the back room team and the club doesn't bring in any advisors with Championship experience- this will support the argument that Roland is happy to play the odds and risk relegation.

    If he is willing to take this risk than as a rational businessman he'll have thought through the pros and cons. Your suggested logic is as good as any.

    Alternatively he may just be poorly advised and drunk on his own arrogance, straying into a new business area that he doesn't fully understand. In business for every Branson there's a Ratner.

    I can't call it at the minute.

    'He may just be poorly advised and drunk on his own arrogance, straying into news business area that he doesn't fully understand'. Classic.

    So conspiracy or incompetence then. Maybe a mixture of the two with a healthy dose of under investment. It is not a receipe for challenging for the premiership in either case.
  • vff said:

    vff earlier

    From the way, Duchatelet is going about business, I don't think he really bothered as a Charlton as a viable Championship outfit. If Charlton have seasons as a Championship club, that is probably seen as a bonus. It takes too much investment to establish Charlton in the higher level of the Championship.

    I think he has a plan B for Charlton as a League One outfit. Duchatelet can still develop the academy and League One is a more natural fit for all the network players not good for Liege and a better step up in level from his other network clubs. The Championship is a tough league and needs a strong team spirit, that needs a high level of investment, a strong manager / head coach with autonomy (who is able to speak up and be listened to) and the loose arrangements of fitting in players from the network does not foster that. The current Duchatelet model is the opposite of what's needed. It may be possible to get away with that set up in League One.

    Jolly Red Robin

    So how comes it works at Watford?

    vff: to @JollyRobin :

    Possibly because Watford are prepared to pay the going rate for wages in the Championship, and are sending over a better quality of player in the first place ?

    Interesting view but at some point he's going to have to invest. We're no use to him as a yo yo team between The Championship and League One. The club will lose money that way. Even selling the odd young player wouldn't counteract that.
  • vff said:

    vff earlier

    From the way, Duchatelet is going about business, I don't think he really bothered as a Charlton as a viable Championship outfit. If Charlton have seasons as a Championship club, that is probably seen as a bonus. It takes too much investment to establish Charlton in the higher level of the Championship.

    I think he has a plan B for Charlton as a League One outfit. Duchatelet can still develop the academy and League One is a more natural fit for all the network players not good for Liege and a better step up in level from his other network clubs. The Championship is a tough league and needs a strong team spirit, that needs a high level of investment, a strong manager / head coach with autonomy (who is able to speak up and be listened to) and the loose arrangements of fitting in players from the network does not foster that. The current Duchatelet model is the opposite of what's needed. It may be possible to get away with that set up in League One.

    Jolly Red Robin

    So how comes it works at Watford?

    vff: to @JollyRobin :

    Possibly because Watford are prepared to pay the going rate for wages in the Championship, and are sending over a better quality of player in the first place ?

    Except that a Championship club will be far more attractive to the young talent we want to attract. This division is full of decent clubs with nice grounds and pitches, L1 is far less appealing
  • @VFF

    Interesting theory. Should be clearer once the window closes. If we lose say TBH and Buyens, there are few quality additions to the squad, Luzon doesn't add to the back room team and the club doesn't bring in any advisors with Championship experience- this will support the argument that Roland is happy to play the odds and risk relegation.

    If he is willing to take this risk than as a rational businessman he'll have thought through the pros and cons. Your suggested logic is as good as any.

    Alternatively he may just be poorly advised and drunk on his own arrogance, straying into a new business area that he doesn't fully understand. In business for every Branson there's a Ratner.

    I can't call it at the minute.

    I cannot for one minute see that he would think a team being relegated would make good business sense.
  • So am I the only one to be clinging onto the hope that he doesn't get the permit? It's eerily quiet.
  • someone posted on the facebook Charlton group that the work permit id to be confirmed tomorrow with a 1pm press conference - think (and hope!) he is wrong as don't we usually have a presser on Thursdays?
  • sammy391 said:

    someone posted on the facebook Charlton group that the work permit id to be confirmed tomorrow with a 1pm press conference - think (and hope!) he is wrong as don't we usually have a presser on Thursdays?

    Let's hope it goes a bit better than the last press conference. Shambles.
  • Sponsored links:


  • So am I the only one to be clinging onto the hope that he doesn't get the permit? It's eerily quiet.

    They probably still haven't put the application yet.
  • vffvff
    edited January 2015
    I hope that it was not Luzon suggesting that Charlton play a high line with slow defenders in the back line (such as Bikey) like happened at Watford. I hope who ever suggested that, with the current pace in the defence, never does that again.
  • Damian said he was acting on Luzon's instructions, at least part of the time against Watford.
    I am assuming Watford was 100% down to Luzon, as I assume Wolves will be 100% down to Luzon, if not Luzon, then Duchatelet.
  • edited January 2015

    I assume he's been on a lovely sunny beach in Israel, since leaving Standard.
    now he's in cold, damp Bexleyheath and looking forward to getting Peeters Pelters before h/t
    against Rotherham if we've not taken the lead.(the Wolves game shouldn't count)

    The word on the street is saying he has found a young flemish lawyer and is reading the small print to see if there's
    a get out clause within the first 14 days.

    Maybe there's a cooling off period.

    Or maybe I'm mixing it up with buying a Timeshare.

    Actually, the "network" IS a bit like the Timeshare concept.

    You buy, then, by means of "banking" your purchase into a "pool", you proceed to borrow another from said pool..... ad infinitum.

    Sound familiar ?





  • I assume he's been on a lovely sunny beach in Israel, since leaving Standard.
    now he's in cold, damp Bexleyheath and looking forward to getting Peeters Pelters before h/t
    against Rotherham if we've not taken the lead.(the Wolves game shouldn't count)

    The word on the street is saying he has found a young flemish lawyer and is reading the small print to see if there's
    a get out clause within the first 14 days.

    Maybe there's a cooling off period.

    Can i have an assist for setting you up Fanny.

    Your just the finisher we need.

  • edited January 2015
    vff said:

    I hope that it was not Luzon suggesting that Charlton play a high line with slow defenders in the back line (such as Bikey) like happened at Watford. I hope who ever suggested that, with the current pace in the defence, never does that again.

    To be fair, as soon as it went 2-0, we seemed to drop back and it didn't exactly go any better!
  • @VFF

    Interesting theory. Should be clearer once the window closes. If we lose say TBH and Buyens, there are few quality additions to the squad, Luzon doesn't add to the back room team and the club doesn't bring in any advisors with Championship experience- this will support the argument that Roland is happy to play the odds and risk relegation.

    If he is willing to take this risk than as a rational businessman he'll have thought through the pros and cons. Your suggested logic is as good as any.

    Alternatively he may just be poorly advised and drunk on his own arrogance, straying into a new business area that he doesn't fully understand. In business for every Branson there's a Ratner.

    I can't call it at the minute.

    I cannot for one minute see that he would think a team being relegated would make good business sense.
    I agree that it does not appear to make good business sense. The strategy does seem insane on a business level. Yet all those things are happening. What does the evidence point to ? What other conclusions can Charlton supporters arrive at ?

    The football decisions make sense on one level for saving money but not in having a successful football strategy. Luzon as manager for a team, when at least 3 of the team have fallen out with him and those players have been moved sideways to that team to escape him ? The probable result will be that those players will be looking to move from that team.

    Liege supporters did warn us that Duchatelet makes baffling football decisions. Duchatelet, I think knows the price of everything but the value of nothing. It may just be hubris. I definitely don't rule out general incompetence.

  • I assume he's been on a lovely sunny beach in Israel, since leaving Standard.
    now he's in cold, damp Bexleyheath and looking forward to getting Peeters Pelters before h/t
    against Rotherham if we've not taken the lead.(the Wolves game shouldn't count)

    The word on the street is saying he has found a young flemish lawyer and is reading the small print to see if there's
    a get out clause within the first 14 days.

    Maybe there's a cooling off period.

    Can i have an assist for setting you up Fanny.

    Your just the finisher we need.

    She'd be FFF then. :smiley:
  • RedChaser said:

    I assume he's been on a lovely sunny beach in Israel, since leaving Standard.
    now he's in cold, damp Bexleyheath and looking forward to getting Peeters Pelters before h/t
    against Rotherham if we've not taken the lead.(the Wolves game shouldn't count)

    The word on the street is saying he has found a young flemish lawyer and is reading the small print to see if there's
    a get out clause within the first 14 days.

    Maybe there's a cooling off period.

    Can i have an assist for setting you up Fanny.

    Your just the finisher we need.

    She'd be FFF then. :smiley:
    I'm happy with that, Red

    As long as the first F isn't misconstrued as "Flatulent".

  • Sponsored links:


  • Not sure if this is rumour
  • No, of course not and thanks for the Lol that's taken me on to three fat ladies at 888. :blush:
  • cabbles said:

    Not sure if this is rumour

    Probably more crap on that group
  • vffvff
    edited January 2015
    seth plum said:

    Damian said he was acting on Luzon's instructions, at least part of the time against Watford.
    I am assuming Watford was 100% down to Luzon, as I assume Wolves will be 100% down to Luzon, if not Luzon, then Duchatelet.

    Unless lessons are quickly learnt, and these people don't take advice (as Riga appeared to do) then I am concerned about the outcome of the Wolves game. I am not holding my breath that Duchatelet or Luzon will actually take advice. If Luzon did suggest that Charlton play a high line, knowing how slow Bikey is, then that is an ominously bad start.

    Lets hope the visa application hits a snag (and the rumours of it being granted are incorrect). I am worried though about Duchatelet running the team selection from his office in Belgium. I fear that he is that much of a misguided megalomanic to think he can do that.
  • vff said:

    seth plum said:

    Damian said he was acting on Luzon's instructions, at least part of the time against Watford.
    I am assuming Watford was 100% down to Luzon, as I assume Wolves will be 100% down to Luzon, if not Luzon, then Duchatelet.

    Unless lessons are quickly learnt, and these people take advice (as Riga appeared to do) then I am concerned about the outcome of the Wolves game.
    And beyond.

  • Fanny, come on...you're meant to be the one who gives us hope however bad it gets...

    Hx
  • edited January 2015
    .
  • sammy391 said:

    someone posted on the facebook Charlton group that the work permit id to be confirmed tomorrow with a 1pm press conference - think (and hope!) he is wrong as don't we usually have a presser on Thursdays?

    Let's hope it goes a bit better than the last press conference. Shambles.
    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...
    'Won't Get Fooled Again' is the most appropriate song title for the mess of the last couple of weeks anyway
  • Gimme hope Fanackapan!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!