Paying first team prices to watch a Charlton XI side.
When will you be able to watch a Charlton First-Team match for £12 though, will be interesting to see how much Chelmsford charge next week as their standard ticket is £13
Paying first team prices to watch a Charlton XI side.
When will you be able to watch a Charlton First-Team match for £12 though?
I watched the first team for a tenner on Saturday, so I don't think it's wholly unreasonable to expect that for twelve quid I'd see more than a ramshackle bunch of reserves.
Paying first team prices to watch a Charlton XI side.
When will you be able to watch a Charlton First-Team match for £12 though?
I watched the first team for a tenner on Saturday, so I don't think it's wholly unreasonable to expect that for twelve quid I'd see more than a ramshackle bunch of reserves.
Agreed but Championship / Premier League can probably afford to have lower prices (i.e. you hear all the time when we reach the FA Cup 3rd Round and everyone wants to charge lower prices but League One / Two / Non-League Teams always want the prices to be more because of it being their windfall.
Its like Welling who charged us £15 when you could say that was crazy because they're only a Conference team
(Think the whole lesson from this post is just the simple old argument... what English fans get charged for to go watch a game of Football is stupid!!)
I'd say precisely that about Welling, but at least people knew what to expect and could make an informed choice as to whether or not they'd attend. The Southend game was billed as a first team friendly but was clearly a reserve/youth side.
Agree wholeheartedly with your conclusion that English fans are charged stupid amounts.
i.e. Even my mate who is a Welling fan says it... How can you be charged £15 for a Conference game (Standing behind the goal) yet for Charlton to charge £17 (Sitting behind the goal).
Sadly this is where Sky have ruined the game, because these teams need to make some money to try and survive or to try and get into the Football League which as a League Two team would see them get a bit of the Television money, they're forced to charge silly amounts as not enough people are interested.
I know I've taken over the "General Things that Annoy You" thread but this really is something that annoys me lol!
To put things into perspective I remember seeing an advert a few years ago that you could get tickets to the Ladies Champions League final for a tenner, and also I paid £15 for a ticket for the Super League Final at Old Trafford last year.
The advert for Totally Marbs or whatever it's called where that blonde bint states 'everybody wants this lifestyle but not everyone can have it". Well actually, not everyone wants to live that vacuous, shallow, materialistic, bullshit life you dopey c***.
People who think jogging anywhere in the city is a really great idea. During the week. Between 5 & 7.
Really?
Yes very good one EastStand. Jogging in built up areas in general. Sorry any city joggers, I like a run myself but it's the way some of them look at you as if to say you're in their way because they have to weave round you. No, the square mile is for soulless finance and overpriced silly eateries, not running
Newspapers and media telling people who they should get outraged at, leading to a neverending deluge of outrage from idiots on social media who are unable to think for themselves.
Paying first team prices to watch a Charlton XI side.
When will you be able to watch a Charlton First-Team match for £12 though, will be interesting to see how much Chelmsford charge next week as their standard ticket is £13
£10 according to the Chelmsford website. Tempted to if I can leave the house in time
I don't use social media neither am I am idiot being told what to think - Shooting Lions etc for fun is sick and if you think it's not there must be something wrong with you.
Dentists killing Lions for fun and the government who licenses them to do so.
I considered starting a thread for this as it didn't look like we had one, but I think we are all in agreement that this guy is c*** of the highest order. I don't care that a certain amount of 'legal' hunting is permitted, or that the man responsible has apologised as he didn't know the lion had a history or a name and was revered amongst the park as a personality (FFS - it doesn't matter if the lion had no name, was not a particularly well known lion or a lion that thought it was a pig). I know 2 wrongs don't make a right and some people may think less of me for saying it, but I hope this guy meets a very painful end. I can't think of it any other way, can't see it from any other point of view.
Perhaps, and this is me trying to think about it rationally, he could now give a donation to protect animals if he is truly sorry. You can say sorry but does he mean it?
If the internet has taught us one thing, it's that animals are better than humans. There are constant videos of great animal moments that you can find in many different situations, whereas we want to film people slapping one another. Says it all really
I don't use social media neither am I am idiot being told what to think - Shooting Lions etc for fun is sick and if you think it's not there must be something wrong with you.
If you're referring to me then it is rather hilarious you of all people calling me a sad arrogant troll.
This wasn't particularly brought on by the lion thing although I have seen this story being posted all over the place. It was more in reference to a string of things in the last few weeks that have been ridiculous witch-hunts, for example, the story of the woman who had a breast-feeding baby ripped from her by a Primark guard that later turned out to be complete bollocks but it didn't stop the social media mob baying for Primark's blood because the media was telling them to be angry.
Anyway, maybe next time don't be so paranoid over who is attacking you, for the record I didn't even see your post about the lions before posting.
Dentists killing Lions for fun and the government who licenses them to do so.
I considered starting a thread for this as it didn't look like we had one, but I think we are all in agreement that this guy is c*** of the highest order. I don't care that a certain amount of 'legal' hunting is permitted, or that the man responsible has apologised as he didn't know the lion had a history or a name and was revered amongst the park as a personality (FFS - it doesn't matter if the lion had no name, was not a particularly well known lion or a lion that thought it was a pig). I know 2 wrongs don't make a right and some people may think less of me for saying it, but I hope this guy meets a very painful end. I can't think of it any other way, can't see it from any other point of view.
Perhaps, and this is me trying to think about it rationally, he could now give a donation to protect animals if he is truly sorry. You can say sorry but does he mean it?
If the internet has taught us one thing, it's that animals are better than humans. There are constant videos of great animal moments that you can find in many different situations, whereas we want to film people slapping one another. Says it all really
I think if you go out of your way to pay and travel across the world just to behead a majestic animal such as a lion youve got serious mental problems.
The amount of dentally challenged Northerners on the Jeremy Kyle show. I'm not a native of the North but there's more to it's people than the badly dressed, ill mannered, uncouth, sweary mouthed specimens that demean themselves by appearing on the programme.
Comments
Its like Welling who charged us £15 when you could say that was crazy because they're only a Conference team
(Think the whole lesson from this post is just the simple old argument... what English fans get charged for to go watch a game of Football is stupid!!)
Agree wholeheartedly with your conclusion that English fans are charged stupid amounts.
Sadly this is where Sky have ruined the game, because these teams need to make some money to try and survive or to try and get into the Football League which as a League Two team would see them get a bit of the Television money, they're forced to charge silly amounts as not enough people are interested.
I know I've taken over the "General Things that Annoy You" thread but this really is something that annoys me lol!
Draw any conclusions you want from that.
Really?
I don't use social media neither am I am idiot being told what to think - Shooting Lions etc for fun is sick and if you think it's not there must be something wrong with you.
Perhaps, and this is me trying to think about it rationally, he could now give a donation to protect animals if he is truly sorry. You can say sorry but does he mean it?
If the internet has taught us one thing, it's that animals are better than humans. There are constant videos of great animal moments that you can find in many different situations, whereas we want to film people slapping one another. Says it all really
This wasn't particularly brought on by the lion thing although I have seen this story being posted all over the place. It was more in reference to a string of things in the last few weeks that have been ridiculous witch-hunts, for example, the story of the woman who had a breast-feeding baby ripped from her by a Primark guard that later turned out to be complete bollocks but it didn't stop the social media mob baying for Primark's blood because the media was telling them to be angry.
Anyway, maybe next time don't be so paranoid over who is attacking you, for the record I didn't even see your post about the lions before posting.
These people should be locked up and studied.