Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Jake Forster-Caskey signs (confirmed).

145679

Comments

  • clb74
    clb74 Posts: 10,824
    So his not signed a new contract?
  • He’s
  • Sage
    Sage Posts: 7,278
    He’s practically ready now. He will be involved on Saturday for sure, as I think Page will be too. Even if they come on, they’ll be involved.

    11 or 12 days away from the first leg, get through Rochdale fine and we will have everyone available except for Solly. Very strong and very exciting.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,222
    Sage said:
    He’s practically ready now. He will be involved on Saturday for sure, as I think Page will be too. Even if they come on, they’ll be involved.

    11 or 12 days away from the first leg, get through Rochdale fine and we will have everyone available except for Solly. Very strong and very exciting.
    What's up with RHF @sage ?
  • Sage
    Sage Posts: 7,278
    Sage said:
    He’s practically ready now. He will be involved on Saturday for sure, as I think Page will be too. Even if they come on, they’ll be involved.

    11 or 12 days away from the first leg, get through Rochdale fine and we will have everyone available except for Solly. Very strong and very exciting.
    What's up with RHF @sage ?
    Not a clue unfortunately. I haven’t heard a single thing about Reeco, sorry mate.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,675
    Sage said:
    Sage said:
    He’s practically ready now. He will be involved on Saturday for sure, as I think Page will be too. Even if they come on, they’ll be involved.

    11 or 12 days away from the first leg, get through Rochdale fine and we will have everyone available except for Solly. Very strong and very exciting.
    What's up with RHF @sage ?
    Not a clue unfortunately. I haven’t heard a single thing about Reeco, sorry mate.
    A and E department at Princess Royal yesterday. 
    Not a clue as to why though .
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    I asked him the other day and he's not heard anything yet.

    I would imagine he's a little annoyed as he has a family to think of and, as it stands, is unemployed in 4 weeks.

    I imagine he has a busy agent right now
  • clb74
    clb74 Posts: 10,824
    He’s
    And him
  • I would have the strongest team starting Saturday, it's 7 or 8 days before the next game with the one after being 6 days after that. More than enough time to recover and keeps the Shapness which Bowyer has mentioned.
    I'd still rotate slightly... Whilst it'll be good to have the first eleven match sharp we'll also need others to have the right match fitness and sharpness

    Only four Id say are guaranteed to start are Phillips / Dijksteel / Purrington / Taylor
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,004
    Swisdom said:
    I asked him the other day and he's not heard anything yet.

    I would imagine he's a little annoyed as he has a family to think of and, as it stands, is unemployed in 4 weeks.

    I imagine he has a busy agent right now
    Contracts run to 30th June usually.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Just starting my day in N. America. What's the deal with Jake then, did he get his move last night? Is that confirmed off? Is he know going to be brought out of the cold and used as the potentially valuable midfield asset that he is, or are we gong to cancel a contract we gave him, under no obligation, a few months ago?

    Anyone know what's going on with him?
  • SantaClaus
    SantaClaus Posts: 7,652
    Just starting my day in N. America. What's the deal with Jake then, did he get his move last night? Is that confirmed off? Is he know going to be brought out of the cold and used as the potentially valuable midfield asset that he is, or are we gong to cancel a contract we gave him, under no obligation, a few months ago?

    Anyone know what's going on with him?
    My cynical take is he's signed up for the season, apparently one of our better earners, unwanted by the manager and seemingly can't be arsed to find another club. Basically he's this season's Ben Watson.
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Just starting my day in N. America. What's the deal with Jake then, did he get his move last night? Is that confirmed off? Is he know going to be brought out of the cold and used as the potentially valuable midfield asset that he is, or are we gong to cancel a contract we gave him, under no obligation, a few months ago?

    Anyone know what's going on with him?
    My cynical take is he's signed up for the season, apparently one of our better earners, unwanted by the manager and seemingly can't be arsed to find another club. Basically he's this season's Ben Watson.
    Why should he be arsed to find another club when it was the club who, unilaterally, extended his contract about 12 weeks ago?

    If a player put in a transfer request 2 months after agreeing a new contract there would be uproar.  Probably justifiably.

    If they club didn't want him "clogging up the wage bill" they should have thought about that, shouldn't they?  Hardly his fault is it.
  • He should be in the matchday "extended" squad for the next 4 months, it would be crazy to still leave him out.
  • Pavoren007
    Pavoren007 Posts: 2,525
    I think the contractual clause referred to on the forum by many others before will deprive JFC of game time (other than cups…). A club gamble which has not paid off, it would appear and I feel for JFC, who has always given everything and has many qualities when fit. Best wishes with you JFC!
  • I think the contractual clause referred to on the forum by many others before will deprive JFC of game time (other than cups…). A club gamble which has not paid off, it would appear and I feel for JFC, who has always given everything and has many qualities when fit. Best wishes with you JFC!
    I fear you may be right, but I hope its not the case. If it is how it play out it'll be a shitty way to treat a player who has always played with commitment. To go from being kept on through his injury (which was the right thing to do) to frozen out of the playing squad in 12 months or so, is not the right way to treat a player. He's a good player when on form and would be an asset to the team.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,764
    edited September 2022
    His knees aren’t up to it anymore. He shouldn’t have got the contract he did two years ago, like I had said at the time but got lambasted for.

    We should’ve helped him with recovery and wished him luck finding a new club.
  • His knees aren’t up to it anymore. He shouldn’t have got the contract he did two years ago, like I had said at the time but got lambasted for.

    We should’ve helped him with recovery and wished him luck finding a new club.
    Oh mate, how can you say that so definitely? Have the physio staff tipped you off?

    You may be right but he showed no sign of "nursing" his knees the other night.

    As I've said above, and others have said as well, it was the club who took up his option, not F-C. The fact he is still here is purely down to the person who decided to take up his option. (Maybe the same bloke who thought it was a good idea to bring Aneke back on a 3.5 year deal!)
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    I'd say JFC grew into the game on Wednesday. He's not a first team starter yet and needs to earn his space in the squad like any other.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,764
    edited September 2022
    His knees aren’t up to it anymore. He shouldn’t have got the contract he did two years ago, like I had said at the time but got lambasted for.

    We should’ve helped him with recovery and wished him luck finding a new club.
    Oh mate, how can you say that so definitely? Have the physio staff tipped you off?

    You may be right but he showed no sign of "nursing" his knees the other night.

    As I've said above, and others have said as well, it was the club who took up his option, not F-C. The fact he is still here is purely down to the person who decided to take up his option. (Maybe the same bloke who thought it was a good idea to bring Aneke back on a 3.5 year deal!)
    Because he gets into any third tier team comfortably if he was anywhere near his best. The fact he isn’t even appearing on the bench tells you everything you need to know.

    Think too many people have been clinging on to him out of sentiment.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,628
    He'll be needed up front when Stockley gets crocked tomorrow. 
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    edited September 2022
    His knees aren’t up to it anymore. He shouldn’t have got the contract he did two years ago, like I had said at the time but got lambasted for.

    We should’ve helped him with recovery and wished him luck finding a new club.
    Oh mate, how can you say that so definitely? Have the physio staff tipped you off?

    You may be right but he showed no sign of "nursing" his knees the other night.

    As I've said above, and others have said as well, it was the club who took up his option, not F-C. The fact he is still here is purely down to the person who decided to take up his option. (Maybe the same bloke who thought it was a good idea to bring Aneke back on a 3.5 year deal!)
    Because he gets into any third tier team comfortably if he was anywhere near his best. The fact he isn’t even appearing on the bench tells you everything you need to know.

    Think too many people have been clinging on to him out of sentiment.
    Let's see what happens now the window has closed.  There was clearly nothing wrong with his "repaired" knee in the 20/21 season.  There is no reason to suspect his other knee is any worse.

    With no more Pizza or fizzy pop games in September I would be tempted to get him a 28 day loan to the national league, the bloke obviously needs games.

    The ultimate insult now would be to pay himnoff today, knowing he couldn't play for anyone until January 1st.
  • His knees aren’t up to it anymore. He shouldn’t have got the contract he did two years ago, like I had said at the time but got lambasted for.

    We should’ve helped him with recovery and wished him luck finding a new club.
    Oh mate, how can you say that so definitely? Have the physio staff tipped you off?

    You may be right but he showed no sign of "nursing" his knees the other night.

    As I've said above, and others have said as well, it was the club who took up his option, not F-C. The fact he is still here is purely down to the person who decided to take up his option. (Maybe the same bloke who thought it was a good idea to bring Aneke back on a 3.5 year deal!)
    Because he gets into any third tier team comfortably if he was anywhere near his best. The fact he isn’t even appearing on the bench tells you everything you need to know.

    Think too many people have been clinging on to him out of sentiment.
    Wrong. It's the contractual clause stopping him from making league appearances. 
  • Cafc43v3r said:
    His knees aren’t up to it anymore. He shouldn’t have got the contract he did two years ago, like I had said at the time but got lambasted for.

    We should’ve helped him with recovery and wished him luck finding a new club.
    Oh mate, how can you say that so definitely? Have the physio staff tipped you off?

    You may be right but he showed no sign of "nursing" his knees the other night.

    As I've said above, and others have said as well, it was the club who took up his option, not F-C. The fact he is still here is purely down to the person who decided to take up his option. (Maybe the same bloke who thought it was a good idea to bring Aneke back on a 3.5 year deal!)
    Because he gets into any third tier team comfortably if he was anywhere near his best. The fact he isn’t even appearing on the bench tells you everything you need to know.

    Think too many people have been clinging on to him out of sentiment.
    Let's she what happens now the window has closed.  There was clearly nothing wrong with his "repaired" knee in the 20/21 season.  There is no reason to suspect his other knee is any worse.

    With no more Pizza or fizzy pop games in September I would be tempted to get him a 28 day loan to the national league, the bloke obviously needs games.

    The ultimate insult now would be to pay himnoff today, knowing he couldn't play for anyone until January 1st.
    The ultimate insult would be sending him to the national league!
  • His knees aren’t up to it anymore. He shouldn’t have got the contract he did two years ago, like I had said at the time but got lambasted for.

    We should’ve helped him with recovery and wished him luck finding a new club.
    Oh mate, how can you say that so definitely? Have the physio staff tipped you off?

    You may be right but he showed no sign of "nursing" his knees the other night.

    As I've said above, and others have said as well, it was the club who took up his option, not F-C. The fact he is still here is purely down to the person who decided to take up his option. (Maybe the same bloke who thought it was a good idea to bring Aneke back on a 3.5 year deal!)
    Because he gets into any third tier team comfortably if he was anywhere near his best. The fact he isn’t even appearing on the bench tells you everything you need to know.

    Think too many people have been clinging on to him out of sentiment.
    Wrong again I'm afraid.

    As @bolloxbolder says above, the reason he is no where near the first team is - so we hear - because any league appearances he makes trigger a large pay rise for him.

    Anyway, I'm off to have my dinner so I'll leave you to it!
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Cafc43v3r said:
    His knees aren’t up to it anymore. He shouldn’t have got the contract he did two years ago, like I had said at the time but got lambasted for.

    We should’ve helped him with recovery and wished him luck finding a new club.
    Oh mate, how can you say that so definitely? Have the physio staff tipped you off?

    You may be right but he showed no sign of "nursing" his knees the other night.

    As I've said above, and others have said as well, it was the club who took up his option, not F-C. The fact he is still here is purely down to the person who decided to take up his option. (Maybe the same bloke who thought it was a good idea to bring Aneke back on a 3.5 year deal!)
    Because he gets into any third tier team comfortably if he was anywhere near his best. The fact he isn’t even appearing on the bench tells you everything you need to know.

    Think too many people have been clinging on to him out of sentiment.
    Let's she what happens now the window has closed.  There was clearly nothing wrong with his "repaired" knee in the 20/21 season.  There is no reason to suspect his other knee is any worse.

    With no more Pizza or fizzy pop games in September I would be tempted to get him a 28 day loan to the national league, the bloke obviously needs games.

    The ultimate insult now would be to pay himnoff today, knowing he couldn't play for anyone until January 1st.
    The ultimate insult would be sending him to the national league!
    Where else can he play?  There is a big difference to sending him to Bromley for 28 days, knowing he could play for us when he cane back, match fit, than forcing him to go to a league 2 club for the whole season.  Which is what a lot of people have suggested.
  • Given that we saved the wages on not signing a striker or a CB, they should just pay him more and play him. 
    He is comprehensively the best midfielder we have apart from Dobbo and I would much rather play him than Albie. 
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,764
    edited September 2022
    To me, a pleb with no ITK sources, the supposed contract clause comes across a nothing but rumour and supposition from fans clinging on to a player that was quality a couple of years ago but no longer exists.

    There are two possibilities:
    1. he’s been injured so often that his body is no longer up to the level that’s needed
    2. there’s the magic clause in his contract and we don’t want to pay it

    If we had no intention of triggering the clause, why did his contract get renewed? To move him on? Ok but he is actually a good player when healthy so if he’s truly ready to play, why are there no takers for him, even in the league below?

    The club has a history of giving contracts to crocked players. To me, with no ITK sources, the conclusion makes sense. It just looks like another one on a growing list.
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,824
    To me, a pleb with no ITK sources, the supposed contract clause comes across a nothing but rumour and supposition from fans clinging on to a player that was quality a couple of years ago but no longer exists.

    There are two possibilities:
    1. he’s been injured so often that his body is no longer up to the level that’s needed
    2. there’s the magic clause in his contract and we don’t want to pay it

    If we had no intention of triggering the clause, why did his contract get renewed? To move him on? Ok but he is actually a good player when healthy so if he’s truly ready to play, why are there no takers for him, even in the league below?

    The club has a history of giving contracts to crocked players. To me, with no ITK sources, the conclusion makes sense. It just looks like another one on a growing list.
    Surely if this clause actually exists, all parties would now benefit from tearing up the contract now.