Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2021 (excluding Ashes)

1…8081838586…183

Comments

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    Leuth said:
    cantersaddick said:
    Good work for England. Excellent that we have their finishers who like to bat the last 10 overs in at the halfway stage. Will mean that they can't play their natural game.
    Cheers cants
    To be fair I think we haven't fully seen their natural game - yet!
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,049
    Liam Livingstone.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    Covered End said:
    Liam Livingstone.
    Liam Lawrence Livingsone
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,049
    Not sure if I'm being whooshed.
    Liam Stephen Livingstone.
    https://www.espncricinfo.com/england/content/player/403902.html
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,008
    Leuth said:
    cantersaddick said:
    Good work for England. Excellent that we have their finishers who like to bat the last 10 overs in at the halfway stage. Will mean that they can't play their natural game.
    Cheers cants
    My sincerest apologies 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    Covered End said:
    Not sure if I'm being whooshed.
    Liam Stephen Livingstone.
    https://www.espncricinfo.com/england/content/player/403902.html
    Not a whoosh as such but I frequently get the two players' names mixed up which I shouldn't so am making their names up as I go along.
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,437
    Like Curran’s mentality.

    They can’t hit you for 6 if you exclusively bowl wides.


  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    Three wides in five balls from Curran followed by a boundary. Wicket sure to follow!
  • AllHailTheHen
    AllHailTheHen Posts: 3,064
    edited March 2021
    Cracking over this from Curran

    Edit - Ha ha last ball and he gets a wicket!
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,437
    Addick Addict said:
    Three wides in five balls from Curran followed by a boundary. Wicket sure to follow!
    Lottery numbers in my DMs please

  • Sponsored links:



  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,049
    Addick Addict said:
    Three wides in five balls from Curran followed by a boundary. Wicket sure to follow!
    Well called.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    Addick Addict said:
    Three wides in five balls from Curran followed by a boundary. Wicket sure to follow!

    Just saying!
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,008
    Fair
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    It is that thing about "liquorice all sorts" bowling. Eventually he'll bowl a good ball that the batsman isn't prepared for!
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    Laddick01 said:
    Like Curran’s mentality.

    They can’t hit you for 6 if you exclusively bowl wides.


    To be fair that’s what the Indian’s tactic was vs stokes the other day
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    Wood could end up bowling 7 overs from one end now!
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    That must be so distracting for a batsman someone like Wood bowling at that pace and constantly following over in front of you
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    They are talking about how run rates have changed over the years. The 1986 B & H Cup Final:

    Middlesex 199-7 off 55 (Dilley 11-1-19-1) 
    Kent 197-8 off 55 (Cowans 9-2-18-2)

    It is difficult to reconcile those scores when you see teams regularly getting that off 20 these days
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    Big wicket that
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    Wood is really struggling out there which is probably why he only bowled 3 overs inside the first 37

  • Sponsored links:



  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,008
    Addick Addict said:
    Wood is really struggling out there which is probably why he only bowled 3 overs inside the first 37
    I reckon he's ill. He doesn't look right at all.
  • moutuakilla
    moutuakilla Posts: 7,584
    Is there a limit to how many bowlers you can use in ODIs?
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,346
    moutuakilla said:
    Is there a limit to how many bowlers you can use in ODIs?
    Eleven
  • moutuakilla
    moutuakilla Posts: 7,584
    Chizz said:
    moutuakilla said:
    Is there a limit to how many bowlers you can use in ODIs?
    Eleven
    Still time for Butler to chip in with some leg spin then
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,008
    moutuakilla said:
    Chizz said:
    moutuakilla said:
    Is there a limit to how many bowlers you can use in ODIs?
    Eleven
    Still time for Butler to chip in with some leg spin then
    I've seen Jason Roy bowl some dirty seam up stuff in a T20 at Chelmsford about 10 years ago. He's very much in the 'should not bowl' class.
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,052
    Tumble of wickets at the end there. 330 should be gettable
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,868
    In all forms of professional cricket:

    Prasidh - 36 lifetime innings = 74 runs & average 6.17
    Natarajan - 32 lifetime innings = 42 runs & average 2.80

    Total: 78 lifetime innings = 116 runs & average 4.30

    Going back in time numbers 10 & 11 were bunnies but these two rival them
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,712
    If I was India I'd be pretty miffed. Should have got 360-380 with that start. They had 2 periods of 12 overs where they score 100 runs in both & in those 24 overs only lost 1 wicket. To think they scored less runs than in the 2nd match where they went slow & built as they went on. 
  • MrWalker
    MrWalker Posts: 4,130
    Take a bow, Mark Wood.
    Under the weather but fought back to the top of his game.
    Last England innings put the frighteners on the Indian batsmen.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,373
    This is still a stiff chase and I reckon it won't be easy 

Categories

“Marketplace”