Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2021 (excluding Ashes)

1…8081838586…183

Comments

  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Leuth said:
    cantersaddick said:
    Good work for England. Excellent that we have their finishers who like to bat the last 10 overs in at the halfway stage. Will mean that they can't play their natural game.
    Cheers cants
    To be fair I think we haven't fully seen their natural game - yet!
  • Covered EndCovered End
    Liam Livingstone.
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Covered End said:
    Liam Livingstone.
    Liam Lawrence Livingsone
  • Covered EndCovered End
    Not sure if I'm being whooshed.
    Liam Stephen Livingstone.
    https://www.espncricinfo.com/england/content/player/403902.html
  • cantersaddickcantersaddick
    Leuth said:
    cantersaddick said:
    Good work for England. Excellent that we have their finishers who like to bat the last 10 overs in at the halfway stage. Will mean that they can't play their natural game.
    Cheers cants
    My sincerest apologies 
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Covered End said:
    Not sure if I'm being whooshed.
    Liam Stephen Livingstone.
    https://www.espncricinfo.com/england/content/player/403902.html
    Not a whoosh as such but I frequently get the two players' names mixed up which I shouldn't so am making their names up as I go along.
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Three wides in five balls from Curran followed by a boundary. Wicket sure to follow!
  • AllHailTheHenAllHailTheHen
    edited March 2021
    Cracking over this from Curran

    Edit - Ha ha last ball and he gets a wicket!
  • Laddick01Laddick01
    Addick Addict said:
    Three wides in five balls from Curran followed by a boundary. Wicket sure to follow!
    Lottery numbers in my DMs please
  • Sponsored links:


  • Covered EndCovered End
    Addick Addict said:
    Three wides in five balls from Curran followed by a boundary. Wicket sure to follow!
    Well called.
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Addick Addict said:
    Three wides in five balls from Curran followed by a boundary. Wicket sure to follow!

    Just saying!
  • cantersaddickcantersaddick
    Fair
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    It is that thing about "liquorice all sorts" bowling. Eventually he'll bowl a good ball that the batsman isn't prepared for!
  • kentaddickkentaddick
    Laddick01 said:
    Like Curran’s mentality.

    They can’t hit you for 6 if you exclusively bowl wides.


    To be fair that’s what the Indian’s tactic was vs stokes the other day
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Wood could end up bowling 7 overs from one end now!
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    That must be so distracting for a batsman someone like Wood bowling at that pace and constantly following over in front of you
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    They are talking about how run rates have changed over the years. The 1986 B & H Cup Final:

    Middlesex 199-7 off 55 (Dilley 11-1-19-1) 
    Kent 197-8 off 55 (Cowans 9-2-18-2)

    It is difficult to reconcile those scores when you see teams regularly getting that off 20 these days
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Big wicket that
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Wood is really struggling out there which is probably why he only bowled 3 overs inside the first 37
  • Sponsored links:


  • cantersaddickcantersaddick
    Addick Addict said:
    Wood is really struggling out there which is probably why he only bowled 3 overs inside the first 37
    I reckon he's ill. He doesn't look right at all.
  • moutuakillamoutuakilla
    Is there a limit to how many bowlers you can use in ODIs?
  • ChizzChizz
    moutuakilla said:
    Is there a limit to how many bowlers you can use in ODIs?
    Eleven
  • moutuakillamoutuakilla
    Chizz said:
    moutuakilla said:
    Is there a limit to how many bowlers you can use in ODIs?
    Eleven
    Still time for Butler to chip in with some leg spin then
  • cantersaddickcantersaddick
    moutuakilla said:
    Chizz said:
    moutuakilla said:
    Is there a limit to how many bowlers you can use in ODIs?
    Eleven
    Still time for Butler to chip in with some leg spin then
    I've seen Jason Roy bowl some dirty seam up stuff in a T20 at Chelmsford about 10 years ago. He's very much in the 'should not bowl' class.
  • McBobbinMcBobbin
    Tumble of wickets at the end there. 330 should be gettable
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    In all forms of professional cricket:

    Prasidh - 36 lifetime innings = 74 runs & average 6.17
    Natarajan - 32 lifetime innings = 42 runs & average 2.80

    Total: 78 lifetime innings = 116 runs & average 4.30

    Going back in time numbers 10 & 11 were bunnies but these two rival them
  • golfaddickgolfaddick
    If I was India I'd be pretty miffed. Should have got 360-380 with that start. They had 2 periods of 12 overs where they score 100 runs in both & in those 24 overs only lost 1 wicket. To think they scored less runs than in the 2nd match where they went slow & built as they went on. 
  • MrWalkerMrWalker
    Take a bow, Mark Wood.
    Under the weather but fought back to the top of his game.
    Last England innings put the frighteners on the Indian batsmen.
  • LeuthLeuth
    This is still a stiff chase and I reckon it won't be easy 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!