GK
Amos
Maynard Brewer
Defence
Gunter | Inniss | Pearce | Maatsen
Oshilaja | Barker | Famewo | Purrington
Midfield
Levitt | Watson | Gilbey
Morgan | Pratley | Vennings
Attack
Oztumer | Aneke | Williams
Washington | Bogle | Maddison
Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Summer Transfer Rumours 2020 (DEADLINE DAY from pg.258)
Comments
-
I won’t believe Doughty’s leaving until it’s “confirmed” by Rich Cawley and/or Pete O’Rourke. Unfortunately RH’s recent track record isn’t as stellar as it once was so I’m a little less inclined to believe it.
There’s about five pages of people calling him greedy etc over one whisper that was posted up here earlier today. Imagine if nothing’s happened and he’s reading those posts LOL.3 -
I'm sure that most of us if offered a new job with a "better" company and lots more money we would go and would not be considered greedy, why should it be different for a footballer?0
-
Kante’s available.9
-
Let's say he's on his apprenticeship.lancashire lad said:I'm sure that most of us if offered a new job with a "better" company and lots more money we would go and would not be considered greedy, why should it be different for a footballer?
Company A has paid for his development and training and he hasn't finished said apprenticeship.
If he goes to Company B it is wholly disrespectful to Company A and a complete waste of their time and money.
Won't judge til it is confirmed and we learn how it affects us.3 -
He changed to 433 because he had Doughty, people put that and the signing of Maddison together and came up with 433 as the preferred formation.Scoham said:
None because we had mobile strikers who could drift wide and cause full backs problems, so a different formation suited us.Cafc43v3r said:
Bowyer’s moved to a 4-3-3 formation and building the squad with that in mind. You’d think he wouldn’t have to completely change his plans just by one player leaving.
LB has talked about "different systems" back normally about 3 or 4 at the back.
Changing to 433, as the default, would have needed major surgery. Where would you put Williams, Oztumer, Aneke etc in a 433?2 -
4
-
On the benchCafc43v3r said:
He changed to 433 because he had Doughty, people put that and the signing of Maddison together and came up with 433 as the preferred formation.Scoham said:
None because we had mobile strikers who could drift wide and cause full backs problems, so a different formation suited us.Cafc43v3r said:
Bowyer’s moved to a 4-3-3 formation and building the squad with that in mind. You’d think he wouldn’t have to completely change his plans just by one player leaving.
LB has talked about "different systems" back normally about 3 or 4 at the back.
Changing to 433, as the default, would have needed major surgery. Where would you put Williams, Oztumer, Aneke etc in a 433?
1 -
You don't need to run if you can pick a killer pass from 50 yardscafc_harry said:
Has a great delivery don’t get me wrong, but I don’t think he’s the type to run up and down the pitch, at defenders etc. Doughty’s pace is absolutely lethal at this level, very hard if not impossible to replace.Dazzler21 said:
Maddison?cafc_harry said:Who’s replacing our main direct attacking threat then? Doubt we’ll get anyone else in not counting towards the cap at this stage. Can’t say I get this one.
Pace is nothing without control/end product...#runforrestrun1 -
-
I’m not sure that analogy works - he can only leave us if we agree to sell him or his contract expires without agreeing a new deal. He can’t just walk out now and join a new “company”.Dazzler21 said:
Let's say he's on his apprenticeship.lancashire lad said:I'm sure that most of us if offered a new job with a "better" company and lots more money we would go and would not be considered greedy, why should it be different for a footballer?
Company A has paid for his development and training and he hasn't finished said apprenticeship.
If he goes to Company B it is wholly disrespectful to Company A and a complete waste of their time and money.
Won't judge til it is confirmed and we learn how it affects us.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
That was nice of Lampard. Kante who is probably one of the least troublesome players out there, refused some time off to attend a wedding.Callumcafc said:Kante’s available.3 -
8
-
I can't speak for everyone who has commented but I'd certainly wish him well and follow his career with interest.lancashire lad said:I'm sure that most of us if offered a new job with a "better" company and lots more money we would go and would not be considered greedy, why should it be different for a footballer?
The problem I have with it is that he's (potentially) being silly. He's making life harder for the club that gave him a chance for a quick, short-term win. If he's as good as he thinks he is, he could sign a contract, smash League One and go in the summer - that will give him more money, status and secure the club financially. We'd all wish each other well and dance off into the moonlight.
Unfortunately, agents exist. They'll be in his ear as much as possible trying to get him to jump ship at the first opportunity.
As for the comparison with normal jobs, it doesn't correlate. While I understand your point, the caveat is that normal jobs don't invest in you since the age of 10 and give you every opportunity to flourish - just for you to run your contract down after 15 odd decent performances.1 -
He wanted a big "do" with hundreds of guests and a marquee, but Lamps wanted something quiet at the registry office?Callumcafc said:Kante’s available.18 -
Thinking the same, decent MF, defence taking shape but no-one to score & I would be surprised there's any decent strikers hanging around that we could afford under the cap.limeygent said:I see a lot of 0-0 draws coming.0 -
I think if you shuffle it to 352 and 442 (diamond) it looks more offensive and more inspirational.Dazzler21 said:@Cafc43v3r
Rather uninspiring options, but options:GK
Amos
Maynard Brewer
Defence
Gunter | Inniss | Pearce | Maatsen
Oshilaja | Barker | Famewo | Purrington
Midfield
Levitt | Watson | Gilbey
Morgan | Pratley | Vennings
Attack
Oztumer | Aneke | Williams
Washington | Bogle | Maddison
We will see.3 -
I reckon bogle could score shit loads off of Maddison crossescharltonbob said:
Thinking the same, decent MF, defence taking shape but no-one to score & I would be surprised there's any decent strikers hanging around that we could afford under the cap.limeygent said:I see a lot of 0-0 draws coming.7 -
Dazzler21 said:
On the benchCafc43v3r said:
He changed to 433 because he had Doughty, people put that and the signing of Maddison together and came up with 433 as the preferred formation.Scoham said:
None because we had mobile strikers who could drift wide and cause full backs problems, so a different formation suited us.Cafc43v3r said:
Bowyer’s moved to a 4-3-3 formation and building the squad with that in mind. You’d think he wouldn’t have to completely change his plans just by one player leaving.
LB has talked about "different systems" back normally about 3 or 4 at the back.
Changing to 433, as the default, would have needed major surgery. Where would you put Williams, Oztumer, Aneke etc in a 433?
for the vets team
1 -
Alfie has gone from being considered a conference player on loan, to Championship and Celtic quality within a year. If it can go that way that quickly, it can go the other way just as quick. Would be mental to not consider a better move presuming he's not on a good contract at the moment.
What is the bigger issue is that we always seem to have a promising youngster break through whilst they are on a one year deal where this scenario keeps happening that we basically have to give in and sell them...1 -
Yeah he has talked about different systems, but he’s likely to have one as his main system. I wouldn’t assume he’s set on that being a diamond, that worked well when we had the right strikers for it. At the moment we probably don’t have that.Cafc43v3r said:
He changed to 433 because he had Doughty, people put that and the signing of Maddison together and came up with 433 as the preferred formation.Scoham said:
None because we had mobile strikers who could drift wide and cause full backs problems, so a different formation suited us.Cafc43v3r said:
Bowyer’s moved to a 4-3-3 formation and building the squad with that in mind. You’d think he wouldn’t have to completely change his plans just by one player leaving.
LB has talked about "different systems" back normally about 3 or 4 at the back.
Changing to 433, as the default, would have needed major surgery. Where would you put Williams, Oztumer, Aneke etc in a 433?
Williams and Oztumer can’t stay in the team, while Aneke can’t stay fit. We won’t be building a system around any of them.
When they do play it wouldn’t be surprising to see Williams our wide or in the midfield 3, Oztumer on the right of the front 3 or Aneke as the central striker. They’ve all played in positions other than a “number 10” during their careers.
1 -
Sponsored links:
-
The purpose of the signings is to get points on the table.
If that happens all is good.
I hope Inniss can avoid trading on the troubled past angle even though true, because sadly he may have caused there to be victims along the way.
Perhaps reparations might be in order.
Either way my attitude overall is good luck to the fella.
Get us points.0 -
Desperately need CBs, and if one of them is Inniss, then great. We need a brickhouse, and you’d assume Gallen and Bowyer wouldn’t sign a donkey. So he’s had problems from a tough childhood, but maybe charlton will help him with those issues? Maarten looks like a slightly taller Dasilva, and could be a great loan. If they’re both confirmed then we’ll have had a decent day under difficult circumstances IMHO.Smyth would potentially be ok as well, who knows.Bogle, Aneke, Smyth & Washington should give us plenty of options up front, and with Madison (and potentially Levitt) opening up defences I think we might do ok, although I’d prefer us to have a proven goalscorer in the ranks.But even so, I’m ever the optimist.1
-
They have also all been pretty poor to average as anything else other than a "number 10". Bowyer has said before that Aneke isn't a 9.Scoham said:
Yeah he has talked about different systems, but he’s likely to have one as his main system. I wouldn’t assume he’s set on that being a diamond, that worked well when we had the right strikers for it. At the moment we probably don’t have that.Cafc43v3r said:
He changed to 433 because he had Doughty, people put that and the signing of Maddison together and came up with 433 as the preferred formation.Scoham said:
None because we had mobile strikers who could drift wide and cause full backs problems, so a different formation suited us.Cafc43v3r said:
Bowyer’s moved to a 4-3-3 formation and building the squad with that in mind. You’d think he wouldn’t have to completely change his plans just by one player leaving.
LB has talked about "different systems" back normally about 3 or 4 at the back.
Changing to 433, as the default, would have needed major surgery. Where would you put Williams, Oztumer, Aneke etc in a 433?
Williams and Oztumer can’t stay in the team, while Aneke can’t stay fit. We won’t be building a system around any of them.
When they do play it wouldn’t be surprising to see Williams our wide or in the midfield 3, Oztumer on the right of the front 3 or Aneke as the central striker. They’ve all played in positions other than a “number 10” during their careers.
Like I said we will see.0 -
Can’t deny Bonne and Doughty their moves given their fantastic performances at the end of last season trying to keep us up.
Dear oh dear.6 -
Thing is they are both now seen as world beaters after onemasicat said:Can’t deny Bonne and Doughty their moves given their fantastic performances at the end of last season trying to keep us up.
Dear oh dear.
season where they were both lets face it, average.
Agree Bonne was a bit of a better player for us, with a few
goals and assists, but what has Alfie really done in the last
12 months to feel he is championship quality.
That said, i don't want him to go,and feel he would benefit
in another year or two, if talent shines through, with a real
life changing move.
Listen to Bowyer, not your agent mate.
0 -
If he wants out, fuck him.10
-
Missing the wage cap deadline has stuffed us a bit. I think this’ll be a season of lower top ten. Then go for it next season.Dazzler21 said:@Cafc43v3r
Rather uninspiring options, but options:GK
Amos
Maynard Brewer
Defence
Gunter | Inniss | Pearce | Maatsen
Oshilaja | Barker | Famewo | Purrington
Midfield
Levitt | Watson | Gilbey
Morgan | Pratley | Vennings
Attack
Oztumer | Aneke | Williams
Washington | Bogle | Maddison1 -
That team screams 9th placeDazzler21 said:@Cafc43v3r
Rather uninspiring options, but options:GK
Amos
Maynard Brewer
Defence
Gunter | Inniss | Pearce | Maatsen
Oshilaja | Barker | Famewo | Purrington
Midfield
Levitt | Watson | Gilbey
Morgan | Pratley | Vennings
Attack
Oztumer | Aneke | Williams
Washington | Bogle | Maddison6 -
I don't know how much of the wage cap we left after Innis, but I'd rather we spunked it (hopefully around £5-10k per week) on one proven striker now, Eisa or Marquis for example. Can't remember the last time a side got out of league one without a goalscorer0
-
Like the sound of this giant psycho fella from Palace.
Just the ticket for League One and gets our squad average height above 5ft 4.
Would be nice if at least one of our academy products could find the heart to stay for a season or two before chasing their fortunes elsewhere but that as they say, is football.23











