Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket Tour Of Bangladesh & India

1…1213151718…38

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    Covered End said:

    Does anyone else find the DRS not 100% convincing in this series ?

    I usually always agree with the DRS decision, but this series I have my doubts.

    I have a little sympathy for Dharasema.

    They've changed the rules now haven't they to reduce the amount of "umpire's call" leeway, as they're confident in the accuracy of the system
  • iamdan
    iamdan Posts: 2,421
    158-8 few overs before lunch, trial by spin..
    Root 56 only highlight.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    163-8 at lunch and still 57 behind

    52 overs bowled and every single one by a spinner. Is this a record?
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    201-8 and just 19 behind now

    Partnership of 57 between Woakes and Rashid - our best in the match
  • superchrissypowell
    superchrissypowell Posts: 693
    Woakes is become so important for England.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    In 22 Test innings for England Woakes has only been out 5 times for under 25 and currently averages 35.57. Not bad for a no. 9.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    Mind you Rashid's average of 23.29 batting at 10 isn't too shabby.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    edited October 2016
    Scores level thanks to an undefeated stand of 76 between Woakes (37) and Rashid (30). The 3rd best 9th wicket stand for England in Asia.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    Woakes is caught off a rank full toss by the part time spinner Sabir at mid wicket but is fortunate for it to be called a "no ball".
  • CHG
    CHG Posts: 4,529
    171-1, opposition 144-8, and they still do not get a lead.
  • Sponsored links:



  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,051
    With low scoring matches on a spinning pitch a big partnership can win or lose a match. But having the least worst catastrophic batting collapse probably helps too
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    243-9 and a lead of 23. Woakes out for 46.

    99 partnership between Woakes and Rashid (43) - a potential match winning performance from these two and crushing blow for Bangladesh given their expectation of a 50 plus lead when we were 144-8.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    Finn goes so we have a lead of 24.

    Rashid left stranded on 43
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    Addick Addict said:

    In 22 Test innings for England Woakes has only been out 5 times for under 25 and currently averages 35.57. Not bad for a no. 9.

    Woakes may be at number 9 today, but that's not his real position!

    A very unusual match, for the England openers you need people who can cope with sharp spin, rather than the normal new ball seam attack!
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    killerandflash said:

    Addick Addict said:

    In 22 Test innings for England Woakes has only been out 5 times for under 25 and currently averages 35.57. Not bad for a no. 9.

    Woakes may be at number 9 today, but that's not his real position!

    A very unusual match, for the England openers you need people who can cope with sharp spin, rather than the normal new ball seam attack!
    Appreciate that's not his normal position but this isn't a normal Test batting side - in fact, in his vert first Test against Australia, he batted at 6 in both innings!

    It's probably the longest batting line up we have ever had. Batting mostly at 8, he's consistently done, over the last year, infinitely better than our current number 4.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    Whereas Finn is currently bowling like a number 4 bat.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315
    Surrey!
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    Ansari gets his first wicket!

    Tamim out for 40. England desperately needed that
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315
    The fact that Stokes bowled the previous over means that that was actually Stokes' wicket because he obviously spooked the batsman
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315
    Stokes has two now
  • Sponsored links:



  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315
    omg that is one of the worst shots of all time :D

    BD still on top
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    Leuth said:

    omg that is one of the worst shots of all time :D

    BD still on top

    Clearly you never had the dubious delight of watching me in my "prime". That was my "go to" shot.
  • iamdan
    iamdan Posts: 2,421
    What the Mahmudullah was that?
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,995
    So who will win ?

    Bangladesh are the best at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. So it could be close again.
  • iamdan
    iamdan Posts: 2,421
    Any idea who the Bexley Rams (flag) are?
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 36,012
    A tough task ahead but England are still in this. With Bangladesh at 200-3 we looked out of it, but we've bowled them out for 296 and need 273 to win.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    iamdan said:

    Any idea who the Bexley Rams (flag) are?

    I believe there is a Bexley in Derbyshire - allgedly and without prejudice.
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,051
    England 67 without loss. Duckett taking the game to BD... Lead now almost below 200. We could knock these off I reckon
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,952
    iamdan said:

    Any idea who the Bexley Rams (flag) are?

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,783
    iamdan said:

    Any idea who the Bexley Rams (flag) are?

    I believe they are from Derbyshire.

Categories

“Marketplace”