Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket Tour Of Bangladesh & India

1111214161738

Comments

  • Leuth said:

    I have no idea why Rashid keeps being picked. He's incredibly lucky to have a Test career. Decent ODI bowler and nothing more.

    Somewhat premature imo to drop him after just four Tests. His record isn't great with 11-669 but a certain Shane Warne had even worse figures at the very same point in his career of 4-386.

    It's always a risk/reward scenario with leg spinners. His job isn't to contain but to entice which he does very well as he not only has the googly, top spinner etc etc in his armoury but also the full bunger and long hop!
  • Like Tuffer's said on 5 live earlier in the week, why is Rashid bowling to one day fields. Does Cook have no faith in him? Rashid should insist on attacking fields and not have defensive fielding positions for bad balls. If Tuffers moved out his point fielder then Gats would take him off in disgust.
  • CHG said:

    Ansari in for Batty, Finn in for Broad.
    What number will Ansari bat?

    8 I'd imagine...
    Or even 9 behind Woakes! Other than Finn at 11, we have a ridiculously long batting lineup
    Maybe they'll bat Ballance at 9 !
  • CHG said:

    Ansari in for Batty, Finn in for Broad.
    What number will Ansari bat?

    8 I'd imagine...
    Or even 9 behind Woakes! Other than Finn at 11, we have a ridiculously long batting lineup
    He's a proper batsman. Should 100% be ahead of Woakes. He's not had a great year with the bat. His season was blighted with injury. But he is a proper batsman.
    He might be me, but Woakes isn't a number 9 either! He's scored lots of runs for England and Warks this year.

    What are the odds of Ballance failing again and Hameed making his debut in the far more pressurised India series?
    What are the odds of Ballance scratching an unconvincing century forcing the selectors to pick him for the entire Indian series?
  • CHG said:

    Ansari in for Batty, Finn in for Broad.
    What number will Ansari bat?

    8 I'd imagine...
    Or even 9 behind Woakes! Other than Finn at 11, we have a ridiculously long batting lineup
    He's a proper batsman. Should 100% be ahead of Woakes. He's not had a great year with the bat. His season was blighted with injury. But he is a proper batsman.
    He might be me, but Woakes isn't a number 9 either! He's scored lots of runs for England and Warks this year.

    What are the odds of Ballance failing again and Hameed making his debut in the far more pressurised India series?
    What are the odds of Ballance scratching an unconvincing century forcing the selectors to pick him for the entire Indian series?
    I would think the chances are very small.

  • CHG said:

    Ansari in for Batty, Finn in for Broad.
    What number will Ansari bat?

    8 I'd imagine...
    Or even 9 behind Woakes! Other than Finn at 11, we have a ridiculously long batting lineup
    He's a proper batsman. Should 100% be ahead of Woakes. He's not had a great year with the bat. His season was blighted with injury. But he is a proper batsman.
    He might be me, but Woakes isn't a number 9 either! He's scored lots of runs for England and Warks this year.

    What are the odds of Ballance failing again and Hameed making his debut in the far more pressurised India series?
    What are the odds of Ballance scratching an unconvincing century forcing the selectors to pick him for the entire Indian series?
    If the match is another low scoring match, then a scratchy 43 might be enough to keep his place

    His best role seems to be as a specialist close to the wicket fielder. Leave him out, but bring him out to field when our bowlers need a rest!
  • CHGCHG
    edited October 2016
    Draw at best by the looks of things today........
    We have bowled a load of dross today, their spinners will not do the same.

    The problem is, England are no where near finding the spinners they need for India, Rashid has almost made himself unpickable.
  • 196-4, the Tigers are bottling this.
  • edited October 2016
    CHG said:

    Draw at best by the looks of things today........
    We have bowled a load of dross today, their spinners will not do the same.

    The problem is, England are no where near finding the spinners they need for India, Rashid has almost made himself unpickable.

    Not sure about the draw now - 171-1 to 202-6.
  • Stokes and Moeen on fire!
  • Sponsored links:


  • Superb spell from Stokes & Ali
  • CHG said:

    Draw at best by the looks of things today........
    We have bowled a load of dross today, their spinners will not do the same.

    The problem is, England are no where near finding the spinners they need for India, Rashid has almost made himself unpickable.

    Not sure about the draw now - 171-1 to 202-6.
    Funny old game cricket, they really have collapsed there.
  • Stokes, 11 overs, 2 for 13!

    A real problem for Cook though, you can't overbowl him as the last thing we want is to knacker him before the India series starts
  • edited October 2016

    I can't wait to see batts bowl in these conditions. Playing the best cricket of his life picked entirely on merit. And what a man!

    I have a small wager that he will be top wicket taketh for us in the series. I expect there will be a few people wondering why we bothered with Moeen for so much of the last few years.

    Still wondering btw
  • 213-8 - 7 wickets lost for 42 runs

    I really can't recall an umpire get quite so many decisions wrong as Dharmesena has in this series.
  • Make that 8 wickets lost for 44 runs. A collapse rather reminiscent of past England sides.

    215-9
  • 220 all out from 171-1

    Moeen Ali 19.5-5-57-5
  • Duckett out, but not for a duck
  • Fuckett Duckett
  • Openers failed again
  • Sponsored links:


  • Cook gone after a review. Don't worry Ballance is at the crease.
  • Ballance gone, what a surprise.
  • 220 starting to look like a decent score
  • Leuth said:

    I can't wait to see batts bowl in these conditions. Playing the best cricket of his life picked entirely on merit. And what a man!

    I have a small wager that he will be top wicket taketh for us in the series. I expect there will be a few people wondering why we bothered with Moeen for so much of the last few years.

    Still wondering btw
    Even the best of us are wrong once.
  • Does anyone else find the DRS not 100% convincing in this series ?

    I usually always agree with the DRS decision, but this series I have my doubts.

    I have a little sympathy for Dharasema.
  • If Gary Ballance is the answer, what is the question?
  • Big_Bob said:

    If Gary Ballance is the answer, what is the question?



    Q - Who can anchor the middle order and allow our multiple stroke players the freedom to express themselves?

    I'm not a fan of Ballance but we need someone who can construct an old fashioned innings given the fragility of our openers.
  • Ballance is never in long enough to stabilise the innings.
  • dickplumb said:

    Ballance is never in long enough to stabilise the innings.

    I'm defending the reasoning behind his selection rather than the execution of his 'performances:.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!