Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2025

1158159161163164175

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,370
    A shame we wasted the hardness of the ball by bowling too short before lunch/dinner 
  • AdTheAddicK
    AdTheAddicK Posts: 3,435
    GET IN!!
  • AdTheAddicK
    AdTheAddicK Posts: 3,435
    Its coming home boys 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,374
    Archer bowls a full one on the stumps rather than feeding Weatherald's addiction to width and traps the batter LBW for 72 (78)

    146-2 (25.5)
  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,885
    Get these 2 out and it’s a very weak middle order & tail for the Aussies. Just need to get into them early 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,374
    edited December 5
    England Lions are playing Australia A in an unofficial Test. The Lions were 166 all out in their first innings - Bethell made 19.

    In reply Australia are 150-2 but any hope that England's number one spinner is going to come to England's rescue in the Ashes seem to be diminishing by the second - Bashir bowled two overs for 21 and was immediately taken off. 


  • AdTheAddicK
    AdTheAddicK Posts: 3,435
    England Lions are playing Australia A in an unofficial Test. The Lions were 166 all out in their first innings - Bethell made 19.

    In reply Australia are 150-2 but any hope that England's number one spinner is going to come to England's rescue in the Ashes seem to be diminishing by the second - Bashir has bowled two overs for 21. 


    Some more great news this morning 
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,629
    Just caught up with things. Ignoring the unfortunate drop, it appears from what Finn is saying that we've bowled the wrong length and line - more than 6 an over says it all and even though you don't want to be bowling too straight consistently, just 4 balls on the stumps says it all.

    We've accused the Aussies of having a one-man bowling attack but that's because their two other main strike bowlers are injured. What's our excuse? It's certainly not Wood because he hasn't picked up a Test wicket in 15 months. 

    The next two sessions will define whether we have any chance of taking the Ashes. 
    Atkinson and Carse in particular were struggling for the right length that's for sure.
    Atkinson was bowling so short the ball was actually on the downward trajectory by the time it reached the batsmen.
    Archer and Stokes were okish
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,771
    Has Carse been bowling like this all day? Any pressure built has just been released with ease
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,374
    Australia are going at more than five an over. But this isn't Bazball. It's controlled aggression. Treating every ball on its merit but punishing the bad ones. The likes of Brook would do well to look and learn. 

    175-2 (34) at drinks




  • Sponsored links:



  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,374
    Not having that fifth bowler is going to hurt us. Archer has bowled 11 overs already and will lose his effectiveness the more he is forced to do, Atkinson hasn't taken a wicket in the series, Carse is going for virtually 9 an over, Jacks' only over went for 9 which leaves just Stokes who, the more he bowls the more he is likely to break down. 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,771
    Potts/Tongue would surely have been more discplined and effectived here
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,357
    I’m going back to bed I’m feeling 200-2 when  I wake up rather than 150-5 zzzzz





    Fffs predictable cnuts 
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 27,065
    this is pathetic bowling


    stumped up 31 quid for tnt sports early yesterday

    too late to get a refund ?
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,282
    England Lions are playing Australia A in an unofficial Test. The Lions were 166 all out in their first innings - Bethell made 19.

    In reply Australia are 150-2 but any hope that England's number one spinner is going to come to England's rescue in the Ashes seem to be diminishing by the second - Bashir bowled two overs for 21 and was immediately taken off. 



    Yeah just saw the Lions attack and I'm not surprised by that , Nathan Gilchrist leading the attack is a bold move and the rest of the options aren't great. Not surprised a strong Aus A side are making light work of it. 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,771
    Labuschagne edges Stokes to Smith for 65
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,629
    edited December 5
    Australia are going at more than five an over. But this isn't Bazball. It's controlled aggression. Treating every ball on its merit but punishing the bad ones. The likes of Brook would do well to look and learn. 

    175-2 (34) at drinks



    Depends on your definition of Bazball.
    In it's initial concept I'm pretty sure it was to score quickly and blow the opposition away early, which Australia are currently doing pretty effortlessly. They took a few risks early on with a newish ball but yes, controlled. It's not necessarily a way we've seen them play in the past. This is Bazball with brains

    Our version, the blueprint has turned into brain-dead cricket and I'm pretty sure destined for the dustbin in a few weeks.

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,374
    Stokes strikes - Labuschagne wafts at one and is well taken by Smith

    196-3
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,370
    Thankfully the "ball trim" break does the business.
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 27,065
    Get in - bowling plan working a treat

    285 all out - you heard it here first

  • Sponsored links:



  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,374
    I’m going back to bed I’m feeling 200-2 when  I wake up rather than 150-5 zzzzz

    Wakey, wakey @oohaahmortimer, it's 200-3
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,875
    Leuth said:
    This is what happens when you prioritise pace over skill and direction, and select an attack that's entirely made up of shock bowlers. All that talk of this being England's best ever Ashes bowling attack was the biggest load of nonsense I've ever heard. You want one or two shock bowlers, not this 
    I don't believe anyone said it was our best ever Ashes bowling attack. 
    They said it was the quickest. 
    While I agree we may need a more balanced attack I'm not sure who we currently have that are better than selected for this series 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,374
    Australia are going at more than five an over. But this isn't Bazball. It's controlled aggression. Treating every ball on its merit but punishing the bad ones. The likes of Brook would do well to look and learn. 

    175-2 (34) at drinks



    Depends on your definition of Bazball.
    In it's initial concept I'm pretty sure it was to score quickly and blow the opposition away early, which Australia are currently doing pretty effortlessly. They took a few risks early on with a newish ball but yes, controlled. It's not necessarily a way we've seen them play in the past. This is Bazball with brains

    Our version, the blueprint has turned into brain-dead cricket and I'm pretty sure destined for the dustbin in a few weeks.

    Australia have never played Bazball. They invented the version of cricket you talk refer to with the advent of Gilchrist coming in at 7 and have continued to play with caution when things are tough and foot on the throat when they are on top. 

    The difficulty for McCullum and Stokes is that they've made such a big thing of "this is how we play, win or lose" that to modify that is an admittance that they had it wrong all along. It simply will not win us series against the best in the world especially away from home.  
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,374
    228-3 (44) at the session end . Australia are 106 runs behind. 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,370
    Clever plan by England.  Bowl filth to get the ball knocked out of shape,  so we can get it changed. 
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,757
    We’ve actually looked pretty dangerous when we’ve bowled full and at the stumps. 

    Shame we decided to bowl so much short rubbish early on.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,374
    We might want to think about having a deep third man for Smith
  • Aussies showing that our 1st innings was below par. 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,771
    Well at least Hazelwood is out of Brisbane 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,236
    I thought it was supposed to be difficult batting under lights with a pink ball.