Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Mason Burstow - progress at Chelsea (p47)

1101113151653

Comments

  • Was Fraser the sweetener and this in the pipeline for a few days
  • It is annoying that whoever has bid left it until now. Davison isn't great but he's at least a 4th striker. Just as Burstow has become 4th striker and we've loaned Davion out, he's off and we've got next to no time to replace him if he goes, very frustrating
  • edited January 2022
    Burstow has proved himself less than Lookman so far (had less opportunity), so not expecting that kind of money. 
  • Laddick01 said:
    Fair play to him, will earn an absolute wedge at Chelsea if that’s true.

    Probably the worst move you can make as a young footballer though.
    That's a joke surely, they've probably got the most successful academy going. Tons of players currently playing at the top level came through their academy.
  • Whatever the ‘substantial’ figure is, I’m sure Sandgaard would invest it in the playing squad for next season. We just have to hope that it is invested wisely.

    Don’t think we will go down, so banking this money for use to build a strong team next season could be good for us. 
  • As he's a striker there will be an uplift there. Expect £4-5m If he goes for less than that I will be very disappointed. 
  • I thought there was some rule incoming that was meant to stop Prem clubs stockpiling players. Lol
  • UEAAddick said:
    Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that. 
    Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.
    Yh I can't see Burstow being that sort of figure, because he hasn't played as much and it has all been in League 1
    Yeah people are in dreamland expecting an eight figure sum.

    Biggest fees paid for League One players...

    https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/league-one/transferrekorde/wettbewerb/GB3
    Then say no. 

    If it's not multiple millions it isn't 'substantial'. 
    I'm surprised you haven't taken the lead off some bloke on twitter who says we shouldn't accept anything less than 25 million.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Another lad going to sit  on a subs bench some where. What a waste of time.
    Won't get near their bench for a while, he'll be out on loan for a couple of years at least. Maybe even loaned back to us?
  • UEAAddick said:
    Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that. 
    Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.
    Yh I can't see Burstow being that sort of figure, because he hasn't played as much and it has all been in League 1
    Yeah people are in dreamland expecting an eight figure sum.

    Biggest fees paid for League One players...

    https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/league-one/transferrekorde/wettbewerb/GB3
    Then say no. 

    If it's not multiple millions it isn't 'substantial'. 
    How easy is it to reject £2m or £5m at this level, and then watch Burstow get a career ending injury against Wimbledon?
    This kind of reasoning leads to Gomez going for £3.5m. If we think they're the real deal then make them wait until the summer. 
  • Thanks for the memories Mason.
  • Worth remembering no deal is done as yet. 
  • UEAAddick said:
    Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that. 
    Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.
    Yh I can't see Burstow being that sort of figure, because he hasn't played as much and it has all been in League 1
    Yeah people are in dreamland expecting an eight figure sum.

    Biggest fees paid for League One players...

    https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/league-one/transferrekorde/wettbewerb/GB3
    Then say no. 

    If it's not multiple millions it isn't 'substantial'. 
    How easy is it to reject £2m or £5m at this level, and then watch Burstow get a career ending injury against Wimbledon?
    This kind of reasoning leads to Gomez going for £3.5m. If we think they're the real deal then make them wait until the summer. 
    Didnt Gomez have a release clause? - Thats not the same sort of reasoning!!
  • Will probably end up following this more than the match thread tonight 
  • Dazzler21 said:
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!
    The deadline day sale of a top prospect does seem to ring a bell from Roland yes. 
    We’ve been doing this for decades. Way before Roland. Parker and Reid come immediately to mind, albeit Reid wasn’t a “prospect”. 
    Thats not correct in Parker’s case. Chelsea moved in early. The entire club fought tooth and nail for almost the entire window to keep Parker, and at least finally got Putin, sorry, Abramovic to pay full whack. 
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Worth remembering no deal is done as yet. 
    If he's been given permission to talk to Chelsea then I'd say it's a done deal.
    They will offer him life changing wages. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Dazzler21 said:
    Worth remembering no deal is done as yet. 
    If he's been given permission to talk to Chelsea then I'd say it's a done deal.
    They will offer him life changing wages. 
    Why did he pick us over them when he left Maidstone then... Dont understand that decision

    I'll probably regret this, but part of me hopes it is Chelsea talking to him
  • Take the money and run if it’s enough of course.

     We got £2m (?) for  Bonne so I can’t see us taking less than £8m at a guess given potential. 
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Worth remembering no deal is done as yet. 
    If he's been given permission to talk to Chelsea then I'd say it's a done deal.
    They will offer him life changing wages. 
    Why did he pick us over them when he left Maidstone then... Dont understand that decision

    I'll probably regret this, but part of me hopes it is Chelsea talking to him
    Chelsea never offered him a deal did they? They had him on trial and dithered, we swooped in and put a contract in front of him and he signed it.
  • Disappointed of course, but always likely whilst we're at this level. Hope the fee's good and goes towards the summer squad build. 
  • He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    We have always sold our rising stars and always will. That's football i'm afraid when a bigger club with money comes knocking . 




  • Wouldn't consider £2m 'substantial' in today's market. Would be disappointed if that's the agreed fee. 
  • Dazzler21 said:
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!
    The deadline day sale of a top prospect does seem to ring a bell from Roland yes. 
    We’ve been doing this for decades. Way before Roland. Parker and Reid come immediately to mind, albeit Reid wasn’t a “prospect”. 
    Thats not correct in Parker’s case. Chelsea moved in early. The entire club fought tooth and nail for almost the entire window to keep Parker, and at least finally got Putin, sorry, Abramovic to pay full whack. 
    We still sold him at the end of the transfer window. 
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Worth remembering no deal is done as yet. 
    If he's been given permission to talk to Chelsea then I'd say it's a done deal.
    They will offer him life changing wages. 
    Why did he pick us over them when he left Maidstone then... Dont understand that decision

    I'll probably regret this, but part of me hopes it is Chelsea talking to him
    Chelsea never offered him a deal did they? They had him on trial and dithered, we swooped in and put a contract in front of him and he signed it.
    Ah I always presumed that he simply decided to come to us instead.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!