Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Mason Burstow - progress at Chelsea (p47)

191012141553

Comments

  • Dazzler21 said:
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!
    The only suggestion is that the fee is "substantial" so let's wait and see.
    If it's substantial then we should be lining up a pricy replacement no? 
    Again, let'[s wait and see. We had planned to have our business finished but maybe we didn't expect someone to match our valuation for Mason.
  • Undisclosed.
  • Same old same old. 
    At least previous owners let us see the lads for at least half a season before cashing in! 
  • Tearful if you ask me
  • I don’t want him to go just yet as I’d like to actually be able to support our youngsters but IF he leaves today I don’t want him back for the rest of the season I want him replaced 
    How are we going to find a similar goalpoacher at short notice on the last evening of the window?

    If this had happened 2 weeks ago, then we could have chosen to find a replacement
    If they haven’t got anyone lined up for the likely hood of mason leaving then we shouldn’t be entertaining bids
  • Dazzler21 said:
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!
    The deadline day sale of a top prospect does seem to ring a bell from Roland yes. 
    We had six January windows under Roland. The first window was a disaster after selling Stephens to Brighton and Yann to Bournemouth.

    The following four windows had no major outgoings.

    The last window we sold Karlan Grant to Premier League Huddersfield before he ran out his contract. We got a 2m fee up front and substantial add on clauses.

    You're acting like we lost a key player every single Jnauary deadline day. It's simply not true.
  • Dazzler21 said:
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    We've not even had a fee suggested and people are comparing Sandgaard to Roland!
    The only suggestion is that the fee is "substantial" so let's wait and see.
    If it's substantial then we should be lining up a pricy replacement no? 
    Who knows?

    The bid has obviously only come in today. I wouldn't get your hopes of a replacement up yet, maybe in the summer though. Or work a loan deal back off that club for a slightly more established player for now?
  • Maybe Abramovich is trying to spend his money before it is frozen!
  • Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Would be nice to get a full season out of these players. Let’s hope it’s not for peanuts as usual. 
  • Just want Mase back


  • He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    What's the fee that would lead you to put your toys back in your pram?
  • Chelsea apparently the club who've had the bid accepted.
  • Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that. 
    Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.
  • Only decent factor is if its £2m tops and gets put back into the squad over the summer

    That could help put a decent squad together without relying on Sandgaard's own cash

    After all, our last title year came from selling Jenkinson
    There’s a ridiculous amount of money at the top level. I’d be asking for ten million. 
  • edited January 2022
    He's gone. 

    So much for not selling our rising stars. 

    Bet the fee will be risable. 
    No-one ever said this.
    Wasn't one of the positives that we would be able to hold onto prospects and demand a better fee? 

    This just calls back to the Roland days of shipping a youth player out the moment a bid comes in. 
    What's the fee that would lead you to put your toys back in your pram?
    More than Lookman's fee and either a loan back or replacement lined up. 

    People seem to forget our current striker shortage. 
  • IF he does go then we are short up top even if the big lad is back fit soon.  Tonight's squad has very little option on the bench if we need a goal, but then again the starting 11 lacks goals.
  • Minimum £5m + 20% sell on + stays with us for the rest of this season

    then (whoever) can have him 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that. 
    Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.
    Yh I can't see Burstow being that sort of figure, because he hasn't played as much and it has all been in League 1
  • Never even got to see him play in person 😂
  • So I understand if we an outlier here, are there any other league one clubs in recent years who have sold/not sold a talented young player (especially a striker scoring goals) to a premiership club when they came knocking?
  • UEAAddick said:
    Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that. 
    Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.
    Yh I can't see Burstow being that sort of figure, because he hasn't played as much and it has all been in League 1
    Yeah people are in dreamland expecting an eight figure sum.

    Biggest fees paid for League One players...

    https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/league-one/transferrekorde/wettbewerb/GB3
  • A massive shame but it’s the first time we’ve been able to sell a youngster on our terms, not theirs.

    Would I rather he stayed… of course. But this is a nothing season now and IF we can start planning for next year with a healthy balance and get deals in place quickly to really push on next season then losing him is a short term price to pay.

    A big IF though and one that Sandgaard will rightly be judged on.
  • You couldn't make this shit up.
    So at the Fleetwood game he was saying goodbye
  • UEAAddick said:
    Lookman was £8m from League One so expecting more than that. 
    Wasnt it £11m? - Plus he had Championship experience.
    Yh I can't see Burstow being that sort of figure, because he hasn't played as much and it has all been in League 1
    Yeah people are in dreamland expecting an eight figure sum.

    Biggest fees paid for League One players...

    https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/league-one/transferrekorde/wettbewerb/GB3
    Then say no. 

    If it's not multiple millions it isn't 'substantial'. 
  • Another lad going to sit  on a subs bench some where. What a waste of time.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!