Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The 2017 Summer Transfer Rumours Thread (Deadline Day from page 264)

1218219221223224296

Comments

  • a PL loan would only be a kid with less experience than KAG so I don't see the point.

    Probably a lot more goal threat though...

  • stonemuse said:
    I hope you like waffles and Trappist beers Jase :wink: .
  • any mention of a fee for TWWW (undisclosed or otherwise), or is it a loan with a view to a purchase after a tear , or the same as Tex & Cebllos and we basically gave them our player.

    I would say its a give away and we are happy to get his wages off our books.
    wtf ??? In the last month we have simply given away 3 players, losing around £3m - 5m in transfer fees !! And KR says we can't afford a decent striker. Our CEO needs lynching.
  • edited August 2017

    any mention of a fee for TWWW (undisclosed or otherwise), or is it a loan with a view to a purchase after a tear , or the same as Tex & Cebllos and we basically gave them our player.

    I would say its a give away and we are happy to get his wages off our books.
    wtf ??? In the last month we have simply given away 3 players, losing around £3m - 5m in transfer fees !! And KR says we can't afford a decent striker.
    I feel your pain but I'd remove that last sentance mate, you never know who's looking in.
  • Any more talk like that jase and you'll be having to learn Flemish....
  • Surprised Pearce hasn't been transfer listed yet.
  • any mention of a fee for TWWW (undisclosed or otherwise), or is it a loan with a view to a purchase after a tear , or the same as Tex & Cebllos and we basically gave them our player.

    I would say its a give away and we are happy to get his wages off our books.
    wtf ??? In the last month we have simply given away 3 players, losing around £3m - 5m in transfer fees !! And KR says we can't afford a decent striker. Our CEO needs lynching.
    I don't think we could have got a fee for Watt. If we paid his contract up, then that is ridiculous, but I don't mind if he left on a free.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Glad Watts gone, bloke is clearly a fruit loop. Watt to Watch FFS. Desperately need a replacement though and if they have got rid of him without a replacement already lined up then they need shooting.
  • When Robinson said he wanted "three nines" did he just mean he wanted another striker just to take the number 27 shirt that is a vacant squad number?
    How many seasons have we had where a good striker is something we obviously have needed ? This problem is something that should have been sorted by now if the club is ever going to move forward. Invest now you Belgian twat and you will be able to reap the benefits later but please do not seek the advice of Driesen.
  • 'I've missed you'? I seem to remember him saying he couldn't wait to get out of Belgium when he came here...
  • Did we actually pay a fee for Watt?, it was rumoured that we (RD) stitched SL up, by getting him on a free before selling the club
  • John Akinde being linked.
  • any mention of a fee for TWWW (undisclosed or otherwise), or is it a loan with a view to a purchase after a tear , or the same as Tex & Cebllos and we basically gave them our player.

    I would say its a give away and we are happy to get his wages off our books.
    wtf ??? In the last month we have simply given away 3 players, losing around £3m - 5m in transfer fees !! And KR says we can't afford a decent striker. Our CEO needs lynching.
    I don't think we could have got a fee for Watt. If we paid his contract up, then that is ridiculous, but I don't mind if he left on a free.
    I doubt we received much of a fee and I very much doubt his new Club would have been able to match his weekly wage with us meaning we'd have to make up the shortfall.

  • any mention of a fee for TWWW (undisclosed or otherwise), or is it a loan with a view to a purchase after a tear , or the same as Tex & Cebllos and we basically gave them our player.

    I would say its a give away and we are happy to get his wages off our books.
    wtf ??? In the last month we have simply given away 3 players, losing around £3m - 5m in transfer fees !! And KR says we can't afford a decent striker. Our CEO needs lynching.
    I don't think we could have got a fee for Watt. If we paid his contract up, then that is ridiculous, but I don't mind if he left on a free.
    I don't think it's very likely that a second tier club in Belgium will be paying Watt the wages he was on at Charlton, so it's highly likely he's yet another pay-as-you-go departure.
  • Sponsored links:


  • any mention of a fee for TWWW (undisclosed or otherwise), or is it a loan with a view to a purchase after a tear , or the same as Tex & Cebllos and we basically gave them our player.

    I would say its a give away and we are happy to get his wages off our books.
    wtf ??? In the last month we have simply given away 3 players, losing around £3m - 5m in transfer fees !! And KR says we can't afford a decent striker. Our CEO needs lynching.
    I don't think we could have got a fee for Watt. If we paid his contract up, then that is ridiculous, but I don't mind if he left on a free.
    I don't think it's very likely that a second tier club in Belgium will be paying Watt the wages he was on at Charlton, so it's highly likely he's yet another pay-as-you-go departure.
    then thats idiotic. It was only last week or 2 weeks ago that Robinson said there was interest in Watt but it had to be best for the club. How can paying off someone be best for the club. All for letting him go on a free, and it would then be up to him to negotiate his next deal.

    I am not doubting the fact we paid him off, just think it's ridiculous. To be honest, should not be surprised at all.

  • I wonder which 1/3rd of Akinde we'll be getting for our £300k then :smirk:
  • HarryLime said:

    John Akinde being linked.

    Marvelous, is this the fella that in 40 odd games at League One level has scored 3 goals.
    Just what we want
    Thanks Roland
    I think he's a much better player than when he last played in League 1 though. Not sure if I want him, but if they want 1 million then its not going to happen anyway.
  • HarryLime said:

    John Akinde being linked.

    Marvelous, is this the fella that in 40 odd games at League One level has scored 3 goals.
    No
  • any mention of a fee for TWWW (undisclosed or otherwise), or is it a loan with a view to a purchase after a tear , or the same as Tex & Cebllos and we basically gave them our player.

    I would say its a give away and we are happy to get his wages off our books.
    wtf ??? In the last month we have simply given away 3 players, losing around £3m - 5m in transfer fees !! And KR says we can't afford a decent striker. Our CEO needs lynching.
    I am looking at it that we are trimming the books for a sale.

    its the hope that kills you.
  • any mention of a fee for TWWW (undisclosed or otherwise), or is it a loan with a view to a purchase after a tear , or the same as Tex & Cebllos and we basically gave them our player.

    I would say its a give away and we are happy to get his wages off our books.
    wtf ??? In the last month we have simply given away 3 players, losing around £3m - 5m in transfer fees !! And KR says we can't afford a decent striker. Our CEO needs lynching.
    I don't think we could have got a fee for Watt. If we paid his contract up, then that is ridiculous, but I don't mind if he left on a free.
    I don't think it's very likely that a second tier club in Belgium will be paying Watt the wages he was on at Charlton, so it's highly likely he's yet another pay-as-you-go departure.
    then thats idiotic. It was only last week or 2 weeks ago that Robinson said there was interest in Watt but it had to be best for the club. How can paying off someone be best for the club. All for letting him go on a free, and it would then be up to him to negotiate his next deal.

    I am not doubting the fact we paid him off, just think it's ridiculous. To be honest, should not be surprised at all.

    but he wouldn't accept us letting him go on a free unless he can find a Club to match his wages. When he can't then we have to sweeten the deal. When Robinson says it has to be best for the Club it means taking the most financially acceptable deal, ie the one that saves us the most money over the course of the season. Remember, although we have had to sweeten the deal it will still be saving the Club some money. At least it should but with KM in charge that shouldn't be taken as a given.
  • edited August 2017
    Yes. It is.

    https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/john-akinde/leistungsdaten/spieler/69749


    Competition---Games -Goals-Assists-Yel--Y/R--R--Minutes
    Total---------306----111---39---48---1---1---21.140'
    League Two-----130----56---11----22---0---0---9.893'
    National League--88----48---19----18---1---0---7.500'
    League One-----48 -----3----7-----3---0---1---2.213'
    Championship---16-----1----0-----2---0---0--- 465'
    FA Cup---------12-----1----0-----1---0----0---477'
    EFL Cup---------8-----2 ----1-----1---0---0---396'
    EFL Trophy------4------0----1-----1---0---0---196'

    I absolutely think he's worth a contract btw. When He was at Crawley I saw him a couple of times, his play was hardworking, but he was often stuck up top on his own and the attack would breakdown before he was supported.
  • shit--a kid---injured---dirt cheap----the pool we fish in is bottomless.
  • Dazzler21 said:


    he was often stuck up top on his own and the attack would breakdown before he was supported.

    Perfect fit for us then!!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!