Not sure why I got 14 lols for this. I don't find it funny.
People tend to LOL when they disagree with a post. Never understood it myself but please do keep posting RH as I and many others do appreciate your updates whether they be good or bad news.
Not sure why I got 14 lols for this. I don't find it funny.
People tend to LOL when they disagree with a post. Never understood it myself but please do keep posting RH as I and many others do appreciate your updates whether they be good or bad news.
Ah, so that's how I can get my push LOL count up. Just write something everyone will disagree with.
Karal Fraeye was the best manager we ever had, and should be the next England manager.
I’ve just heard this on good authority, cant name names, but usually they are ITK, that this thread has turned into a who has the biggest dick swinging competition.
I’ve just heard this on good authority, cant name names, but usually they are ITK, that this thread has turned into a who has the biggest dick swinging competition.
Matches my balls though mate all about keeping it in proportion
Sale of Charlton : Much comment, e-x-p-a-n-d-e-d. 'Enough!', they say. 'Have it disbanded!' Repetitive, long, with bold claims (some wrong). It's HUGE, due to comments each fan did.
Not sure why I got 14 lols for this. I don't find it funny.
People tend to LOL when they disagree with a post. Never understood it myself but please do keep posting RH as I and many others do appreciate your updates whether they be good or bad news.
I lol when:
1, I find something funny 2, I find something absurd - not necessarily the post itself but the overall situation. 3, I don't believe what has been posted.
I always take into account who is posting the comment. I don't believe I lol'd redhenry's post but if I had it would have been for reason 2. Redhenry's posts are normally sensible and I respect his opinions.
Not sure why I got 14 lols for this. I don't find it funny.
Well to say they have ‘rejected’ it was a little misleading wasn’t it. So yes, it’s not yet been accepted but no it’s not been rejected either ....my guess is that they need some further clarification on one or two issues and that the word ‘rejected’ simply isn’t the correct analogy. The application is still in progress and as things are at present cannot be accepted until certain matters are resolved.......so the application has NOT been rejected. A very misleading comment RH.....sorry mate!
Not sure why I got 14 lols for this. I don't find it funny.
Well to say they have ‘rejected’ it was a little misleading wasn’t it. So yes, it’s not yet been accepted but no it’s not been rejected either ....my guess is that they need some further clarification on one or two issues and that the word ‘rejected’ simply isn’t the correct analogy. The application is still in progress and as things are at present cannot be accepted until certain matters are resolved.......so the application has NOT been rejected. A very misleading comment RH.....sorry mate!
"The first causalty of war is truth." "Men will wave their willies while women make the soup." "The drip drip of fibs will turn into a tsunami of lies" " If your journey is a circle you can only ever end up at the beginning" " Maybe we should shoot the messenger if He utters falsehoods" "I will not see the benefits of our actions but I hope my granddaughters do.
Not sure why I got 14 lols for this. I don't find it funny.
Well to say they have ‘rejected’ it was a little misleading wasn’t it. So yes, it’s not yet been accepted but no it’s not been rejected either ....my guess is that they need some further clarification on one or two issues and that the word ‘rejected’ simply isn’t the correct analogy. The application is still in progress and as things are at present cannot be accepted until certain matters are resolved.......so the application has NOT been rejected. A very misleading comment RH.....sorry mate!
How do you know what he heard?
I don’t. But logic would tell you that a great deal of time and effort has gone into the process...(from all sides) and as such they would not reject the application out of hand before certain issues can or cannot be resolved. In rejecting the process unequivocally, it would mean a completely new application would have to be made.......as crazy as the EFL are, I just can’t see that being the case.
I laughed mate as I find it fucking hilarious that after RD we can still find people who are unfit to run the club,
What the fuck have the EFL done about RD being unfit to run a bath
Have they found people who are unfit to run the club? What have you heard?
Nothing @JamesSeed I am reacting to RH post where he says it’s been rejected, now if it’s true then that’s funny as fuck because how can cafc find someone more unfit than RD
Not sure why I got 14 lols for this. I don't find it funny.
Well to say they have ‘rejected’ it was a little misleading wasn’t it. So yes, it’s not yet been accepted but no it’s not been rejected either ....my guess is that they need some further clarification on one or two issues and that the word ‘rejected’ simply isn’t the correct analogy. The application is still in progress and as things are at present cannot be accepted until certain matters are resolved.......so the application has NOT been rejected. A very misleading comment RH.....sorry mate!
How do you know what he heard?
I don’t. But logic would tell you that a great deal of time and effort has gone into the process...(from all sides) and as such they would not reject the application out of hand before certain issues can or cannot be resolved. In rejecting the process unequivocally, it would mean a completely new application would have to be made.......I just can’t see that being the case.
It seems a bit messenger-shooting though. He didn't say they rejected it "out of hand". He didn't say they'd rejected the "process unequivocally". He didn't say it had been rejected.
He said he heard it had been rejected.
I think someone who has brought a lot of interesting facts and information to this thread like @Redhenry has, deserves to be cut some slack when he reports something that simply cannot be contradicted.
I’ve just heard this on good authority, cant name names, but usually they are ITK, that this thread has turned into a who has the biggest dick swinging competition.
I don't need to join the competition..............sadly.
I laughed mate as I find it fucking hilarious that after RD we can still find people who are unfit to run the club,
What the fuck have the EFL done about RD being unfit to run a bath
Have they found people who are unfit to run the club? What have you heard?
Nothing @JamesSeed I am reacting to RH post where he says it’s been rejected, now if it’s true then that’s funny as fuck because how can cafc find someone more unfit than RD
Oh I see. Their definition of 'unfit' is too narrow to include RD unfortunately :-(
I'm sort of with @SoundAsa£ as I can't believe it's an unequivocal 'no', for the reasons he mentioned.
On the other hand, I don't know who the background investors are (does anyone btw?), and if one of them is a. dodgy or b. involved with another club, you would image the aussies would get an opportunity to rectify the issue rather than have it rejected outright? I think if it was a flat 'no' then a lifer with connections at the EFL would have been tipped off by now, if the flat 'no' meant starting the whole F&PPT again.
Wasn't this big meeting supposed to be happening today btw? Or am I mixing it up with today being the date of the club's 113th birthday?
Not sure why I got 14 lols for this. I don't find it funny.
Well to say they have ‘rejected’ it was a little misleading wasn’t it. So yes, it’s not yet been accepted but no it’s not been rejected either ....my guess is that they need some further clarification on one or two issues and that the word ‘rejected’ simply isn’t the correct analogy. The application is still in progress and as things are at present cannot be accepted until certain matters are resolved.......so the application has NOT been rejected. A very misleading comment RH.....sorry mate!
How do you know what he heard?
I don’t. But logic would tell you that a great deal of time and effort has gone into the process...(from all sides) and as such they would not reject the application out of hand before certain issues can or cannot be resolved. In rejecting the process unequivocally, it would mean a completely new application would have to be made.......I just can’t see that being the case.
It seems a bit messenger-shooting though. He didn't say they rejected it "out of hand". He didn't say they'd rejected the "process unequivocally". He didn't say it had been rejected.
He said he heard it had been rejected.
I think someone who has brought a lot of interesting facts and information to this thread like @Redhenry has, deserves to be cut some slack when he reports something that simply cannot be contradicted.
Not sure why I got 14 lols for this. I don't find it funny.
Well to say they have ‘rejected’ it was a little misleading wasn’t it. So yes, it’s not yet been accepted but no it’s not been rejected either ....my guess is that they need some further clarification on one or two issues and that the word ‘rejected’ simply isn’t the correct analogy. The application is still in progress and as things are at present cannot be accepted until certain matters are resolved.......so the application has NOT been rejected. A very misleading comment RH.....sorry mate!
How do you know what he heard?
I don’t. But logic would tell you that a great deal of time and effort has gone into the process...(from all sides) and as such they would not reject the application out of hand before certain issues can or cannot be resolved. In rejecting the process unequivocally, it would mean a completely new application would have to be made.......I just can’t see that being the case.
It seems a bit messenger-shooting though. He didn't say they rejected it "out of hand". He didn't say they'd rejected the "process unequivocally". He didn't say it had been rejected.
He said he heard it had been rejected.
I think someone who has brought a lot of interesting facts and information to this thread like @Redhenry has, deserves to be cut some slack when he reports something that simply cannot be contradicted.
But I wouldnt have thought the EFL would give consent unless an agreement was in place otherwise they would spend valuable time on it when it may not come to fruition?
Exactly my thoughts, hence why I have my doubts as to what has been sent/lodged with the EFL.
They approved done deals, they are not a vetting agency for potential owners.
Still time will tell.
The club sent the paperwork to the league.
There’s the problem and the source of the delay
If the regime sent in the paperwork it’s guaranteed there’ll be a bouquet of omissions errors falsehoods coffee stains shopping lists and puppy pads in the envelope.
Roly’s toxic pantomime has got the square root of precisely fuck all right in 4 and a half years of this shitshow and this is just the next in the endless stream of cynical fuckwittery perpetrated by the miserable cunt. Hold tight chaps somebody will eventually sort it out
Comments
You have to be seriously poor to be relegated from this league. We were dreadful the season before last and still finished mid table.
Karal Fraeye was the best manager we ever had, and should be the next England manager.
What the fuck have the EFL done about RD being unfit to run a bath
My nuts are huge
'Enough!', they say. 'Have it disbanded!'
Repetitive, long, with bold claims (some wrong).
It's HUGE, due to comments each fan did.
1, I find something funny
2, I find something absurd - not necessarily the post itself but the overall situation.
3, I don't believe what has been posted.
I always take into account who is posting the comment. I don't believe I lol'd redhenry's post but if I had it would have been for reason 2. Redhenry's posts are normally sensible and I respect his opinions.
So yes, it’s not yet been accepted but no it’s not been rejected either ....my guess is that they need some further clarification on one or two issues and that the word ‘rejected’ simply isn’t the correct analogy.
The application is still in progress and as things are at present cannot be accepted until certain matters are resolved.......so the application has NOT been rejected.
A very misleading comment RH.....sorry mate!
"The first causalty of war is truth."
"Men will wave their willies while women make the soup."
"The drip drip of fibs will turn into a tsunami of lies"
" If your journey is a circle you can only ever end up at the beginning"
" Maybe we should shoot the messenger if He utters falsehoods"
"I will not see the benefits of our actions but I hope my granddaughters do.
A prescience lady who was ahead of the game.
But logic would tell you that a great deal of time and effort has gone into the process...(from all sides) and as such they would not reject the application out of hand before certain issues can or cannot be resolved.
In rejecting the process unequivocally, it would mean a completely new application would have to be made.......as crazy as the EFL are, I just can’t see that being the case.
He said he heard it had been rejected.
I think someone who has brought a lot of interesting facts and information to this thread like @Redhenry has, deserves to be cut some slack when he reports something that simply cannot be contradicted.
I'm sort of with @SoundAsa£ as I can't believe it's an unequivocal 'no', for the reasons he mentioned.
On the other hand, I don't know who the background investors are (does anyone btw?), and if one of them is a. dodgy or b. involved with another club, you would image the aussies would get an opportunity to rectify the issue rather than have it rejected outright? I think if it was a flat 'no' then a lifer with connections at the EFL would have been tipped off by now, if the flat 'no' meant starting the whole F&PPT again.
Wasn't this big meeting supposed to be happening today btw? Or am I mixing it up with today being the date of the club's 113th birthday?
Who'd have thought Keohane could do that with a marrow?
There’s the problem and the source of the delay
If the regime sent in the paperwork it’s guaranteed there’ll be a bouquet of omissions errors falsehoods coffee stains shopping lists and puppy pads in the envelope.
Roly’s toxic pantomime has got the square root of precisely fuck all right in 4 and a half years of this shitshow and this is just the next in the endless stream of cynical fuckwittery perpetrated by the miserable cunt.
Hold tight chaps somebody will eventually sort it out