Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) both that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
A resolution to the ownership situation is far more likely to assist Bowyer than extra support and while we certainly canât deliver it we can expose lies and contradictions in Duchateletâs position so that they donât gain any traction.
i also wonder where âsupport the teamâ gets us if Bowyer isnât retained, because of the ownership situation. Or will it just move on to Johnnie Jackson, Jose Riga or anyone else who turns up?
It seems to me that there is only one reason why the ex-director loans need to be repaid now. It is because whoever is providing the purchase funds needs it to be so.
This suggests that the purchase will be funded via a loan from perhaps a hedge fund the like of SISU who own Coventry and this will be secured by The Valley/Sparrows Lane.
If this is the case it is far from clear as to the merits of a new owner over the existing owner.
Some think that anyone is better than RD.
Some think like Brexit, just get it done, I'm past caring.Â
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
I don't think AFKA was saying not to discuss the takeover. Without speaking for him my interpretation of the point he was making was a very similar viewpoint to mine in that it does seem for about the umpteenth time we're all arguing with each other over whether a price has really been agreed or not and have The Aussies got the money? And I make AFKA correct it does almost feel like we are picking over quotes from the last 12 months where no doubt there is a mixture of spin, truth and lies in there and frankly it does get tedious and tiresome to keep re-reading it over and over.
There's probably an easier solution out there which would be to create a flow chart of all the possible theories that have been discussed over the last two years, 1672 pages and 51k comments to save reading the same arguments over and over again.
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
I don't think AFKA was saying not to discuss the takeover. Without speaking for him my interpretation of the point he was making was a very similar viewpoint to mine in that it does seem for about the umpteenth time we're all arguing with each other over whether a price has really been agreed or not and have The Aussies got the money? And I make AFKA correct it does almost feel like we are picking over quotes from the last 12 months where no doubt there is a mixture of spin, truth and lies in there and frankly it does get tedious and tiresome to keep re-reading it over and over.
There's probably an easier solution out there which would be to create a flow chart of all the possible theories that have been discussed over the last two years, 1672 pages and 51k comments to save reading the same arguments over and over again.
Point is that things are moving, of which RDâs statement is one aspect, and there is some solid information coming into the public domain, with more likely to follow. So itâs not the case that we are simply going over old ground at all. Even if it feels like it!
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
I don't think AFKA was saying not to discuss the takeover. Without speaking for him my interpretation of the point he was making was a very similar viewpoint to mine in that it does seem for about the umpteenth time we're all arguing with each other over whether a price has really been agreed or not and have The Aussies got the money? And I make AFKA correct it does almost feel like we are picking over quotes from the last 12 months where no doubt there is a mixture of spin, truth and lies in there and frankly it does get tedious and tiresome to keep re-reading it over and over.
There's probably an easier solution out there which would be to create a flow chart of all the possible theories that have been discussed over the last two years, 1672 pages and 51k comments to save reading the same arguments over and over again.
Point is that things are moving, of which RDâs statement is one aspect, and there is some solid information coming into the public domain, with more likely to follow. So itâs not the case that we are simply going over old ground at all. Even if it feels like it!
But do you think a hedge fund owner like SISU is preferable to RD ? Notwithstanding the fact that most Charlton fans want RD gone.
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
I don't think AFKA was saying not to discuss the takeover. Without speaking for him my interpretation of the point he was making was a very similar viewpoint to mine in that it does seem for about the umpteenth time we're all arguing with each other over whether a price has really been agreed or not and have The Aussies got the money? And I make AFKA correct it does almost feel like we are picking over quotes from the last 12 months where no doubt there is a mixture of spin, truth and lies in there and frankly it does get tedious and tiresome to keep re-reading it over and over.
There's probably an easier solution out there which would be to create a flow chart of all the possible theories that have been discussed over the last two years, 1672 pages and 51k comments to save reading the same arguments over and over again.
Point is that things are moving, of which RDâs statement is one aspect, and there is some solid information coming into the public domain, with more likely to follow. So itâs not the case that we are simply going over old ground at all. Even if it feels like it!
But do you think a hedge fund owner like SISU is preferable to RD ? Notwithstanding the fact that most Charlton fans want RD gone.
Of course I donât. There remain big questions about the Aussies, but the reality is we will get the ownership that Duchatelet sells to not the one we would ideally want. But I would question why a hedge fund would buy Charlton, because the only route to profit is the Premier League.
I believe if RD remains in charge then sooner or later weâll be back in L1. And things could fall apart very quickly if he is foolish enough to lose Bowyer.Â
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
I don't think AFKA was saying not to discuss the takeover. Without speaking for him my interpretation of the point he was making was a very similar viewpoint to mine in that it does seem for about the umpteenth time we're all arguing with each other over whether a price has really been agreed or not and have The Aussies got the money? And I make AFKA correct it does almost feel like we are picking over quotes from the last 12 months where no doubt there is a mixture of spin, truth and lies in there and frankly it does get tedious and tiresome to keep re-reading it over and over.
There's probably an easier solution out there which would be to create a flow chart of all the possible theories that have been discussed over the last two years, 1672 pages and 51k comments to save reading the same arguments over and over again.
Point is that things are moving, of which RDâs statement is one aspect, and there is some solid information coming into the public domain, with more likely to follow. So itâs not the case that we are simply going over old ground at all. Even if it feels like it!
But do you think a hedge fund owner like SISU is preferable to RD ? Notwithstanding the fact that most Charlton fans want RD gone.
Who says it is a hedge fund that is supplying the money?
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) both that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
A resolution to the ownership situation is far more likely to assist Bowyer than extra support and while we certainly canât deliver it we can expose lies and contradictions in Duchateletâs position so that they donât gain any traction.
i also wonder where âsupport the teamâ gets us if Bowyer isnât retained, because of the ownership situation. Or will it just move on to Johnnie Jackson, Jose Riga or anyone else who turns up?
Ah. That question I posed on Friday is asked yet again with still no clear cut indications as to how Lifers might react should Bow reject a derisory offer and decide to walk....followed by the out of contract players.Â
It's certainly not something I want to dwell upon but with the end of June getting ever closer, sadly, it needs to be considered IMO.Â
Yes, this will still be "our" club , but maybe in name only.
And with a new manager stepping into the unknown, with meagre resources at his disposal, it's likely we would be on a hiding to nothing on the hallowed turf, week after week....
Wearing black & white, frequent chanting against the Rat and possibly displaying protest banners would probably be the limit of an individual's show of anger. Would we be so depressed about the situation that most might either sit numbed to the core, silently in their seats , or indeed find something more positive to do on Saturday afternoons ?Â
The stuffing would be knocked out of yours truly for sure.Â
So, once again, I ask, how would YOU react if the unthinkable happens ?
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
I don't think AFKA was saying not to discuss the takeover. Without speaking for him my interpretation of the point he was making was a very similar viewpoint to mine in that it does seem for about the umpteenth time we're all arguing with each other over whether a price has really been agreed or not and have The Aussies got the money? And I make AFKA correct it does almost feel like we are picking over quotes from the last 12 months where no doubt there is a mixture of spin, truth and lies in there and frankly it does get tedious and tiresome to keep re-reading it over and over.
There's probably an easier solution out there which would be to create a flow chart of all the possible theories that have been discussed over the last two years, 1672 pages and 51k comments to save reading the same arguments over and over again.
Point is that things are moving, of which RDâs statement is one aspect, and there is some solid information coming into the public domain, with more likely to follow. So itâs not the case that we are simply going over old ground at all. Even if it feels like it!
But do you think a hedge fund owner like SISU is preferable to RD ? Notwithstanding the fact that most Charlton fans want RD gone.
Who says it is a hedge fund that is supplying the money?
For the last few seasons some high ranking members of staff have been saying the the club will be easier to sell when we are in the championship. I don't think so Â
I was certain that getting relegated would have helped get rid of these people easier, that did not work.
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) both that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
A resolution to the ownership situation is far more likely to assist Bowyer than extra support and while we certainly canât deliver it we can expose lies and contradictions in Duchateletâs position so that they donât gain any traction.
i also wonder where âsupport the teamâ gets us if Bowyer isnât retained, because of the ownership situation. Or will it just move on to Johnnie Jackson, Jose Riga or anyone else who turns up?
Ah. That question I posed on Friday is asked yet again with still no clear cut indications as to how Lifers might react should Bow reject a derisory offer and decide to walk....followed by the out of contract players.Â
It's certainly not something I want to dwell upon but with the end of June getting ever closer, sadly, it needs to be considered IMO.Â
Yes, this will still be "our" club , but maybe in name only.
And with a new manager stepping into the unknown, with meagre resources at his disposal, it's likely we would be on a hiding to nothing on the hallowed turf, week after week....
Wearing black & white, frequent chanting against the Rat and possibly displaying protest banners would probably be the limit of an individual's show of anger. Would we be so depressed about the situation that most might either sit numbed to the core, silently in their seats , or indeed find something more positive to do on Saturday afternoons ?Â
The stuffing would be knocked out of yours truly for sure.Â
So, once again, I ask, how would YOU react if the unthinkable happens ?
I don't think I can answer that until it actually happens and when I understand what is actually going on.
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
I don't think AFKA was saying not to discuss the takeover. Without speaking for him my interpretation of the point he was making was a very similar viewpoint to mine in that it does seem for about the umpteenth time we're all arguing with each other over whether a price has really been agreed or not and have The Aussies got the money? And I make AFKA correct it does almost feel like we are picking over quotes from the last 12 months where no doubt there is a mixture of spin, truth and lies in there and frankly it does get tedious and tiresome to keep re-reading it over and over.
There's probably an easier solution out there which would be to create a flow chart of all the possible theories that have been discussed over the last two years, 1672 pages and 51k comments to save reading the same arguments over and over again.
Point is that things are moving, of which RDâs statement is one aspect, and there is some solid information coming into the public domain, with more likely to follow. So itâs not the case that we are simply going over old ground at all. Even if it feels like it!
But do you think a hedge fund owner like SISU is preferable to RD ? Notwithstanding the fact that most Charlton fans want RD gone.
Who says it is a hedge fund that is supplying the money?
No one says it is a hedge fund. It's a discussion.
But if the new owners need clean title it may well be because the money is being borrowed and it won't be being borrowed from a bank.
So if it's being borrowed, but not from a bank, who is lending the money ?
If the purchase funds are not being borrowed, then the new owners may want clean title, but they don't need clean title.
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) both that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
A resolution to the ownership situation is far more likely to assist Bowyer than extra support and while we certainly canât deliver it we can expose lies and contradictions in Duchateletâs position so that they donât gain any traction.
i also wonder where âsupport the teamâ gets us if Bowyer isnât retained, because of the ownership situation. Or will it just move on to Johnnie Jackson, Jose Riga or anyone else who turns up?
Ah. That question I posed on Friday is asked yet again with still no clear cut indications as to how Lifers might react should Bow reject a derisory offer and decide to walk....followed by the out of contract players.Â
It's certainly not something I want to dwell upon but with the end of June getting ever closer, sadly, it needs to be considered IMO.Â
Yes, this will still be "our" club , but maybe in name only.
And with a new manager stepping into the unknown, with meagre resources at his disposal, it's likely we would be on a hiding to nothing on the hallowed turf, week after week....
Wearing black & white, frequent chanting against the Rat and possibly displaying protest banners would probably be the limit of an individual's show of anger. Would we be so depressed about the situation that most might either sit numbed to the core, silently in their seats , or indeed find something more positive to do on Saturday afternoons ?Â
The stuffing would be knocked out of yours truly for sure.Â
So, once again, I ask, how would YOU react if the unthinkable happens ?
I don't think I can answer that until it actually happens and I think I understand what is actually going on.
What you mean is that you don't want to think about it actually happening.Â
Just catching up on this discussion and essentially no one has a clue about where the deal is at, if there is a deal and if there is a delay then why there is a delay. Once the club is sold (đ€) then we will know. I know without speculation however then there wouldn't be a thread to read. That being said, Lee Lee Lee Bowyer.Â
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) both that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
A resolution to the ownership situation is far more likely to assist Bowyer than extra support and while we certainly canât deliver it we can expose lies and contradictions in Duchateletâs position so that they donât gain any traction.
i also wonder where âsupport the teamâ gets us if Bowyer isnât retained, because of the ownership situation. Or will it just move on to Johnnie Jackson, Jose Riga or anyone else who turns up?
Ah. That question I posed on Friday is asked yet again with still no clear cut indications as to how Lifers might react should Bow reject a derisory offer and decide to walk....followed by the out of contract players.Â
It's certainly not something I want to dwell upon but with the end of June getting ever closer, sadly, it needs to be considered IMO.Â
Yes, this will still be "our" club , but maybe in name only.
And with a new manager stepping into the unknown, with meagre resources at his disposal, it's likely we would be on a hiding to nothing on the hallowed turf, week after week....
Wearing black & white, frequent chanting against the Rat and possibly displaying protest banners would probably be the limit of an individual's show of anger. Would we be so depressed about the situation that most might either sit numbed to the core, silently in their seats , or indeed find something more positive to do on Saturday afternoons ?Â
The stuffing would be knocked out of yours truly for sure.Â
So, once again, I ask, how would YOU react if the unthinkable happens ?
I don't think I can answer that until it actually happens and I think I understand what is actually going on.
What you mean is that you don't want to think about it actually happening.Â
No, I meant what I said. I'm not going to start shouting that I'm off to Belgium again & then look foolish when it doesn't happen. I think it's better to deal in actuals at the time, than hypotheticals.
Iâm predicting that this latest round of takeover mania will continue for another couple of days. Subside and briefly be revived on 27th June and then subside again until just before the season kicks off when we will be discussing the same issues that we have been discussing for at least 18 months.
I hate the cryptic stuff itâs like trying to decider the da Vinci codeÂ
Every 'ITK'Â poster keeps it cryptic enough to avoid any backlash when their prediction inevitably doesn't happen. I'm convinced that no one has an effing clue what's going on.Â
Seems we are back to micro analysing details without anyone really knowing whether those details are the real issue or not.Â
Weve been in a similar round to this about 6 or 7 times over the last two years. Iâve absolutely no idea why some people wrap themselves up so much in it.Â
Probably because many of us realise that just chanting âsupport the teamâ isnât much use in the medium term unless the owner does so as well.
Well, Bowyer and the team seemed to think that supporting the team was was of considerable use to them.I don't recall them commenting on the use of 17,000 pages of gossip and conjecture on a Charlton forum... I think we can all agree the owner is of little use at all.
Yes, in L1 where Charlton will always be competitive because about two thirds of the division are perennial strugglers. In the Championship that wonât cut it for very long, as a series of small clubs have found out.
I think you may need to clarify this, because it reads that there is no point Charlton fans supporting the team above L1.
No, it means that it wonât of itself enable the team to be successful. Some people seem to think that asking questions and exploring what is going on is somehow exclusive of or detracts from âsupporting the teamâ. However as Redskin himself points out, Bowyer and the team are oblivious to this discussion.Â
You can, if you want, stick your fingers in your ears and join RD is his delusion that having the lowest budget in the division (according to Bowyer) doesnât mean we canât get promoted. You can ignore the fact that teams with Charltonâs likely budget usually go down. But shouting louder at matches still wonât be a solution.
Jesus wept, you can be fully aware of the negligence of the owner and the damage being inflicted on the club and still support the team without thinking it's a solution to the problems.
Of course you can - and I did, all over the country last season. I was responding to AFKA who has been arguing (see above) both that more people should go to matches and that discussing the takeover situation is pointless, to paraphrase. Obviously itâs entirely open to anyone what they do, I just find it a bit odd for the owner of a message board to argue that such discussion is pointless.
A resolution to the ownership situation is far more likely to assist Bowyer than extra support and while we certainly canât deliver it we can expose lies and contradictions in Duchateletâs position so that they donât gain any traction.
i also wonder where âsupport the teamâ gets us if Bowyer isnât retained, because of the ownership situation. Or will it just move on to Johnnie Jackson, Jose Riga or anyone else who turns up?
Ah. That question I posed on Friday is asked yet again with still no clear cut indications as to how Lifers might react should Bow reject a derisory offer and decide to walk....followed by the out of contract players.Â
It's certainly not something I want to dwell upon but with the end of June getting ever closer, sadly, it needs to be considered IMO.Â
Yes, this will still be "our" club , but maybe in name only.
And with a new manager stepping into the unknown, with meagre resources at his disposal, it's likely we would be on a hiding to nothing on the hallowed turf, week after week....
Wearing black & white, frequent chanting against the Rat and possibly displaying protest banners would probably be the limit of an individual's show of anger. Would we be so depressed about the situation that most might either sit numbed to the core, silently in their seats , or indeed find something more positive to do on Saturday afternoons ?Â
The stuffing would be knocked out of yours truly for sure.Â
So, once again, I ask, how would YOU react if the unthinkable happens ?
I don't think I can answer that until it actually happens and I think I understand what is actually going on.
What you mean is that you don't want to think about it actually happening.Â
No, I meant what I said. I'm not going to start shouting that I'm off to Belgium again & then look foolish when it doesn't happen. I think it's better to deal in actuals at the time, than hypotheticals.
Nobody is asking you to go off to Belgium before anything happens. Fanny has given a hypothetical situation and has asked what people would do in that situation.Â
Comments
A resolution to the ownership situation is far more likely to assist Bowyer than extra support and while we certainly canât deliver it we can expose lies and contradictions in Duchateletâs position so that they donât gain any traction.
i also wonder where âsupport the teamâ gets us if Bowyer isnât retained, because of the ownership situation. Or will it just move on to Johnnie Jackson, Jose Riga or anyone else who turns up?
It is because whoever is providing the purchase funds needs it to be so.
This suggests that the purchase will be funded via a loan from perhaps a hedge fund the like of SISU who own Coventry and this will be secured by The Valley/Sparrows Lane.
If this is the case it is far from clear as to the merits of a new owner over the existing owner.
Some think that anyone is better than RD.
Some think like Brexit, just get it done, I'm past caring.Â
I really don't know what to think.
There's probably an easier solution out there which would be to create a flow chart of all the possible theories that have been discussed over the last two years, 1672 pages and 51k comments to save reading the same arguments over and over again.
Notwithstanding the fact that most Charlton fans want RD gone.
I believe if RD remains in charge then sooner or later weâll be back in L1. And things could fall apart very quickly if he is foolish enough to lose Bowyer.Â
Blimey, if the new lot need a fund just to buy a hedge how can they afford a whole stadium and training ground??
It's certainly not something I want to dwell upon but with the end of June getting ever closer, sadly, it needs to be considered IMO.Â
Yes, this will still be "our" club , but maybe in name only.
And with a new manager stepping into the unknown, with meagre resources at his disposal, it's likely we would be on a hiding to nothing on the hallowed turf, week after week....
Wearing black & white, frequent chanting against the Rat and possibly displaying protest banners would probably be the limit of an individual's show of anger. Would we be so depressed about the situation that most might either sit numbed to the core, silently in their seats , or indeed find something more positive to do on Saturday afternoons ?Â
The stuffing would be knocked out of yours truly for sure.Â
So, once again, I ask, how would YOU react if the unthinkable happens ?
But if the new owners need clean title it may well be because the money is being borrowed and it won't be being borrowed from a bank.
So if it's being borrowed, but not from a bank, who is lending the money ?
If the purchase funds are not being borrowed, then the new owners may want clean title, but they don't need clean title.
Just booked 2x2 nights at the Stayen.
I'm not going to start shouting that I'm off to Belgium again & then look foolish when it doesn't happen.
I think it's better to deal in actuals at the time, than hypotheticals.
VarneyÂ