Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sue Parkes

1456810

Comments

  • J BLOCK said:

    Sue Parkes states 'I don't hold with protests in any walk of life'. Luckily for her (and the rest of us )there have been plenty of individuals throughout history who have protested to give us the many freedoms we enjoy today.

    I know her personally, good family friend; but she does need to remember that we would not have a Club if it wasn't for some form of protest that we as fans held. That is a fact. Not to mention other such protests as you say.
    Tell her to shut up please.
    Will pass it on for you.

    :- )
  • I don't do twitter much but in a lull at work I came across this.

    Katrien Meire ‏@KatrienMeire1 9h
    Magnificent comments from Sue Parkes correctly blaming #cafc fans & not me for relegation

    Sue - your 28th consecutive free ST is in post.

    It's a parody account unless I'm being whooshed and you already knew this?
  • seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    So those million plus people who protested about going into Iraq were a disgrace, as were the Suffragettes.
    I would imagine this protestor in America was a disgrace too. Causing all that disruption and whatnot.

    image

    Pretty disgraceful comparing Charltons situation with those.
    I am trying to express that protesting per se is not disgraceful. Sue compared our protests for example to teachers striking, I am also making comparisons and make absolutely no apology for doing so.
    I never expect you to
  • Dazzler21 said:

    I don't do twitter much but in a lull at work I came across this.

    Katrien Meire ‏@KatrienMeire1 9h
    Magnificent comments from Sue Parkes correctly blaming #cafc fans & not me for relegation

    Sue - your 28th consecutive free ST is in post.

    It's a parody account unless I'm being whooshed and you already knew this?
    Nope, do you have dodgy twitter accounts?
  • Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    So those million plus people who protested about going into Iraq were a disgrace, as were the Suffragettes.
    I would imagine this protestor in America was a disgrace too. Causing all that disruption and whatnot.

    image

    Pretty disgraceful comparing Charltons situation with those.
    I am trying to express that protesting per se is not disgraceful. Sue compared our protests for example to teachers striking, I am also making comparisons and make absolutely no apology for doing so.
    I never expect you to
    I have made plenty of apologies over the years on Charlton life.

    You said that I was comparing the situation at Charlton with the unrest in America, which I was plainly not doing.
    I was clearly saying that protest has value and is not in itself a disgrace, which is what Sue Parkes said all protests were.

    However thank you for enlightening me as to your expectations of me.
  • seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    So those million plus people who protested about going into Iraq were a disgrace, as were the Suffragettes.
    I would imagine this protestor in America was a disgrace too. Causing all that disruption and whatnot.

    image

    Pretty disgraceful comparing Charltons situation with those.
    I am trying to express that protesting per se is not disgraceful. Sue compared our protests for example to teachers striking, I am also making comparisons and make absolutely no apology for doing so.
    I never expect you to
    I have made plenty of apologies over the years on Charlton life.

    You said that I was comparing the situation at Charlton with the unrest in America, which I was plainly not doing.
    I was clearly saying that protest has value and is not in itself a disgrace, which is what Sue Parkes said all protests were.

    However thank you for enlightening me as to your expectations of me.
    Surprised you did not know them already!
  • Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    So those million plus people who protested about going into Iraq were a disgrace, as were the Suffragettes.
    I would imagine this protestor in America was a disgrace too. Causing all that disruption and whatnot.

    image

    Pretty disgraceful comparing Charltons situation with those.
    I am trying to express that protesting per se is not disgraceful. Sue compared our protests for example to teachers striking, I am also making comparisons and make absolutely no apology for doing so.
    I never expect you to
    I have made plenty of apologies over the years on Charlton life.

    You said that I was comparing the situation at Charlton with the unrest in America, which I was plainly not doing.
    I was clearly saying that protest has value and is not in itself a disgrace, which is what Sue Parkes said all protests were.

    However thank you for enlightening me as to your expectations of me.
    Surprised you did not know them already!
    Do we know each-other or something?
  • seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    So those million plus people who protested about going into Iraq were a disgrace, as were the Suffragettes.
    I would imagine this protestor in America was a disgrace too. Causing all that disruption and whatnot.

    image

    Pretty disgraceful comparing Charltons situation with those.
    I am trying to express that protesting per se is not disgraceful. Sue compared our protests for example to teachers striking, I am also making comparisons and make absolutely no apology for doing so.
    I never expect you to
    I have made plenty of apologies over the years on Charlton life.

    You said that I was comparing the situation at Charlton with the unrest in America, which I was plainly not doing.
    I was clearly saying that protest has value and is not in itself a disgrace, which is what Sue Parkes said all protests were.

    However thank you for enlightening me as to your expectations of me.
    Surprised you did not know them already!
    Do we know each-other or something?
    God I hope not
  • Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    So those million plus people who protested about going into Iraq were a disgrace, as were the Suffragettes.
    I would imagine this protestor in America was a disgrace too. Causing all that disruption and whatnot.

    image

    Pretty disgraceful comparing Charltons situation with those.
    I am trying to express that protesting per se is not disgraceful. Sue compared our protests for example to teachers striking, I am also making comparisons and make absolutely no apology for doing so.
    I never expect you to
    I have made plenty of apologies over the years on Charlton life.

    You said that I was comparing the situation at Charlton with the unrest in America, which I was plainly not doing.
    I was clearly saying that protest has value and is not in itself a disgrace, which is what Sue Parkes said all protests were.

    However thank you for enlightening me as to your expectations of me.
    Surprised you did not know them already!
    Do we know each-other or something?
    God I hope not
    Nice to have that sorted, what a relief.
  • Sponsored links:


  • seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    So those million plus people who protested about going into Iraq were a disgrace, as were the Suffragettes.
    I would imagine this protestor in America was a disgrace too. Causing all that disruption and whatnot.

    image

    Pretty disgraceful comparing Charltons situation with those.
    I am trying to express that protesting per se is not disgraceful. Sue compared our protests for example to teachers striking, I am also making comparisons and make absolutely no apology for doing so.
    I never expect you to
    I have made plenty of apologies over the years on Charlton life.

    You said that I was comparing the situation at Charlton with the unrest in America, which I was plainly not doing.
    I was clearly saying that protest has value and is not in itself a disgrace, which is what Sue Parkes said all protests were.

    However thank you for enlightening me as to your expectations of me.
    Surprised you did not know them already!
    Do we know each-other or something?
    God I hope not
    Nice to have that sorted, what a relief.
    Is this a private love fest or can anyone join in :wink:
  • seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    Kap10 said:

    seth plum said:

    So those million plus people who protested about going into Iraq were a disgrace, as were the Suffragettes.
    I would imagine this protestor in America was a disgrace too. Causing all that disruption and whatnot.

    image

    Pretty disgraceful comparing Charltons situation with those.
    I am trying to express that protesting per se is not disgraceful. Sue compared our protests for example to teachers striking, I am also making comparisons and make absolutely no apology for doing so.
    I never expect you to
    I have made plenty of apologies over the years on Charlton life.

    You said that I was comparing the situation at Charlton with the unrest in America, which I was plainly not doing.
    I was clearly saying that protest has value and is not in itself a disgrace, which is what Sue Parkes said all protests were.

    However thank you for enlightening me as to your expectations of me.
    Surprised you did not know them already!
    Do we know each-other or something?
    God I hope not
    Nice to have that sorted, what a relief.
    That's a first we both agree
  • Fight Fight......
  • Fight Fight......

    I thought that was over we agreed
  • The telling thing is that Sue's views aren't shared by people sitting around her in the directors' box, hence the public rows she has had with former directors. A couple of weeks ago I went to see another former director who I won't name but is universally respected. He also supports the protests.

    Her views aren't shared by the long-term sponsors who have quit. They aren't shared by staff who have left the club and they aren't shared by many of the staff working there now. They aren't shared by the hierarchy of the community trust and they aren't shared by any of the people who have been there and done it as far as running the club is concerned, which Sue never has.

    They are only shared by the small group of people clustered around Meire whose positions are dependent on the regime continuing. So the best thing to do with her is to ignore her.

    if anyone wants to know what would happen if the current labour leadership was in charge of anything, look no further than CAFC... Corbyn-esque levels of leadership by meire, only keep around those that agree with you!
  • The most important lesson we've all learnt by seeing those exchange of messages is the importance of the paragraph.

    1. A distinct division of written or printed matter that begins on a new, usually indented line, consists of one or more sentences, and typically deals with a single thought or topic or quotes one speaker's continuous words.
    2. A mark ( ¶ ) used to indicate where a new paragraph should begin or to serve as a reference mark.
    3. A brief article, notice, or announcement, as in a newspaper.
  • The telling thing is that Sue's views aren't shared by people sitting around her in the directors' box, hence the public rows she has had with former directors. A couple of weeks ago I went to see another former director who I won't name but is universally respected. He also supports the protests.

    Her views aren't shared by the long-term sponsors who have quit. They aren't shared by staff who have left the club and they aren't shared by many of the staff working there now. They aren't shared by the hierarchy of the community trust and they aren't shared by any of the people who have been there and done it as far as running the club is concerned, which Sue never has.

    They are only shared by the small group of people clustered around Meire whose positions are dependent on the regime continuing. So the best thing to do with her is to ignore her.

    if anyone wants to know what would happen if the current labour leadership was in charge of anything, look no further than CAFC... Corbyn-esque levels of leadership by meire, only keep around those that agree with you!
    The only complete and utter difference between the two is the supporters of the Labour Party are with Corbyn, the supporters of Charlton are against Meire. Other than that, spot on...
  • The telling thing is that Sue's views aren't shared by people sitting around her in the directors' box, hence the public rows she has had with former directors. A couple of weeks ago I went to see another former director who I won't name but is universally respected. He also supports the protests.

    Her views aren't shared by the long-term sponsors who have quit. They aren't shared by staff who have left the club and they aren't shared by many of the staff working there now. They aren't shared by the hierarchy of the community trust and they aren't shared by any of the people who have been there and done it as far as running the club is concerned, which Sue never has.

    They are only shared by the small group of people clustered around Meire whose positions are dependent on the regime continuing. So the best thing to do with her is to ignore her.

    if anyone wants to know what would happen if the current labour leadership was in charge of anything, look no further than CAFC... Corbyn-esque levels of leadership by meire, only keep around those that agree with you!
    The only complete and utter difference between the two is the supporters of the Labour Party are with Corbyn, the supporters of Charlton are against Meire. Other than that, spot on...
    The majority of members, not labour "supporters" or voters...
  • Sponsored links:


  • She probably only has one friend, guess who it is!

    She does Chris no favours at all, feel for him to be honest.
  • Oh brilliant it's turned political again.

    I just laughed out loud on the bus reading that one
  • She probably only has one friend, guess who it is!

    She does Chris no favours at all, feel for him to be honest.

    With respect to Chris, who is obviously a proper Charlton man, he should tell his wife to keep her opinions, no matter what they are, off social media. If he hasn't got the danglies to do that then no sympathy from me. She's making a prick of him and he's letting it happen.
  • For someone trying to defend Roland against irrefutable evidence he's an arse, the words "I found him totally reasonable" is the definition of damning with faint praise.
  • RedChaser said:

    who's Sue Parkes ?

    Chris Parkes' (long serving club secretary's) wife.
    Why did this get a like?
  • edited July 2016

    RedChaser said:

    who's Sue Parkes ?

    Chris Parkes' (long serving club secretary's) wife.
    Why did this get a like?
    I've met Lincs at Preston away last year and he probably appreciated the quick response as to who she was. I can't help it if I'm popular :wink: .
  • All, I wore a Roland out sticker at a home game last season!! I apologise for getting us relegated and feel that my wearing a sticker holds as much blame as sarr falling over on the pitch allowing the opposition to score
  • Go home Sue, you're drunk.
  • Go home Sue, you're drunk.

    She must have a liver the size of a pea.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!