Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Wigan financial woes - up for sale again? p40
Comments
-
Wigan Athletic: Administrators confident a deal to sell club can go ahead
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53932948
I am sure I heard on SSN that a new buyer would have to pay £4m for the stadium and training ground, makes our ones look expensive0 -
ross1 said:
Wigan Athletic: Administrators confident a deal to sell club can go ahead
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53932948
I am sure I heard on SSN that a new buyer would have to pay £5m for the stadium and training ground, makes our ones look expensive0 -
ross1 said:
Wigan Athletic: Administrators confident a deal to sell club can go ahead
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53932948
I am sure I heard on SSN that a new buyer would have to pay £5m for the stadium and training ground, makes our ones look expensive
Need something brought in so they cant be sold for £1 (letting chancers in) yet stopping others from holding them to ransom1 -
The Euxton training ground backs onto the development I used to live on (and am moving back to next month). Its a pretty nice part of the Northwest - one of the rare places that affordable housing and private housing sits side by side without any major issues. The ground is, however, Euxton in name only - its basically Chorley (200 yards down the hill from Chorley A&E)
It's regularly been mooted for development in the future - can't believe its being passed around from club to club - with the amount of new developments round here in the last few years its got to be prime for re-zoning0 -
ForeverAddickted said:ross1 said:
Wigan Athletic: Administrators confident a deal to sell club can go ahead
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53932948
I am sure I heard on SSN that a new buyer would have to pay £5m for the stadium and training ground, makes our ones look expensive
Need something brought in so they cant be sold for £1 (letting chancers in) yet stopping others from holding them to ransom
All sales of clubs and appointment of company directors and officials must be subject to regulator approval and only a limited time in which to rectify any deficiencies. This would, hopefully, prevent the situation we've found ourselves in this year with ESI 1's takeover floundering due to lack of clarity over funding, and ESI 2 fouling foul because Farnell and Elliotttttttttt were dodgy as fcuk.
There's nothing wrong, per se, with selling a club for £1; it could have a price tag of £10m but still have the same problems as us if the new regime is full of wrong 'uns! It should be a condition of sale that all business plans are scrutinised and signed off by the regulator.
For many years I had the "pleasure" of compiling year end insurance business returns for the PRA, consisting of an Income Statement, a Balance Sheet, Solvency details, and a full analysis of the premiums written and claims movements/reserves. After recent events (Sheff Wed/Derby, salary cap) I've been thinking that there should be a footballing equivalent of the PRA return, if there isn't anything already, to help identify financial breaches. This would ensure that all clubs were submitting data to the regulator in the same format and on the same basis instead of the authorities relying on financial statements which may have differing accounting treatments from club to club.
The penalties for breaking the rules should be set out clearly so that everyone - clubs, fans, and media - knows what should happen. The current process seems to be anything but consistent and transparent.
If there was an appetite for any of this within the game then I'm sure it would have been implemented by now but, as we know, the FL is just a members' club that organises its own competitions like the local golf club runs the Sunday Fourballs and the PL is essentially a cartel that begrudgingly allows a bit of movement in its membership. The last thing the owners/PL would vote for was someone to come in and oversee their operations.
There needs to be clear direction on the legal status of football clubs; they can't be treated the same as "normal" limited companies there has to be a separate distinction in Company Law which means that Government has to take the lead and introduce a new Football Companies Finance Act which would include the establishment of a regulatory body with a legal standing and full powers.
That's my two penn'orth ...9 -
Has donated £3k
18 -
Just reading the incentives they are offering to people who donate either £250 £500 or £1,000, nice if younare a fan who can afford those amounts
https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/save-wigan-athletic
0 -
paulie8290 said:Just reading the incentives they are offering to people who donate either £250 £500 or £1,000, nice if younare a fan who can afford those amounts
https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/save-wigan-athletic
1 -
- Sponsored links:
-
They have done really well, 87% of £500,000 raised! Good luck WASC6
-
Eynsfordaddick said:They have done really well, 87% of £500,000 raised! Good luck WASC0
-
Wish we could do a crowdfunder to get shot of ESI!0
-
AddicksAddict said:Eynsfordaddick said:They have done really well, 87% of £500,000 raised! Good luck WASC2
-
stoneroses19 said:AddicksAddict said:Eynsfordaddick said:They have done really well, 87% of £500,000 raised! Good luck WASC3
-
Sorry only caught tail end, but someone who was involved with Barnsley is one of the bidders to takeover Wigan0
-
Isnt the deadline tomorrow0
-
Passed the original target this afternoon.14
-
Brilliant. Good luck to the WASC3
-
Roberto Martinez put in £5,000 too.
6 - Sponsored links:
-
Wigan administrator wants £3M for the DW Stadium. While it's obviously not in Kensington, a bit of perspective on Roland's price.1
-
Ferryman said:Wigan administrator wants £3M for the DW Stadium. While it's obviously not in Kensington, a bit of perspective on Roland's price.
Roads around the Valley appear to be 3x that on average, but new builds always put a premium on, especially ones in London by a commuter route, so expect a decent flat built on The Valley to set you back 450-500k. That would put Wigan's £3m estimate (selling cheaper than market value to ensure a deal) as quite low, and RD's probable 20m as slightly too high, I'd say Wigan for £5m and The Valley for £15m is more on the money1 -
sam3110 said:Ferryman said:Wigan administrator wants £3M for the DW Stadium. While it's obviously not in Kensington, a bit of perspective on Roland's price.
Roads around the Valley appear to be 3x that on average, but new builds always put a premium on, especially ones in London by a commuter route, so expect a decent flat built on The Valley to set you back 450-500k. That would put Wigan's £3m estimate (selling cheaper than market value to ensure a deal) as quite low, and RD's probable 20m as slightly too high, I'd say Wigan for £5m and The Valley for £15m is more on the money2 -
sam3110 said:Ferryman said:Wigan administrator wants £3M for the DW Stadium. While it's obviously not in Kensington, a bit of perspective on Roland's price.
Roads around the Valley appear to be 3x that on average, but new builds always put a premium on, especially ones in London by a commuter route, so expect a decent flat built on The Valley to set you back 450-500k. That would put Wigan's £3m estimate (selling cheaper than market value to ensure a deal) as quite low, and RD's probable 20m as slightly too high, I'd say Wigan for £5m and The Valley for £15m is more on the money
What is the footprint of both stadiums?
What would be the density of build you could put on both sites?
Most importantly, costs to build have a floor so if you are developing low valie homes then the cost of actually building them will be a higher % of their value and hence the land will be commensurably less valuable as developers will all wish to get 20% + profit margins.0 -
Athletico Charlton said:sam3110 said:Ferryman said:Wigan administrator wants £3M for the DW Stadium. While it's obviously not in Kensington, a bit of perspective on Roland's price.
Roads around the Valley appear to be 3x that on average, but new builds always put a premium on, especially ones in London by a commuter route, so expect a decent flat built on The Valley to set you back 450-500k. That would put Wigan's £3m estimate (selling cheaper than market value to ensure a deal) as quite low, and RD's probable 20m as slightly too high, I'd say Wigan for £5m and The Valley for £15m is more on the money
What is the footprint of both stadiums?
What would be the density of build you could put on both sites?
Most importantly, costs to build have a floor so if you are developing low valie homes then the cost of actually building them will be a higher % of their value and hence the land will be commensurably less valuable as developers will all wish to get 20% + profit margins.3 -
Preston have finalised their buy of Wigan training ground
0 -
-
-
addick1956 said:Scoham said:
Now I see him as a decent bloke and a proper fan of football everywhere. 👏👏👏2