Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Summer Transfer Window - Non Charlton Signings / Rumours (Dday from p43)
Comments
-
That's 100m euros, so £85m. In todays world i don't think that's a bad deal.Chunes said:I wouldn't pay 100 million for the Lukaku who played at Man Utd.
Think how many chances Werner misses. Lukaku won't.0 -
There's no way City are bidding 100m for a player Pep doesn't want.Rothko said:
I dunno, I think City would spend big on both, Grealish doesn't smack me as a Pep playerSELR_addicks said:Kane is a bit stuck as Man City have chosen to sign Grealish for 100m and don't think they fancy the 180m+ for Kane.0 -
It’s a very bad deal when you consider that they sold him for less than £30m. Paying over £50m for the fee you received when selling him.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
That's 100m euros, so £85m. In todays world i don't think that's a bad deal.Chunes said:I wouldn't pay 100 million for the Lukaku who played at Man Utd.
Think how many chances Werner misses. Lukaku won't.0 -
Yes but they got rid when he was 21. But the way Chelsea do business, running an academy and selling a lot of young players there's always a chance that some will go on to become world class.Todds_right_hook said:
It’s a very bad deal when you consider that they sold him for less than £30m. Paying over £50m for the fee you received when selling him.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
That's 100m euros, so £85m. In todays world i don't think that's a bad deal.Chunes said:I wouldn't pay 100 million for the Lukaku who played at Man Utd.
Think how many chances Werner misses. Lukaku won't.
Will be even worse if they sign Rice who they let go on a free as a kid. Let's not forget they also got rid of Salah and De Bruyne early on in their careers as well.0 -
Exactly this, the other side to that is that they've sold players like Guehi, Tomori, Liveamento etc this summer and made £60m-odd, that then goes a long way to paying for incoming transfers.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Yes but they got rid when he was 21. But the way Chelsea do business, running an academy and selling a lot of young players there's always a chance that some will go on to become world class.Todds_right_hook said:
It’s a very bad deal when you consider that they sold him for less than £30m. Paying over £50m for the fee you received when selling him.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
That's 100m euros, so £85m. In todays world i don't think that's a bad deal.Chunes said:I wouldn't pay 100 million for the Lukaku who played at Man Utd.
Think how many chances Werner misses. Lukaku won't.
Will be even worse if they sign Rice who they let go on a free as a kid. Let's not forget they also got rid of Salah and De Bruyne early on in their careers as well.
The amount that they get through, some are bound to end up doing well, others they'll sell for a decent price and they'll be on Nottingham Forest's bench in 3 or 4 years.0 -
Still a mystery what happed to Lukaku at United, as they never replaced him properlyTodds_right_hook said:
It’s a very bad deal when you consider that they sold him for less than £30m. Paying over £50m for the fee you received when selling him.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
That's 100m euros, so £85m. In todays world i don't think that's a bad deal.Chunes said:I wouldn't pay 100 million for the Lukaku who played at Man Utd.
Think how many chances Werner misses. Lukaku won't.0 -
Proper Medway Tattoo’s them …. Skull and Crossbones. Very apt for PompeiMarcusH26 said:1 -
Interesting looking at the net spend of current premier league sides over the last 5 seasons.North Lower Neil said:
Exactly this, the other side to that is that they've sold players like Guehi, Tomori, Liveamento etc this summer and made £60m-odd, that then goes a long way to paying for incoming transfers.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
Yes but they got rid when he was 21. But the way Chelsea do business, running an academy and selling a lot of young players there's always a chance that some will go on to become world class.Todds_right_hook said:
It’s a very bad deal when you consider that they sold him for less than £30m. Paying over £50m for the fee you received when selling him.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
That's 100m euros, so £85m. In todays world i don't think that's a bad deal.Chunes said:I wouldn't pay 100 million for the Lukaku who played at Man Utd.
Think how many chances Werner misses. Lukaku won't.
Will be even worse if they sign Rice who they let go on a free as a kid. Let's not forget they also got rid of Salah and De Bruyne early on in their careers as well.
The amount that they get through, some are bound to end up doing well, others they'll sell for a decent price and they'll be on Nottingham Forest's bench in 3 or 4 years.
0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Abdulmalik now on trial at Southampton, is he doing the 92 this summer.....0
-
Grealish to city is a "done deal"0
-
We're going on a journey.Scoham said:3 -
Wigan sign Jordan Jones from Rangers on a 3yr deal.
0 -
That’s a good signing! Sunderland fans must be bemused as he was great for them last season.0
-
-
He's a rich owner because he doesn't spend any money.1
-
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:0 -
Sunderland are skint after years of buying very expensive but rubbish players and then having to pay them big wages to sit on the bench, or play in the junior teams and then not being able to move them on 'cos no-one wants themMarcusH26 said:
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:1 -
Sponsored links:
-
They've got a new billionaire (well certainly that's the family wealth) ownerLincsaddick said:
Sunderland are skint after years of buying very expensive but rubbish players and then having to pay them to sit on the bench, or play in the junior teams and not being able to move them on 'cos no-one wants themMarcusH26 said:
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:1 -
so what ? .. Eisner owns Pompey and they have yet to escape this division, though with a new 'name' manager and having spent a few quid, that might change .. Billionaires are such cos they know how and where to spend and invest .. Sunderland have yet to show that there is a huge transfer budget available to sign some top quality talentkillerandflash said:
They've got a new billionaire (well certainly that's the family wealth) ownerLincsaddick said:
Sunderland are skint after years of buying very expensive but rubbish players and then having to pay them to sit on the bench, or play in the junior teams and not being able to move them on 'cos no-one wants themMarcusH26 said:
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:0 -
Are Pompey not cost cutting?Lincsaddick said:
so what ? .. Eisner owns Pompey and they have yet to escape this division, though with a new 'name' manager and having spent a few quid, that might change .. Billionaires are such cos they know how and where to spend and invest .. Sunderland have yet to show that there is a huge transfer budget available to sign some top quality talentkillerandflash said:
They've got a new billionaire (well certainly that's the family wealth) ownerLincsaddick said:
Sunderland are skint after years of buying very expensive but rubbish players and then having to pay them to sit on the bench, or play in the junior teams and not being able to move them on 'cos no-one wants themMarcusH26 said:
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:0 -
they have signed a few and got rid of a few, probably close to balancing the wage budget .. I think every EFL club is cost cutting to an extent, over a year with little income has seen to that, even clubs with 'mega mega rich patrons are counting the spare changecafcfan1990 said:
Are Pompey not cost cutting?Lincsaddick said:
so what ? .. Eisner owns Pompey and they have yet to escape this division, though with a new 'name' manager and having spent a few quid, that might change .. Billionaires are such cos they know how and where to spend and invest .. Sunderland have yet to show that there is a huge transfer budget available to sign some top quality talentkillerandflash said:
They've got a new billionaire (well certainly that's the family wealth) ownerLincsaddick said:
Sunderland are skint after years of buying very expensive but rubbish players and then having to pay them to sit on the bench, or play in the junior teams and not being able to move them on 'cos no-one wants themMarcusH26 said:
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:0 -
Billionaires don't buy "sleeping giant" clubs just to plod along in the 3rd divisionLincsaddick said:
so what ? .. Eisner owns Pompey and they have yet to escape this division, though with a new 'name' manager and having spent a few quid, that might change .. Billionaires are such cos they know how and where to spend and invest .. Sunderland have yet to show that there is a huge transfer budget available to sign some top quality talentkillerandflash said:
They've got a new billionaire (well certainly that's the family wealth) ownerLincsaddick said:
Sunderland are skint after years of buying very expensive but rubbish players and then having to pay them to sit on the bench, or play in the junior teams and not being able to move them on 'cos no-one wants themMarcusH26 said:
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:1 -
Pompey are a weird one , think the Eisner's main focus is fixing up Fratton Park so it's 21st century standard as opposed to splashing out on players0
-
So as per your post saying 'they are skint' .. They aintLincsaddick said:
so what ? .. Eisner owns Pompey and they have yet to escape this division, though with a new 'name' manager and having spent a few quid, that might change .. Billionaires are such cos they know how and where to spend and invest .. Sunderland have yet to show that there is a huge transfer budget available to sign some top quality talentkillerandflash said:
They've got a new billionaire (well certainly that's the family wealth) ownerLincsaddick said:
Sunderland are skint after years of buying very expensive but rubbish players and then having to pay them to sit on the bench, or play in the junior teams and not being able to move them on 'cos no-one wants themMarcusH26 said:
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:1 -
Yeah fair points, I haven't followed massively but just knew they'd lost a few decent players with Curtis to follow. I think the point about everyone cost cutting is accurate though.Lincsaddick said:
they have signed a few and got rid of a few, probably close to balancing the wage budget .. I think every EFL club is cost cutting to an extent, over a year with little income has seen to that, even clubs with 'mega mega rich patrons are counting the spare changecafcfan1990 said:
Are Pompey not cost cutting?Lincsaddick said:
so what ? .. Eisner owns Pompey and they have yet to escape this division, though with a new 'name' manager and having spent a few quid, that might change .. Billionaires are such cos they know how and where to spend and invest .. Sunderland have yet to show that there is a huge transfer budget available to sign some top quality talentkillerandflash said:
They've got a new billionaire (well certainly that's the family wealth) ownerLincsaddick said:
Sunderland are skint after years of buying very expensive but rubbish players and then having to pay them to sit on the bench, or play in the junior teams and not being able to move them on 'cos no-one wants themMarcusH26 said:
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:0 -
"He is estimated to have a trust fund worth more than £2bn that is held by his mother, Margarita Bogdanova - who remains a minority shareholder at Marseille despite selling her majority in 2016."killerandflash said:
They've got a new billionaire (well certainly that's the family wealth) ownerLincsaddick said:
Sunderland are skint after years of buying very expensive but rubbish players and then having to pay them to sit on the bench, or play in the junior teams and not being able to move them on 'cos no-one wants themMarcusH26 said:
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:
So we don't actually know how much cash he actually has to throw at Sunderland.0 -
who ? .. and whoever you're on about, my point is that just because a club has a billionaire owner, that club can still be skint IF the rich bloke doesn't hand over any moneyJ BLOCK said:
So as per your post saying 'they are skint' .. They aintLincsaddick said:
so what ? .. Eisner owns Pompey and they have yet to escape this division, though with a new 'name' manager and having spent a few quid, that might change .. Billionaires are such cos they know how and where to spend and invest .. Sunderland have yet to show that there is a huge transfer budget available to sign some top quality talentkillerandflash said:
They've got a new billionaire (well certainly that's the family wealth) ownerLincsaddick said:
Sunderland are skint after years of buying very expensive but rubbish players and then having to pay them to sit on the bench, or play in the junior teams and not being able to move them on 'cos no-one wants themMarcusH26 said:
Sunderland's whole window has been a bit weird , Alex Pritchard the only interesting signing they've made .killerandflash said:0
