0 goals in 11 for Millwall yes that was Championship
2 goals in 18 for Ipswich in League 1.
I dont see him being someone who is gonna get goals galore
As a comparison at the same age as Parrott's loans, Harry Kane scored:
5 in 18 for Orient in league one. 7 in 22 for Millwall in the championship.
Then at the age Parrott is now he scored 2 in 13 for Leicester.
Obviously not saying Parrott will be anywhere near as good as Kane as that's highly unlikely, but he has already scored goals at international level and he's still only 19. Time is still on his side.
This is a big year for him though, if he flops at MK Dons then Spurs will probably get rid, if he does well he'll get a contract extension and another chance at a championship loan next year.
0 goals in 11 for Millwall yes that was Championship
2 goals in 18 for Ipswich in League 1.
I dont see him being someone who is gonna get goals galore
As a comparison at the same age as Parrott's loans, Harry Kane scored:
5 in 18 for Orient in league one. 7 in 22 for Millwall in the championship.
Then at the age Parrott is now he scored 2 in 13 for Leicester.
Obviously not saying Parrott will be anywhere near as good as Kane as that's highly unlikely, but he has already scored goals at international level and he's still only 19. Time is still on his side.
This is a big year for him though, if he flops at MK Dons then Spurs will probably get rid, if he does well he'll get a contract extension and another chance at a championship loan next year.
Obviously Grealish is an amazing player but he's not someone you'd say that City really need. When you already have De Bruyne, Sterling, Foden, Mahrez, Torres, Bernardo and Gundogan he's hardly a priority.
Surely the 100m should be put towards getting Kane. If they can do that deal and sell someone like Bernardo/Mahrez, then go back in for Grealish later. But for me their priority should be the striker first.
Obviously Grealish is an amazing player but he's not someone you'd say that City really need. When you already have De Bruyne, Sterling, Foden, Mahrez, Torres, Bernardo and Gundogan he's hardly a priority.
Surely the 100m should be put towards getting Kane. If they can do that deal and sell someone like Bernardo/Mahrez, then go back in for Grealish later. But for me their priority should be the striker first.
The crazy thing is that could pay £160m for Kane and £100m for Grealish and not have to sell anybody. Good luck getting them all in the team though. But as you say Grealish isn’t a priority.
Comments
5 in 18 for Orient in league one.
7 in 22 for Millwall in the championship.
Then at the age Parrott is now he scored 2 in 13 for Leicester.
Obviously not saying Parrott will be anywhere near as good as Kane as that's highly unlikely, but he has already scored goals at international level and he's still only 19. Time is still on his side.
This is a big year for him though, if he flops at MK Dons then Spurs will probably get rid, if he does well he'll get a contract extension and another chance at a championship loan next year.
Charlton bid for Plymouth striker conformed!
Thats the Swiss Club, not our very own Steve
Bit of an uninspiring record in Scotland of late for Aberdeen, Hibs and Rangers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florian_Kamberi
Always seems to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Donny used him as a 6 in a couple of friendlies but he was a 10 or 11.
They did the same with Madger Gomes.
Surely the 100m should be put towards getting Kane. If they can do that deal and sell someone like Bernardo/Mahrez, then go back in for Grealish later. But for me their priority should be the striker first.
I could understand if it was an academy lad who left etc but not a Chelsea loan