If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Well spotted mate, I read it & it didn't even register
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Well spotted mate, I read it & it didn't even register
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Well spotted mate, I read it & it didn't even register
Isn't this just a rumour based on a friend's friend of JFC or something like that.
Remind me of the thread title please.
My point is that it is at least a rumour based on 3rd hand news. Most rumours of this type are . My comment is entirely in keeping with the title. Have you forgotten the title ?
Except you didn't comment. You asked a question regarding the validity of someone else's rumour. On the rumour thread.
Jfc had a great season for us last year and we should do the right thing by him but that’s it as far as I’m concerned - hopefully he gets a better offer as I don’t see him as any more than a squad filler at Charlton going forwards
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
Why ?
Should change your name to 1963
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
Why ?
Should change your name to 1963
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
Hey, mate ........ just read what you yourself wrote a few posts back. You could have dodged that bullet.
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
Why ?
Should change your name to 1963
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
Why ?
Should change your name to 1963
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
Why ?
Should change your name to 1963
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so. May all be bolloxs though of course.
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance. We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps. Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
Why ?
Should change your name to 1963
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
I agree the 1st injury is grassy knoll and void as far as I am concerned.
Comments
Shot in the dark i suppose
A new rumour? No.
A plethora of puns? Nope.
Has to be a mini row then? Yep.
Don't drive a convertible along Dealey Plaza.
… and it’s means that ‘spotty kid on Twitter’ that everyone was knocking is at least 25% right so far 👍🏼
https://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&client=ms-android-samsung-rev2&source=android-browser&q=jfk
What has Warren got to say about it?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jake_Forster-Caskey&ved=2ahUKEwjuyMi685zxAhXRgP0HHXDLBVIQmhMwDXoECAgQAg&usg=AOvVaw1yiifi1OVgklqIHD_s410C