Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)

1…151152154156157…867

Comments

  • Addicks59
    Addicks59 Posts: 140
    Any chance Thomas we can sign the whole Welsh team 2nil.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,289
    edited June 2021
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
     Can't  see how you can call that a sensible comment.  More that of a child perhaps. 
    Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this. 
    Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
    Why ?
    Dallas

  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
     Can't  see how you can call that a sensible comment.  More that of a child perhaps. 
    Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this. 
    Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
    Why ?
    Should change your name to 1963
  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,287
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
    Well spotted mate, I read it & it didn't even register  :D
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 22,810
    Henry Irving said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
     Can't  see how you can call that a sensible comment.  More that of a child perhaps. 
    Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this. 
    Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
    Why ?
    Dallas

    Always sad when you have to explain the joke
  • Cordoban Addick
    Cordoban Addick Posts: 5,448
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
     Can't  see how you can call that a sensible comment.  More that of a child perhaps. 
    Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this. 
    Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
    Why ?
    Oh Dude, stop digging.
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,404
    edited June 2021
    I like JFK and all the other members of Jamiroquai
  • up_the_valley
    up_the_valley Posts: 4,231
    charltonbob said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
    Well spotted mate, I read it & it didn't even register  :D
    Register what?
  • EricBanterna
    EricBanterna Posts: 1,740
    up_the_valley said:
    charltonbob said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
    Well spotted mate, I read it & it didn't even register  :D
    Register what?
    If you know you know. 
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    addick1956 said:
    Addickted said:
    addick1956 said:
    Isn't this just a rumour based on a friend's friend of JFC or something  like that.
    Remind me of the thread title please.
     My point is that it is at least a rumour based on 3rd hand news. Most rumours of this type are .  My comment is entirely in keeping with the title. Have you forgotten  the title ?

    Except you didn't comment. You asked a question regarding the validity of someone else's rumour. On the rumour thread.

    Don't drive a convertible along Dealey Plaza.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Maccn05
    Maccn05 Posts: 967
    Wigan have signed Max Power today to follow up the signing of Cousins yesterday… they could be a real problem next season 

    … and it’s means that ‘spotty kid on Twitter’ that everyone was knocking is at least 25% right so far 👍🏼
  • ElliotCAFC
    ElliotCAFC Posts: 2,553
    edited June 2021
    Joe Morrell having an outstanding euros so far. Won Lincoln’s player of the season in 2019/20 and is very much a Josh Cullen type of player.

    He can’t get a kick for Luton and Pompey are looking to take him - exactly the sort of midfielder we missed last season.
  • EricBanterna
    EricBanterna Posts: 1,740
    ElliotCAFC said:
    Joe Morrell having an outstanding euros so far. Won Lincoln’s player of the season in 2019/20 and is very much a Josh Cullen type of player.

    He can’t get a kick for Luton and Pompey are looking to take him - exactly the sort of midfielder we missed last season.
    Definitely have him over JFK.
  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,494
    Uboat said:
    Laddick01 said:
    EricBanterna said:
    ElliotCAFC said:
    Joe Morrell having an outstanding euros so far. Won Lincoln’s player of the season in 2019/20 and is very much a Josh Cullen type of player.

    He can’t get a kick for Luton and Pompey are looking to take him - exactly the sort of midfielder we missed last season.
    Definitely have him over JFK.
    Liked him at first but he’s not been the same since that injury in 1963.
    Head’s gone. 
    Couldn't he borrow Cech's skullcap?
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,916
    Jfc had a great season for us last year and we should do the right thing by him but that’s it as far as I’m concerned - hopefully he gets a better offer as I don’t see him as any more than a squad filler at Charlton going forwards 
  • up_the_valley
    up_the_valley Posts: 4,231
    edited June 2021
    addick1956 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
     Can't  see how you can call that a sensible comment.  More that of a child perhaps. 
    Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this. 
    Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
    Why ?
    Should change your name to 1963
    Why ?   And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
    Oh please. Someone help. What have I started? 🙄
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,962
    addick1956 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
     Can't  see how you can call that a sensible comment.  More that of a child perhaps. 
    Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this. 
    Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
    Why ?
    Should change your name to 1963
    Why ?   And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
    Hey, mate  ........ just read what you yourself wrote a few posts back. You could have dodged that bullet.


  • up_the_valley
    up_the_valley Posts: 4,231
    edited June 2021
    This is JFK
    https://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&client=ms-android-samsung-rev2&source=android-browser&q=jfk

  • Sponsored links:



  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    addick1956 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
     Can't  see how you can call that a sensible comment.  More that of a child perhaps. 
    Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this. 
    Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
    Why ?
    Should change your name to 1963
    Why ?   And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
    JFK could be the magic bullet.

    What has Warren got to say about it?
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,778
    Maccn05 said:
    Wigan have signed Max Power today to follow up the signing of Cousins yesterday… they could be a real problem next season 

    … and it’s means that ‘spotty kid on Twitter’ that everyone was knocking is at least 25% right so far 👍🏼
    I don’t rate him at all and neither did the Sunderland fans the last two seasons . 
  • up_the_valley
    up_the_valley Posts: 4,231
    edited June 2021
    This is JFC
    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jake_Forster-Caskey&ved=2ahUKEwjuyMi685zxAhXRgP0HHXDLBVIQmhMwDXoECAgQAg&usg=AOvVaw1yiifi1OVgklqIHD_s410C
  • up_the_valley
    up_the_valley Posts: 4,231
    edited June 2021
    Addickted said:
    addick1956 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
     Can't  see how you can call that a sensible comment.  More that of a child perhaps. 
    Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this. 
    Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
    Why ?
    Should change your name to 1963
    Why ?   And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
    JFK could be the magic bullet.

    What has Warren got to say about it?
    Maybe we should ask LHO
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    up_the_valley said:
    Addickted said:
    addick1956 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
     Can't  see how you can call that a sensible comment.  More that of a child perhaps. 
    Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this. 
    Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
    Why ?
    Should change your name to 1963
    Why ?   And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
    JFK could be the magic bullet.

    What has Warren got to say about it?
    Maybe we should ask LHO
    His shooting is so accurate.
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    addick1956 said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    up_the_valley said:
    addick1956 said:
    Redrobo said:
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Athletico Charlton said:
    If it is true I would pull the contract offer.  Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries.  He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end.  Don't think so.
    May all be bolloxs though of course.
    Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?

    He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence.   There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1.  If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.

    It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing.  I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?

    Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with.  If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract.  Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured.   There are no winners now, what ever the outcome. 
    Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.
    We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
    I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal.  My opinion. 
    😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣
     Can't  see how you can call that a sensible comment.  More that of a child perhaps. 
    Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this. 
    Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.
    Why ?
    Should change your name to 1963
    Why ?   And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.
    I agree the 1st injury is grassy knoll and void as far as I am concerned. 
  • EricBanterna
    EricBanterna Posts: 1,740
    up_the_valley said:
    This is JFK
    https://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&client=ms-android-samsung-rev2&source=android-browser&q=jfk
    They named him after an airport?
  • KiwiValley
    KiwiValley Posts: 3,384
    Laddick01 said:
    EricBanterna said:
    ElliotCAFC said:
    Joe Morrell having an outstanding euros so far. Won Lincoln’s player of the season in 2019/20 and is very much a Josh Cullen type of player.

    He can’t get a kick for Luton and Pompey are looking to take him - exactly the sort of midfielder we missed last season.
    Definitely have him over JFK.
    Liked him at first but he’s not been the same since that injury in 1963.
    Yes, but he's a leader
  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 4,530
    Bedsaddick said:
    Maccn05 said:
    Wigan have signed Max Power today to follow up the signing of Cousins yesterday… they could be a real problem next season 

    … and it’s means that ‘spotty kid on Twitter’ that everyone was knocking is at least 25% right so far 👍🏼
    I don’t rate him at all and neither did the Sunderland fans the last two seasons . 
    Cousins and Power …..blimey can you imagine reaction if we brought them !!!!!

    Would not worry to much about Wigan if this is the level of player there getting 
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,289
    Anyone else remember the Lone Gunman articles in the Voice?
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”