From Guardian today 'Half of voters believe there will be a “Brexit dividend” that could contribute at least something towards an NHS funding boost, the poll suggests.'
So that's 2% less than fell for the lies two years ago then. Things are going in the right direction.
From Guardian today 'Half of voters believe there will be a “Brexit dividend” that could contribute at least something towards an NHS funding boost, the poll suggests.'
It would be interesting to know where they think the additional civil servants employed solely on Brexit related work are going to be funded from.
Heathrow airport has just had the go-ahead for a massive expansion, centred round the building of a third runway. The Government - despite some of its senior members' vehement objections, apparently - has called for, and secured, Parliamentary approval for this significant piece of infrastructure funding. Because, of course, post-Brexit, Britain will be a thrusting, outward-looking trading nation once again. A £16bn shot in the arm for anyone worried that Brexit Britain is going to fall short of its proponents' expectations.
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
Heathrow airport has just had the go-ahead for a massive expansion, centred round the building of a third runway. The Government - despite some of its senior members' vehement objections, apparently - has called for, and secured, Parliamentary approval for this significant piece of infrastructure funding. Because, of course, post-Brexit, Britain will be a thrusting, outward-looking trading nation once again. A £16bn shot in the arm for anyone worried that Brexit Britain is going to fall short of its proponents' expectations.
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
No nerd for me to give them a lift to the airport then... See money saved already.
Heathrow airport has just had the go-ahead for a massive expansion, centred round the building of a third runway. The Government - despite some of its senior members' vehement objections, apparently - has called for, and secured, Parliamentary approval for this significant piece of infrastructure funding. Because, of course, post-Brexit, Britain will be a thrusting, outward-looking trading nation once again. A £16bn shot in the arm for anyone worried that Brexit Britain is going to fall short of its proponents' expectations.
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
No nerd for me to give them a lift to the airport then... See money saved already.
Give who a lift to the airport? All the British workers who've lost their jobs to be replaced by Dutch workers in Amsterdam. Or maybe all the public sector workers who's jobs will be cut as business rates and income tax revenues decline due to jobs being relocated out of the country.
You make it sound you were planning to personally deport every Jonny Foreigner from your post-brexit, pure-bred British (note: there's no such thing, we're a nation of mongrels, defined by wave after wave of immigration) utopia.
Heathrow airport has just had the go-ahead for a massive expansion, centred round the building of a third runway. The Government - despite some of its senior members' vehement objections, apparently - has called for, and secured, Parliamentary approval for this significant piece of infrastructure funding. Because, of course, post-Brexit, Britain will be a thrusting, outward-looking trading nation once again. A £16bn shot in the arm for anyone worried that Brexit Britain is going to fall short of its proponents' expectations.
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
No nerd for me to give them a lift to the airport then... See money saved already.
Give who a lift to the airport? All the British workers who've lost their jobs to be replaced by Dutch workers in Amsterdam. Or maybe all the public sector workers who's jobs will be cut as business rates and income tax revenues decline due to jobs being relocated out of the country.
You make it sound you were planning to personally deport every Jonny Foreigner from your post-brexit, pure-bred British (note: there's no such thing, we're a nation of mongrels, defined by wave after wave of immigration) utopia.
Heathrow airport has just had the go-ahead for a massive expansion, centred round the building of a third runway. The Government - despite some of its senior members' vehement objections, apparently - has called for, and secured, Parliamentary approval for this significant piece of infrastructure funding. Because, of course, post-Brexit, Britain will be a thrusting, outward-looking trading nation once again. A £16bn shot in the arm for anyone worried that Brexit Britain is going to fall short of its proponents' expectations.
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
No nerd for me to give them a lift to the airport then... See money saved already.
Give who a lift to the airport? All the British workers who've lost their jobs to be replaced by Dutch workers in Amsterdam. Or maybe all the public sector workers who's jobs will be cut as business rates and income tax revenues decline due to jobs being relocated out of the country.
You make it sound you were planning to personally deport every Jonny Foreigner from your post-brexit, pure-bred British (note: there's no such thing, we're a nation of mongrels, defined by wave after wave of immigration) utopia.
Anybody who wants to leave. Do you think spending 14 billion pounds of private finance from investors on a runway when there is nobody on a plane going in and out in your real world would be done..
Heathrow airport has just had the go-ahead for a massive expansion, centred round the building of a third runway. The Government - despite some of its senior members' vehement objections, apparently - has called for, and secured, Parliamentary approval for this significant piece of infrastructure funding. Because, of course, post-Brexit, Britain will be a thrusting, outward-looking trading nation once again. A £16bn shot in the arm for anyone worried that Brexit Britain is going to fall short of its proponents' expectations.
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
No nerd for me to give them a lift to the airport then... See money saved already.
Give who a lift to the airport? All the British workers who've lost their jobs to be replaced by Dutch workers in Amsterdam. Or maybe all the public sector workers who's jobs will be cut as business rates and income tax revenues decline due to jobs being relocated out of the country.
You make it sound you were planning to personally deport every Jonny Foreigner from your post-brexit, pure-bred British (note: there's no such thing, we're a nation of mongrels, defined by wave after wave of immigration) utopia.
Heathrow airport has just had the go-ahead for a massive expansion, centred round the building of a third runway. The Government - despite some of its senior members' vehement objections, apparently - has called for, and secured, Parliamentary approval for this significant piece of infrastructure funding. Because, of course, post-Brexit, Britain will be a thrusting, outward-looking trading nation once again. A £16bn shot in the arm for anyone worried that Brexit Britain is going to fall short of its proponents' expectations.
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
Apologies for my laziness...but assume your referring to this article.....where it states no job losses...hmmmm...as usual some of your friends are a bit quick to dive in also...
Heathrow airport has just had the go-ahead for a massive expansion, centred round the building of a third runway. The Government - despite some of its senior members' vehement objections, apparently - has called for, and secured, Parliamentary approval for this significant piece of infrastructure funding. Because, of course, post-Brexit, Britain will be a thrusting, outward-looking trading nation once again. A £16bn shot in the arm for anyone worried that Brexit Britain is going to fall short of its proponents' expectations.
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
Apologies for my laziness...but assume your referring to this article.....where it states no job losses...hmmmm...as usual some of your friends are a bit quick to dive in also...
Utilising a sad tactic used by others. Where does Chizz say there would be job losses?
Heathrow airport has just had the go-ahead for a massive expansion, centred round the building of a third runway. The Government - despite some of its senior members' vehement objections, apparently - has called for, and secured, Parliamentary approval for this significant piece of infrastructure funding. Because, of course, post-Brexit, Britain will be a thrusting, outward-looking trading nation once again. A £16bn shot in the arm for anyone worried that Brexit Britain is going to fall short of its proponents' expectations.
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
Apologies for my laziness...but assume your referring to this article.....where it states no job losses...hmmmm...as usual some of your friends are a bit quick to dive in also...
Utilising a sad tactic used by others. Where does Chizz say there would be job losses?
Randy did, which I assume is what was meant by 'your friends are quick to dive in'
I haven't suggested there will be job losses in the UK. Although I don't know how moving an overseas HQ from the UK to another country would avoid UK-based job losses.
The company's statement (kindly linked to above) includes "there is no impact on employment, and our operations in the UK will remain unchanged." I take that to mean that the net effect on the company is that there will be no more and no fewer people employed after the business moves to Amsterdam. I do not take this to mean that there will be as many jobs in the UK as there are before the move.
(Example: company employing 100 people in Maidstone and moves to Toulouse, sacks 90 UK staff, moves ten and hires 90 French replacements. That company would be able to say "there is no impact on employment").
That's one aspect of the move. There are two others. One is the tax revenue the UK Treasury will no longer be able to claim from a UK-based, international company. They run projects at a lot of airports, not just Heathrow, but airports from Aberdeen to Southampton, and Doha to Denver. A solid, well-run British company, which will soon be a solid, well-run Dutch company, thanks to Brexit.
And the other aspect is the crushing blow to Brexiteers - or at least those who can take their head out of the sand and fingers out of their ears. Brexit has caused this successful company to exit the UK. Even if this doesn't cause UK job losses (notwithstanding the above) it will probably costing revenue to the Treasury and certainly causing embarrassment and regret to anyone who thinks Britain should be a great, international business hub.
It's not the biggest bit of news and it's not the biggest company that will leave the UK because of Brexit. But every time we look at Heathrow Airport - one of the busiest international airports in the world - with a bit of pride, that pride will be tarnished when we remember the company that owned it didn't have faith in the UK's ability to continue as a great place to be located.
Just a thought but if we leave on WTO rules is there any other country that also trades solely on WTO?
No one is saying we will trade solely under WTO rules though, are they?
Eventually, no of course not. But if we leave without a trade deal with the EU that also includes the EU trade deals with other non-EU countries, then from day one until we can negotiate independent trade deals there would be little alternative - or am I missing something?
Any trade deals we do independently will take time, and in some cases considerable time.
F*** me so we will be like Mauritania, who according to that link are the only country on WTO rules (although even they aren't quite).
The article highliights this claim as well -
Recently, the pro-brexit group Leave.EU shared an image sharing a claim made by Richard Tice. “WTO rules are what most great countries trade under. If it’s good enough for Australia, America and Canada, it’s good enough for the UK”
Can anybody clever/young post the actual image ( @Stu_of_Kunming ).
F*** me so we will be like Mauritania, who according to that link are the only country on WTO rules (although even they aren't quite).
The article highliights this claim as well -
Recently, the pro-brexit group Leave.EU shared an image sharing a claim made by Richard Tice. “WTO rules are what most great countries trade under. If it’s good enough for Australia, America and Canada, it’s good enough for the UK”
Can anybody clever/young post the actual image ( @Stu_of_Kunming ).
Heathrow airport has just had the go-ahead for a massive expansion, centred round the building of a third runway. The Government - despite some of its senior members' vehement objections, apparently - has called for, and secured, Parliamentary approval for this significant piece of infrastructure funding. Because, of course, post-Brexit, Britain will be a thrusting, outward-looking trading nation once again. A £16bn shot in the arm for anyone worried that Brexit Britain is going to fall short of its proponents' expectations.
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
Apologies for my laziness...but assume your referring to this article.....where it states no job losses...hmmmm...as usual some of your friends are a bit quick to dive in also...
Utilising a sad tactic used by others. Where does Chizz say there would be job losses?
Randy did, which I assume is what was meant by 'your friends are quick to dive in'
I live a 10 minute drive from Heathrow and am out of work. Given that queues at passport control are already up to two hours, where are the job ads for employing extra post-Brexit. They need to be trained. And customs officers. Ditto at Gatwick, Stanstead, Dover, Ashford, Harwich, Fishguard etc. How long will it take to build lorry parks on the M2?
Comments
The day after the vote, Heathrow's biggest shareholder, a Spanish company, announced that it will be joining the Brexodus and moving its non-Spanish operations from the UK to Amsterdam next year.
You make it sound you were planning to personally deport every Jonny Foreigner from your post-brexit, pure-bred British (note: there's no such thing, we're a nation of mongrels, defined by wave after wave of immigration) utopia.
Apologies for my laziness...but assume your referring to this article.....where it states no job losses...hmmmm...as usual some of your friends are a bit quick to dive in also...
Mauritania
Monaco
Montenegro
Palau
Timor-Leste
Sao Tome and Principe
Serbia
Somalia
South Sudan
Sudan
Western Sahara
We'll kick some arse in that company!!
Still, don't forget blue passports.
The company's statement (kindly linked to above) includes "there is no impact on employment, and our operations in the UK will remain unchanged." I take that to mean that the net effect on the company is that there will be no more and no fewer people employed after the business moves to Amsterdam. I do not take this to mean that there will be as many jobs in the UK as there are before the move.
(Example: company employing 100 people in Maidstone and moves to Toulouse, sacks 90 UK staff, moves ten and hires 90 French replacements. That company would be able to say "there is no impact on employment").
That's one aspect of the move. There are two others. One is the tax revenue the UK Treasury will no longer be able to claim from a UK-based, international company. They run projects at a lot of airports, not just Heathrow, but airports from Aberdeen to Southampton, and Doha to Denver. A solid, well-run British company, which will soon be a solid, well-run Dutch company, thanks to Brexit.
And the other aspect is the crushing blow to Brexiteers - or at least those who can take their head out of the sand and fingers out of their ears. Brexit has caused this successful company to exit the UK. Even if this doesn't cause UK job losses (notwithstanding the above) it will probably costing revenue to the Treasury and certainly causing embarrassment and regret to anyone who thinks Britain should be a great, international business hub.
It's not the biggest bit of news and it's not the biggest company that will leave the UK because of Brexit. But every time we look at Heathrow Airport - one of the busiest international airports in the world - with a bit of pride, that pride will be tarnished when we remember the company that owned it didn't have faith in the UK's ability to continue as a great place to be located.
Any trade deals we do independently will take time, and in some cases considerable time.
The article highliights this claim as well -
Recently, the pro-brexit group Leave.EU shared an image sharing a claim made by Richard Tice. “WTO rules are what most great countries trade under. If it’s good enough for Australia, America and Canada, it’s good enough for the UK”
Can anybody clever/young post the actual image ( @Stu_of_Kunming ).
*See my request to post the Richard Tice image from the link you provided.
I was trying to post the image direct but only seem to be able to accidentally do that!