Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Wimbledon v Charlton - Post Match Views

1234568»

Comments

  • Another very poor ref but to be fair he was dreadful for both teams.
  • JamesSeed said:

    kr will never learn
    attack is the best form of defence
    once he took of holmes and watt we was doomed for a draw or loss
    at the end of the season when we finish maybee 10th or 11th his excuse will be he wasnt here from the start
    after 2 months of next season he to will be moved on and were back to square 1 talking again about tbe same shite this time next year

    Don't agree, as he brought on three attacking players, Magennis, Mavididi and Botaka. You could argue that he might have brought on a defender to hang on for the win for the last ten minutes?
    Except we didn't have a defender on the bench! Dasilva isn't a defender, can you imagine a 5'4 kid against a physical team like AFC?

    The 3 subs were all attacking ones, clearly he was looking for the second goal to kill the game off
  • KR is finding more ways to cement his position as fuckwit-gobshite-in-chief.
    He talks incessantly, mostly drivel.
    He's happy to slag people off - we were a basket case just a year ago (still true obv) - but he can't take it and has a hissy fit whirling arms and all when he gets a bit back - don't give me any guff about the 'language went too far' this is football ffs and the standards of profanity and filth are different, he's heard exactly the same every day since his teens.
    Blaming referees every week is lame and and counterproductive.
    He has one shape, one plan, regardless of who's available and he has no concept of square pegs in round holes and has neither the wit nor humility to adjust things when the one plan fails (yet again).
    Playing Watt on the left and Aribo to the right is a case in point. It might have been worth a try, for a while, out of interest but as soon as it was obvious that it suited neither and was seriously limiting the team KR has to revise it - does he? Of course not.
    Witless berk.
  • Ignore last post it wasn't meant for here.

    Texting and WhatsApp at the same Time: (

    Been in all day waiting for you to drop the £3 off
  • clb74 said:

    Ignore last post it wasn't meant for here.

    Texting and WhatsApp at the same Time: (

    Been in all day waiting for you to drop the £3 off
    Haha thanks for the scotch Chris.
    You must let the elf get your round more often
  • PeterGage said:

    PeterGage said:

    Too many people on here have unrealistic expectations or just want to use the results to bitch about the regime. There are teams no longer in the top four divisions that I do a double take at their names at how far they've fallen when I see them. Football is a tough, competitive game and, as hard as this may be for some people to fathom, beating every other team every week is rarely going to happen. We've just gone 7 (?) games unbeaten and we're starting to look like a team that could do some damage. Bitching because we are not quite there yet is pointless. A fit Homes and Magennis, Byrne back and I think we've got a team where scoring two or three goals a game and picking up all three points here on in will be realistic but even then this league is competitive enough that there will still be matches when we drop points. That's football.

    Unrealistic expectations? We were categorically told that we will have a top 6 budget and will be going all out for promotion this season. If I have any expectations it's that the club reach it's goal. Winning 9 games from 29 is NOT promotion form in any way. We have a mountain to climb if we are to have any hope of reaching the play offs, and whilst an optimist might say we can do it, a realist would say we have no chance.
    A Winner will say let's do it, a Loser will say we have no chance.
    I just love your positivity.

    I have been saying for 3 years "let's do it", "let's do it", but nothing happens; I must be using the wrong password (the world is governed, these days, by passwords, it seems).

    Do you fancy a small wager with me that we wont finish in the top 6? Nothing heavy, just a donation to our favourite charities (I financially support A native American School each month) or if I win, you could, alternatively, send your losing stake to CARD, to which I subscribe financially on a regular basis. Your call.
    That's something else a loser does, bets.
    A "loser" is surely only a "loser" if he loses such bets. As you seemingly think (and that is an inference on my part- I haven't checked your previous statements) you believe your own hype that they will finish in the top six then take up my bet, because by my definition you wont be a "loser". So, a straightforward question; are you going to take up my wager, yes or no (no other narrative is necessary...just "yes or no".

    I believe that the Protest Fund balance will be reduced by their financial input into the forthcoming Belgium trip. I am sure they would love to have financial input from "winners" such as you.

    So, "Yes" or "No" ???????
    Betting is a mugs game but out of curiosity I've just checked Paddy Power's odds and they seem to be offering 30 to 1 on charlton getting promoted. They also seem to be offering a free £30 bet if I sign up with them so basically that seems to imply a £10 bet would return odds of 120 to 1 and I wouldn't be risking contributing to what would then be the anti-Charlton fund if I and the team lose. So no thanks to your offer.
  • I don't bet but would be surprised if a betting company are offering odds of 30-1 for Charlton to finish in the top six.

    But that is almost irrelevant. You are so sure of success for Charlton this year that I am offering a simple wager of say £5. If you win, I will pay into the charity of your choice. If I win, you can contribute to a very good cause, namely CARD. Yes or No ??
  • DaSilva looks like one of those RD signings where the manager doesn't actually want him. It kind of smacks of "here you go" when we sold Lookman, but surely if Robinson wanted him he would be playing him now.

    Just watched the one minute of Sky "highlights", and the sending off of Elliot is a joke decision.

    Joke in what way?
    Didnt see his goal as didnt see most things, but one thing i did see as it was parallel to me, was when he took tex out with his elbow ref bottle as usual.... They dont seem to bottle though when its our players though.
    So his not being sent off for the elbow is a joke, but then what about his being sent off for two valid yellows is a joke?
    What on earth you going on about.
    @Chippycafc EveshamAddick says Elliot's sending off is a joke. I ask why. You mention the ref bottling it for his elbow on Tex. If that's meant as an answer to my original question, I'm asking why this makes his actual sending off a joke? That's what I'm going on about.
    Only that I couldn't see what he had done that merited a booking - I imagined some crazy goal celebration in front of opposition fans or the opposition dug out, but it looked quite low key to me.
  • Sponsored links:


  • PeterGage said:

    I don't bet but would be surprised if a betting company are offering odds of 30-1 for Charlton to finish in the top six.

    But that is almost irrelevant. You are so sure of success for Charlton this year that I am offering a simple wager of say £5. If you win, I will pay into the charity of your choice. If I win, you can contribute to a very good cause, namely CARD. Yes or No ??

    13/2 top 6 betsky
  • clb74 said:

    PeterGage said:

    I don't bet but would be surprised if a betting company are offering odds of 30-1 for Charlton to finish in the top six.

    But that is almost irrelevant. You are so sure of success for Charlton this year that I am offering a simple wager of say £5. If you win, I will pay into the charity of your choice. If I win, you can contribute to a very good cause, namely CARD. Yes or No ??

    13/2 top 6 betsky
    And then you have to include a bet on us to win the playoffs on top of that. 30/1 sounds about right.
  • Davey I see the part where Pete said I'd be surprised if offering 30/1 for top 6
    Indeed 30/1promotion
  • clb74 said:

    Davey I see the part where Pete said I'd be surprised if offering 30/1 for top 6
    Indeed 30/1promotion

    Sorry thought we were referring to @letthegoodtimesroll 's price
  • Too many people on here have unrealistic expectations or just want to use the results to bitch about the regime. There are teams no longer in the top four divisions that I do a double take at their names at how far they've fallen when I see them. Football is a tough, competitive game and, as hard as this may be for some people to fathom, beating every other team every week is rarely going to happen. We've just gone 7 (?) games unbeaten and we're starting to look like a team that could do some damage. Bitching because we are not quite there yet is pointless. A fit Homes and Magennis, Byrne back and I think we've got a team where scoring two or three goals a game and picking up all three points here on in will be realistic but even then this league is competitive enough that there will still be matches when we drop points. That's football.

    On god I hope your right. But unfortunately I think you are delusional ! The green shoots arrived at Bolton and are now firmly trodden on. An post Oldham an Rochdale ( the heavy weights of this leauge) will be gone and finished for another year. Nothing to see here, team establishing itself as a mid table leauge one stalwart, move along.
  • clb74 said:

    Ignore last post it wasn't meant for here.

    Texting and WhatsApp at the same Time: (

    Been in all day waiting for you to drop the £3 off
    Haha thanks for the scotch Chris.
    You must let the elf get your round more often
    'He' bought me some peanuts as well!
  • clb74 said:

    Davey I see the part where Pete said I'd be surprised if offering 30/1 for top 6
    Indeed 30/1promotion

    Sorry thought we were referring to @letthegoodtimesroll 's price
    Might have some of that 30/1
  • edited February 2017
    One of England's great failings is that they don't have goals throughout the team. You either need prolific strikers or a significant number of players who can chip in. Otherwise you are saying to opponents - if you stop him and him and maybe him, they won't score many! For me, a lesser player who knows where the goal is, is worth his place if your goal scoring balance is out. We don't have prolific strikers so we need more of the others to chip in. This basic rule applies to all levels of the game.

    I think Holmes gets more than his fair share given his position, our two centre halves are not shoddy in that department, but every other player is below where they should be in that respect!
  • One of England's great failings is that they don't have goals throughout the team. You either need prolific strikers or a significant number of players who can chip in. Otherwise you are saying to opponents - if you stop him and him and maybe him, they won't score many! For me, a lesser player is worth his place if your goal scoring balance is out. We don't have prolific strikers so we need more of the others to chip in. This basic rule applies to all levelsof the game.

    No such thing as a 'lesser player' in a team
  • PeterGage said:

    PeterGage said:

    Too many people on here have unrealistic expectations or just want to use the results to bitch about the regime. There are teams no longer in the top four divisions that I do a double take at their names at how far they've fallen when I see them. Football is a tough, competitive game and, as hard as this may be for some people to fathom, beating every other team every week is rarely going to happen. We've just gone 7 (?) games unbeaten and we're starting to look like a team that could do some damage. Bitching because we are not quite there yet is pointless. A fit Homes and Magennis, Byrne back and I think we've got a team where scoring two or three goals a game and picking up all three points here on in will be realistic but even then this league is competitive enough that there will still be matches when we drop points. That's football.

    Unrealistic expectations? We were categorically told that we will have a top 6 budget and will be going all out for promotion this season. If I have any expectations it's that the club reach it's goal. Winning 9 games from 29 is NOT promotion form in any way. We have a mountain to climb if we are to have any hope of reaching the play offs, and whilst an optimist might say we can do it, a realist would say we have no chance.
    A Winner will say let's do it, a Loser will say we have no chance.
    I just love your positivity.

    I have been saying for 3 years "let's do it", "let's do it", but nothing happens; I must be using the wrong password (the world is governed, these days, by passwords, it seems).

    Do you fancy a small wager with me that we wont finish in the top 6? Nothing heavy, just a donation to our favourite charities (I financially support A native American School each month) or if I win, you could, alternatively, send your losing stake to CARD, to which I subscribe financially on a regular basis. Your call.
    That's something else a loser does, bets.
    A "loser" is surely only a "loser" if he loses such bets. As you seemingly think (and that is an inference on my part- I haven't checked your previous statements) you believe your own hype that they will finish in the top six then take up my bet, because by my definition you wont be a "loser". So, a straightforward question; are you going to take up my wager, yes or no (no other narrative is necessary...just "yes or no".

    I believe that the Protest Fund balance will be reduced by their financial input into the forthcoming Belgium trip. I am sure they would love to have financial input from "winners" such as you.

    So, "Yes" or "No" ???????
    Betting is a mugs game but out of curiosity I've just checked Paddy Power's odds and they seem to be offering 30 to 1 on charlton getting promoted. They also seem to be offering a free £30 bet if I sign up with them so basically that seems to imply a £10 bet would return odds of 120 to 1 and I wouldn't be risking contributing to what would then be the anti-Charlton fund if I and the team lose. So no thanks to your offer.
    I believe thays called bottling it.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!