Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Plans to turn the Club shop into flats?

Stripped out from another thread:

Just to rub salt in the wounds!
Club submitted planning application to remove club shop and replace with 4 flats,
Rumour is he's waiting for improved offer for ground and relocate at Blackwall site
Guys he's going nowhere quick if anyone attends meeting with club I would suggest you ask the question
The squad means nothing at all to him look at his network no squad investment at all
Ask yourselves this question WHY has Greenwich council not popped up expressing there concerns!
Answer they get state of the art stadium in there catchment
Jiminez and slater did not fit the model and far to much baggage once they got knock back Kevin cash pulled the funding
And the rest is history.
As they say for warned is for armed.

I heard about ten days ago that RD planned to demolish the Superstore and replace it with flats. I didn't bring it here because 1) it would be possible subject to consent to build up with reinstated retail, 2) I couldn't find a second source and 3) I did not want to start a story that might involve the shop staff losing their jobs - or the threat of that - without sufficient verification.

You cannot put another storey on the existing building.

There is no planning application to date but if there is one I think we should organise to get it rejected.

I have heard from another source that Meire would prefer a store at the 02 or Bexleyheath, but we have been there before.

«134567

Comments

  • Thanks for posting this on a new thread, AFKA.

    Everyone needs to read this IMHO.

    And be very worried.....
  • This completely speaks volumes of the man, his cronie CEO and the whole regime

    f*** off Roland

    This needs to be rejected!
  • How legit is this information/source?
  • They should turn that ill-fated Brew & Choo space into the new shop ;)
  • edited November 2015
    I think the point about this (if true) is it is asset stripping, and possibly the beginning of such a process for getting money out of CAFC, so much for the stability of a rich owner eh?
  • Puts this ownership into an entirely new perspective if true.

    Needs to be torn apart ... the club needs a shop on-site.

    The more that surfaces regarding RD & KM, the smellier this regime gets.
  • Maybe he wants to relocate his red sofa.
    Joking aside, if there's substance to this, we should oppose it every step of the way.
  • Nothing on Greenwich Council's planning search (last application was for a catering facility in 2013).
  • GUYS THERE IS MORE THAN ONE WAY TO SKIN A CAT!
    if you all stand united and keep insults and personal threats limited i believe something or someone will crack and will have to provide answers.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Won't happen. He clearly doesn't know his Charlton history. We as fans* aren't pushovers.

    *as players however....
  • This is a question that has to be asked at the FF /PR event and by CAST until we have an answer.
  • Time to dust off the old ACV legislation. Under that we (CAST) have to be advised when there is an intention to sell the ground. Two questions to be answered are;

    a) does the legislation apply when there is an intention to sell a part of the registered property ?
    b) did we include the club shop within the boundaries of the registered area ?

    I hope KM/RD have appraised themselves of the law before they go and do something that may find them on the wrong side of it.
  • edited November 2015
    Question:

    In light of West Ham moving to the OS would you take a stadium move to Greenwich Peninsula? It's a question I've been asking myself for a while now and I'm not sure on the answer.

    Could this also explain why the training ground plans have been waived through with such ease?
  • se9addick said:

    Time to dust off the old ACV legislation. Under that we (CAST) have to be advised when there is an intention to sell the ground. Two questions to be answered are;

    a) does the legislation apply when there is an intention to sell a part of the registered property ?
    b) did we include the club shop within the boundaries of the registered area ?

    I hope KM/RD have appraised themselves of the law before they go and do something that may find them on the wrong side of it.

    Perhaps the land registry is a port of call for that?


    The land itself could be redeveloped, the shop moved to a temporary location nearby, and put back afterwards, or dispersed, one assumes?
  • Question:

    In light of West Ham moving to the OS would you take a stadium move to Greenwich Peninsula? It's a question I've been asking myself for a while now and I'm not sure on the answer.

    For me that's just too broad a question to answer. It entirely depends on the business case, I'm not wedded to the idea that we have to always play at the Valley, forever, but it would have to be a pretty compelling argument that convinced me we should leave.
  • se9addick said:

    Time to dust off the old ACV legislation. Under that we (CAST) have to be advised when there is an intention to sell the ground. Two questions to be answered are;

    a) does the legislation apply when there is an intention to sell a part of the registered property ?
    b) did we include the club shop within the boundaries of the registered area ?

    I hope KM/RD have appraised themselves of the law before they go and do something that may find them on the wrong side of it.

    and what a useful person KM would be when getting into legal minefields.
  • Leaving aside everything else that stinks about this proposal, how can they justify squeezing four flats into such a small site? Feckin tight bastards.
  • Question:

    In light of West Ham moving to the OS would you take a stadium move to Greenwich Peninsula? It's a question I've been asking myself for a while now and I'm not sure on the answer.

    I think that's one for a separate debate / thread
    Fair enough.
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited November 2015
    The fact that KM used to work in law, I would suspect they know what they are doing. Dark dark times ahead. Even if he sells up he won't give up the ground.

    He did this at another team he owned. Now rents it back to them at an extortionate rate
  • robroy said:

    The fact that KM used to work in law, I would suspect they know what they are doing.

    International competition law is KM's specialism - a little different from English planning law.

    Rumour on Twitter was that the shop would move to Bartram's.
  • So could this be stage one of moving us to Greenwich Peninsula or just part of a plan to build property / hotels on the current site? Didn't he do something similar at Sint Truiden?

    Good time to dig these out?

    https://londondocklands.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/greenwich-peninsula-and-the-mystery-stadium/

    http://853blog.com/2013/08/19/greenwich-council-in-new-charlton-athletic-stadium-talks/

  • \you can rule out the move to the Greenwich Penisular. The Hong Kong developers only interested in luxury homes, hotels and offices. A football stadium would not fit into this.
  • If the current ownership move us to the peninsula and handle it in the same manner they have most other things, then they should only build one with 10,000 seats.
  • If you look at Floyd Road, a developer could buy up the housing there and building a hotel that backed on the pitch and once assumes around the corner too behind the JS, with car park below, its a few minutes walk from a station, if you look at Sidcup plenty of hotels around that station, seems to be a new trend, as are hotels behind stadia.
  • Will they come in XXL sizes?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!