Greenie, if the taste is only caused by the additives you could have the additives on bread, or as a dip or something.
Its not all caused by additives, meat tastes lovely especially beef and Lamb. Also omnivores are healthier than veggies/vegans because the human body has evolved to have a balanced diet of meat fish veggies etc.
I don't care if people are veggies/vegans, good luck to them, what pees me off is that they have to keep preaching about it. Pasty faced freaks. ;o)
You are entitled to your views, especially as you never preach about anything yourself, and you have clearly demonstrated that omnivores are healthier than vegans/vegetarians.
Nothing wrong with some tasty additives. Like E150a which is caramel - yum yum.
I'm quite fond of E948 too - that's oxygen.
Whereas the only benefit of spinach (apart from E172) and many other fruit & veg is that you use more calories eating them than you get out of them, so it's a sort of dieting aid I suppose.
You are entitled to your views, especially as you never preach about anything yourself, and you have clearly demonstrated that omnivores are healthier than vegans/vegetarians.
Thanks Seth, how very kind. I don't have to demonstrate to you or anyone else, however I know a lot of veggies/vegans and they are always ill or have no energy, oddly enough they tend to eat a lot of chocolate?? I understand that there is something in choccie that supplements a lack of meat! Ask any women.
You are entitled to your views, especially as you never preach about anything yourself, and you have clearly demonstrated that omnivores are healthier than vegans/vegetarians.
Thanks Seth, how very kind. I don't have to demonstrate to you or anyone else, however I know a lot of veggies/vegans and they are always ill or have no energy, oddly enough they tend to eat a lot of chocolate?? I understand that there is something in choccie that supplements a lack of meat! Ask any women.
I wouldn't think you would have to demonstrate to me or anybody else, your personal experience is all the evidence you need. You could even say you're right, just because you're you.
Nothing wrong with some tasty additives. Like E150a which is caramel - yum yum.
I'm quite fond of E948 too - that's oxygen.
Whereas the only benefit of spinach (apart from E172) and many other fruit & veg is that you use more calories eating them than you get out of them, so it's a sort of dieting aid I suppose.
So, why don't vegetarians gradually disappear?
Not true. There is no such thing as negative calorie foods:
Nothing wrong with some tasty additives. Like E150a which is caramel - yum yum.
I'm quite fond of E948 too - that's oxygen.
Whereas the only benefit of spinach (apart from E172) and many other fruit & veg is that you use more calories eating them than you get out of them, so it's a sort of dieting aid I suppose.
So, why don't vegetarians gradually disappear?
Not true. There is no such thing as negative calorie foods:
That's a very simplistic way of looking at the figures.
Lets take spinach. 100g grams is apparently 23 calories. So you take it out of the fridge, carefully, remember where the recycled plastic goes for its bag, wash it, prepare it by cutting of all the manky bits, cut out the inedible central stalk, fill a pan with water, cook it, take it to the sink, drain it, slice it up and serve it. You then chew it, gag on it and finally throw up because it tastes so nasty. That's got to take more than 23 calories surely?
You are entitled to your views, especially as you never preach about anything yourself, and you have clearly demonstrated that omnivores are healthier than vegans/vegetarians.
Thanks Seth, how very kind. I don't have to demonstrate to you or anyone else, however I know a lot of veggies/vegans and they are always ill or have no energy, oddly enough they tend to eat a lot of chocolate?? I understand that there is something in choccie that supplements a lack of meat! Ask any women.
I wouldn't think you would have to demonstrate to me or anybody else, your personal experience is all the evidence you need. You could even say you're right, just because you're you.
Nothing wrong with some tasty additives. Like E150a which is caramel - yum yum.
I'm quite fond of E948 too - that's oxygen.
Whereas the only benefit of spinach (apart from E172) and many other fruit & veg is that you use more calories eating them than you get out of them, so it's a sort of dieting aid I suppose.
So, why don't vegetarians gradually disappear?
Not true. There is no such thing as negative calorie foods:
That's a very simplistic way of looking at the figures.
Lets take spinach. 100g grams is apparently 23 calories. So you take it out of the fridge, carefully, remember where the recycled plastic goes for its bag, wash it, prepare it by cutting of all the manky bits, cut out the inedible central stalk, fill a pan with water, cook it, take it to the sink, drain it, slice it up and serve it. You then chew it, gag on it and finally throw up because it tastes so nasty. That's got to take more than 23 calories surely?
So if I run 10 miles to a shop and buy a Mars Bar, eat it then run 10 miles home that makes it negative calorie? Lmao!
How the hell did this get 2 LOLs? Some people are easily pleased :-(
Because most on this forum aren't po faced vegans who appear to have had a sense of humour bypass.
My mistake for not knowing the emoticon for 'tongue-in-cheek'. Well done for deducing someones character by judging one post though. It must be a gift ( ;-) )
Nothing wrong with some tasty additives. Like E150a which is caramel - yum yum.
I'm quite fond of E948 too - that's oxygen.
Whereas the only benefit of spinach (apart from E172) and many other fruit & veg is that you use more calories eating them than you get out of them, so it's a sort of dieting aid I suppose.
So, why don't vegetarians gradually disappear?
Not true. There is no such thing as negative calorie foods:
That's a very simplistic way of looking at the figures.
Lets take spinach. 100g grams is apparently 23 calories. So you take it out of the fridge, carefully, remember where the recycled plastic goes for its bag, wash it, prepare it by cutting of all the manky bits, cut out the inedible central stalk, fill a pan with water, cook it, take it to the sink, drain it, slice it up and serve it. You then chew it, gag on it and finally throw up because it tastes so nasty. That's got to take more than 23 calories surely?
Not me, I just take the can out of the cupboard, squeeze the contents out, swallow in one mouthful (sometimes through my jauntily angled pipe) then give my skinny bint of a wife a good seeing to.
I'm guessing this thread is going to be rammo tomorrow night after more of the valley faithful have sampled the culinary delights in store tomorrow afternoon.
Is the food better than the junk they normally sell? If I want to order something at halftime will I annoy everyone in my row by making them stand to let me pass 15 minutes into the second half?
I'm guessing this thread is going to be rammo tomorrow night after more of the valley faithful have sampled the culinary delights in store tomorrow afternoon.
I was one of the select band of fans at the open day to try the food and tried the salt beef that was nice minus the gherkin as I'm not keen on Gherkins.
Nothing wrong with some tasty additives. Like E150a which is caramel - yum yum.
I'm quite fond of E948 too - that's oxygen.
Whereas the only benefit of spinach (apart from E172) and many other fruit & veg is that you use more calories eating them than you get out of them, so it's a sort of dieting aid I suppose.
So, why don't vegetarians gradually disappear?
Not true. There is no such thing as negative calorie foods:
That's a very simplistic way of looking at the figures.
Lets take spinach. 100g grams is apparently 23 calories. So you take it out of the fridge, carefully, remember where the recycled plastic goes for its bag, wash it, prepare it by cutting of all the manky bits, cut out the inedible central stalk, fill a pan with water, cook it, take it to the sink, drain it, slice it up and serve it. You then chew it, gag on it and finally throw up because it tastes so nasty. That's got to take more than 23 calories surely?
So if I run 10 miles to a shop and buy a Mars Bar, eat it then run 10 miles home that makes it negative calorie? Lmao!
You got it. The downside is you'll have knees like Chris Solly.
Comments
I don't care if people are veggies/vegans, good luck to them, what pees me off is that they have to keep preaching about it. Pasty faced freaks. ;o)
I'm quite fond of E948 too - that's oxygen.
Whereas the only benefit of spinach (apart from E172) and many other fruit & veg is that you use more calories eating them than you get out of them, so it's a sort of dieting aid I suppose.
So, why don't vegetarians gradually disappear?
Sorry.....
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative-calorie_food
Look at anyone on Atkins, they really struggle with energy for the first few weeks. The Paleo diet is similar.
Vegetarians are very healthy and can get protein from many sources.
The Paleo
Lets take spinach. 100g grams is apparently 23 calories. So you take it out of the fridge, carefully, remember where the recycled plastic goes for its bag, wash it, prepare it by cutting of all the manky bits, cut out the inedible central stalk, fill a pan with water, cook it, take it to the sink, drain it, slice it up and serve it.
You then chew it, gag on it and finally throw up because it tastes so nasty. That's got to take more than 23 calories surely?
By the way, I love animals
They're delicious!
If you get there two hours before kick-off you should be fine RC :-)