Can't prove she was driving - they didn't catch her actually driving the car. Straightforward, unfortunately - the law in this area is shit. though much more likely that without the star power and presence of an expensive brief, the magistrates would have banned the culprit for a lot longer
It used to be the same thing with speeding fines, congestion charge fines, parking fines etc. Where there is a doubt about who was driving, its very difficult to get a solid conviction. That's why the 'registered keeper' law is important in parking offences and the like
Can't prove she was driving - they didn't catch her actually driving the car. Straightforward, unfortunately - the law in this area is shit. though much more likely that without the star power and presence of an expensive brief, the magistrates would have banned the culprit for a lot longer
It used to be the same thing with speeding fines, congestion charge fines, parking fines etc. Where there is a doubt about who was driving, its very difficult to get a solid conviction. That's why the 'registered keeper' law is important in parking offences and the like
Is this the same as you what you would get done for if found asleep and pissed in your car with the keys?
Am I missing something. How do the police “see the car veer off the road and hit a grass verge” at 00.40am “before seeing it stationary 15 minutes later”.
Why didn’t they do something at 00.40am?? Could have removed any uncertainty then about “mystery male driver” and whether she was drunk or not.
Am I missing something. How do the police “see the car veer off the road and hit a grass verge” at 00.40am “before seeing it stationary 15 minutes later”.
Why didn’t they do something at 00.40am?? Could have removed any uncertainty then about “mystery male driver” and whether she was drunk or not.
Am I missing something. How do the police “see the car veer off the road and hit a grass verge” at 00.40am “before seeing it stationary 15 minutes later”.
Why didn’t they do something at 00.40am?? Could have removed any uncertainty then about “mystery male driver” and whether she was drunk or not.
Have no time for her (or anyone like her for that matter). It's the media that fill their pages/websites with stories of who they are currently shagging, together with images of these so-called celebrities in various states of undress or inebriation. Says a lot about society in general. Why this should appear as a thread on Charlton Life is beyond me.
Comments
It used to be the same thing with speeding fines, congestion charge fines, parking fines etc. Where there is a doubt about who was driving, its very difficult to get a solid conviction. That's why the 'registered keeper' law is important in parking offences and the like
Why didn’t they do something at 00.40am?? Could have removed any uncertainty then about “mystery male driver” and whether she was drunk or not.
What is this, a witch hunt?
The article clearly states she is out of the country and apparently has something more important to attend to than a piffling court case.
#jugsmatter
Golfie, the voice of a generation.