Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2023

1201202204206207260

Comments

  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,751
    Jimmy Anderson has confirmed that he has no intention of retiring. So that puts that one to bed. He does admit that he wished that he had made a bigger contribution and had he been a lot younger there would be speculation as to whether he should be dropped as opposed to whether he should hang his boots up. 

    So it's now down to Stokes and McCullum to decide whether he does or not. 
    And Anderson has been picked in an unchanged team
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,906
    Can't help thinking we will regret that Tongue should be playing.
  • kinveachyaddick
    kinveachyaddick Posts: 3,874
    That selection puts a lot of pressure on Anderson to deliver - and also does nothing to dispel the suspicion that the team isn’t picked 100% on merit but certain players get preferential treatment 
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    That selection puts a lot of pressure on Anderson to deliver - and also does nothing to dispel the suspicion that the team isn’t picked 100% on merit but certain players get preferential treatment 
    stokes has already said he picks players on what they can do on their best days, which you can understand the selection of anderson, ditto bairstow and crawley.
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,345
    Jimmy Anderson has confirmed that he has no intention of retiring. So that puts that one to bed. He does admit that he wished that he had made a bigger contribution and had he been a lot younger there would be speculation as to whether he should be dropped as opposed to whether he should hang his boots up. 

    So it's now down to Stokes and McCullum to decide whether he does or not. 
    And Anderson has been picked in an unchanged team
    thing is, would this have been the case had we won the last game ? ..  many pundits are saying things like 'Jimmy has done enough for England to choose when he goes' .. all the time he's pulling in the BIG bucks, he might decide to carry on for twenty more years .. all respect to a great cricketer, BUT his time to go has surely come
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,345
    That selection puts a lot of pressure on Anderson to deliver - and also does nothing to dispel the suspicion that the team isn’t picked 100% on merit but certain players get preferential treatment 
    nostalgia rules OK !!
  • kinveachyaddick
    kinveachyaddick Posts: 3,874
    That selection puts a lot of pressure on Anderson to deliver - and also does nothing to dispel the suspicion that the team isn’t picked 100% on merit but certain players get preferential treatment 
    stokes has already said he picks players on what they can do on their best days, which you can understand the selection of anderson, ditto bairstow and crawley.
    But on the evidence of the past four tests Anderson’s best days are behind him whereas Tongue got stuck into their top order bats when we saw him at Lord’s 
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,345
    f w i w .. England's friend Ricky Ponting is suggesting that Stokes is a rotten captain and that under a 'proper skipper' England would have won this series already
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,606
    biggest winning draw I can remember. Bit farcical it's ended like this. I know the WTC final had an option of 6th day if there was rain, think this should be for all tests tbh.
    When all Test matches started  on a Thursday there used to be a rest day on a Sunday & finish on the Tuesday. I believe some may have played on the Sunday to "make up" time if there had been a washout the day before. 

    Or am I mis-remembering. 
    Don't think they played on a Sunday, in fact it wasn't unheard of for players to turn out for their counties or play in benefits on the rest day. Going back a few years, I think there was a provisional sixth day at the last test if it was a series decider, may still exist of course.

    There were plenty of timeless tests in the past, apparently all tests in Australia pre WW2 followed this format. There's a good Wikipedia article about it.
    I think timeless Tests came to an end when one Test had to be cut short due to the boat leaving for the UK. In the days of having flights multiple times a day there is no reason why Timeless Tests cant make a comeback :0
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,828
    Unsettled weather tomorrow, with a fair chance of a shower. Friday and Sunday look ok, Saturday and Monday less good...
  • Sponsored links:



  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,751
    biggest winning draw I can remember. Bit farcical it's ended like this. I know the WTC final had an option of 6th day if there was rain, think this should be for all tests tbh.
    When all Test matches started  on a Thursday there used to be a rest day on a Sunday & finish on the Tuesday. I believe some may have played on the Sunday to "make up" time if there had been a washout the day before. 

    Or am I mis-remembering. 
    Don't think they played on a Sunday, in fact it wasn't unheard of for players to turn out for their counties or play in benefits on the rest day. Going back a few years, I think there was a provisional sixth day at the last test if it was a series decider, may still exist of course.

    There were plenty of timeless tests in the past, apparently all tests in Australia pre WW2 followed this format. There's a good Wikipedia article about it.
    I think timeless Tests came to an end when one Test had to be cut short due to the boat leaving for the UK. In the days of having flights multiple times a day there is no reason why Timeless Tests cant make a comeback :0
    As long as the Test stopped in time for The Hundred
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    That selection puts a lot of pressure on Anderson to deliver - and also does nothing to dispel the suspicion that the team isn’t picked 100% on merit but certain players get preferential treatment 
    stokes has already said he picks players on what they can do on their best days, which you can understand the selection of anderson, ditto bairstow and crawley.
    But on the evidence of the past four tests Anderson’s best days are behind him whereas Tongue got stuck into their top order bats when we saw him at Lord’s 
    Does it or has he had a couple of "bad days at the office"?   He was the world number one bowler 3 test matches ago.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,828
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/66285711

    It look like Stokes will have 6 months off between The Ashes and the India Tests to get his knee sorted.
  • kinveachyaddick
    kinveachyaddick Posts: 3,874
    Cafc43v3r said:
    That selection puts a lot of pressure on Anderson to deliver - and also does nothing to dispel the suspicion that the team isn’t picked 100% on merit but certain players get preferential treatment 
    stokes has already said he picks players on what they can do on their best days, which you can understand the selection of anderson, ditto bairstow and crawley.
    But on the evidence of the past four tests Anderson’s best days are behind him whereas Tongue got stuck into their top order bats when we saw him at Lord’s 
    Does it or has he had a couple of "bad days at the office"?   He was the world number one bowler 3 test matches ago.
    I guess we'll find out tomorrow if this rain ever stops
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,751
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/66285711

    It look like Stokes will have 6 months off between The Ashes and the India Tests to get his knee sorted.
    Not before time. Given that he played just two IPL games and bowled one over, he could have missed the two NZ Tests and had the six months off between December and June to do that. The talk about "we've found a way of managing it" was complete and utter tosh. 
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,453
     I get the sentiment for picking Anderson for Old Trafford, but it was a big mistake.
     I've written him off many times before but I seriously think he's done now.
    Vaughn called it the other day. He didn't take one critical wicket in the 3 tests he played. They dropped him from Headingley and we won.

    Love the bloke to bits. But for the good of Bazball, please say enough is enough
  • Wellred
    Wellred Posts: 1,118
    They have already won the Ashes but
    Let's win this test & send them home knowing it was only the weather that won them & who really is the better team 
    So Come On England let's do this
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,875
    Wellred said:
    They have already won the Ashes but
    Let's win this test & send them home knowing it was only the weather that won them & who really is the better team 
    So Come On England let's do this
    I think that is a good message for the england team to fire them up but I really don't think the Aussies will care about what happened on days 4 and 5 in Manchester. For them it's job done and they won't see past that.
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/66285711

    It look like Stokes will have 6 months off between The Ashes and the India Tests to get his knee sorted.
    Not before time. Given that he played just two IPL games and bowled one over, he could have missed the two NZ Tests and had the six months off between December and June to do that. The talk about "we've found a way of managing it" was complete and utter tosh. 
    he's hobbled around in the field and at the crease, was clear there was something really wrong with his knee. 
  • Wellred
    Wellred Posts: 1,118
    edited July 2023
    Wellred said:
    They have already won the Ashes but
    Let's win this test & send them home knowing it was only the weather that won them & who really is the better team 
    So Come On England let's do this
    I think that is a good message for the england team to fire them up but I really don't think the Aussies will care about what happened on days 4 and 5 in Manchester. For them it's job done and they won't see past that.
    I think they will want to prove they would have won it anyway & go all out for the win 
  • Sponsored links:



  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,606
    Wellred said:
    They have already won the Ashes but
    Let's win this test & send them home knowing it was only the weather that won them & who really is the better team 
    So Come On England let's do this
    The haven't won the Ashes (yet) they've merely retained the urn because the best we can now do is a draw. 

    If we win the last one then the series is drawn. And they keep the urn by "default". 
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    A fully fit jofra and we'd have walked this series imo.
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,822
    Wellred said:
    They have already won the Ashes but
    Let's win this test & send them home knowing it was only the weather that won them & who really is the better team 
    So Come On England let's do this
    The haven't won the Ashes (yet) they've merely retained the urn because the best we can now do is a draw. 

    If we win the last one then the series is drawn. And they keep the urn by "default". 
    Well, seeing as you're being pedantic, they technically don't "keep the urn" because it never leaves Lords.

    Thanks!
  • Wellred
    Wellred Posts: 1,118
    Wellred said:
    They have already won the Ashes but
    Let's win this test & send them home knowing it was only the weather that won them & who really is the better team 
    So Come On England let's do this
    The haven't won the Ashes (yet) they've merely retained the urn because the best we can now do is a draw. 

    If we win the last one then the series is drawn. And they keep the urn by "default". 
    Your right I stand corrected 
  • iaitch
    iaitch Posts: 10,216
    A fully fit jofra and we'd have walked this series imo.
    The Chuks of test cricket.
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    A fully fit jofra and we'd have walked this series imo.
    A fully fit Mark Wood and we would have won it. 
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,745
    Cafc43v3r said:
    A fully fit jofra and we'd have walked this series imo.
    A fully fit Mark Wood and we would have won it. 
    Both fully fit and we would’ve won 6-0?
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,751
    "Would have, could have, should have". The Aussies would argue that had Lyon been fit they would have won every Test or if they'd won the toss each and every time as we have. Had that ball not hit Stokes' bat and gone to the boundary we wouldn't have won the 2019 World Cup would we? But it doesn't say that on the trophy does it? At the end of the day, it's what's in the book that counts. Always has been and always should be. 
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,939
    Think this'll be another rain affected draw.

    Not getting the tail out at Edgbaston decided the series.