The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
This week is the week........ it's gonna happen........1000 pages bring it on !2
-
Given the in-fighting, complete crap and silly puns on this sadly, out-dated, thread - I have reverted to only scanning for posts by @""Airman Brown" , @Redhenry , @JamesSeed and (reluctantly) @DOUCHER ... in the hope of actually learning something about the impending takeover...4
-
Come a join #TeamWIOTOScafc-west said:Given the in-fighting, complete crap and silly puns on this sadly, out-dated, thread - I have reverted to only scanning for posts by @""Airman Brown" , @Redhenry , @JamesSeed and (reluctantly) @DOUCHER ... in the hope of actually learning something about the impending takeover...
We only wait for it to be 'official' on the site
4 -
#ourWembleyBig_Bad_World said:Saturday nights shenanigans was your version of fighting amongst yourselves in the stands.
3 -
I bet a few of them had flat caps and string vests on whilst sitting in front of their keyboardsBig_Bad_World said:Saturday nights shenanigans was your version of fighting amongst yourselves in the stands.
1 -
Just caught up and read most of the comments...fucking hell, is this what its come too? Having a pop at each other over who has the best info.
No sides taken i should add.
I think i speak for most people when i say the shirty comments have got to stop. We are all hoping for the same end result so is all this bitching really worth it?
If its a British lot..great or if its the Aussies...great. We all just want RD gone.
Personally i enjoy hearing all info. Gets the imagination thinking of a brighter future!
Hope there is a development this week as J Block mentioned though, would be nice for the team to have a solid foundation instead of it all up in the air!16 -
Come on, guys, I vote we all give it another week, and if nothing happens we’ll go and start our own society. 5
-
I'd like to think that my modern man look hasn't yet made it's way over to SE7.eaststandmike said:
I bet a few of them had flat caps and string vests on whilst sitting in front of their keyboardsBig_Bad_World said:Saturday nights shenanigans was your version of fighting amongst yourselves in the stands.
1 -
It was only a shame that some had to wire their beards on.
0 -
h
Christ mate, if you think this thread is bad for people having a pop at each other, get over to the latest Jeremy Corbyn one.king addick said:Just caught up and read most of the comments...fucking hell, is this what its come too? Having a pop at each other over who has the best info.
No sides taken i should add.
I think i speak for most people when i say the shirty comments have got to stop. We are all hoping for the same end result so is all this bitching really worth it?
If its a British lot..great or if its the Aussies...great. We all just want RD gone.
Personally i enjoy hearing all info. Gets the imagination thinking of a brighter future!
Hope there is a development this week as J Block mentioned though, would be nice for the team to have a solid foundation instead of it all up in the air!
I can confidently predict a queue of people lining up in the Makro car park before the day is out.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
And/or anorak or cagouleeaststandmike said:
I bet a few of them had flat caps and string vests on whilst sitting in front of their keyboardsBig_Bad_World said:Saturday nights shenanigans was your version of fighting amongst yourselves in the stands.
0 -
To be honest, I try to avoid the political ones. I hear it on the news and in everyday life.Fortune 82nd Minute said:h
Christ mate, if you think this thread is bad for people having a pop at each other, get over to the latest Jeremy Corbyn one.king addick said:Just caught up and read most of the comments...fucking hell, is this what its come too? Having a pop at each other over who has the best info.
No sides taken i should add.
I think i speak for most people when i say the shirty comments have got to stop. We are all hoping for the same end result so is all this bitching really worth it?
If its a British lot..great or if its the Aussies...great. We all just want RD gone.
Personally i enjoy hearing all info. Gets the imagination thinking of a brighter future!
Hope there is a development this week as J Block mentioned though, would be nice for the team to have a solid foundation instead of it all up in the air!
I can confidently predict a queue of people lining up in the Makro car park before the day is out.
Prefer my Charlton Life experience to be (mostly!) sports based with some funny threads (best lie, drunken stories!)
Saying that, I am curious now, lunchtime reading maybe? Haha4 -
Did everyone go nuts last week? Did I miss it?3blokes said:Come on, guys, I vote we all give it another week, and if nothing happens we’ll go and start our own society.
1 -
Fixed that for you.cafc-west said:Given the in-fighting, complete crap and silly puns on this sadly, out-dated, thread - I have reverted to only scanning for posts by @""Airman Brown" , @Redhenry and @JamesSeed
and (reluctantly) @DOUCHER... in the hope of actually learning something about the impending takeover...1 -
Big news inbound this week.
Roland won't have a leg to stand on when it comes to holding up the price if he keeps selling players off.
(It's confirmation of the Bauer move I have heard about)1 -
I think you mean ‘a well known bearded playwright.’nth london addick said:Let’s see I said about the Aussie farm £100 to upbeats if in 12 months we have not had an influx of Australian players into the squad and mgmt team after 12 months
Stu_of_Kunming said:
But how do you know it's anti-Aussie stuff info, rather than the truth? His contacts have been more accurate than anyone else's, are you sure it's not that that's annoying you? Clearly something is.JamesSeed said:
NLA's source releasing anti Aussie info with an agenda isn't the same as the Aussies stating their intentions. I'm sorry, it just isn't.Stu_of_Kunming said:
No, I think it's exactly the same, anyone releasing info is only doing it to benefit their own cause.JamesSeed said:Stu_of_Kunming said:
Which you accept could just be spin?JamesSeed said:
You don’t know what the model is. They’ve already said it’s not going to be an Aussie nursery club.nth london addick said:
See there’s one thing I don’t like about the Aussie model and that is that it is too similar to the RD Belgian dream but using Australian links to fulfil our quota of players
All signs that the Australian consortium do not have the required pool of cash to help us regain a decent foothold in divisions higher than we currently are
This ex director is briefing him against the Aussies, and he's going along with it without proof. Dont you tbink that's different from me repeating what they say, because there's no third party in between , putting their own spin on it.
You can’t handle the truth a great actor once said
I think this is the same
Don’t leave us James x.0 -
Don’t forget Ken, but for goodness sake don’t invite Action Man, he can’t handle his drink on a hot day._MrDick said:As the weathers nice, think I’ll get the Barbie out later #TeamWIOTOS
1 -
Deadline of this Friday to prove funds with second consortium ready to move in according airman5
-
-
Sponsored links:
-
Surely, with their stated plan, the Aussies have a large pot of money. That pot would be divided into 3 sections:
A: The money to buy the club (£25m - £50m)
B: The money to run the club (circa. £1m a month)
C: The money to fund transfers for the stated promotion ambitions
B is pretty much set in stone, there are things you can do to try to raise revenue and/or lower costs, but it's not going to make a massive difference, especially in the short term.
Therefore, the most sensible route is to try and minimise A to maximise C. Now the complications with the EFL may have shrunk the overall pot (there's zero proof of this, but lets play that game anyway), in which case C shrinks and the pressure to minimise A is higher.
When it is stated that the Aussies don't have the money, that is clearly false. That they may not want to spend as much on A as Roland wants is almost certainly true. The question is, will Roland lower A (through desperation to get out, sale of assets or some sort of leasing arrangement) to a point where the Aussies are happy that it won't impact on C and the ability to meet their stated aims.
Just to add to the above. I would guess the total pot would need to be £150m to £200m for a 5 year plan. Now not all the funding would need to be in place on day one obviously, but you'd need an idea where it's going to come from, and more importantly, investors would need to know before committing, otherwise they're just throwing their money away.8 -
Sale of Charlton:
The War and Peace of Threads.
"We can only know, that we know nothing"
"The strongest of all warriors are these two:
Time and patience.0 -
Sounds like RD is trying to help with A by settling with ex-directors, as he has realised he's not going to sell the club for his ridiculous overvaluation.randy andy said:Surely, with their stated plan, the Aussies have a large pot of money. That pot would be divided into 3 sections:
A: The money to buy the club (£25m - £50m)
B: The money to run the club (circa. £1m a month)
C: The money to fund transfers for the stated promotion ambitions
B is pretty much set in stone, there are things you can do to try to raise revenue and/or lower costs, but it's not going to make a massive difference, especially in the short term.
Therefore, the most sensible route is to try and minimise A to maximise C. Now the complications with the EFL may have shrunk the overall pot (there's zero proof of this, but lets play that game anyway), in which case C shrinks and the pressure to minimise A is higher.
When it is stated that the Aussies don't have the money, that is clearly false. That they may not want to spend as much on A as Roland wants is almost certainly true. The question is, will Roland lower A (through desperation to get out, sale of assets or some sort of leasing arrangement) to a point where the Aussies are happy that it won't impact on C and the ability to meet their stated aims.
@Airman Brown you've now stated the British party interest is legitimate. A few questions on that to anyone with knowledge.
1. Why are they so quiet / why have they not been aggressive in trying to outdo the Aussies?
2. Do the Aussies have a period of exclusivity over the British bid?
3. Why did RD not mention them in the statement last Wednesday?0 -
even IF funding is proved by Friday a completion date of mid July leaves us up a creek without a paddle, without a boat even, unless RD sanctions signings/appointments before completion. IF funding isn't found and this mysterious other party enters the fray then we will start the season with Roland in charge still and that is unpalatable so my mantra is Go Aussies !!The Red Robin said:
2 -
So this week could be summed up as 'Shit or (dare I say) bust?' (No reference to statue intended) 0
-
Summary please ... just the facts ... I can't keep up.0
-
7
-
Binary mathematics is fundamental to the digital world, and of course that includes charltonlife.nth london addick said:
Nope still don’tChizz said:It's quite simple. Either you know what binary means or you don't.
In fact there would be no charltonlife without it.
Google it.0 -
The Red Robin said:
Sounds like RD is trying to help with A by settling with ex-directors, as he has realised he's not going to sell the club for his ridiculous overvaluation.randy andy said:Surely, with their stated plan, the Aussies have a large pot of money. That pot would be divided into 3 sections:
A: The money to buy the club (£25m - £50m)
B: The money to run the club (circa. £1m a month)
C: The money to fund transfers for the stated promotion ambitions
B is pretty much set in stone, there are things you can do to try to raise revenue and/or lower costs, but it's not going to make a massive difference, especially in the short term.
Therefore, the most sensible route is to try and minimise A to maximise C. Now the complications with the EFL may have shrunk the overall pot (there's zero proof of this, but lets play that game anyway), in which case C shrinks and the pressure to minimise A is higher.
When it is stated that the Aussies don't have the money, that is clearly false. That they may not want to spend as much on A as Roland wants is almost certainly true. The question is, will Roland lower A (through desperation to get out, sale of assets or some sort of leasing arrangement) to a point where the Aussies are happy that it won't impact on C and the ability to meet their stated aims.
@Airman Brown you've now stated the British party interest is legitimate. A few questions on that to anyone with knowledge.
1. Why are they so quiet / why have they not been aggressive in trying to outdo the Aussies?
2. Do the Aussies have a period of exclusivity over the British bid?
3. Why did RD not mention them in the statement last Wednesday?
all very good questions. Maybe they are not in a position, yet, to get involved. For example, if Mike Ashley were interested he needs to dispose of Newcastle first but is keeping an eye on the situation. Or maybe the Aussies are the preferred bidders but if they drop out then the other party can step in.2 -
Don’t quit.JamesSeed said:
I agree entirely, but I was alerted by someone here about some disgusting things being said about me on there, by some weirdo who's banned from here and ittv, has never met me, and knows nothing about me. He has a thing about someone here, who he believes is my best mate (he's my second best mate). I had to defend my name, and tried to do so. But some of his mates come here occasionally and have a pop ar me, and I'm not the sort of person to take it lying down. I really enjoy this forum and the people on it, so don't want to quit.Manicmania said:I chose this site because it was above the forum bashing of the others. Would be nice if we could keep it that way.
4
